asimovreviews.net Asimovreviews.net

   
Jenkins’ Spoiler-Laden Guide to Isaac Asimov

Domain Summary

What is the traffic rank for Asimovreviews.net?

• Asimovreviews.net ranks #5,457,159 globally on HypeStat.

What percent of global Internet users visit Asimovreviews.net?

• 1.5E-6% of global Internet users visit Asimovreviews.net

How many people visit Asimovreviews.net each day?

• Asimovreviews.net receives approximately 72 visitors and 156 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Asimovreviews.net receive most of its visitors from?

• Asimovreviews.net is mostly visited by people located in United States.

How much Asimovreviews.net can earn?

• Asimovreviews.net should earn about $0.75/day from advertising revenue.

What is Asimovreviews.net estimated value?

• Estimated value of Asimovreviews.net is $788.10.

What IP addresses does Asimovreviews.net resolve to?

• Asimovreviews.net resolves to the IP addresses 2607:fa18:8::10, 166.70.53.64.

Where are Asimovreviews.net servers located in?

• Asimovreviews.net has servers located in Layton, Utah, 84041, United States.

asimovreviews.net Profile

Title:Jenkins’ Spoiler-Laden Guide to Isaac Asimov
Category:Arts and Entertainment / Books and Literature
Edit Site Info

What technologies does asimovreviews.net use?

These are the technologies used at asimovreviews.net. asimovreviews.net has a total of 1 technologies installed in 2 different categories.
Web Servers
Nginx Nginx
Reverse proxies
Nginx Nginx

asimovreviews.net Traffic Analysis

Asimovreviews.net is ranked #5,457,159 in the world. This website is viewed by an estimated 72 visitors daily, generating a total of 156 pageviews. This equates to about 2.2K monthly visitors. Asimovreviews.net traffic has decreased by 36.55% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors72
36.55%
Monthly Visits2.2K
36.55%
Pages per Visit2.15
37.94%
Visit duration00:41
1126.32%
Bounce Rate36.52%
11.04%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
72
Monthly Visits:
2,182
Pages per Visit:
2.15
Daily Pageviews:
156
Avg. visit duration:
00:41
Bounce rate:
36.52%
Global Reach:
1.5E-6%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
427
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
427
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
2,153
HypeRank:
5,457,159
SEMrush Rank:
4,037,025
SimilarWeb Rank:
5,457,159
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
0%
Referral:
0%
Search:
100.00%
Social:
0%
Paid:
0%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
100.00%
Mobile:
0%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

3.9K
MAR
3.4K
APR
2.2K
MAY

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
United States 100.00%

Which sites are competitors to asimovreviews.net?

Websites similar to asimovreviews.net are sites similar on user interests and browsing behavior. Users can discover new websites that are similar to the ones they already enjoy or find useful.
Last update was 12 hours ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

Update will be available in 12 hours
*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with asimovreviews.net in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

Search Engine Indexes ▼

Search engine indexes are huge databases or collections of net pages that search engines like google like google and yahoo use to retrieve applicable facts while customers carry out searches. These indexes are created through search engines like google and yahoo through crawling and indexing net pages from throughout the internet.
Bing Index:
7,330,000

  ▼

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  asimovreviews.net
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  4,037,025
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  464
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  75
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $10.00
Full SEMrush Report >>

Revenue report ▼

Google.com would generate approximately $0.8 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $22.5 and annual gross revenue of approximately $273.8. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $788.1.

How much would asimovreviews.net make?

Daily Revenue:
$0.75
Monthly Revenue:
$22.50
Yearly Revenue:
$273.75
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
United States 156$0.75

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$0.14
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$4.07
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$49.50
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
28
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
842
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
10,249

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
United States 28$0.14

How much is asimovreviews.net worth?

Website Value:
$788.1

Ad Experience Report ▼

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
asimovreviews.net
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
asimovreviews.net
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report ▼

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
asimovreviews.net
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is asimovreviews.net hosted? ▼

Asimovreviews.net may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
2607:fa18:8::10, 166.70.53.64
ASN:
AS6315 
ISP:
XMission, L.C. 
Server Location:
Layton
Utah, UT
84041
United States, US
 

Other sites hosted on 166.70.53.64

How fast does asimovreviews.net load? ▼

The average loading time of asimovreviews.net is 2192 ms. The Desktop speed index is 94 and mobile speed index is 88.
Average Load Time:
2192 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

94
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0%

Lab Data

First Contentful Paint 0.6 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Largest Contentful Paint 0.6 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Max Potential First Input Delay 20 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Time to Interactive 0.6 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Duplicated JavaScript  
Remove large, duplicate JavaScript modules from bundles to reduce unnecessary bytes consumed by network activity.
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Does not have a `<meta name="viewport">` tag with `width` or `initial-scale`  
A `<meta name="viewport">` not only optimizes your app for mobile screen sizes, but also prevents . a 300 millisecond delay to user input Learn more about using the viewport meta tag
Speed Index 2.4 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
3rd parties  
3rd party code can significantly impact load performance. to prioritize your page's content. Reduce and defer loading of 3rd party code
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Legacy JavaScript  
Polyfills and transforms enable older browsers to use new JavaScript features. However, many aren't necessary for modern browsers. Consider modifying your JavaScript build process to not transpile features, unless you know you must support older browsers. Baseline Learn why most sites can deploy ES6+ code without transpiling

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

88
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0%

Lab Data

First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
First Contentful Paint 2.2 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Does not have a `<meta name="viewport">` tag with `width` or `initial-scale`  
A `<meta name="viewport">` not only optimizes your app for mobile screen sizes, but also prevents . a 300 millisecond delay to user input Learn more about using the viewport meta tag
3rd parties  
3rd party code can significantly impact load performance. to prioritize your page's content. Reduce and defer loading of 3rd party code
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Legacy JavaScript  
Polyfills and transforms enable older browsers to use new JavaScript features. However, many aren't necessary for modern browsers. Consider modifying your JavaScript build process to not transpile features, unless you know you must support older browsers. Baseline Learn why most sites can deploy ES6+ code without transpiling
Largest Contentful Paint 2.2 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Time to Interactive 2.2 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Max Potential First Input Delay 20 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Speed Index 8.9 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Duplicated JavaScript  
Remove large, duplicate JavaScript modules from bundles to reduce unnecessary bytes consumed by network activity.
Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides

Does asimovreviews.net use compression? ▼

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on asimovreviews.net are reduced by 60%.
asimovreviews.net use gzip compression.
Original size: 26.31 KB
Compressed size: 10.38 KB
File reduced by: 15.93 KB (60%)

Google Safe Browsing ▼

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites. asimovreviews.net has 60 Safety Reputations.
Status:
  UNKNOWN
Safety Reputations:
  60
Safety Confidence:
  2

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify ▼

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. asimovreviews.net supports HTTPS.
 asimovreviews.net supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: asimovreviews.net
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: R11
Valid from: May 22 03:37:56 2025 GMT
Valid until: Aug 20 03:37:55 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Common Name: R11
Organization: Let's Encrypt
Location: US
Issuer: ISRG Root X1
Valid from: Mar 13 00:00:00 2024 GMT
Valid until: Mar 12 23:59:59 2027 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 2048 Bits

Verify HTTP/2 Support ▼

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 asimovreviews.net supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header ▼

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server. 
server: nginx/1.22.1
date: Sun, 29 Jun 2025 03:46:04 GMT
content-type: text/html
content-length: 169
location: https://www.asimovreviews.net/

HTTP/2 200 
server: nginx/1.22.1
date: Sun, 29 Jun 2025 03:46:04 GMT
content-type: text/html; charset=utf-8
last-modified: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 23:10:45 GMT
etag: W/"55f20df5-6940"
content-encoding: gzip

DNS Lookup ▼

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
SOA 3600
Mname ns.tejat.net
Rname solra.bizna.name
Serial Number 1547501376
Refresh 3600
Retry 3600
Expire 2419200
Minimum TTL 3600
NS ns.tejat.net 3600
NS ns.xmission.com 3600
NS ns1.xmission.com 3600
NS ns2.xmission.com 3600
NS ns3.xmission.com 3600
TXT v=spf1 include:gmail.com a -all 3600
A 166.70.53.64 3600
AAAA 2607:fa18:8::10 3600
MX mail.tejat.net 3600

Whois Lookup ▼

Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information. Domain registration for this website began on September 1, 2010 and will expire on September 1, 2025 if not renewed. This website is now assigned through the registrar TUCOWS, INC.. The WHOIS data for this website's domain was last updated on March 27, 2023.
Domain Created:
2010-09-01
Domain Expires:
2025-09-01
Domain Updated:
2023-03-27
Domain Age:
14 years 9 months 28 days
Domain Registrar:
TUCOWS, INC.
Domain Owner:
REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
WhoIs:
 

Domain Name: ASIMOVREVIEWS.NET
Registry Domain ID: 1613878923_DOMAIN_NET-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.tucows.com
Registrar URL: http://tucowsdomains.com
Updated Date: 2023-03-27T05:50:00
Creation Date: 2010-09-01T22:11:23
Registrar Registration Expiration Date: 2025-09-01T22:11:23
Registrar: TUCOWS, INC.
Registrar IANA ID: 69
Reseller: XMission
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Domain Status: clientUpdateProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientUpdateProhibited
Registry Registrant ID: 
Registrant Name: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrant Organization: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrant Street: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY 
Registrant City: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrant State/Province: UT
Registrant Postal Code: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrant Country: US
Registrant Phone: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrant Phone Ext: 
Registrant Fax: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrant Fax Ext: 
Registrant Email: https://tieredaccess.com/contact/cc4b7d80-d464-4da3-b351-2c4dabc05c16
Registry Admin ID: 
Admin Name: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Organization: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Street: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY 
Admin City: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin State/Province: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Postal Code: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Country: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Phone: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Phone Ext: 
Admin Fax: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Fax Ext: 
Admin Email: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registry Tech ID: 
Tech Name: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Organization: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Street: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY 
Tech City: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech State/Province: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Postal Code: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Country: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Phone: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Phone Ext: 
Tech Fax: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Fax Ext: 
Tech Email: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Name Server: ns.tejat.net
Name Server: ns2.tejat.net
DNSSEC: unsigned
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: email
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +1.4165350123
URL of the ICANN WHOIS Data Problem Reporting System: https://icann.org/wicf
>>> Last update of WHOIS database: 2025-06-29T03:46:52Z