allenkim67.github.io Allenkim67.github.io

   
Allen's Blog

Domain Summary

What is the traffic rank for Allenkim67.github.io?

• Allenkim67.github.io ranks #9,369,833 globally on HypeStat.

What percent of global Internet users visit Allenkim67.github.io?

7.0E-7% of global Internet users visit Allenkim67.github.io

How many people visit Allenkim67.github.io each day?

• Allenkim67.github.io receives approximately 36 visitors and 37 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Allenkim67.github.io receive most of its visitors from?

• Allenkim67.github.io is mostly visited by people located in India,United States,Netherlands.

How much Allenkim67.github.io can earn?

• Allenkim67.github.io should earn about $0.09/day from advertising revenue.

What is Allenkim67.github.io estimated value?

• Estimated value of Allenkim67.github.io is $84.02.

What IP addresses does Allenkim67.github.io resolve to?

• Allenkim67.github.io resolves to the IP addresses 2606:50c0:8001::153, 185.199.109.153.

Where are Allenkim67.github.io servers located in?

• Allenkim67.github.io has servers located in San Francisco, California, 94107, United States.

allenkim67.github.io Profile

Title:Allen's Blog

What technologies does allenkim67.github.io use?

These are the technologies used at allenkim67.github.io. allenkim67.github.io has a total of 6 technologies installed in 6 different categories.

allenkim67.github.io Traffic Analysis

Allenkim67.github.io is ranked #9,369,833 in the world. This website is viewed by an estimated 36 visitors daily, generating a total of 37 pageviews. This equates to about 1.1K monthly visitors. Allenkim67.github.io traffic has decreased by 43.84% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors36
62.71%
Monthly Visits1.1K
43.84%
Pages per Visit1.01
5.82%
Visit duration02:22
67.87%
Bounce Rate46.32%
0.97%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
36
Monthly Visits:
1,091
Pages per Visit:
1.01
Daily Pageviews:
37
Avg. visit duration:
02:22
Bounce rate:
46.32%
Global Reach:
7.0E-7%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
1,741
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
817
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
1,072
HypeRank:
9,369,833
SEMrush Rank:
15,516,961
SimilarWeb Rank:
9,369,833
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
28.32%
Referral:
5.17%
Search:
19.01%
Social:
47.50%
Paid:
0%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
100.00%
Mobile:
0%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

2.3K
MAR
1.9K
APR
1.1K
MAY

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
India 45.95%
 
United States 43.09%
 
Netherlands 10.96%
Last update was 118 days ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with allenkim67.github.io in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

 

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  allenkim67.github.io
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  15,516,961
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  12
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  0
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $0.00

Revenue report

Google.com would generate approximately $0.1 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $2.7 and annual gross revenue of approximately $32.9. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $84.

How much would allenkim67.github.io make?

Daily Revenue:
$0.09
Monthly Revenue:
$2.70
Yearly Revenue:
$32.85
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
United States 16$0.08
 
Netherlands 4$0.01
 
India 17$0.01

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$0.02
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$0.51
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$6.20
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
8
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
250
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
3,037

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
United States 3$0.01
 
India 5$0.00
 
Netherlands 1$0.00

How much is allenkim67.github.io worth?

Website Value:
$84

Ad Experience Report

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
allenkim67.github.io
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
allenkim67.github.io
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
allenkim67.github.io
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is allenkim67.github.io hosted?

Allenkim67.github.io may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
2606:50c0:8001::153, 185.199.109.153
ASN:
AS54113 
ISP:
Fastly 
Server Location:
San Francisco
California, CA
94107
United States, US
 

Other sites hosted on 185.199.109.153

How fast does allenkim67.github.io load?

The average loading time of allenkim67.github.io is 141 ms. The Desktop speed index is 99 and mobile speed index is 90.
Average Load Time:
141 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

99
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)502ms 89% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 89% 6% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 6% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 4%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.3s 86% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 86% 9% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 9% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 3%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)31ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 97% 2% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 2% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.5s 93% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 93% 4% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 4% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)502ms 89% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 89% 6% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 6% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 4%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.3s 86% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 86% 9% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 9% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 3%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)31ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 97% 2% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 2% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.5s 93% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 93% 4% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 4% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1%

Lab Data

Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
First Contentful Paint 0.8 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Max Potential First Input Delay 20 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Largest Contentful Paint 0.8 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Speed Index 0.8 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Legacy JavaScript  
Polyfills and transforms enable legacy browsers to use new JavaScript features. However, many aren't necessary for modern browsers. Consider modifying your JavaScript build process to not transpile features, unless you know you must support legacy browsers. Baseline Learn why most sites can deploy ES6+ code without transpiling
Time to Interactive 0.8 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Duplicated JavaScript  
Remove large, duplicate JavaScript modules from bundles to reduce unnecessary bytes consumed by network activity.

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

90
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 100% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)679ms 89% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 83% 10% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 10% 6% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 6%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.9s 86% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 72% 18% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 18% 9% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 9%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)0 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.8s 93% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 88% 9% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 9% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 100% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 100% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)679ms 83% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 83% 10% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 10% 6% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 6%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.9s 72% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 72% 18% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 18% 9% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 9%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.8s 88% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 88% 9% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 9% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2%

Lab Data

Time to Interactive 2.9 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Legacy JavaScript  
Polyfills and transforms enable legacy browsers to use new JavaScript features. However, many aren't necessary for modern browsers. Consider modifying your JavaScript build process to not transpile features, unless you know you must support legacy browsers. Baseline Learn why most sites can deploy ES6+ code without transpiling
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Largest Contentful Paint 2.9 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
First Contentful Paint 2.7 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Duplicated JavaScript  
Remove large, duplicate JavaScript modules from bundles to reduce unnecessary bytes consumed by network activity.
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Max Potential First Input Delay 20 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Speed Index 3.0 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade

Does allenkim67.github.io use compression?

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on allenkim67.github.io are reduced by 66%.
allenkim67.github.io use gzip compression.
Original size: 5.74 KB
Compressed size: 1.92 KB
File reduced by: 3.82 KB (66%)

Google Safe Browsing

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites.
Status:
  SAFE

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. allenkim67.github.io supports HTTPS.
 allenkim67.github.io supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: *.github.io
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA
Valid from: Mar 7 00:00:00 2025 GMT
Valid until: Mar 7 23:59:59 2026 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Common Name: Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA
Organization: Sectigo Limited
Location: Salford, Greater Manchester, GB
Issuer: USERTrust RSA Certification Authority
Valid from: Nov 2 00:00:00 2018 GMT
Valid until: Dec 31 23:59:59 2030 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Common Name: USERTrust RSA Certification Authority
Organization: The USERTRUST Network
Location: Jersey City, New Jersey, US
Issuer: AAA Certificate Services
Valid from: Mar 12 00:00:00 2019 GMT
Valid until: Dec 31 23:59:59 2028 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 4096 Bits

Verify HTTP/2 Support

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 allenkim67.github.io supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server.
server: GitHub.com
content-type: text/html; charset=utf-8
last-modified: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 10:24:53 GMT
access-control-allow-origin: *
etag: W/"5bffbe75-16f1"
expires: Mon, 09 Jun 2025 20:03:01 GMT
cache-control: max-age=600
content-encoding: gzip
x-proxy-cache: MISS
x-github-request-id: 1A80:32E9F5:7AA407:7BA7BA:68473B9D
accept-ranges: bytes
age: 0
date: Mon, 09 Jun 2025 19:53:01 GMT
via: 1.1 varnish
x-served-by: cache-fra-eddf8230158-FRA
x-cache: MISS
x-cache-hits: 0
x-timer: S1749498781.479631,VS0,VE103
vary: Accept-Encoding
x-fastly-request-id: cd6725d5825605ca2237024b9548ce30f7c34f85
content-length: 1962

DNS Lookup

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
A 185.199.110.153 3600
A 185.199.108.153 3600
A 185.199.111.153 3600
A 185.199.109.153 3600
AAAA 2606:50c0:8003::153 3600
AAAA 2606:50c0:8000::153 3600
AAAA 2606:50c0:8002::153 3600
AAAA 2606:50c0:8001::153 3600
CAA digicert.com 3600
CAA sectigo.com 3600
CAA digicert.com 3600
CAA letsencrypt.org 3600
CAA sectigo.com 3600

Whois Lookup

Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information.
WhoIs:
 

Malformed request.
>>> Last update of WHOIS database: 2025-06-09T19:53:38Z