69xgeorgia.link 69xgeorgia.link

   
XGEORGIA.ME ესკორტ გოგოები, eskort gogoebi, xgeorgia, xgeorgia.link, xgeorgia.info, xgeorgiame link, xgeorgia me, *** tbilisi batumi, eskortebi, эскорт Тбилиси Батуми, x georgia tbilisi, xgeorgia link

Domain Summary

What is the traffic rank for 69xgeorgia.link?

• 69xgeorgia.link ranks #212,091 globally on HypeStat.

What percent of global Internet users visit 69xgeorgia.link?

• 0.0001721% of global Internet users visit 69xgeorgia.link

How many people visit 69xgeorgia.link each day?

• 69xgeorgia.link receives approximately 8.5K visitors and 13,901 page impressions per day.

Which countries does 69xgeorgia.link receive most of its visitors from?

• 69xgeorgia.link is mostly visited by people located in Georgia.

How much 69xgeorgia.link can earn?

• 69xgeorgia.link should earn about $2.36/day from advertising revenue.

What is 69xgeorgia.link estimated value?

• Estimated value of 69xgeorgia.link is $2,233.64.

What IP addresses does 69xgeorgia.link resolve to?

• 69xgeorgia.link resolves to the IP addresses 186.2.163.198.

Where are 69xgeorgia.link servers located in?

• 69xgeorgia.link has servers located in The Netherlands.

69xgeorgia.link Profile

Title:XGEORGIA.ME ესკორტ გოგოები, eskort gogoebi, xgeorgia, xgeorgia.link, xgeorgia.info, xgeorgiame link, xgeorgia me, *** tbilisi batumi, eskortebi, эскорт Тбилиси Батуми, x georgia tbilisi, xgeorgia link
Description:ესკორტ გოგოები, eskort gogoebi, xgeorgia, xgeorgia.link, xgeorgiame link, xgeorgia me, *** tbilisi batumi, eskortebi, эскорт Тбилиси Батуми, x georgia tbilisi, xgeorgia link, *** kutaisi
Edit Site Info

What technologies does 69xgeorgia.link use?

These are the technologies used at 69xgeorgia.link. 69xgeorgia.link has a total of 9 technologies installed in 8 different categories.
Security
DDoS-Guard DDoS-Guard
HSTS HSTS
JavaScript Libraries
jQuery jQuery
jQuery Migrate jQuery Migrate
Miscellaneous
Open Graph Open Graph
Programming Languages
PHP PHP
WordPress themes
Twenty Twenty-One Twenty Twenty-One
CMS
WordPress WordPress
Blogs
WordPress WordPress
Databases
MySQL MySQL

69xgeorgia.link Traffic Analysis

69xgeorgia.link is ranked #212,091 in the world. This website is viewed by an estimated 8.5K visitors daily, generating a total of 13.9K pageviews. This equates to about 257.1K monthly visitors. 69xgeorgia.link traffic has decreased by 40% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors8.5K
11.28%
Monthly Visits257.1K
40%
Pages per Visit1.64
1.9%
Visit duration03:17
31.7%
Bounce Rate60.52%
2.18%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
8,484
Monthly Visits:
257,065
Pages per Visit:
1.64
Daily Pageviews:
13,901
Avg. visit duration:
03:17
Bounce rate:
60.52%
Global Reach:
0.0001721%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
267,098
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
218,295
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
249,542
HypeRank:
212,091
SEMrush Rank:
2,280,811
SimilarWeb Rank:
212,091
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
51.20%
Referral:
1.88%
Search:
46.92%
Social:
0%
Paid:
0%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
5.70%
Mobile:
94.30%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

178.7K
DEC
428.4K
JAN
257.1K
FEB

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
Georgia 100.00%
Last update was 15 hours ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

Update will be available in 9 hours
*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with 69xgeorgia.link in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

  ▼

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  69xgeorgia.link
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  2,280,811
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  25
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  270
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $0.00
Full SEMrush Report >>

Revenue report ▼

Google.com would generate approximately $2.4 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $70.8 and annual gross revenue of approximately $861.4. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $2.2K.

How much would 69xgeorgia.link make?

Daily Revenue:
$2.36
Monthly Revenue:
$70.80
Yearly Revenue:
$861.40
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
Georgia 13,901$2.36

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$0.12
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$3.54
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$43.13
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
695
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
20,852
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
253,693

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
Georgia 695$0.12

How much is 69xgeorgia.link worth?

Website Value:
$2.2K

Ad Experience Report ▼

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
69xgeorgia.link
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
69xgeorgia.link
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report ▼

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
69xgeorgia.link
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is 69xgeorgia.link hosted? ▼

69xgeorgia.link may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
186.2.163.198
ASN:
AS59692 
ISP:
KnightSwarm Handelsbolag 
Server Location:

The Netherlands, NL
 

Other sites hosted on 186.2.163.198

There are no other sites hosted on this IP

How fast does 69xgeorgia.link load? ▼

The average loading time of 69xgeorgia.link is 762 ms. The Desktop speed index is 99 and mobile speed index is 99.
Average Load Time:
762 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

99
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 100% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 100% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.2s 36% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 36% 57% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 57% 6% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 6%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.9s 74% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 74% 19% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 19% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 5%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)60ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 96% 2% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 2% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.9s 89% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 89% 7% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 7% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 3%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 100% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 100% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.2s 36% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 36% 57% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 57% 6% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 6%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.9s 71% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 71% 22% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 22% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 5%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)60ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 96% 2% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 2% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.9s 89% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 89% 7% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 7% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2%

Lab Data

Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Time to Interactive 0.4 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Optimize DOM size  
A large DOM can increase the duration of style calculations and layout reflows, impacting page responsiveness. A large DOM will also increase memory usage. Learn how to avoid an excessive DOM size
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Max Potential First Input Delay 50 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Largest Contentful Paint 0.4 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
First Contentful Paint 0.4 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Speed Index 1.3 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

99
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 100% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 97% 1% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 1% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 1%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.4s 36% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 16% 70% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 70% 12% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 12%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.9s 74% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 69% 23% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 23% 6% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 6%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)139ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<200s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 90% 8% of loads for this page have an average (200s ~ 500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 8% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.9s 89% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 88% 7% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 7% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 3%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 97% 1% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 1% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 1%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.4s 16% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 16% 70% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 70% 12% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 12%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.9s 69% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 69% 23% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 23% 6% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 6%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)139ms 90% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.2s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 90% 8% of loads for this page have an average (0.2s ~ 0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 8% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.9s 88% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 88% 7% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 7% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 3%

Lab Data

Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
First Contentful Paint 1.3 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Largest Contentful Paint 1.6 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Optimize DOM size  
A large DOM can increase the duration of style calculations and layout reflows, impacting page responsiveness. A large DOM will also increase memory usage. Learn how to avoid an excessive DOM size
Max Potential First Input Delay 60 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Time to Interactive 2.7 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Speed Index 2.7 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric

Does 69xgeorgia.link use compression? ▼

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on 69xgeorgia.link are reduced by 78%.
69xgeorgia.link use gzip compression.
Original size: 37.84 KB
Compressed size: 8.25 KB
File reduced by: 29.6 KB (78%)

Google Safe Browsing ▼

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites.
Status:
  UNKNOWN

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify ▼

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. 69xgeorgia.link supports HTTPS.
 69xgeorgia.link supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: 69xgeorgia.link
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: R10
Valid from: Feb 26 09:28:37 2025 GMT
Valid until: May 27 09:28:36 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Common Name: R10
Organization: Let's Encrypt
Location: US
Issuer: ISRG Root X1
Valid from: Mar 13 00:00:00 2024 GMT
Valid until: Mar 12 23:59:59 2027 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 2048 Bits

Verify HTTP/2 Support ▼

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 69xgeorgia.link supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header ▼

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server. 
server: ddos-guard
set-cookie: __ddg8_=AWr593N9f9QL4ML2; Domain=.69xgeorgia.link; Path=/; Expires=Tue, 11-Mar-2025 02:23:22 GMT
set-cookie: __ddg10_=1741658602; Domain=.69xgeorgia.link; Path=/; Expires=Tue, 11-Mar-2025 02:23:22 GMT
set-cookie: __ddg9_=108.178.0.234; Domain=.69xgeorgia.link; Path=/; Expires=Tue, 11-Mar-2025 02:23:22 GMT
strict-transport-security: max-age=31536000
content-security-policy: upgrade-insecure-requests;
set-cookie: __ddg1_=fQhADccMEzRhYTf6noRH; Domain=.69xgeorgia.link; HttpOnly; Path=/; Expires=Wed, 11-Mar-2026 02:03:22 GMT
date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 02:03:23 GMT
content-type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
x-powered-by: PHP/7.4.33
expires: Thu, 18 Aug 1994 05:00:00 GMT
cache-control: no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate
x-frame-options: SAMEORIGIN
link: <https://69xgeorgia.link/wp-json/>; rel="https://api.w.org/"
link: <https://69xgeorgia.link/wp-json/wp/v2/pages/2>; rel="alternate"; type="application/json"
link: <https://69xgeorgia.link/>; rel=shortlink
content-encoding: gzip

DNS Lookup ▼

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
SOA 3600
Mname ns1.ddos-guard.net
Rname support.ddos-guard.net
Serial Number 0
Refresh 10800
Retry 3600
Expire 604800
Minimum TTL 3600
A 186.2.163.198 3528
NS ns1.ddos-guard.net 828
NS ns2.ddos-guard.net 828

Whois Lookup ▼

Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information. Domain registration for this website began on March 4, 2024 and will expire on March 4, 2026 if not renewed. This website is now assigned through the registrar NAMECHEAP INC. The WHOIS data for this website's domain was last updated on February 2, 2025.
Domain Created:
2024-03-04
Domain Expires:
2026-03-04
Domain Updated:
2025-02-02
Domain Age:
1 years 7 days
Domain Registrar:
NAMECHEAP INC
Domain Owner:
Privacy service provided by Withheld for Privacy e
WhoIs:
 

Domain name: 69xgeorgia.link
Registry Domain ID: DO_f9a0765a8f7912489a14763ed1bbe77a-UR
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.namecheap.com
Registrar URL: http://www.namecheap.com
Updated Date: 2025-02-02T05:37:13.67Z
Creation Date: 2024-03-04T18:24:33.28Z
Registrar Registration Expiration Date: 2026-03-04T18:24:33.28Z
Registrar: NAMECHEAP INC
Registrar IANA ID: 1068
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: email
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +1.9854014545
Reseller: NAMECHEAP INC
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Registry Registrant ID: 
Registrant Name: Redacted for Privacy
Registrant Organization: Privacy service provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf
Registrant Street: Kalkofnsvegur 2 
Registrant City: Reykjavik
Registrant State/Province: Capital Region
Registrant Postal Code: 101
Registrant Country: IS
Registrant Phone: +354.4212434
Registrant Phone Ext: 
Registrant Fax: 
Registrant Fax Ext: 
Registrant Email: email
Registry Admin ID: 
Admin Name: Redacted for Privacy
Admin Organization: Privacy service provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf
Admin Street: Kalkofnsvegur 2 
Admin City: Reykjavik
Admin State/Province: Capital Region
Admin Postal Code: 101
Admin Country: IS
Admin Phone: +354.4212434
Admin Phone Ext: 
Admin Fax: 
Admin Fax Ext: 
Admin Email: email
Registry Tech ID: 
Tech Name: Redacted for Privacy
Tech Organization: Privacy service provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf
Tech Street: Kalkofnsvegur 2 
Tech City: Reykjavik
Tech State/Province: Capital Region
Tech Postal Code: 101
Tech Country: IS
Tech Phone: +354.4212434
Tech Phone Ext: 
Tech Fax: 
Tech Fax Ext: 
Tech Email: email
Name Server: ns1.ddos-guard.net
Name Server: ns2.ddos-guard.net
Name Server: ns3.ddos-guard.net
Name Server: ns4.ddos-guard.net
Name Server: ns5.ddos-guard.net
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN WHOIS Data Problem Reporting System: http://wdprs.internic.net/
>>> Last update of WHOIS database: 2025-03-10T09:04:32.69Z