'Class action lawsuit' trends

Domains containing the tag 'Class action lawsuit'

: Bounce ratePages / VisitVisit duration
1glucosaminesettlement.com Rexall Glucosamine Settlement: n/a 2.90 n/a
2fivefingerssettlement.com fivefingerssettlement.com Vibram FiveFingers Class Action: n/a 2.40 n/a
3roofsettlement.com roofsettlement.com U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA: n/a 2.10 n/a
4lamblawoffice.com
North Carolina Law: Asbestos-Mesothelioma Lawyer; Drug Injury Attorney
Offering services for personal injury, workers' compensation, and asbestos litigation, from offices in Wilmington.
North Carolina lawyer Tom Lamb handles asbestos claims and mesothelioma lawsuits as well as *** drug injury cases across the state and around US.: n/a 1.60 n/a
5angeloslaw.com Maryland Personal Injury Lawyer | Law Offices of Peter Angelos, P.C. Law firm focusing on personal injury and medical malpractice. Maryland personal injury lawyers from The Law Offices of Peter Angelos, P.C. have recovered billions of dollars in compensation for victims across the state.: n/a 2.90 n/a
6grandegamessettlement.com
Home | Heathcote, et al. v. SpinX Games Limited, et al.
This Settlement involves a class action lawsuit against SpinX Games Limited, Grande Games Limited, and Beijing Bole Technology Co., Ltd., alleging claims based on the sale of virtual coins in the following social ***-style games: Cash Frenzy, Lotsa Slots, Jackpot World, Vegas Friends, Jackpot Mania, Jackpot Fever, DAFU, Cash Bash, and Jackpot Crush.: 71.61 1.54 02:22
7mysettlementclaims.com My Settlement Claims Find claims from class action lawsuits that you may be eligible for but didn't know about. Every year millions of dollars in class action settlement awards go unclaimed because class members don't know that they are eligible to file a claim. This website is here to provide a fast and easy process to help you find out which claims you may be eligible for and how to claim them. There are no fees and no personal information is collected. It's your money, what are you waiting for?: n/a 2.00 n/a
85751timberlaneroadmattesonfraudforeclsoure.com Fraud | United States | 5751TimberlaneRoad.wixsite.com/foreclosure BUYERS BEWARE: Owner is suing anyone involved in aiding, abetting and being an accomplise to the criminal activity involving Chase bank. This property is a Fraudulent Foreclosure with Chase bank and the WAMU scandal. Look up Chase Foreclosure fraud to see several lawsuits won by victims for their fraudlent practices.: n/a 0.00 n/a
9bankheadsettlement.com Home | Bankhead v. First Advantage Plaintiffs allege that Defendant violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act by allegedly producing background reports containing non-conviction information older than 7 years from the report date.: n/a 0.00 n/a
10grandegamessettlement.org
Home | Heathcote, et al. v. SpinX Games Limited, et al.
This Settlement involves a class action lawsuit against SpinX Games Limited, Grande Games Limited, and Beijing Bole Technology Co., Ltd., alleging claims based on the sale of virtual coins in the following social ***-style games: Cash Frenzy, Lotsa Slots, Jackpot World, Vegas Friends, Jackpot Mania, Jackpot Fever, DAFU, Cash Bash, and Jackpot Crush.: n/a 0.00 n/a
11grandegamessettlement.info
Home | Heathcote, et al. v. SpinX Games Limited, et al.
This Settlement involves a class action lawsuit against SpinX Games Limited, Grande Games Limited, and Beijing Bole Technology Co., Ltd., alleging claims based on the sale of virtual coins in the following social ***-style games: Cash Frenzy, Lotsa Slots, Jackpot World, Vegas Friends, Jackpot Mania, Jackpot Fever, DAFU, Cash Bash, and Jackpot Crush.: n/a 0.00 n/a
12herculeslaundrycardsettlement.net Home | Hercules Laundry Card Settlement Plaintiffs in this case allege that Defendant Hercules Corp. misrepresented the value of its reloadable cash cards designed for use with laundry machines that are provided by and serviced by Defendant by setting the reload amounts and laundry machine prices such that the Laundry Cards were guaranteed to have a remainder balance, and then charging consumers a $5 processing and handling fee to collect the unused balance, without clearly and conspicuously disclosing that fee.: n/a 0.00 n/a
136q3a5.net Home | Hercules Laundry Card Settlement Plaintiffs in this case allege that Defendant Hercules Corp. misrepresented the value of its reloadable cash cards designed for use with laundry machines that are provided by and serviced by Defendant by setting the reload amounts and laundry machine prices such that the Laundry Cards were guaranteed to have a remainder balance, and then charging consumers a $5 processing and handling fee to collect the unused balance, without clearly and conspicuously disclosing that fee.: n/a 0.00 n/a
14herculeslaundrycardsettlement.org Home | Hercules Laundry Card Settlement Plaintiffs in this case allege that Defendant Hercules Corp. misrepresented the value of its reloadable cash cards designed for use with laundry machines that are provided by and serviced by Defendant by setting the reload amounts and laundry machine prices such that the Laundry Cards were guaranteed to have a remainder balance, and then charging consumers a $5 processing and handling fee to collect the unused balance, without clearly and conspicuously disclosing that fee.: n/a 0.00 n/a
15herculeslaundrycardsettlement.info Home | Hercules Laundry Card Settlement Plaintiffs in this case allege that Defendant Hercules Corp. misrepresented the value of its reloadable cash cards designed for use with laundry machines that are provided by and serviced by Defendant by setting the reload amounts and laundry machine prices such that the Laundry Cards were guaranteed to have a remainder balance, and then charging consumers a $5 processing and handling fee to collect the unused balance, without clearly and conspicuously disclosing that fee.: n/a 0.00 n/a
16pacificorpfirelitigation.net Home | Jeanyne James, et al. v. PacifiCorp, et al. This Action, known as James et al. v. PacifiCorp et al., Case No. 20CV33885, is about whether PacifiCorp caused or contributed to, or is otherwise responsible or liable for, alleged damages caused by the Echo Mountain Fire (including the Kimberling Fire), South Obenchain Fire, 242 Fire, and Santiam Canyon Fire, all around Labor Day 2020. PacifiCorp denies that it caused or contributed to the Fires or is otherwise liable for them, denies that it did anything wrong or violated any law, and denies that Plaintiffs have been injured or damaged by reason of any carelessness, negligence, act, or omission of PacifiCorp.: n/a 0.00 n/a
17pacificorpfirelitigation.org Home | Jeanyne James, et al. v. PacifiCorp, et al. This Action, known as James et al. v. PacifiCorp et al., Case No. 20CV33885, is about whether PacifiCorp caused or contributed to, or is otherwise responsible or liable for, alleged damages caused by the Echo Mountain Fire (including the Kimberling Fire), South Obenchain Fire, 242 Fire, and Santiam Canyon Fire, all around Labor Day 2020. PacifiCorp denies that it caused or contributed to the Fires or is otherwise liable for them, denies that it did anything wrong or violated any law, and denies that Plaintiffs have been injured or damaged by reason of any carelessness, negligence, act, or omission of PacifiCorp.: n/a 0.00 n/a
18pacificorpfirelitigation.info Home | Jeanyne James, et al. v. PacifiCorp, et al. This Action, known as James et al. v. PacifiCorp et al., Case No. 20CV33885, is about whether PacifiCorp caused or contributed to, or is otherwise responsible or liable for, alleged damages caused by the Echo Mountain Fire (including the Kimberling Fire), South Obenchain Fire, 242 Fire, and Santiam Canyon Fire, all around Labor Day 2020. PacifiCorp denies that it caused or contributed to the Fires or is otherwise liable for them, denies that it did anything wrong or violated any law, and denies that Plaintiffs have been injured or damaged by reason of any carelessness, negligence, act, or omission of PacifiCorp.: n/a 0.00 n/a
19theweeksettlement.net Home | Moeller v. The Week Publications, Inc. This lawsuit claims that The Week violated Michigan’s Preservation of Personal Privacy Act by disclosing information related to its customers’ magazine subscriptions to third parties before July 30, 2016. The Defendant denies it violated any law. However, the Parties have agreed to settle the lawsuit to avoid the uncertainties and expenses associated with ongoing litigation.: n/a 0.00 n/a
20theweeksettlement.org Home | Moeller v. The Week Publications, Inc. This lawsuit claims that The Week violated Michigan’s Preservation of Personal Privacy Act by disclosing information related to its customers’ magazine subscriptions to third parties before July 30, 2016. The Defendant denies it violated any law. However, the Parties have agreed to settle the lawsuit to avoid the uncertainties and expenses associated with ongoing litigation.: n/a 0.00 n/a
21theweeksettlement.info Home | Moeller v. The Week Publications, Inc. This lawsuit claims that The Week violated Michigan’s Preservation of Personal Privacy Act by disclosing information related to its customers’ magazine subscriptions to third parties before July 30, 2016. The Defendant denies it violated any law. However, the Parties have agreed to settle the lawsuit to avoid the uncertainties and expenses associated with ongoing litigation.: n/a 0.00 n/a
22sundown966.info: n/a 0.00 n/a