writecontrol.fr Writecontrol.fr

   
WriteControl

Domain Summary

What is the traffic rank for Writecontrol.fr?

• Writecontrol.fr ranks #498,078 globally on HypeStat.

What percent of global Internet users visit Writecontrol.fr?

• 3.97E-5% of global Internet users visit Writecontrol.fr

How many people visit Writecontrol.fr each day?

• Writecontrol.fr receives approximately 2K visitors and 7,374 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Writecontrol.fr receive most of its visitors from?

• Writecontrol.fr is mostly visited by people located in France,Portugal,Belgium.

How much Writecontrol.fr can earn?

• Writecontrol.fr should earn about $5.45/day from advertising revenue.

What is Writecontrol.fr estimated value?

• Estimated value of Writecontrol.fr is $5,578.35.

What IP addresses does Writecontrol.fr resolve to?

• Writecontrol.fr resolves to the IP addresses 216.239.38.21.

Where are Writecontrol.fr servers located in?

• Writecontrol.fr has servers located in California, United States.

writecontrol.fr Profile

Title:WriteControl Description:Logiciel pour écrire un livre, application d'écriture, écrire un roman, écrire en ligne, site pour écrire, application pour écrire un livre, traitement de texte, les outils de l'écrivain, écrire un livre en ligne, structurer son roman, organiser son roman, logiciel nanowriwo, faire un livre, logiciel éducatif écriture, correcteur grammaire, logiciel pour écrire un roman, nouvelle, fiction, auto-biographie ou thèse. alternative scrivener. Impression de livre à la demande. Création de la couverture. Imprimer mon livre. Editeur de texte, gestion des chapitres, fiches personnages, détecteur de répétition, synonymes, mise en page, mind-map, objectifs d'écriture, correcteur d'orthographe, mode hors-ligne. alternative scrivener
Tags:
imprimer un livre
outils pour écrivain
auto publication
écrire un livre
comment écrire un livre
application d'écriture
logiciel écriture
traitement de texte
imprimer mon livre
auteur
auto édition
écrivain
Category:Reference Materials / Dictionaries and Encyclopedias
Edit Site Info

What technologies does writecontrol.fr use?

These are the technologies used at writecontrol.fr. writecontrol.fr has a total of 9 technologies installed in 7 different categories.
Cookie compliance
CookieFirst CookieFirst
CDN
Google Cloud CDN Google Cloud CDN
Google Cloud Google Cloud
Tag Managers
Google Tag Manager Google Tag Manager
Miscellaneous
Open Graph Open Graph
PWA PWA
JavaScript Frameworks
Polymer Polymer
Web Frameworks
Spring Spring
Programming Languages
Java Java

writecontrol.fr Traffic Analysis

Writecontrol.fr is ranked #498,078 in the world. This website is viewed by an estimated 2K visitors daily, generating a total of 7.4K pageviews. This equates to about 59.4K monthly visitors. Writecontrol.fr traffic has increased by 315.23% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors2K
85.11%
Monthly Visits59.4K
315.23%
Pages per Visit3.77
29.99%
Visit duration03:54
101.78%
Bounce Rate39.35%
29.69%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
1,959
Monthly Visits:
59,358
Pages per Visit:
3.77
Daily Pageviews:
7,374
Avg. visit duration:
03:54
Bounce rate:
39.35%
Global Reach:
3.97E-5%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
124,431
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
27,875
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
58,176
HypeRank:
498,078
SEMrush Rank:
10,357,853
SimilarWeb Rank:
498,078
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
57.20%
Referral:
5.14%
Search:
37.58%
Social:
0.08%
Paid:
0%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
63.69%
Mobile:
36.31%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

54.8K
DEC
14.3K
JAN
59.4K
FEB

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
France 88.86%
 
Portugal 4.75%
 
Belgium 3.11%
 
Canada 2.73%
 
Switzerland 0.57%

Which sites are competitors to writecontrol.fr?

Websites similar to writecontrol.fr are sites similar on user interests and browsing behavior. Users can discover new websites that are similar to the ones they already enjoy or find useful.
Domain
CompareDaily Visitors
deepl.com
Compare >6.2M
Last update was 102 days ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with writecontrol.fr in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

Search Engine Indexes ▼

Search engine indexes are huge databases or collections of net pages that search engines like google like google and yahoo use to retrieve applicable facts while customers carry out searches. These indexes are created through search engines like google and yahoo through crawling and indexing net pages from throughout the internet.
Google Index:
167

  ▼

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  writecontrol.fr
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  10,357,853
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  59
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  2
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $3.00
Full SEMrush Report >>

Revenue report ▼

Google.com would generate approximately $5.5 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $163.5 and annual gross revenue of approximately $2K. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $5.6K.

How much would writecontrol.fr make?

Daily Revenue:
$5.45
Monthly Revenue:
$163.50
Yearly Revenue:
$1,989.25
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
France 6,552$3.80
 
Canada 201$1.21
 
Switzerland 42$0.23
 
Belgium 229$0.13
 
Portugal 350$0.08

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$0.79
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$23.83
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$289.99
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
879
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
26,384
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
321,010

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
France 721$0.42
 
Canada 50$0.30
 
Switzerland 8$0.04
 
Portugal 73$0.02
 
Belgium 27$0.02

How much is writecontrol.fr worth?

Website Value:
$5.6K

Ad Experience Report ▼

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
writecontrol.fr
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
writecontrol.fr
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report ▼

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
writecontrol.fr
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is writecontrol.fr hosted? ▼

Writecontrol.fr may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
216.239.38.21
ASN:
AS15169 
ISP:
Google LLC 
Server Location:
California, CA
United States, US
 

Other sites hosted on 216.239.38.21

How fast does writecontrol.fr load? ▼

The average loading time of writecontrol.fr is 945 ms. The Desktop speed index is 96 and mobile speed index is 87.
Average Load Time:
945 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

96
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a SLOW speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)21ms 47% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 47% 36% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 36% 16% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 16%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)299ms 92% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 92% 5% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 5% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 2%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)633ms 93% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 93% 3% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 3% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 3%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)200ms 74% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 74% 16% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 16% 8% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 8%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)5.9s 34% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 34% 26% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 26% 39% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 39%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an SLOW speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)16ms 66% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 66% 21% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 21% 12% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 12%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)237ms 92% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 92% 4% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 4% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 2%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)590ms 93% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 93% 2% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 2% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 3%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)212ms 72% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 72% 18% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 18% 9% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 9%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)8.4s 28% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 28% 19% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 19% 51% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 51%

Lab Data

Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Time to Interactive 0.9 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Largest Contentful Paint 0.9 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Speed Index 1.7 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Max Potential First Input Delay 30 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Optimize DOM size  
A large DOM can increase the duration of style calculations and layout reflows, impacting page responsiveness. A large DOM will also increase memory usage. Learn how to avoid an excessive DOM size
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Render blocking requests  
Requests are blocking the page's initial render, which may delay LCP. can move these network requests out of the critical path. Deferring or inlining
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
First Contentful Paint 0.5 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

87
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a SLOW speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)40ms 47% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 44% 5% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 5% 49% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 49%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)525ms 92% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 86% 9% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 9% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 4%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.0s 93% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 90% 6% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 6% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 3%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)339ms 74% of loads for this page have a fast (<200s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 55% 30% of loads for this page have an average (200s ~ 500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 30% 14% of loads for this page have a slow (>500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 14%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)6.6s 34% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 32% 20% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 20% 46% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 46%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an SLOW speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)30ms 55% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 55% 14% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 14% 30% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 30%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)433ms 88% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 88% 8% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 8% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 2%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)952ms 91% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 91% 5% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 5% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 3%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)375ms 52% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.2s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 52% 29% of loads for this page have an average (0.2s ~ 0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 29% 17% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 17%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)7.2s 22% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 22% 21% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 21% 55% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 55%

Lab Data

CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
First Contentful Paint 1.5 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Time to Interactive 3.7 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Speed Index 4.2 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
Optimize DOM size  
A large DOM can increase the duration of style calculations and layout reflows, impacting page responsiveness. A large DOM will also increase memory usage. Learn how to avoid an excessive DOM size
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Max Potential First Input Delay 40 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Largest Contentful Paint 3.7 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Render blocking requests  
Requests are blocking the page's initial render, which may delay LCP. can move these network requests out of the critical path. Deferring or inlining
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements

Does writecontrol.fr use compression? ▼

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on writecontrol.fr are reduced by 75%.
writecontrol.fr use gzip compression.
Original size: 18.19 KB
Compressed size: 4.38 KB
File reduced by: 13.81 KB (75%)

Google Safe Browsing ▼

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites.
Status:
  SAFE

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify ▼

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. writecontrol.fr supports HTTPS.
 writecontrol.fr supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: www.writecontrol.fr
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: WR3
Valid from: Mar 11 09:47:08 2025 GMT
Valid until: Jun 9 10:36:59 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Common Name: WR3
Organization: Google Trust Services
Location: US
Issuer: GTS Root R1
Valid from: Dec 13 09:00:00 2023 GMT
Valid until: Feb 20 14:00:00 2029 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Common Name: GTS Root R1
Organization: Google Trust Services LLC
Location: US
Issuer: GlobalSign Root CA
Valid from: Jun 19 00:00:42 2020 GMT
Valid until: Jan 28 00:00:42 2028 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 4096 Bits

Verify HTTP/2 Support ▼

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 writecontrol.fr supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header ▼

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server. 
date: Fri, 14 Mar 2025 16:59:01 GMT
content-type: text/plain;charset=utf-8
content-length: 18630
access-control-allow-headers: Authorization, X-XSRF-TOKEN, Access-Control-Allow-Headers, Origin, Accept, X-Requested-With, Content-Type, Access-Control-Request-Method, Access-Control-Request-Headers, Transfer-Encoding
set-cookie: SESSION=63841968-768f-4cd3-950c-e62dec14ebfb; Path=/; HttpOnly; Max-Age=604800000; Secure; SameSite=None
expires: Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 GMT
location: https://www.writecontrol.fr/
x-application-context: gateway:prod:8080
x-content-type-options: nosniff
x-xss-protection: 1; mode=block
content-security-policy: upgrade-insecure-requests; frame-ancestors 'self' none
via: 1.1 google

HTTP/2 200 
date: Fri, 14 Mar 2025 16:59:02 GMT
content-type: text/plain;charset=utf-8
access-control-allow-headers: Authorization, X-XSRF-TOKEN, Access-Control-Allow-Headers, Origin, Accept, X-Requested-With, Content-Type, Access-Control-Request-Method, Access-Control-Request-Headers, Transfer-Encoding
set-cookie: SESSION=a667310c-88d7-4c56-bdb2-ba65786f427f; Path=/; HttpOnly; Max-Age=604800000; Secure; SameSite=None
expires: Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 GMT
x-application-context: gateway:prod:8080
x-content-type-options: nosniff
x-xss-protection: 1; mode=block
content-security-policy: upgrade-insecure-requests; frame-ancestors 'self' none
vary: Accept-Encoding, User-Agent
content-encoding: gzip
via: 1.1 google

Whois Lookup ▼

Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information. Domain registration for this website began on September 21, 2016 and will expire on September 21, 2025 if not renewed. This website is now assigned through the registrar OVH. The WHOIS data for this website's domain was last updated on October 31, 2024.
Domain Created:
2016-09-21
Domain Expires:
2025-09-21
Domain Updated:
2024-10-31
Domain Age:
8 years 9 months 4 days
Domain Registrar:
OVH
Domain Owner:
Ano Nymous
WhoIs:
 

%%
%% This is the AFNIC Whois server.
%%
%% complete date format: YYYY-MM-DDThh:mm:ssZ
%%
%% Rights restricted by copyright.
%% See https://www.afnic.fr/en/domain-names-and-support/everything-there-is-to-know-about-domain-names/find-a-domain-name-or-a-holder-using-whois/
%%
%%

domain:                        writecontrol.fr
status:                        ACTIVE
eppstatus:                     active
hold:                          NO
holder-c:                      ANO00-FRNIC
admin-c:                       OVH5-FRNIC
tech-c:                        OVH5-FRNIC
registrar:                     OVH
Expiry Date:                   2025-09-21T15:53:37Z
created:                       2016-09-21T15:53:37Z
last-update:                   2024-10-31T23:11:53.590663Z
source:                        FRNIC

nserver:                       dns200.anycast.me
nserver:                       ns200.anycast.me
source:                        FRNIC

registrar:                     OVH
address:                       2 Rue Kellermann
address:                       59100 ROUBAIX
country:                       FR
phone:                         +33.899701761
fax-no:                        +33.320200958
e-mail:                        email
website:                       http://www.ovh.com
anonymous:                     No
registered:                    1999-10-18T00:00:00Z
source:                        FRNIC

nic-hdl:                       OVH5-FRNIC
type:                          ORGANIZATION
contact:                       OVH NET
address:                       OVH
address:                       140, quai du Sartel
address:                       59100 Roubaix
country:                       FR
phone:                         +33.899701761
e-mail:                        email
registrar:                     OVH
changed:                       2025-03-14T16:50:06.418726Z
anonymous:                     NO
obsoleted:                     NO
eppstatus:                     associated
eppstatus:                     active
eligstatus:                    not identified
reachstatus:                   not identified
source:                        FRNIC

nic-hdl:                       ANO00-FRNIC
type:                          PERSON
contact:                       Ano Nymous
registrar:                     OVH
changed:                       2018-06-14T21:29:22Z
anonymous:                     YES
remarks:                       -------------- WARNING --------------
remarks:                       While the registrar knows him/her,
remarks:                       this person chose to restrict access
remarks:                       to his/her personal data. So PLEASE,
remarks:                       don't send emails to Ano Nymous. This
remarks:                       address is bogus and there is no hope
remarks:                       of a reply.
remarks:                       -------------- WARNING --------------
obsoleted:                     NO
eppstatus:                     associated
eppstatus:                     active
eligstatus:                    not identified
reachstatus:                   not identified
source:                        FRNIC

>>> Last update of WHOIS database: 2025-03-14T16:59:48.56889Z