vite-ruby.netlify.app Vite-ruby.netlify.app

   
Vite Ruby

Domain Summary

What percent of global Internet users visit Vite-ruby.netlify.app?

• 2.2E-6% of global Internet users visit Vite-ruby.netlify.app

How many people visit Vite-ruby.netlify.app each day?

• Vite-ruby.netlify.app receives approximately 110 visitors and 1,187 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Vite-ruby.netlify.app receive most of its visitors from?

• Vite-ruby.netlify.app is mostly visited by people located in United States,Canada,Russian Federation.

How much Vite-ruby.netlify.app can earn?

• Vite-ruby.netlify.app should earn about $4.23/day from advertising revenue.

What is Vite-ruby.netlify.app estimated value?

• Estimated value of Vite-ruby.netlify.app is $4,365.93.

What IP addresses does Vite-ruby.netlify.app resolve to?

• Vite-ruby.netlify.app resolves to the IP addresses 3.75.10.80.

Where are Vite-ruby.netlify.app servers located in?

• Vite-ruby.netlify.app has servers located in Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, 60313, Germany.

vite-ruby.netlify.app Profile

Title:Vite Ruby
Description:Bringing joy to your frontend experience
Tags:
rails
vitejs
vite
vue
react
ruby
Edit Site Info

What technologies does vite-ruby.netlify.app use?

These are the technologies used at vite-ruby.netlify.app. vite-ruby.netlify.app has a total of 5 technologies installed in 5 different categories.
Security
HSTS HSTS
PaaS
Netlify Netlify
CDN
Netlify Netlify
Unpkg Unpkg
Miscellaneous
Open Graph Open Graph
JavaScript Frameworks
Vue.js Vue.js

vite-ruby.netlify.app Traffic Analysis

This website is viewed by an estimated 110 visitors daily, generating a total of 1.2K pageviews. This equates to about 3.3K monthly visitors. Vite-ruby.netlify.app traffic has decreased by 14.78% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors110
12.94%
Monthly Visits3.3K
14.78%
Pages per Visit10.78
1.12%
Visit duration06:03
1%
Bounce Rate40.17%
1.4%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
110
Monthly Visits:
3,333
Pages per Visit:
10.78
Daily Pageviews:
1,187
Avg. visit duration:
06:03
Bounce rate:
40.17%
Global Reach:
2.2E-6%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
41,804,337
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
20,004,679
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
3,339
HypeRank:
n/a
SEMrush Rank:
3,478,264
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
72.77%
Referral:
8.83%
Search:
12.75%
Social:
5.52%
Paid:
0.14%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
40.56%
Mobile:
59.44%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

4K
FEB
3.9K
MAR
3.3K
APR

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
United States 15.21%
 
Canada 11.81%
 
Russian Federation 8.85%
 
Costa Rica 7.06%
 
China 6.74%

Which sites are competitors to vite-ruby.netlify.app?

Websites similar to vite-ruby.netlify.app are sites similar on user interests and browsing behavior. Users can discover new websites that are similar to the ones they already enjoy or find useful.
Last update was 15 hours ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

Update will be available in 9 hours
*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with vite-ruby.netlify.app in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

Search Engine Indexes ▼

Search engine indexes are huge databases or collections of net pages that search engines like google like google and yahoo use to retrieve applicable facts while customers carry out searches. These indexes are created through search engines like google and yahoo through crawling and indexing net pages from throughout the internet.
Google Index:
24

  ▼

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  vite-ruby.netlify.app
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  3,478,264
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  102
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  110
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $0.00
Full SEMrush Report >>

Revenue report ▼

Google.com would generate approximately $4.2 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $126.9 and annual gross revenue of approximately $1.5K. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $4.4K.

How much would vite-ruby.netlify.app make?

Daily Revenue:
$4.23
Monthly Revenue:
$126.90
Yearly Revenue:
$1,543.95
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
United States 181$0.87
 
Canada 140$0.85
 
Russian Federation 105$0.04
 
Costa Rica 84$0.02
 
China 80$0.01

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$0.37
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$11.21
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$136.36
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
89
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
2,678
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
32,583

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
Canada 35$0.21
 
United States 33$0.16
 
Russian Federation 6$0.00
 
Costa Rica 5$0.00
 
China 10$0.00

How much is vite-ruby.netlify.app worth?

Website Value:
$4.4K

Ad Experience Report ▼

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
vite-ruby.netlify.app
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
vite-ruby.netlify.app
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report ▼

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
vite-ruby.netlify.app
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is vite-ruby.netlify.app hosted? ▼

Vite-ruby.netlify.app may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
3.75.10.80
ASN:
AS16509 
ISP:
Amazon.com, Inc. 
Server Location:
Frankfurt am Main
Hesse, HE
60313
Germany, DE
 

Other sites hosted on 3.75.10.80

There are no other sites hosted on this IP

How fast does vite-ruby.netlify.app load? ▼

The average loading time of vite-ruby.netlify.app is 27 ms. The Desktop speed index is 100 and mobile speed index is 98.
Average Load Time:
27 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

100
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 100% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 100% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)951ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 98% 1% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 1% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)63ms 94% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 94% 4% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 4% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 98% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)602ms 89% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 89% 8% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 8% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 2%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)964ms 95% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 95% 3% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 3% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 1%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)56ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 96% 3% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 3% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)991ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 98% 1% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0%

Lab Data

Largest Contentful Paint 0.3 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Legacy JavaScript  
Polyfills and transforms enable legacy browsers to use new JavaScript features. However, many aren't necessary for modern browsers. Consider modifying your JavaScript build process to not transpile features, unless you know you must support legacy browsers. Baseline Learn why most sites can deploy ES6+ code without transpiling
Max Potential First Input Delay 20 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Time to Interactive 0.3 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Speed Index 0.6 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
Duplicated JavaScript  
Remove large, duplicate JavaScript modules from bundles to reduce unnecessary bytes consumed by network activity.
Use efficient cache lifetimes  
A long cache lifetime can speed up repeat visits to your page. Learn more
First Contentful Paint 0.3 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

98
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0 100% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)0 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)0 94% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0%

Lab Data

Largest Contentful Paint 2.3 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
First Contentful Paint 1.2 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Time to Interactive 2.3 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Duplicated JavaScript  
Remove large, duplicate JavaScript modules from bundles to reduce unnecessary bytes consumed by network activity.
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
Speed Index 2.5 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Legacy JavaScript  
Polyfills and transforms enable legacy browsers to use new JavaScript features. However, many aren't necessary for modern browsers. Consider modifying your JavaScript build process to not transpile features, unless you know you must support legacy browsers. Baseline Learn why most sites can deploy ES6+ code without transpiling
Max Potential First Input Delay 40 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Use efficient cache lifetimes  
A long cache lifetime can speed up repeat visits to your page. Learn more

Does vite-ruby.netlify.app use compression? ▼

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on vite-ruby.netlify.app are reduced by 71%.
vite-ruby.netlify.app use br compression.
Original size: 16.36 KB
Compressed size: 4.73 KB
File reduced by: 11.63 KB (71%)

Google Safe Browsing ▼

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites. vite-ruby.netlify.app has 60 Safety Reputations.
Status:
  UNKNOWN
Safety Reputations:
  60
Safety Confidence:
  2

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify ▼

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. vite-ruby.netlify.app supports HTTPS.
 vite-ruby.netlify.app supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: *.netlify.app
Organization: "Netlify, Inc"
Location: San Francisco, California, US
Issuer: DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1
Valid from: Jan 31 00:00:00 2025 GMT
Valid until: Mar 3 23:59:59 2026 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize:
Common Name: DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1
Organization: DigiCert Inc
Location: US
Issuer: DigiCert Global Root G2
Valid from: Mar 30 00:00:00 2021 GMT
Valid until: Mar 29 23:59:59 2031 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 2048 Bits

Verify HTTP/2 Support ▼

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 vite-ruby.netlify.app supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header ▼

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server. 
accept-ranges: bytes
age: 34076
cache-control: public,max-age=0,must-revalidate
cache-status: "Netlify Edge"; hit
content-encoding: br
content-type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
date: Fri, 06 Jun 2025 03:12:01 GMT
etag: "a571907e8ac6cc7eb8c36092687b059d-ssl-df"
server: Netlify
strict-transport-security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload
vary: Accept-Encoding
x-nf-request-id: 01JX1KJPSN276MGGB8H6EVXCSC
content-length: 4839

DNS Lookup ▼

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
HINFO 300