vitasdk.org Vitasdk.org

   
Vita SDK

Domain Summary

What is the traffic rank for Vitasdk.org?

• Vitasdk.org ranks #2,562,576 globally on HypeStat.

What percent of global Internet users visit Vitasdk.org?

• 4.0E-6% of global Internet users visit Vitasdk.org

How many people visit Vitasdk.org each day?

• Vitasdk.org receives approximately 197 visitors and 510 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Vitasdk.org receive most of its visitors from?

• Vitasdk.org is mostly visited by people located in United States,Canada,Poland.

How much Vitasdk.org can earn?

• Vitasdk.org should earn about $2.19/day from advertising revenue.

What is Vitasdk.org estimated value?

• Estimated value of Vitasdk.org is $2,237.67.

What IP addresses does Vitasdk.org resolve to?

• Vitasdk.org resolves to the IP addresses 185.199.108.153.

Where are Vitasdk.org servers located in?

• Vitasdk.org has servers located in California, United States.

vitasdk.org Profile

Title:Vita SDK
Category:Games / Video Games Consoles and Accessories
Edit Site Info

What technologies does vitasdk.org use?

These are the technologies used at vitasdk.org. vitasdk.org has a total of 3 technologies installed in 3 different categories.
CDN
Fastly Fastly
PaaS
GitHub Pages GitHub Pages
Caching
Varnish Varnish

vitasdk.org Traffic Analysis

Vitasdk.org is ranked #2,562,576 in the world. This website is viewed by an estimated 197 visitors daily, generating a total of 510 pageviews. This equates to about 6K monthly visitors. Vitasdk.org traffic has increased by 56.05% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors197
22.7%
Monthly Visits6K
56.05%
Pages per Visit2.59
41.95%
Visit duration01:28
153.43%
Bounce Rate29.04%
7.03%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
197
Monthly Visits:
5,969
Pages per Visit:
2.59
Daily Pageviews:
510
Avg. visit duration:
01:28
Bounce rate:
29.04%
Global Reach:
4.0E-6%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
3,160
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
2,146
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
5,786
HypeRank:
2,562,576
SEMrush Rank:
7,460,815
SimilarWeb Rank:
2,562,576
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
20.89%
Referral:
5.63%
Search:
52.59%
Social:
20.89%
Paid:
0%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
100.00%
Mobile:
0%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

3.3K
MAR
3.8K
APR
6K
MAY

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
United States 67.65%
 
Canada 12.79%
 
Poland 9.35%
 
United Kingdom 5.15%
 
Germany 4.70%

Which sites are competitors to vitasdk.org?

Websites similar to vitasdk.org are sites similar on user interests and browsing behavior. Users can discover new websites that are similar to the ones they already enjoy or find useful.
Last update was 15 hours ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

Update will be available in 9 hours
*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with vitasdk.org in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

Search Engine Indexes ▼

Search engine indexes are huge databases or collections of net pages that search engines like google like google and yahoo use to retrieve applicable facts while customers carry out searches. These indexes are created through search engines like google and yahoo through crawling and indexing net pages from throughout the internet.
Google Index:
418

  ▼

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  vitasdk.org
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  7,460,815
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  48
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  11
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $0.00
Full SEMrush Report >>

Revenue report ▼

Google.com would generate approximately $2.2 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $65.7 and annual gross revenue of approximately $799.4. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $2.2K.

How much would vitasdk.org make?

Daily Revenue:
$2.19
Monthly Revenue:
$65.70
Yearly Revenue:
$799.35
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
United States 345$1.67
 
Canada 65$0.39
 
United Kingdom 26$0.07
 
Germany 24$0.03
 
Poland 48$0.02

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$0.43
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$12.77
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$155.39
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
105
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
3,159
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
38,437

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
United States 62$0.30
 
Canada 16$0.10
 
United Kingdom 4$0.01
 
Germany 7$0.01
 
Poland 16$0.01

How much is vitasdk.org worth?

Website Value:
$2.2K

Ad Experience Report ▼

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
vitasdk.org
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
vitasdk.org
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report ▼

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
vitasdk.org
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is vitasdk.org hosted? ▼

Vitasdk.org may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
185.199.108.153
ASN:
AS54113 
ISP:
Fastly 
Server Location:
California, CA
United States, US
 

Other sites hosted on 185.199.108.153

How fast does vitasdk.org load? ▼

The average loading time of vitasdk.org is 133 ms. The Desktop speed index is 100 and mobile speed index is 98.
Average Load Time:
133 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

100
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 96% 1% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 1% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 1%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)432ms 92% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 92% 4% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 4% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 2%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)729ms 95% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 95% 2% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 2% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 2%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)16ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 97% 2% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 2% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)706ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 97% 1% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 96% 1% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 1% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 1%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)432ms 92% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 92% 4% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 4% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 2%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)729ms 95% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 95% 2% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 2% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 2%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)16ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 97% 2% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 2% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)706ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 97% 1% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1%

Lab Data

Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Speed Index 0.5 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Largest Contentful Paint 0.4 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Duplicated JavaScript  
Remove large, duplicate JavaScript modules from bundles to reduce unnecessary bytes consumed by network activity.
Max Potential First Input Delay 20 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Does not have a `<meta name="viewport">` tag with `width` or `initial-scale`  
A `<meta name="viewport">` not only optimizes your app for mobile screen sizes, but also prevents . a 300 millisecond delay to user input Learn more about using the viewport meta tag
First Contentful Paint 0.2 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Legacy JavaScript  
Polyfills and transforms enable older browsers to use new JavaScript features. However, many aren't necessary for modern browsers. Consider modifying your JavaScript build process to not transpile features, unless you know you must support older browsers. Baseline Learn why most sites can deploy ES6+ code without transpiling
Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Time to Interactive 0.4 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

98
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 97% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 1%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)687ms 92% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 80% 15% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 15% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 4%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.2s 95% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 89% 5% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 5% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 5%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)0 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.2s 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 93% 4% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 4% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 97% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 1%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)687ms 79% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 79% 15% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 15% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 4%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.2s 89% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 89% 5% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 5% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 5%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.2s 93% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 93% 3% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 3% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2%

Lab Data

Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Max Potential First Input Delay 20 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
Largest Contentful Paint 1.5 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Time to Interactive 1.5 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
First Contentful Paint 0.8 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Duplicated JavaScript  
Remove large, duplicate JavaScript modules from bundles to reduce unnecessary bytes consumed by network activity.
Legacy JavaScript  
Polyfills and transforms enable older browsers to use new JavaScript features. However, many aren't necessary for modern browsers. Consider modifying your JavaScript build process to not transpile features, unless you know you must support older browsers. Baseline Learn why most sites can deploy ES6+ code without transpiling
Does not have a `<meta name="viewport">` tag with `width` or `initial-scale`  
A `<meta name="viewport">` not only optimizes your app for mobile screen sizes, but also prevents . a 300 millisecond delay to user input Learn more about using the viewport meta tag
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Speed Index 3.5 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading

Does vitasdk.org use compression? ▼

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on vitasdk.org are reduced by 65%.
vitasdk.org use gzip compression.
Original size: 9.59 KB
Compressed size: 3.32 KB
File reduced by: 6.27 KB (65%)

Google Safe Browsing ▼

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites.
Status:
  UNKNOWN

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify ▼

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. vitasdk.org supports HTTPS.
 vitasdk.org supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: vitasdk.org
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: R11
Valid from: Apr 27 12:20:35 2025 GMT
Valid until: Jul 26 12:20:34 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Common Name: R11
Organization: Let's Encrypt
Location: US
Issuer: ISRG Root X1
Valid from: Mar 13 00:00:00 2024 GMT
Valid until: Mar 12 23:59:59 2027 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 2048 Bits

Verify HTTP/2 Support ▼

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 vitasdk.org supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header ▼

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server. 
server: GitHub.com
content-type: text/html; charset=utf-8
last-modified: Thu, 15 Jun 2023 19:01:23 GMT
access-control-allow-origin: *
etag: W/"648b6003-265b"
expires: Fri, 13 Jun 2025 22:18:26 GMT
cache-control: max-age=600
content-encoding: gzip
x-proxy-cache: MISS
x-github-request-id: B516:281C7A:19A317A:19E6B9C:684CA15A
accept-ranges: bytes
age: 0
date: Sat, 14 Jun 2025 01:55:01 GMT
via: 1.1 varnish
x-served-by: cache-fra-eddf8230097-FRA
x-cache: HIT
x-cache-hits: 0
x-timer: S1749866102.755985,VS0,VE107
vary: Accept-Encoding
x-fastly-request-id: 0fb55bec497c229f9a28064b7dc425f63ad2396c
content-length: 3396

DNS Lookup ▼

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
HINFO 3600

Whois Lookup ▼

Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information. Domain registration for this website began on December 8, 2016 and will expire on December 8, 2034 if not renewed. This website is now assigned through the registrar TUCOWS, INC.. The WHOIS data for this website's domain was last updated on April 18, 2025.
Domain Created:
2016-12-08
Domain Expires:
2034-12-08
Domain Updated:
2025-04-18
Domain Age:
8 years 6 months 6 days
Domain Registrar:
TUCOWS, INC.
Domain Owner:
Contact Privacy Inc. Customer 0170244006
WhoIs:
 

Domain Name: VITASDK.ORG
Registry Domain ID: 941b7b86df9f43e6bb82feb31e2db92e-LROR
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.tucows.com
Registrar URL: http://tucowsdomains.com
Updated Date: 2025-04-18T15:25:56
Creation Date: 2016-12-08T19:45:00
Registrar Registration Expiration Date: 2034-12-08T19:45:00
Registrar: TUCOWS, INC.
Registrar IANA ID: 69
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Domain Status: clientUpdateProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientUpdateProhibited
Registry Registrant ID: 
Registrant Name: Contact Privacy Inc. Customer 0170244006
Registrant Organization: Contact Privacy Inc. Customer 0170244006
Registrant Street: 96 Mowat Ave 
Registrant City: Toronto
Registrant State/Province: ON
Registrant Postal Code: M6K 3M1
Registrant Country: CA
Registrant Phone: +1.4165385457
Registrant Phone Ext: 
Registrant Fax: 
Registrant Fax Ext: 
Registrant Email: email
Registry Admin ID: 
Admin Name: Contact Privacy Inc. Customer 0170244006
Admin Organization: Contact Privacy Inc. Customer 0170244006
Admin Street: 96 Mowat Ave 
Admin City: Toronto
Admin State/Province: ON
Admin Postal Code: M6K 3M1
Admin Country: CA
Admin Phone: +1.4165385457
Admin Phone Ext: 
Admin Fax: 
Admin Fax Ext: 
Admin Email: email
Registry Tech ID: 
Tech Name: Contact Privacy Inc. Customer 0170244006
Tech Organization: Contact Privacy Inc. Customer 0170244006
Tech Street: 96 Mowat Ave 
Tech City: Toronto
Tech State/Province: ON
Tech Postal Code: M6K 3M1
Tech Country: CA
Tech Phone: +1.4165385457
Tech Phone Ext: 
Tech Fax: 
Tech Fax Ext: 
Tech Email: email
Name Server: dexter.ns.cloudflare.com
Name Server: ullis.ns.cloudflare.com
DNSSEC: unsigned
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: email
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +1.4165350123
URL of the ICANN WHOIS Data Problem Reporting System: https://icann.org/wicf
>>> Last update of WHOIS database: 2025-06-14T01:55:45Z