vidbox.to Vidbox.to

   
Vidbox - Your Ultimate Streaming Guide

Domain Summary

What percent of global Internet users visit Vidbox.to?

0.0016488% of global Internet users visit Vidbox.to

How many people visit Vidbox.to each day?

• Vidbox.to receives approximately 81.3K visitors and 289,134 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Vidbox.to receive most of its visitors from?

• Vidbox.to is mostly visited by people located in United States,United Kingdom,Canada.

How much Vidbox.to can earn?

• Vidbox.to should earn about $1,202.51/day from advertising revenue.

What is Vidbox.to estimated value?

• Estimated value of Vidbox.to is $1,140,921.70.

What IP addresses does Vidbox.to resolve to?

• Vidbox.to resolves to the IP addresses 2606:4700:3032::6815:23db, 172.67.180.58.

Where are Vidbox.to servers located in?

• Vidbox.to has servers located in United States.

vidbox.to Profile

Title:Vidbox - Your Ultimate Streaming Guide Description:Discover and track your favorite movies and TV shows across all streaming platforms. Get personalized recommendations, trending content, and streaming availability information.
Tags:
Category:Arts and Entertainment / Streaming & Online TV

What technologies does vidbox.to use?

These are the technologies used at vidbox.to. vidbox.to has a total of 9 technologies installed in 7 different categories.

vidbox.to Traffic Analysis

This website is viewed by an estimated 81.3K visitors daily, generating a total of 289.1K pageviews. This equates to about 2.5M monthly visitors. Vidbox.to traffic has increased by 357.14% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors81.3K
374.37%
Monthly Visits2.5M
357.14%
Pages per Visit3.56
10.37%
Visit duration04:46
28.04%
Bounce Rate40.48%
12.17%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
81,284
Monthly Visits:
2,462,905
Pages per Visit:
3.56
Daily Pageviews:
289,134
Avg. visit duration:
04:46
Bounce rate:
40.48%
Global Reach:
0.0016488%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
2,877,447
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
1,020,490
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
2,463,139
HypeRank:
n/a
SEMrush Rank:
14,900,555
SimilarWeb Rank:
27,731
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
89.41%
Referral:
7.32%
Search:
0.88%
Social:
2.38%
Paid:
0%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
37.16%
Mobile:
62.84%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

0.9M
JAN
538.8K
FEB
2.5M
MAR

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
United States 43.64%
 
United Kingdom 18.20%
 
Canada 7.94%
 
India 4.76%
 
Australia 3.66%

Which sites are competitors to vidbox.to?

Websites similar to vidbox.to are sites similar on user interests and browsing behavior. Users can discover new websites that are similar to the ones they already enjoy or find useful.
Last update was 59 days ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with vidbox.to in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

Search Engine Indexes

Search engine indexes are huge databases or collections of net pages that search engines like google like google and yahoo use to retrieve applicable facts while customers carry out searches. These indexes are created through search engines like google and yahoo through crawling and indexing net pages from throughout the internet.
Google Index:
10

 

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  vidbox.to
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  14,900,555
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  15
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  0
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $0.00

Revenue report

Google.com would generate approximately $1.2K per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $36.1K and annual gross revenue of approximately $438.9K. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $1.1M.

How much would vidbox.to make?

Daily Revenue:
$1,202.51
Monthly Revenue:
$36,075.30
Yearly Revenue:
$438,916.15
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
United States 126,176$609.43
 
United Kingdom 52,626$141.04
 
Canada 22,967$138.72
 
Australia 10,584$51.01
 
India 13,772$5.23

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$178.61
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$5,358.34
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$65,193.14
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
42,846
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
1,285,394
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
15,638,956

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
United States 22,712$109.70
 
Canada 5,742$34.68
 
United Kingdom 8,420$22.57
 
Australia 2,117$10.20
 
India 3,856$1.47

How much is vidbox.to worth?

Website Value:
$1.1M

Ad Experience Report

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
vidbox.to
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
vidbox.to
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
vidbox.to
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is vidbox.to hosted?

Vidbox.to may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
2606:4700:3032::6815:23db, 172.67.180.58
ASN:
AS13335 
ISP:
Cloudflare Inc 
Server Location:

United States, US
 

Other sites hosted on 172.67.180.58

How fast does vidbox.to load?

The average loading time of vidbox.to is 39 ms. The Desktop speed index is 100 and mobile speed index is 76.
Average Load Time:
39 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

100
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)6ms 80% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 80% 16% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 16% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 3%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)317ms 93% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 93% 5% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 5% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 1%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)825ms 94% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 94% 3% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 3% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 1%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)99ms 88% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 88% 6% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 6% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 4%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)878ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 97% 1% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)6ms 79% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 79% 16% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 16% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 3%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)375ms 91% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 91% 6% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 6% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 2%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)894ms 92% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 92% 4% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 4% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 3%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)104ms 87% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 87% 7% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 7% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 4%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.3s 89% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 89% 5% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 5% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 5%

Lab Data

Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Speed Index 0.5 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
First Contentful Paint 0.4 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Total Blocking Time 20 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Largest Contentful Paint 0.8 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Max Potential First Input Delay 70 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Time to Interactive 1.1 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

76
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)14ms 80% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 69% 16% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 16% 14% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 14%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)509ms 93% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 87% 9% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 9% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 2%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.2s 94% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 89% 6% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 6% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 3%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)242ms 88% of loads for this page have a fast (<200s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 68% 21% of loads for this page have an average (200s ~ 500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 21% 9% of loads for this page have a slow (>500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 9%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.2s 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 95% 2% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)15ms 71% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 71% 14% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 14% 13% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 13%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)487ms 88% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 88% 8% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 8% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 2%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.2s 88% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 88% 7% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 7% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 4%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)253ms 66% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.2s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 66% 22% of loads for this page have an average (0.2s ~ 0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 22% 11% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 11%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.6s 86% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 86% 6% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 6% 7% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 7%

Lab Data

LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
First Contentful Paint 2.3 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Total Blocking Time 20 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Largest Contentful Paint 5.6 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Speed Index 3.3 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Time to Interactive 5.7 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Max Potential First Input Delay 70 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides

Does vidbox.to use compression?

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on vidbox.to are reduced by 78%.
vidbox.to use br compression.
Original size: 36.57 KB
Compressed size: 8.01 KB
File reduced by: 28.56 KB (78%)

Google Safe Browsing

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites. vidbox.to has 80 Safety Reputations.
Status:
  SAFE
Safety Reputations:
  80
Safety Confidence:
  51

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. vidbox.to supports HTTPS.
 vidbox.to supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: vidbox.to
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: WE1
Valid from: Mar 27 10:57:27 2025 GMT
Valid until: Jun 25 11:54:50 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize:
Common Name: WE1
Organization: Google Trust Services
Location: US
Issuer: GTS Root R4
Valid from: Dec 13 09:00:00 2023 GMT
Valid until: Feb 20 14:00:00 2029 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize:
Common Name: GTS Root R4
Organization: Google Trust Services LLC
Location: US
Issuer: GlobalSign Root CA
Valid from: Nov 15 03:43:21 2023 GMT
Valid until: Jan 28 00:00:42 2028 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize:

Verify HTTP/2 Support

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 vidbox.to supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server.
date: Tue, 15 Apr 2025 22:41:18 GMT
content-type: text/html; charset=utf-8
server: cloudflare
age: 6075
access-control-allow-credentials: true
access-control-allow-origin: *
access-control-allow-methods: GET,POST,OPTIONS
access-control-allow-headers: *
x-clerk-auth-reason: session-token-and-uat-missing
x-clerk-auth-status: signed-out
x-middleware-rewrite: /
vary: RSC, Next-Router-State-Tree, Next-Router-Prefetch, Next-Router-Segment-Prefetch, Accept-Encoding
x-nextjs-cache: HIT
x-nextjs-prerender: 1
x-nextjs-stale-time: 4294967294
x-powered-by: Next.js
cache-control: max-age=28800, s-maxage=31536000
cf-cache-status: HIT
x-frame-options: SAMEORIGIN
x-content-type-options: nosniff
x-xss-protection: 1; mode=block
x-permitted-cross-domain-policies: master-only
referrer-policy: same-origin
content-encoding: br
cf-ray: 930ef31c3e57eb62-ORD
alt-svc: h3=":443"; ma=86400

DNS Lookup

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
AAAA 2606:4700:3032::ac43:b43a 249
AAAA 2606:4700:3032::6815:23db 249
A 172.67.180.58 249
A 104.21.35.219 249
NS boyd.ns.cloudflare.com 86349
NS collins.ns.cloudflare.com 86349
HINFO 3600