tuintranet.cl Tuintranet.cl

   
Not Found

Domain Summary

What percent of global Internet users visit Tuintranet.cl?

• 4.0E-7% of global Internet users visit Tuintranet.cl

How many people visit Tuintranet.cl each day?

• Tuintranet.cl receives approximately 22 visitors and 82 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Tuintranet.cl receive most of its visitors from?

• Tuintranet.cl is mostly visited by people located in Chile.

How much Tuintranet.cl can earn?

• Tuintranet.cl should earn about $0.06/day from advertising revenue.

What is Tuintranet.cl estimated value?

• Estimated value of Tuintranet.cl is $56.28.

What IP addresses does Tuintranet.cl resolve to?

• Tuintranet.cl resolves to the IP addresses 201.148.107.62.

Where are Tuintranet.cl servers located in?

• Tuintranet.cl has servers located in Santiago, Santiago Metropolitan, Chile.

tuintranet.cl Profile

Title:Not Found
Edit Site Info

What technologies does tuintranet.cl use?

These are the technologies used at tuintranet.cl. tuintranet.cl has a total of 3 technologies installed in 3 different categories.
Web Servers
IIS IIS
Web Frameworks
Microsoft ASP.NET Microsoft ASP.NET
Operating Systems
Windows Server Windows Server

tuintranet.cl Traffic Analysis

This website is viewed by an estimated 22 visitors daily, generating a total of 82 pageviews. This equates to about 666.6 monthly visitors. Tuintranet.cl traffic has decreased by 99.84% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors22
99.8%
Monthly Visits666.6
99.84%
Pages per Visit3.82
28.14%
Visit duration01:35
215.63%
Bounce Rate24.55%
100%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
22
Monthly Visits:
667
Pages per Visit:
3.82
Daily Pageviews:
82
Avg. visit duration:
01:35
Bounce rate:
24.55%
Global Reach:
4.0E-7%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
12
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
12
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
652
HypeRank:
n/a
SEMrush Rank:
31,817,282
SimilarWeb Rank:
3,948,994
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
100.00%
Referral:
0%
Search:
0%
Social:
0%
Paid:
0%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
100.00%
Mobile:
0%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

196
DEC
416.6K
JAN
666.6
FEB

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
Chile 100.00%
Last update was 111 days ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with tuintranet.cl in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

Search Engine Indexes ▼

Search engine indexes are huge databases or collections of net pages that search engines like google like google and yahoo use to retrieve applicable facts while customers carry out searches. These indexes are created through search engines like google and yahoo through crawling and indexing net pages from throughout the internet.
Google Index:
4

  ▼

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  tuintranet.cl
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  31,817,282
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  1
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  0
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $0.00
Full SEMrush Report >>

Revenue report ▼

Google.com would generate approximately $0.1 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $1.8 and annual gross revenue of approximately $21.9. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $56.3.

How much would tuintranet.cl make?

Daily Revenue:
$0.06
Monthly Revenue:
$1.80
Yearly Revenue:
$21.90
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
Chile 82$0.06

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$0.01
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$0.23
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$2.76
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
11
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
320
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
3,891

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
Chile 11$0.01

How much is tuintranet.cl worth?

Website Value:
$56.3

Ad Experience Report ▼

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
tuintranet.cl
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
tuintranet.cl
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report ▼

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
tuintranet.cl
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is tuintranet.cl hosted? ▼

Tuintranet.cl may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
201.148.107.62
ASN:
AS265839 
ISP:
HOSTING. 
Server Location:
Santiago
Santiago Metropolitan, RM
Chile, CL
 

Other sites hosted on 201.148.107.62

There are no other sites hosted on this IP

How fast does tuintranet.cl load? ▼

The average loading time of tuintranet.cl is 726 ms. The Desktop speed index is 100 and mobile speed index is 100.
Average Load Time:
726 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

100
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0%

Lab Data

Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Render blocking requests  
Requests are blocking the page's initial render, which may delay LCP. can move these network requests out of the critical path. Deferring or inlining
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Largest Contentful Paint 0.3 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
First Contentful Paint 0.3 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Minimize third-party usage  
Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading. Learn how to minimize third-party impact
Speed Index 0.6 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Third parties  
Third party code can significantly impact load performance. to prioritize your page's content. Reduce and defer loading of third party code
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
Does not have a `<meta name="viewport">` tag with `width` or `initial-scale`  
A `<meta name="viewport">` not only optimizes your app for mobile screen sizes, but also prevents . a 300 millisecond delay to user input Learn more about using the viewport meta tag
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Max Potential First Input Delay 30 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Time to Interactive 0.3 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

100
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 98% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)325ms 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 87% 6% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 6% 6% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 6%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)667ms 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 91% 3% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 3% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 4%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)94ms 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<200s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 94% 4% of loads for this page have an average (200s ~ 500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 4% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)685ms 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 94% 2% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 3%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 98% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)325ms 87% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 87% 6% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 6% 6% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 6%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)667ms 91% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 91% 3% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 3% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 4%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)94ms 94% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.2s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 94% 4% of loads for this page have an average (0.2s ~ 0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 4% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)685ms 94% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 94% 2% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 3%

Lab Data

INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Speed Index 1.1 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Does not have a `<meta name="viewport">` tag with `width` or `initial-scale`  
A `<meta name="viewport">` not only optimizes your app for mobile screen sizes, but also prevents . a 300 millisecond delay to user input Learn more about using the viewport meta tag
Max Potential First Input Delay 20 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Time to Interactive 0.8 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Render blocking requests  
Requests are blocking the page's initial render, which may delay LCP. can move these network requests out of the critical path. Deferring or inlining
Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
First Contentful Paint 0.8 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Minimize third-party usage  
Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading. Learn how to minimize third-party impact
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Largest Contentful Paint 0.8 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Third parties  
Third party code can significantly impact load performance. to prioritize your page's content. Reduce and defer loading of third party code

Does tuintranet.cl use compression? ▼

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on tuintranet.cl are reduced by %.
tuintranet.cl does not use compression.
Original size: 315 B
Compressed size: n/a
File reduced by: (%)

Google Safe Browsing ▼

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites.
Status:
  SAFE

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify ▼

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. tuintranet.cl supports HTTPS.
 tuintranet.cl supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: tuintranet.cl
Organization: ESERT SERVICIOS INTEGRALES DE SEGURIDAD LIMITADA
Location: Santiago, Regi\C3\B3n Metropolitana de Santiago, CL
Issuer: GlobalSign RSA OV SSL CA 2018
Valid from: Mar 27 13:56:01 2025 GMT
Valid until: Apr 28 13:56:00 2026 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Common Name: GlobalSign RSA OV SSL CA 2018
Organization: GlobalSign nv-sa
Location: BE
Issuer: GlobalSign
Valid from: Nov 21 00:00:00 2018 GMT
Valid until: Nov 21 00:00:00 2028 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 2048 Bits

Verify HTTP/2 Support ▼

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 tuintranet.cl supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header ▼

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server. 
content-type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
server: Microsoft-HTTPAPI/2.0
date: Sun, 06 Apr 2025 16:31:41 GMT
content-length: 315

DNS Lookup ▼

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
A 201.148.107.62 3551
NS ns1.bdm.microsoftonline.com 3551
NS ns2.bdm.microsoftonline.com 3551
HINFO 300

Whois Lookup ▼

Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information.
Domain Registrar:
NIC Chile
Domain Owner:
Esert Servicios Integrales de Seguridad Ltda
WhoIs:
 

%%
%% This is the NIC Chile Whois server (whois.nic.cl).
%%
%% Rights restricted by copyright.
%% See https://www.nic.cl/normativa/politica-publicacion-de-datos-cl.pdf
%%

Domain name: tuintranet.cl
Registrant name: Esert Servicios Integrales de Seguridad Ltda
Registrant organisation: 
Registrar name: NIC Chile
Registrar URL: https://www.nic.cl
Creation date: 2024-01-17 16:13:08 CLST
Expiration date: 2027-01-17 16:13:08 CLST
Name server: ns1.bdm.microsoftonline.com
Name server: ns2.bdm.microsoftonline.com

%%
%% For communication with domain contacts please use website.
%% See https://www.nic.cl/registry/Whois.do?d=tuintranet.cl
%%