trashmail.ws Trashmail.ws

   
Just a moment...

Domain Summary

What percent of global Internet users visit Trashmail.ws?

9.56E-5% of global Internet users visit Trashmail.ws

How many people visit Trashmail.ws each day?

• Trashmail.ws receives approximately 4.7K visitors and 58,740 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Trashmail.ws receive most of its visitors from?

• Trashmail.ws is mostly visited by people located in Switzerland,Germany,United States.

How much Trashmail.ws can earn?

• Trashmail.ws should earn about $187.22/day from advertising revenue.

What is Trashmail.ws estimated value?

• Estimated value of Trashmail.ws is $197,802.59.

What IP addresses does Trashmail.ws resolve to?

• Trashmail.ws resolves to the IP addresses 104.21.12.11.

trashmail.ws Profile

Title:Just a moment... Description:hide your real email address for privacy and anonymity. get rid of unwanted advertising, spam and malware.

trashmail.ws Traffic Analysis

This website is viewed by an estimated 4.7K visitors daily, generating a total of 58.7K pageviews. This equates to about 142.9K monthly visitors. Trashmail.ws traffic has decreased by 69.39% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors4.7K
43.23%
Monthly Visits142.9K
69.39%
Pages per Visit12.46
14.52%
Visit duration19:50
42.33%
Bounce Rate14.69%
5.18%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
4,715
Monthly Visits:
142,865
Pages per Visit:
12.46
Daily Pageviews:
58,740
Avg. visit duration:
19:50
Bounce rate:
14.69%
Global Reach:
9.56E-5%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
22,273
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
16,273
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
144,337
HypeRank:
n/a
SEMrush Rank:
1,594,088
SimilarWeb Rank:
207,315
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
74.33%
Referral:
2.11%
Search:
23.56%
Social:
0%
Paid:
0%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
29.84%
Mobile:
70.16%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

84.4K
OCT
466.7K
NOV
142.9K
DEC

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
Switzerland 30.72%
 
Germany 25.21%
 
United States 20.94%
 
France 15.06%
 
India 8.07%
Last update was 1 hour ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

Update will be available in 23 hours
*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with trashmail.ws in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

 

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  trashmail.ws
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  1,594,088
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  19
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  523
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $608.00

Revenue report

Google.com would generate approximately $187.2 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $5.6K and annual gross revenue of approximately $68.3K. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $197.8K.

How much would trashmail.ws make?

Daily Revenue:
$187.22
Monthly Revenue:
$5,616.60
Yearly Revenue:
$68,335.30
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
Switzerland 18,045$100.15
 
United States 12,299$59.40
 
Germany 14,809$20.73
 
France 8,844$5.13
 
India 4,743$1.80

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$35.80
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$1,074.04
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$13,067.51
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
12,057
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
361,721
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
4,400,933

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
Switzerland 3,248$18.03
 
United States 2,214$10.69
 
Germany 4,295$6.01
 
France 973$0.56
 
India 1,328$0.50

How much is trashmail.ws worth?

Website Value:
$197.8K

Ad Experience Report

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
trashmail.ws
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
trashmail.ws
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
trashmail.ws
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is trashmail.ws hosted?

Trashmail.ws may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
104.21.12.11
ASN:
AS13335 
ISP:
Cloudflare Inc 
Server Location:


 

Other sites hosted on 104.21.12.11

How fast does trashmail.ws load?

The average loading time of trashmail.ws is 44 ms. The Desktop speed index is 52 and mobile speed index is 50.
Average Load Time:
44 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

52
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a SLOW speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)50ms 13% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 13% 38% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 38% 48% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 48%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.4s 42% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 42% 43% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 43% 14% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 14%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)2.3s 61% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 61% 25% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 25% 13% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 13%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)166ms 76% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 76% 9% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 9% 14% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 14%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.7s 73% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 73% 14% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 14% 12% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 12%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an SLOW speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)38ms 4% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 4% 46% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 46% 49% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 49%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.0s 59% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 59% 35% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 35% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 4%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.6s 81% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 81% 14% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 14% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 3%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)127ms 83% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 83% 13% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 13% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 3%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)5.5s 46% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 46% 15% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 15% 38% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 38%

Lab Data

First Contentful Paint 0.7 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Time to Interactive 4.2 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
INP breakdown  
Start investigating by looking at the longest subpart. how to improve INP
Max Potential First Input Delay 360 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Largest Contentful Paint 0.8 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Speed Index 1.7 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Total Blocking Time 1,000 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
LCP request discovery  
by making the LCP image discoverable from the HTML immediately, and avoiding lazy-loading Optimize LCP

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

50
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a SLOW speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)51ms 13% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 27% 7% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 7% 65% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 65%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.4s 42% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 52% 31% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 31% 15% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 15%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)2.2s 61% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 64% 21% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 21% 14% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 14%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)529ms 76% of loads for this page have a fast (<200s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 47% 25% of loads for this page have an average (200s ~ 500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 25% 26% of loads for this page have a slow (>500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 26%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.6s 73% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 73% 13% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 13% 12% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 12%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)25ms 26% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 26% 44% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 44% 29% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 29%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.1s 61% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 61% 27% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 27% 10% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 10%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.8s 74% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 74% 15% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 15% 9% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 9%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)354ms 59% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.2s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 59% 23% of loads for this page have an average (0.2s ~ 0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 23% 17% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 17%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)3.4s 63% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 63% 16% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 16% 19% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 19%

Lab Data

Speed Index 5.2 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Largest Contentful Paint 2.8 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
LCP request discovery  
by making the LCP image discoverable from the HTML immediately, and avoiding lazy-loading Optimize LCP
INP breakdown  
Start investigating by looking at the longest subpart. how to improve INP
Max Potential First Input Delay 310 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
First Contentful Paint 2.6 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Total Blocking Time 560 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Time to Interactive 16.0 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric

Does trashmail.ws use compression?

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on trashmail.ws are reduced by 36%.
trashmail.ws use br compression.
Original size: 6.83 KB
Compressed size: 4.35 KB
File reduced by: 2.48 KB (36%)

Google Safe Browsing

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites. trashmail.ws has 76 Safety Reputations.
Status:
  SAFE
Safety Reputations:
  76
Safety Confidence:
  7

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. trashmail.ws supports HTTPS.
 trashmail.ws supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: trashmail.ws
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: WE1
Valid from: Nov 30 16:30:29 2025 GMT
Valid until: Feb 28 17:27:58 2026 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize:
Common Name: WE1
Organization: Google Trust Services
Location: US
Issuer: GTS Root R4
Valid from: Dec 13 09:00:00 2023 GMT
Valid until: Feb 20 14:00:00 2029 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize:
Common Name: GTS Root R4
Organization: Google Trust Services LLC
Location: US
Issuer: GlobalSign Root CA
Valid from: Nov 15 03:43:21 2023 GMT
Valid until: Jan 28 00:00:42 2028 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize:

Verify HTTP/2 Support

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 trashmail.ws supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server.
date: Thu, 15 Jan 2026 23:33:23 GMT
content-type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
accept-ch: Sec-CH-UA-Bitness, Sec-CH-UA-Arch, Sec-CH-UA-Full-Version, Sec-CH-UA-Mobile, Sec-CH-UA-Model, Sec-CH-UA-Platform-Version, Sec-CH-UA-Full-Version-List, Sec-CH-UA-Platform, Sec-CH-UA, UA-Bitness, UA-Arch, UA-Full-Version, UA-Mobile, UA-Model, UA-Platform-Version, UA-Platform, UA
cf-mitigated: challenge
critical-ch: Sec-CH-UA-Bitness, Sec-CH-UA-Arch, Sec-CH-UA-Full-Version, Sec-CH-UA-Mobile, Sec-CH-UA-Model, Sec-CH-UA-Platform-Version, Sec-CH-UA-Full-Version-List, Sec-CH-UA-Platform, Sec-CH-UA, UA-Bitness, UA-Arch, UA-Full-Version, UA-Mobile, UA-Model, UA-Platform-Version, UA-Platform, UA
cross-origin-embedder-policy: require-corp
cross-origin-opener-policy: same-origin
cross-origin-resource-policy: same-origin
origin-agent-cluster: ?1
permissions-policy: accelerometer=(),browsing-topics=(),camera=(),clipboard-read=(),clipboard-write=(),geolocation=(),gyroscope=(),hid=(),interest-cohort=(),magnetometer=(),microphone=(),payment=(),publickey-credentials-get=(),screen-wake-lock=(),serial=(),sync-xhr=(),usb=()
referrer-policy: same-origin
server-timing: chlray;desc="9be92d842bf9a167"
x-content-type-options: nosniff
x-frame-options: SAMEORIGIN
cache-control: private, max-age=0, no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate, post-check=0, pre-check=0
expires: Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:01 GMT
report-to: {"endpoints":[{"url":"https://a.nel.cloudflare.com/report/v4?s=UGMqL8YD8B71SVCRgxE%2BJYfrFVH0zEsuJjDJaoRm4ojAcdHJadraFM35HG0C6pHqGOu5d7soP%2FnYJTzKvc2nrAclej%2BYSSyxNExAynugrMnsqReDihfgND7O1BKdylGrSARYLF972RqVflA%3D"}],"group":"cf-nel","max_age":604800}
nel: {"success_fraction":0,"report_to":"cf-nel","max_age":604800}
vary: Accept-Encoding
server: cloudflare
cf-ray: 9be92d842bf9a167-FRA
content-encoding: br
alt-svc: h3=":443"; ma=86400
server-timing: cfL4;desc="?proto=TCP&rtt=5572&min_rtt=5557&rtt_var=1589&sent=7&recv=8&lost=0&retrans=0&sent_bytes=3364&recv_bytes=832&delivery_rate=717021&cwnd=253&unsent_bytes=0&cid=fa8497642a2ad43d&ts=31&x=0"

DNS Lookup

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
HINFO 3600