tnebcalculator-gowdham.netlify.app Tnebcalculator-gowdham.netlify.app

   
TNEB Bill Calculator

Domain Summary

What percent of global Internet users visit Tnebcalculator-gowdham.netlify.app?

• 3.01E-5% of global Internet users visit Tnebcalculator-gowdham.netlify.app

How many people visit Tnebcalculator-gowdham.netlify.app each day?

• Tnebcalculator-gowdham.netlify.app receives approximately 1.5K visitors and 2,643 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Tnebcalculator-gowdham.netlify.app receive most of its visitors from?

• Tnebcalculator-gowdham.netlify.app is mostly visited by people located in India.

How much Tnebcalculator-gowdham.netlify.app can earn?

• Tnebcalculator-gowdham.netlify.app should earn about $1.00/day from advertising revenue.

What is Tnebcalculator-gowdham.netlify.app estimated value?

• Estimated value of Tnebcalculator-gowdham.netlify.app is $931.78.

What IP addresses does Tnebcalculator-gowdham.netlify.app resolve to?

• Tnebcalculator-gowdham.netlify.app resolves to the IP addresses 3.124.100.143.

Where are Tnebcalculator-gowdham.netlify.app servers located in?

• Tnebcalculator-gowdham.netlify.app has servers located in Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, 60313, Germany.

tnebcalculator-gowdham.netlify.app Profile

Title: TNEB Bill Calculator
Edit Site Info

What technologies does tnebcalculator-gowdham.netlify.app use?

These are the technologies used at tnebcalculator-gowdham.netlify.app. tnebcalculator-gowdham.netlify.app has a total of 4 technologies installed in 3 different categories.
CDN
cdnjs cdnjs
Netlify Netlify
CloudFlare CloudFlare
Security
HSTS HSTS
PaaS
Netlify Netlify

tnebcalculator-gowdham.netlify.app Traffic Analysis

This website is viewed by an estimated 1.5K visitors daily, generating a total of 2.6K pageviews. This equates to about 44.9K monthly visitors. Tnebcalculator-gowdham.netlify.app traffic has increased by 18.3% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors1.5K
20.77%
Monthly Visits44.9K
18.3%
Pages per Visit1.78
0.93%
Visit duration02:06
7.12%
Bounce Rate69.72%
4.28%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
1,483
Monthly Visits:
44,935
Pages per Visit:
1.78
Daily Pageviews:
2,643
Avg. visit duration:
02:06
Bounce rate:
69.72%
Global Reach:
3.01E-5%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
49,452,616
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
24,158,851
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
44,935
HypeRank:
n/a
SEMrush Rank:
4,648,997
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
73.53%
Referral:
10.63%
Search:
10.39%
Social:
5.36%
Paid:
0.10%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
40.12%
Mobile:
59.88%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

14.2K
MAR
38K
APR
44.9K
MAY

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
India 100.00%

Which sites are competitors to tnebcalculator-gowdham.netlify.app?

Websites similar to tnebcalculator-gowdham.netlify.app are sites similar on user interests and browsing behavior. Users can discover new websites that are similar to the ones they already enjoy or find useful.
Last update was 7 hours ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

Update will be available in 17 hours
*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with tnebcalculator-gowdham.netlify.app in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

Search Engine Indexes ▼

Search engine indexes are huge databases or collections of net pages that search engines like google like google and yahoo use to retrieve applicable facts while customers carry out searches. These indexes are created through search engines like google and yahoo through crawling and indexing net pages from throughout the internet.
Google Index:
1
Bing Index:
82,000

  ▼

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  tnebcalculator-gowdham.netlify.app
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  4,648,997
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  230
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  53
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $112.00
Full SEMrush Report >>

Revenue report ▼

Google.com would generate approximately $1 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $30 and annual gross revenue of approximately $365. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $0.9K.

How much would tnebcalculator-gowdham.netlify.app make?

Daily Revenue:
$1.00
Monthly Revenue:
$30.00
Yearly Revenue:
$365.00
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
India 2,643$1.00

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$0.28
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$8.44
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$102.64
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
740
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
22,201
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
270,115

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
India 740$0.28

How much is tnebcalculator-gowdham.netlify.app worth?

Website Value:
$0.9K

Ad Experience Report ▼

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
tnebcalculator-gowdham.netlify.app
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
tnebcalculator-gowdham.netlify.app
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report ▼

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
tnebcalculator-gowdham.netlify.app
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is tnebcalculator-gowdham.netlify.app hosted? ▼

Tnebcalculator-gowdham.netlify.app may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
3.124.100.143
ASN:
AS16509 
ISP:
Amazon.com, Inc. 
Server Location:
Frankfurt am Main
Hesse, HE
60313
Germany, DE
 

Other sites hosted on 3.124.100.143

There are no other sites hosted on this IP

How fast does tnebcalculator-gowdham.netlify.app load? ▼

The average loading time of tnebcalculator-gowdham.netlify.app is 141 ms. The Desktop speed index is 100 and mobile speed index is 98.
Average Load Time:
141 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

100
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 100% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 100% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)522ms 87% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 87% 10% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 10% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 3%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)682ms 95% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 95% 2% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 2% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 1%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)49ms 95% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 95% 2% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 2% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)682ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 96% 2% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 100% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 100% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)522ms 87% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 87% 9% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 9% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 2%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)682ms 95% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 95% 2% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 2% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 1%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)49ms 95% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 95% 2% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 2% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)682ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 96% 2% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1%

Lab Data

INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
Speed Index 0.5 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Largest Contentful Paint 0.5 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Max Potential First Input Delay 20 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Legacy JavaScript  
Polyfills and transforms enable older browsers to use new JavaScript features. However, many aren't necessary for modern browsers. Consider modifying your JavaScript build process to not transpile features, unless you know you must support older browsers. Baseline Learn why most sites can deploy ES6+ code without transpiling
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Duplicated JavaScript  
Remove large, duplicate JavaScript modules from bundles to reduce unnecessary bytes consumed by network activity.
First Contentful Paint 0.5 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Time to Interactive 0.5 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

98
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 100% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 97% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 1%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)656ms 87% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 81% 13% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 13% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 5%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.2s 95% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 88% 6% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 6% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 4%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)117ms 95% of loads for this page have a fast (<200s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 93% 5% of loads for this page have an average (200s ~ 500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 5% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.1s 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 94% 3% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 3% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 97% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 1%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)656ms 81% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 81% 13% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 13% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 5%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.2s 88% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 88% 6% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 6% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 4%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)117ms 93% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.2s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 93% 5% of loads for this page have an average (0.2s ~ 0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 5% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.1s 93% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 93% 3% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 3% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2%

Lab Data

Max Potential First Input Delay 20 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Time to Interactive 2.0 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Duplicated JavaScript  
Remove large, duplicate JavaScript modules from bundles to reduce unnecessary bytes consumed by network activity.
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Largest Contentful Paint 2.0 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Legacy JavaScript  
Polyfills and transforms enable older browsers to use new JavaScript features. However, many aren't necessary for modern browsers. Consider modifying your JavaScript build process to not transpile features, unless you know you must support older browsers. Baseline Learn why most sites can deploy ES6+ code without transpiling
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
First Contentful Paint 2.0 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Speed Index 2.0 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric

Does tnebcalculator-gowdham.netlify.app use compression? ▼

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on tnebcalculator-gowdham.netlify.app are reduced by 87%.
tnebcalculator-gowdham.netlify.app use br compression.
Original size: 17.58 KB
Compressed size: 2.24 KB
File reduced by: 15.35 KB (87%)

Google Safe Browsing ▼

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites. tnebcalculator-gowdham.netlify.app has 60 Safety Reputations.
Status:
  UNKNOWN
Safety Reputations:
  60
Safety Confidence:
  2

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify ▼

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. tnebcalculator-gowdham.netlify.app supports HTTPS.
 tnebcalculator-gowdham.netlify.app supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: *.netlify.app
Organization: "Netlify, Inc"
Location: San Francisco, California, US
Issuer: DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1
Valid from: Jan 31 00:00:00 2025 GMT
Valid until: Mar 3 23:59:59 2026 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize:
Common Name: DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1
Organization: DigiCert Inc
Location: US
Issuer: DigiCert Global Root G2
Valid from: Mar 30 00:00:00 2021 GMT
Valid until: Mar 29 23:59:59 2031 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 2048 Bits

Verify HTTP/2 Support ▼

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 tnebcalculator-gowdham.netlify.app supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header ▼

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server. 
accept-ranges: bytes
age: 0
cache-control: public,max-age=0,must-revalidate
cache-status: "Netlify Edge"; fwd=miss
content-encoding: br
content-type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
date: Wed, 02 Jul 2025 18:00:23 GMT
etag: "57874141641776adf1dfb0c64d2ffccd-ssl-df"
server: Netlify
strict-transport-security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload
vary: Accept-Encoding
x-nf-request-id: 01JZ64R11EZRQYVGK9121D18GP

DNS Lookup ▼

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
A 35.157.26.135 80
A 3.124.100.143 80