timetagger.app Timetagger.app

   
TimeTagger - Tag your time, get the insight

Domain Summary

What is the traffic rank for Timetagger.app?

• Timetagger.app ranks #2,550,786 globally on HypeStat.

What percent of global Internet users visit Timetagger.app?

• 6.1E-6% of global Internet users visit Timetagger.app

How many people visit Timetagger.app each day?

• Timetagger.app receives approximately 299 visitors and 438 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Timetagger.app receive most of its visitors from?

• Timetagger.app is mostly visited by people located in United States,Netherlands.

How much Timetagger.app can earn?

• Timetagger.app should earn about $2.10/day from advertising revenue.

What is Timetagger.app estimated value?

• Estimated value of Timetagger.app is $1,923.31.

What IP addresses does Timetagger.app resolve to?

• Timetagger.app resolves to the IP addresses 94.237.7.14.

Where are Timetagger.app servers located in?

• Timetagger.app has servers located in Amsterdam, North Holland, 1012, The Netherlands.

timetagger.app Profile

Title:TimeTagger - Tag your time, get the insight Description:An open source time tracker based on an interactive timeline and with powerful reporting.
Category:Computers Electronics and Technology / Programming and Developer Software
Edit Site Info

What technologies does timetagger.app use?

These are the technologies used at timetagger.app. timetagger.app has a total of 4 technologies installed in 4 different categories.
Security
HSTS HSTS
Web Servers
Uvicorn Uvicorn
Video Players
YouTube YouTube
Programming Languages
Python Python

timetagger.app Traffic Analysis

Timetagger.app is ranked #2,550,786 in the world. This website is viewed by an estimated 299 visitors daily, generating a total of 438 pageviews. This equates to about 9.1K monthly visitors. Timetagger.app traffic has increased by 24.54% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors299
26.7%
Monthly Visits9.1K
24.54%
Pages per Visit1.46
13.73%
Visit duration00:47
115.86%
Bounce Rate69.39%
4.15%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
299
Monthly Visits:
9,060
Pages per Visit:
1.46
Daily Pageviews:
438
Avg. visit duration:
00:47
Bounce rate:
69.39%
Global Reach:
6.1E-6%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
5,862
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
1,625
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
8,883
HypeRank:
2,550,786
SEMrush Rank:
4,581,130
SimilarWeb Rank:
2,550,786
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
76.02%
Referral:
5.56%
Search:
7.95%
Social:
10.47%
Paid:
0%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
100.00%
Mobile:
0%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

15.4K
MAR
7.3K
APR
9.1K
MAY

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
United States 98.77%
 
Netherlands 1.23%

Which sites are competitors to timetagger.app?

Websites similar to timetagger.app are sites similar on user interests and browsing behavior. Users can discover new websites that are similar to the ones they already enjoy or find useful.
Last update was 19 hours ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

Update will be available in 5 hours
*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with timetagger.app in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

Search Engine Indexes ▼

Search engine indexes are huge databases or collections of net pages that search engines like google like google and yahoo use to retrieve applicable facts while customers carry out searches. These indexes are created through search engines like google and yahoo through crawling and indexing net pages from throughout the internet.
Google Index:
78

  ▼

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  timetagger.app
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  4,581,130
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  40
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  56
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $4.00
Full SEMrush Report >>

Revenue report ▼

Google.com would generate approximately $2.1 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $63 and annual gross revenue of approximately $766.5. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $1.9K.

How much would timetagger.app make?

Daily Revenue:
$2.10
Monthly Revenue:
$63.00
Yearly Revenue:
$766.50
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
United States 433$2.09
 
Netherlands 5$0.01

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$0.38
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$11.34
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$137.92
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
79
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
2,364
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
28,757

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
United States 78$0.38
 
Netherlands 1$0.00

How much is timetagger.app worth?

Website Value:
$1.9K

Ad Experience Report ▼

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
timetagger.app
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
timetagger.app
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report ▼

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
timetagger.app
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is timetagger.app hosted? ▼

Timetagger.app may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
94.237.7.14
ASN:
AS202053 
ISP:
UpCloud Ltd 
Server Location:
Amsterdam
North Holland, NH
1012
The Netherlands, NL
 

Other sites hosted on 94.237.7.14

There are no other sites hosted on this IP

How fast does timetagger.app load? ▼

The average loading time of timetagger.app is 174 ms. The Desktop speed index is 100 and mobile speed index is 88.
Average Load Time:
174 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

100
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)566ms 83% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 83% 15% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 15% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 1%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)985ms 93% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 93% 5% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 5% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 1%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)34ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 98% 1% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 1% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.4s 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 97% 1% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 97% 1% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 1% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)394ms 88% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 88% 10% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 10% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 1%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)880ms 93% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 93% 4% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 4% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 1%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)48ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 97% 1% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 1% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.4s 93% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 93% 4% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 4% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2%

Lab Data

Duplicated JavaScript  
Remove large, duplicate JavaScript modules from bundles to reduce unnecessary bytes consumed by network activity.
Legacy JavaScript  
Polyfills and transforms enable older browsers to use new JavaScript features. However, many aren't necessary for modern browsers. Consider modifying your JavaScript build process to not transpile features, unless you know you must support older browsers. Baseline Learn why most sites can deploy ES6+ code without transpiling
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
First Contentful Paint 0.3 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Use efficient cache lifetimes  
A long cache lifetime can speed up repeat visits to your page. Learn more
Max Potential First Input Delay 20 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Speed Index 0.3 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Largest Contentful Paint 0.6 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Time to Interactive 0.6 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

88
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)818ms 83% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 73% 23% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 23% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 3%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.2s 93% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 90% 7% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 7% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 2%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)70ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<200s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (200s ~ 500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.7s 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 96% 2% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)569ms 83% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 83% 14% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 14% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 2%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.2s 88% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 88% 8% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 8% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 3%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)100ms 94% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.2s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 94% 5% of loads for this page have an average (0.2s ~ 0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 5% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.7s 90% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 90% 6% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 6% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 3%

Lab Data

Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Max Potential First Input Delay 20 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Use efficient cache lifetimes  
A long cache lifetime can speed up repeat visits to your page. Learn more
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Speed Index 4.0 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Largest Contentful Paint 3.6 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Duplicated JavaScript  
Remove large, duplicate JavaScript modules from bundles to reduce unnecessary bytes consumed by network activity.
First Contentful Paint 1.7 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Legacy JavaScript  
Polyfills and transforms enable older browsers to use new JavaScript features. However, many aren't necessary for modern browsers. Consider modifying your JavaScript build process to not transpile features, unless you know you must support older browsers. Baseline Learn why most sites can deploy ES6+ code without transpiling
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Time to Interactive 3.6 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric

Does timetagger.app use compression? ▼

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on timetagger.app are reduced by 69%.
timetagger.app use gzip compression.
Original size: 26.46 KB
Compressed size: 7.99 KB
File reduced by: 18.47 KB (69%)

Google Safe Browsing ▼

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites.
Status:
  SAFE

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify ▼

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. timetagger.app supports HTTPS.
 timetagger.app supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: timetagger.app
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: R10
Valid from: Apr 17 05:03:59 2025 GMT
Valid until: Jul 16 05:03:58 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize: 4096 Bits
Common Name: R10
Organization: Let's Encrypt
Location: US
Issuer: ISRG Root X1
Valid from: Mar 13 00:00:00 2024 GMT
Valid until: Mar 12 23:59:59 2027 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 2048 Bits

Verify HTTP/2 Support ▼

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 timetagger.app supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header ▼

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server. 
cache-control: public, must-revalidate, max-age=0
content-encoding: gzip
content-type: text/html
date: Fri, 13 Jun 2025 10:58:21 GMT
etag: 31107d1737b25fb4c390d53e0286ac11f5c9d40f169bbc77462210b90713d6cd
server: uvicorn
strict-transport-security: max-age=63072000
content-length: 8181

DNS Lookup ▼

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
A 94.237.7.14 3600
NS ns0.transip.net 86400
NS ns1.transip.nl 86400
NS ns2.transip.eu 86400
SOA 3600
Mname ns0.transip.net
Rname hostmaster.transip.nl
Serial Number 2025021901
Refresh 86400
Retry 1800
Expire 2419200
Minimum TTL 300
MX in2-smtp.messagingengine.com 3600
MX in1-smtp.messagingengine.com 3600
TXT google-site-verification=m35AWm21DmiqvdJCq5Jy3GhiJ0eK5rYBkhZMldMnYEU 3600
TXT trustpilot-one-time-verification-id=7f38ef96-1acb-4c3a-a0c2-bb58a0d18c2b 3600
TXT v=spf1 include:spf.messagingengine.com ?all 3600