testdesanidad.es Testdesanidad.es

   
🩺 Test de Sanidad 2025 📚 Celador, Auxiliar, Enfermería, etc.

Domain Summary

What is the traffic rank for Testdesanidad.es?

• Testdesanidad.es ranks #394,721 globally on HypeStat.

What percent of global Internet users visit Testdesanidad.es?

• 5.64E-5% of global Internet users visit Testdesanidad.es

How many people visit Testdesanidad.es each day?

• Testdesanidad.es receives approximately 2.8K visitors and 17,893 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Testdesanidad.es receive most of its visitors from?

• Testdesanidad.es is mostly visited by people located in Spain.

How much Testdesanidad.es can earn?

• Testdesanidad.es should earn about $8.59/day from advertising revenue.

What is Testdesanidad.es estimated value?

• Estimated value of Testdesanidad.es is $8,653.64.

What IP addresses does Testdesanidad.es resolve to?

• Testdesanidad.es resolves to the IP addresses 2a12:d280:100:59::, 178.211.133.59.

Where are Testdesanidad.es servers located in?

• Testdesanidad.es has servers located in Madrid, Madrid, 28085, Spain.

testdesanidad.es Profile

Title:🩺 Test de Sanidad 2025 📚 Celador, Auxiliar, Enfermería, etc.
Description:📝 Haz test de sanidad GRATIS: Celador, Auxiliar, Enfermería y más. Exámenes oficiales 2025 con corrección ✅ y estadísticas 📊. ¡Empieza ya!
Edit Site Info

What technologies does testdesanidad.es use?

These are the technologies used at testdesanidad.es. testdesanidad.es has a total of 3 technologies installed in 2 different categories.
Miscellaneous
HTTP/3 HTTP/3
PWA PWA
Programming Languages
PHP PHP

testdesanidad.es Traffic Analysis

Testdesanidad.es is ranked #394,721 in the world. This website is viewed by an estimated 2.8K visitors daily, generating a total of 17.9K pageviews. This equates to about 84.2K monthly visitors. Testdesanidad.es traffic has increased by 2810.47% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors2.8K
1131.27%
Monthly Visits84.2K
2810.47%
Pages per Visit6.44
98.1%
Visit duration06:42
88.47%
Bounce Rate17.03%
1475.66%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
2,780
Monthly Visits:
84,234
Pages per Visit:
6.44
Daily Pageviews:
17,893
Avg. visit duration:
06:42
Bounce rate:
17.03%
Global Reach:
5.64E-5%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
90,894
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
13,544
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
81,764
HypeRank:
394,721
SEMrush Rank:
10,466,973
SimilarWeb Rank:
394,721
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
81.52%
Referral:
0.33%
Search:
17.95%
Social:
0.20%
Paid:
0%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
6.77%
Mobile:
93.23%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

649
JAN
2.9K
FEB
84.2K
MAR

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
Spain 100.00%
Last update was 17 days ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with testdesanidad.es in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

Search Engine Indexes ▼

Search engine indexes are huge databases or collections of net pages that search engines like google like google and yahoo use to retrieve applicable facts while customers carry out searches. These indexes are created through search engines like google and yahoo through crawling and indexing net pages from throughout the internet.
Google Index:
18,200

  ▼

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  testdesanidad.es
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  10,466,973
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  26
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  2
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $1.00
Full SEMrush Report >>

Revenue report ▼

Google.com would generate approximately $8.6 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $257.7 and annual gross revenue of approximately $3.1K. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $8.7K.

How much would testdesanidad.es make?

Daily Revenue:
$8.59
Monthly Revenue:
$257.70
Yearly Revenue:
$3,135.35
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
Spain 17,893$8.59

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$1.63
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$48.96
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$595.62
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
3,400
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
101,990
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
1,240,880

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
Spain 3,400$1.63

How much is testdesanidad.es worth?

Website Value:
$8.7K

Ad Experience Report ▼

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
testdesanidad.es
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
testdesanidad.es
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report ▼

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
testdesanidad.es
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is testdesanidad.es hosted? ▼

Testdesanidad.es may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
2a12:d280:100:59::, 178.211.133.59
ASN:
AS56958 
ISP:
ZAO Uzel svyazi 
Server Location:
Madrid
Madrid, M
28085
Spain, ES
 

Other sites hosted on 178.211.133.59

How fast does testdesanidad.es load? ▼

The average loading time of testdesanidad.es is 296 ms. The Desktop speed index is 100 and mobile speed index is 100.
Average Load Time:
296 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

100
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)528ms 81% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 81% 10% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 10% 7% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 7%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)994ms 85% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 85% 5% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 5% 8% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 8%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)13ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 98% 0% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)995ms 89% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 89% 3% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 3% 6% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 6%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)3ms 88% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 88% 8% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 8% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 2%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)101ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 97% 1% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 1% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)408ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 97% 1% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 1% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 1%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)49ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 97% 0% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)428ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 98% 0% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1%

Lab Data

Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
First Contentful Paint 0.2 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Time to Interactive 0.2 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Speed Index 0.4 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Minimize third-party usage  
Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading. Learn how to minimize third-party impact
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Third parties  
Third party code can significantly impact load performance. to prioritize your page's content. Reduce and defer loading of third party code
Max Potential First Input Delay 30 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Largest Contentful Paint 0.2 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

100
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)433ms 81% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 89% 8% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 8% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 2%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.1s 85% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 91% 5% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 5% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 2%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)79ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<200s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 97% 2% of loads for this page have an average (200s ~ 500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 2% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.2s 89% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 95% 2% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 95% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 95% 3% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 3% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 1%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)166ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 96% 2% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 2% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)498ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 97% 1% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 1% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)98ms 94% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.2s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 94% 4% of loads for this page have an average (0.2s ~ 0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 4% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)589ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 98% 1% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0%

Lab Data

CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Largest Contentful Paint 0.9 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
First Contentful Paint 0.8 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Third parties  
Third party code can significantly impact load performance. to prioritize your page's content. Reduce and defer loading of third party code
Speed Index 2.1 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Time to Interactive 0.9 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Max Potential First Input Delay 20 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
Minimize third-party usage  
Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading. Learn how to minimize third-party impact
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs

Does testdesanidad.es use compression? ▼

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on testdesanidad.es are reduced by 84%.
testdesanidad.es use br compression.
Original size: 16.11 KB
Compressed size: 2.5 KB
File reduced by: 13.61 KB (84%)

Google Safe Browsing ▼

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites.
Status:
  UNKNOWN

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify ▼

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. testdesanidad.es supports HTTPS.
 testdesanidad.es supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: testdesanidad.es
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: R11
Valid from: Apr 22 09:54:32 2025 GMT
Valid until: Jul 21 09:54:31 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Common Name: R11
Organization: Let's Encrypt
Location: US
Issuer: ISRG Root X1
Valid from: Mar 13 00:00:00 2024 GMT
Valid until: Mar 12 23:59:59 2027 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 2048 Bits

Verify HTTP/2 Support ▼

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 testdesanidad.es supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header ▼

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server. 
set-cookie: PHPSESSID=7e5fda1ca81889d3ad04a6f4a387ab01; expires=Tue, 22-Apr-2025 22:58:23 GMT; Max-Age=21600; path=/; secure
expires: Thu, 19 Nov 1981 08:52:00 GMT
cache-control: private, max-age=3600
pragma: no-cache
content-type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
content-encoding: br
vary: Accept-Encoding
date: Tue, 22 Apr 2025 16:58:23 GMT
content-security-policy: 
content-security-policy-report-only: 
alt-svc: h3=":443"; ma=2592000, h3-29=":443"; ma=2592000, h3-Q050=":443"; ma=2592000, h3-Q046=":443"; ma=2592000, h3-Q043=":443"; ma=2592000, quic=":443"; ma=2592000; v="43,46"

DNS Lookup ▼

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
SOA 86400
Mname dns1.raiolanetworks.es
Rname cpanel.raiolanetworks.es
Serial Number 2025042201
Refresh 3600
Retry 7200
Expire 1209600
Minimum TTL 86400
MX mail.testdesanidad.es 14400
TXT v=spf1 a mx +include:spf.raiolanetworks.com -all 14400
AAAA 2a12:d280:100:59:: 14352
A 178.211.133.59 14352
NS dns2.raiolanetworks.es 86352
NS dns1.raiolanetworks.es 86352
NS dns3.raiolanetworks.es 86352