telemark.cz Telemark.cz

   
TELEMARK

Domain Summary

What is the traffic rank for Telemark.cz?

• Telemark.cz ranks #4,327,046 globally on HypeStat.

What percent of global Internet users visit Telemark.cz?

• 2.2E-6% of global Internet users visit Telemark.cz

How many people visit Telemark.cz each day?

• Telemark.cz receives approximately 108 visitors and 331 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Telemark.cz receive most of its visitors from?

• Telemark.cz is mostly visited by people located in Czech Republic.

How much Telemark.cz can earn?

• Telemark.cz should earn about $0.15/day from advertising revenue.

What is Telemark.cz estimated value?

• Estimated value of Telemark.cz is $144.50.

What IP addresses does Telemark.cz resolve to?

• Telemark.cz resolves to the IP addresses 80.188.23.215.

Where are Telemark.cz servers located in?

• Telemark.cz has servers located in Prague, Prague, 160 00, Czechia.

telemark.cz Profile

Title:TELEMARK Description:Vše nejen pro telemarkové lyžování. Obchod s outdoorovým vybavením a oblečením pro telemark, skialpinismus a backcountry skiing. Boty, vázání, lyže, helmy,
Tags:
telemark
Category:Reference Materials / Dictionaries and Encyclopedias
Edit Site Info

What technologies does telemark.cz use?

These are the technologies used at telemark.cz. telemark.cz has a total of 3 technologies installed in 2 different categories.
Web Frameworks
Microsoft ASP.NET Microsoft ASP.NET
Miscellaneous
Open Graph Open Graph
PWA PWA

telemark.cz Traffic Analysis

Telemark.cz is ranked #4,327,046 in the world. This website is viewed by an estimated 108 visitors daily, generating a total of 331 pageviews. This equates to about 3.3K monthly visitors. Telemark.cz traffic has decreased by 84.24% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors108
32.72%
Monthly Visits3.3K
84.24%
Pages per Visit3.07
71.14%
Visit duration00:58
76.26%
Bounce Rate27.21%
52.14%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
108
Monthly Visits:
3,272
Pages per Visit:
3.07
Daily Pageviews:
331
Avg. visit duration:
00:58
Bounce rate:
27.21%
Global Reach:
2.2E-6%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
4,011
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
4,011
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
3,194
HypeRank:
4,327,046
SEMrush Rank:
17,925,030
SimilarWeb Rank:
4,327,046
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
0%
Referral:
7.21%
Search:
92.79%
Social:
0%
Paid:
0%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
8.53%
Mobile:
91.47%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

3.1K
JUN
20.8K
JUL
3.3K
AUG

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
Czech Republic 100.00%

Which sites are competitors to telemark.cz?

Websites similar to telemark.cz are sites similar on user interests and browsing behavior. Users can discover new websites that are similar to the ones they already enjoy or find useful.
Last update was 15 days ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with telemark.cz in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

  ▼

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  telemark.cz
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  17,925,030
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  8
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  0
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $0.00
Full SEMrush Report >>

Revenue report ▼

Google.com would generate approximately $0.2 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $4.5 and annual gross revenue of approximately $54.8. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $144.5.

How much would telemark.cz make?

Daily Revenue:
$0.15
Monthly Revenue:
$4.50
Yearly Revenue:
$54.75
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
Czech Republic 331$0.15

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$0.02
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$0.46
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$5.56
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
33
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
993
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
12,082

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
Czech Republic 33$0.02

How much is telemark.cz worth?

Website Value:
$144.5

Ad Experience Report ▼

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
telemark.cz
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
telemark.cz
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report ▼

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
telemark.cz
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is telemark.cz hosted? ▼

Telemark.cz may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
80.188.23.215
ASN:
AS5610 
ISP:
O2 Czech Republic, a.s. 
Server Location:
Prague
Prague, 10
160 00
Czechia, CZ
 

Other sites hosted on 80.188.23.215

There are no other sites hosted on this IP

How fast does telemark.cz load? ▼

The average loading time of telemark.cz is 113 ms. The Desktop speed index is 96 and mobile speed index is 80.
Average Load Time:
113 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

96
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)3ms 85% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 85% 10% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 10% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 3%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)192ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)501ms 100% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 100% 0% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)49ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)655ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)3ms 85% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 85% 10% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 10% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 3%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)192ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)501ms 100% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 100% 0% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)49ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)655ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0%

Lab Data

First Contentful Paint 0.6 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Time to Interactive 1.4 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Speed Index 0.7 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
INP breakdown  
Start investigating with the longest subpart. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Largest Contentful Paint 1.4 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Max Potential First Input Delay 30 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

80
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 85% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 97% 1% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 1% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 1%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)263ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 94% 3% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 3% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 1%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)608ms 100% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 95% 2% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 2% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 2%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)81ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<200s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 97% 2% of loads for this page have an average (200s ~ 500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 2% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)630ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 97% 1% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 98% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)331ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 96% 2% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 2% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 1%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)657ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 96% 1% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 1% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 1%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)94ms 95% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.2s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 95% 4% of loads for this page have an average (0.2s ~ 0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 4% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)801ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 97% 1% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1%

Lab Data

Total Blocking Time 10 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Speed Index 2.3 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Max Potential First Input Delay 70 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Time to Interactive 7.2 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Largest Contentful Paint 4.9 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
INP breakdown  
Start investigating with the longest subpart. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
First Contentful Paint 2.2 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric

Does telemark.cz use compression? ▼

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on telemark.cz are reduced by 74%.
telemark.cz use gzip compression.
Original size: 50.29 KB
Compressed size: 12.88 KB
File reduced by: 37.42 KB (74%)

Google Safe Browsing ▼

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites.
Status:
  SAFE

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify ▼

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. telemark.cz supports HTTPS.
 telemark.cz supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: *.telemark.cz
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: Sectigo Public Server Authentication CA DV R36
Valid from: Jun 11 00:00:00 2025 GMT
Valid until: Jun 11 23:59:59 2026 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Common Name: Sectigo Public Server Authentication CA DV R36
Organization: Sectigo Limited
Location: GB
Issuer: Sectigo Public Server Authentication Root R46
Valid from: Mar 22 00:00:00 2021 GMT
Valid until: Mar 21 23:59:59 2036 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 3072 Bits
Common Name: Sectigo Public Server Authentication Root R46
Organization: Sectigo Limited
Location: GB
Issuer: USERTrust RSA Certification Authority
Valid from: Mar 22 00:00:00 2021 GMT
Valid until: Jan 18 23:59:59 2038 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 4096 Bits
Common Name: USERTrust RSA Certification Authority
Organization: The USERTRUST Network
Location: Jersey City, New Jersey, US
Issuer: AAA Certificate Services
Valid from: Mar 12 00:00:00 2019 GMT
Valid until: Dec 31 23:59:59 2028 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 4096 Bits

Verify HTTP/2 Support ▼

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 telemark.cz supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header ▼

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server. 
content-type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
location: https://www.telemark.cz/
x-content-type-options: nosniff
date: Sat, 20 Sep 2025 20:41:56 GMT
content-length: 147

HTTP/2 200 
cache-control: private
content-type: text/html; charset=utf-8
content-encoding: gzip
vary: Accept-Encoding
set-cookie: ASP.NET_SessionId=lgwcahtmkhojul3icn4zmqmf; path=/; secure; HttpOnly; SameSite=Lax
x-content-type-options: nosniff
date: Sat, 20 Sep 2025 20:41:56 GMT
content-length: 13187

DNS Lookup ▼

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
A 80.188.23.215 900