technikarolna.pl Technikarolna.pl

   

Domain Summary

What is the traffic rank for Technikarolna.pl?

• Technikarolna.pl ranks #1,459,465 globally on HypeStat.

What percent of global Internet users visit Technikarolna.pl?

• 8.8E-6% of global Internet users visit Technikarolna.pl

How many people visit Technikarolna.pl each day?

• Technikarolna.pl receives approximately 433 visitors and 1,515 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Technikarolna.pl receive most of its visitors from?

• Technikarolna.pl is mostly visited by people located in Poland,Russian Federation,Germany.

How much Technikarolna.pl can earn?

• Technikarolna.pl should earn about $0.80/day from advertising revenue.

What is Technikarolna.pl estimated value?

• Estimated value of Technikarolna.pl is $761.35.

What IP addresses does Technikarolna.pl resolve to?

• Technikarolna.pl resolves to the IP addresses 109.95.159.54.

Where are Technikarolna.pl servers located in?

• Technikarolna.pl has servers located in Poland.

technikarolna.pl Profile

Description:części do ciągników rolniczych
Category:Heavy Industry and Engineering / Agriculture
Edit Site Info

What technologies does technikarolna.pl use?

These are the technologies used at technikarolna.pl. technikarolna.pl has a total of 2 technologies installed in 2 different categories.
Miscellaneous
HTTP/3 HTTP/3
Web Servers
LiteSpeed LiteSpeed

technikarolna.pl Traffic Analysis

Technikarolna.pl is ranked #1,459,465 in the world. This website is viewed by an estimated 433 visitors daily, generating a total of 1.5K pageviews. This equates to about 13.1K monthly visitors. Technikarolna.pl traffic has increased by 21.12% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors433
32.22%
Monthly Visits13.1K
21.12%
Pages per Visit3.50
133.88%
Visit duration03:06
279.45%
Bounce Rate52.31%
10%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
433
Monthly Visits:
13,120
Pages per Visit:
3.50
Daily Pageviews:
1,515
Avg. visit duration:
03:06
Bounce rate:
52.31%
Global Reach:
8.8E-6%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
35,844
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
26,577
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
12,872
HypeRank:
1,459,465
SEMrush Rank:
11,301,627
SimilarWeb Rank:
1,459,465
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
9.80%
Referral:
0.01%
Search:
90.09%
Social:
0%
Paid:
0.11%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
28.70%
Mobile:
71.30%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

12K
DEC
10.8K
JAN
13.1K
FEB

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
Poland 71.21%
 
Russian Federation 14.01%
 
Germany 7.14%
 
France 3.28%
 
Portugal 2.92%

Which sites are competitors to technikarolna.pl?

Websites similar to technikarolna.pl are sites similar on user interests and browsing behavior. Users can discover new websites that are similar to the ones they already enjoy or find useful.
Last update was 1 day ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with technikarolna.pl in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

Search Engine Indexes ▼

Search engine indexes are huge databases or collections of net pages that search engines like google like google and yahoo use to retrieve applicable facts while customers carry out searches. These indexes are created through search engines like google and yahoo through crawling and indexing net pages from throughout the internet.
Google Index:
140,000

  ▼

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  technikarolna.pl
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  11,301,627
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  69
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  1
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $0.00
Full SEMrush Report >>

Revenue report ▼

Google.com would generate approximately $0.8 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $24 and annual gross revenue of approximately $292. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $761.4.

How much would technikarolna.pl make?

Daily Revenue:
$0.80
Monthly Revenue:
$24.00
Yearly Revenue:
$292.00
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
Poland 1,079$0.43
 
Germany 108$0.15
 
Russian Federation 212$0.09
 
France 50$0.03
 
Portugal 44$0.01

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$0.20
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$5.90
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$71.81
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
415
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
12,446
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
151,428

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
Poland 356$0.14
 
Germany 31$0.04
 
Russian Federation 13$0.01
 
France 5$0.00
 
Portugal 9$0.00

How much is technikarolna.pl worth?

Website Value:
$761.4

Ad Experience Report ▼

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
technikarolna.pl
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
technikarolna.pl
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report ▼

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
technikarolna.pl
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is technikarolna.pl hosted? ▼

Technikarolna.pl may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
109.95.159.54
ASN:
AS48896 
ISP:
dhosting.pl Sp. z o.o. 
Server Location:

Poland, PL
 

Other sites hosted on 109.95.159.54

How fast does technikarolna.pl load? ▼

The average loading time of technikarolna.pl is 363 ms. The Desktop speed index is 100 and mobile speed index is 100.
Average Load Time:
363 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

100
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a SLOW speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)2ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)4.0s 11% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 11% 16% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 16% 72% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 72%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)4.6s 22% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 22% 18% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 18% 59% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 59%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)35ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 98% 1% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 1% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)4.6s 31% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 31% 30% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 30% 37% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 37%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an SLOW speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)2ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)2.7s 32% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 32% 29% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 29% 38% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 38%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)3.3s 52% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 52% 19% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 19% 27% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 27%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)38ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 98% 0% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)3.5s 61% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 61% 18% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 18% 20% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 20%

Lab Data

Third parties  
Third party code can significantly impact load performance. to prioritize your page's content. Reduce and defer loading of third party code
Render blocking requests  
Requests are blocking the page's initial render, which may delay LCP. can move these network requests out of the critical path. Deferring or inlining
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Speed Index 0.5 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Does not have a `<meta name="viewport">` tag with `width` or `initial-scale`  
A `<meta name="viewport">` not only optimizes your app for mobile screen sizes, but also prevents . a 300 millisecond delay to user input Learn more about using the viewport meta tag
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Largest Contentful Paint 0.2 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Minimize third-party usage  
Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading. Learn how to minimize third-party impact
Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
Time to Interactive 0.2 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
First Contentful Paint 0.2 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Max Potential First Input Delay 20 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

100
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a SLOW speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 95% 3% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 3% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)3.8s 11% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 8% 19% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 19% 71% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 71%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)4.4s 22% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 22% 17% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 17% 60% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 60%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)112ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<200s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 93% 3% of loads for this page have an average (200s ~ 500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 3% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 3%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)4.4s 31% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 31% 32% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 32% 35% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 35%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an SLOW speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 97% 1% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 1% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)2.4s 41% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 41% 26% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 26% 32% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 32%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)3.0s 57% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 57% 18% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 18% 24% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 24%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)112ms 94% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.2s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 94% 4% of loads for this page have an average (0.2s ~ 0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 4% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)3.0s 67% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 67% 15% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 15% 16% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 16%

Lab Data

Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Render blocking requests  
Requests are blocking the page's initial render, which may delay LCP. can move these network requests out of the critical path. Deferring or inlining
Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
Largest Contentful Paint 0.8 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Max Potential First Input Delay 20 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
First Contentful Paint 0.8 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Minimize third-party usage  
Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading. Learn how to minimize third-party impact
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Third parties  
Third party code can significantly impact load performance. to prioritize your page's content. Reduce and defer loading of third party code
Time to Interactive 0.8 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Speed Index 1.3 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Does not have a `<meta name="viewport">` tag with `width` or `initial-scale`  
A `<meta name="viewport">` not only optimizes your app for mobile screen sizes, but also prevents . a 300 millisecond delay to user input Learn more about using the viewport meta tag
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors

Does technikarolna.pl use compression? ▼

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on technikarolna.pl are reduced by 49%.
technikarolna.pl use br compression.
Original size: 752 B
Compressed size: 378 B
File reduced by: 374 B (49%)

Google Safe Browsing ▼

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites.
Status:
  SAFE

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify ▼

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. technikarolna.pl supports HTTPS.
 technikarolna.pl supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: technikarolna.pl
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: R10
Valid from: Feb 3 02:23:36 2025 GMT
Valid until: May 4 02:23:35 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Common Name: R10
Organization: Let's Encrypt
Location: US
Issuer: ISRG Root X1
Valid from: Mar 13 00:00:00 2024 GMT
Valid until: Mar 12 23:59:59 2027 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Common Name: R11
Organization: Let's Encrypt
Location: US
Issuer: ISRG Root X1
Valid from: Mar 13 00:00:00 2024 GMT
Valid until: Mar 12 23:59:59 2027 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Common Name: ISRG Root X1
Organization: Internet Security Research Group
Location: US
Issuer: ISRG Root X1
Valid from: Jun 4 11:04:38 2015 GMT
Valid until: Jun 4 11:04:38 2035 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 4096 Bits

Verify HTTP/2 Support ▼

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 technikarolna.pl supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header ▼

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server. 
content-type: text/html; charset=utf-8
x-xss-protection: 1; mode=block
x-content-type-options: nosniff
x-frame-options: Deny
content-length: 378
content-encoding: br
vary: Accept-Encoding
date: Tue, 01 Apr 2025 11:18:22 GMT
server: LiteSpeed
alt-svc: h3=":443"; ma=2592000, h3-29=":443"; ma=2592000, h3-Q050=":443"; ma=2592000, h3-Q046=":443"; ma=2592000, h3-Q043=":443"; ma=2592000, quic=":443"; ma=2592000; v="43,46"

DNS Lookup ▼

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
SOA 900
Mname ns1.dhosting.pl
Rname root.technikarolna.pl
Serial Number 2023091805
Refresh 21600
Retry 7200
Expire 1209600
Minimum TTL 86400
TXT v=spf1 include:_mail.dhosting.pl -all 900
MX mx-2.dpoczta.pl 900
MX mx-1.dpoczta.pl 900
A 109.95.159.54 858
NS ns2.dhosting.pl 900
NS ns1.dhosting.pl 900

Whois Lookup ▼

Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information.
WhoIs:
 

DOMAIN NAME:                    technikarolna.pl
registrant type:                individual
nameservers:                    ns1.dhosting.pl. [195.88.50.140]
                                ns2.dhosting.pl. [109.95.154.140]
created:                        2012.10.28 10:14:40
last modified:                  2024.12.16 20:47:37
renewal date:                   2025.10.28 10:14:40

option:                         no

dnssec:                         Unsigned

REGISTRAR:
Aftermarket.pl Limited
Chytron, 3, Office 301, P.C.
1075 Nicosia
Cypr/Cyprus
Tel: +357.22761649
Fax: +357.22767543
http://www.AfterMarket.pl/contact.php
email

WHOIS database responses:       https://dns.pl/en/whois

WHOIS displays data with a delay not exceeding 15 minutes in relation to the .pl Registry system