standards.freedesktop.org Standards.freedesktop.org

   
Freedesktop.org Specifications

Domain Summary

What percent of global Internet users visit Standards.freedesktop.org?

• 5.9E-6% of global Internet users visit Standards.freedesktop.org

How many people visit Standards.freedesktop.org each day?

• Standards.freedesktop.org receives approximately 290 visitors and 369 page impressions per day.

How much Standards.freedesktop.org can earn?

• Standards.freedesktop.org should earn about $1.51/day from advertising revenue.

What is Standards.freedesktop.org estimated value?

• Estimated value of Standards.freedesktop.org is $1,368.66.

What IP addresses does Standards.freedesktop.org resolve to?

• Standards.freedesktop.org resolves to the IP addresses 131.252.210.176.

Where are Standards.freedesktop.org servers located in?

• Standards.freedesktop.org has servers located in Portland, Oregon, 97205, United States.

standards.freedesktop.org Profile

Title:Freedesktop.org Specifications
Edit Site Info

What technologies does standards.freedesktop.org use?

These are the technologies used at standards.freedesktop.org. standards.freedesktop.org has a total of 2 technologies installed in 2 different categories.
Security
HSTS HSTS
Caching
Varnish Varnish

standards.freedesktop.org Traffic Analysis

This website is viewed by an estimated 290 visitors daily, generating a total of 369 pageviews. This equates to about 8.8K monthly visitors.
Daily Visitors290
Monthly Visits8.8K
Pages per Visit1.28
Visit duration n/a
Bounce Rate89.80%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
290
Monthly Visits:
8,787
Pages per Visit:
1.28
Daily Pageviews:
369
Avg. visit duration:
n/a
Bounce rate:
89.80%
Global Reach:
5.9E-6%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
180
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
180
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
8,519
HypeRank:
n/a
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
0%
Referral:
100.00%
Search:
0%
Social:
0%
Paid:
0%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
100.00%
Mobile:
0%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

9.5K
JAN
8.8K
FEB
8.8K
MAR

Which sites are competitors to standards.freedesktop.org?

Websites similar to standards.freedesktop.org are sites similar on user interests and browsing behavior. Users can discover new websites that are similar to the ones they already enjoy or find useful.
Last update was 54 days ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with standards.freedesktop.org in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

  ▼

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  standards.freedesktop.org
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  n/a
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  0
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  0
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $0.00
Full SEMrush Report >>

Revenue report ▼

Google.com would generate approximately $1.5 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $45.3 and annual gross revenue of approximately $551.2. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $1.4K.

How much would standards.freedesktop.org make?

Daily Revenue:
$1.51
Monthly Revenue:
$45.30
Yearly Revenue:
$551.15
*All earnings values are estimates only.

How much is standards.freedesktop.org worth?

Website Value:
$1.4K

Ad Experience Report ▼

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
standards.freedesktop.org
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
standards.freedesktop.org
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report ▼

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
standards.freedesktop.org
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is standards.freedesktop.org hosted? ▼

Standards.freedesktop.org may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
131.252.210.176
ASN:
AS6366 
ISP:
Portland State University 
Server Location:
Portland
Oregon, OR
97205
United States, US
 

Other sites hosted on 131.252.210.176

How fast does standards.freedesktop.org load? ▼

The average loading time of standards.freedesktop.org is 659 ms. The Desktop speed index is 97 and mobile speed index is 98.
Average Load Time:
659 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

97
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 98% 1% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 1% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.0s 65% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 65% 27% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 27% 6% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 6%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.7s 77% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 77% 12% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 12% 10% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 10%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)18ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 98% 0% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.6s 87% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 87% 8% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 8% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 4%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 98% 1% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 1% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.0s 65% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 65% 27% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 27% 6% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 6%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.7s 77% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 77% 12% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 12% 10% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 10%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)18ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 98% 0% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.6s 87% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 87% 8% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 8% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 4%

Lab Data

Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Max Potential First Input Delay 20 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Third parties  
Third party code can significantly impact load performance. to prioritize your page's content. Reduce and defer loading of third party code
Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
First Contentful Paint 0.5 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Largest Contentful Paint 0.5 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Time to Interactive 0.5 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Speed Index 1.9 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Minimize third-party usage  
Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading. Learn how to minimize third-party impact
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

98
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.2s 65% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 58% 28% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 28% 12% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 12%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)2.3s 77% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 68% 14% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 14% 16% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 16%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)77ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<200s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 90% 5% of loads for this page have an average (200s ~ 500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 5% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 3%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.0s 87% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 80% 13% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 13% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 5%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.2s 58% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 58% 28% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 28% 12% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 12%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)2.3s 68% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 68% 14% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 14% 16% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 16%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)77ms 90% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.2s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 90% 5% of loads for this page have an average (0.2s ~ 0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 5% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 3%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.0s 80% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 80% 13% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 13% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 5%

Lab Data

CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Speed Index 3.7 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
Time to Interactive 1.7 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
First Contentful Paint 1.7 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Max Potential First Input Delay 20 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Third parties  
Third party code can significantly impact load performance. to prioritize your page's content. Reduce and defer loading of third party code
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Minimize third-party usage  
Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading. Learn how to minimize third-party impact
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Largest Contentful Paint 1.7 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading

Does standards.freedesktop.org use compression? ▼

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on standards.freedesktop.org are reduced by 90%.
standards.freedesktop.org use br compression.
Original size: 26.28 KB
Compressed size: 2.47 KB
File reduced by: 23.81 KB (90%)

Google Safe Browsing ▼

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites. standards.freedesktop.org has 90 Safety Reputations.
Status:
  SAFE
Safety Reputations:
  90
Safety Confidence:
  12
Child Safety Reputations:
  95
Child Safety Confidence:
  23

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify ▼

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. standards.freedesktop.org supports HTTPS.
 standards.freedesktop.org supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: specifications.freedesktop.org
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: R11
Valid from: Apr 3 05:27:10 2025 GMT
Valid until: Jul 2 05:27:09 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Common Name: R11
Organization: Let's Encrypt
Location: US
Issuer: ISRG Root X1
Valid from: Mar 13 00:00:00 2024 GMT
Valid until: Mar 12 23:59:59 2027 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 2048 Bits

Verify HTTP/2 Support ▼

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 standards.freedesktop.org supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header ▼

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server. 
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2025 03:38:02 GMT
Server: Apache
Location: https://specifications.freedesktop.org/
Content-Length: 323
Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1

HTTP/2 200 
content-type: text/html; charset=utf-8
cache-control: max-age=600
etag: W/"167c06d74b7cfd4558fda9123732c1dafe12efac3dcf24d683b73e215d0b34b7"
expires: Thu, 24 Apr 2025 01:49:28 UTC
last-modified: Wed, 05 Mar 2025 22:42:35 GMT
x-request-id: 4bd815e18c124c5512f5276ec0297450
content-encoding: br
accept-ranges: bytes
age: 0
date: Thu, 24 Apr 2025 03:38:03 GMT
via: 1.1 varnish
x-served-by: cache-chi-kigq8000021-CHI
x-cache: HIT
x-cache-hits: 0
x-timer: S1745465883.734754,VS0,VE496
vary: Accept-Encoding, Origin
strict-transport-security: max-age=300
content-length: 2533

DNS Lookup ▼

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
CNAME annarchy.freedesktop.org 14327

Whois Lookup ▼

Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information.
WhoIs:
 

Malformed request.
>>> Last update of WHOIS database: 2025-04-24T03:39:14Z