skincareroutine.app Skincareroutine.app

   
Skincare Routine

Domain Summary

What is the traffic rank for Skincareroutine.app?

• Skincareroutine.app ranks #3,788,747 globally on HypeStat.

What percent of global Internet users visit Skincareroutine.app?

• 2.7E-6% of global Internet users visit Skincareroutine.app

How many people visit Skincareroutine.app each day?

• Skincareroutine.app receives approximately 135 visitors and 358 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Skincareroutine.app receive most of its visitors from?

• Skincareroutine.app is mostly visited by people located in United States,Germany,India.

How much Skincareroutine.app can earn?

• Skincareroutine.app should earn about $1.53/day from advertising revenue.

What is Skincareroutine.app estimated value?

• Estimated value of Skincareroutine.app is $1,444.64.

What IP addresses does Skincareroutine.app resolve to?

• Skincareroutine.app resolves to the IP addresses 13.227.37.15.

Where are Skincareroutine.app servers located in?

• Skincareroutine.app has servers located in United States.

skincareroutine.app Profile

Title:Skincare Routine
Description:Manage your daily skin care beauty regimen & track your skin's progress.
Edit Site Info

What technologies does skincareroutine.app use?

These are the technologies used at skincareroutine.app. skincareroutine.app has a total of 5 technologies installed in 4 different categories.
CDN
Amazon Cloudfront Amazon Cloudfront
Miscellaneous
Amazon S3 Amazon S3
Open Graph Open Graph
JavaScript Frameworks
React React
PaaS
Amazon Web Services Amazon Web Services

skincareroutine.app Traffic Analysis

Skincareroutine.app is ranked #3,788,747 in the world. This website is viewed by an estimated 135 visitors daily, generating a total of 358 pageviews. This equates to about 4.1K monthly visitors. Skincareroutine.app traffic has decreased by 17.67% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors135
17.67%
Monthly Visits4.1K
17.67%
Pages per Visit2.65
13.11%
Visit duration00:38
100%
Bounce Rate32.65%
3.11%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
135
Monthly Visits:
4,091
Pages per Visit:
2.65
Daily Pageviews:
358
Avg. visit duration:
00:38
Bounce rate:
32.65%
Global Reach:
2.7E-6%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
382
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
382
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
4,020
HypeRank:
3,788,747
SEMrush Rank:
5,567,103
SimilarWeb Rank:
3,788,747
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
0%
Referral:
0%
Search:
100.00%
Social:
0%
Paid:
0%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
100.00%
Mobile:
0%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

5.2K
JAN
5K
FEB
4.1K
MAR

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
United States 83.57%
 
Germany 15.88%
 
India 0.55%
Last update was 9 hours ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

Update will be available in 15 hours
*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with skincareroutine.app in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

Search Engine Indexes ▼

Search engine indexes are huge databases or collections of net pages that search engines like google like google and yahoo use to retrieve applicable facts while customers carry out searches. These indexes are created through search engines like google and yahoo through crawling and indexing net pages from throughout the internet.
Google Index:
38

  ▼

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  skincareroutine.app
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  5,567,103
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  73
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  30
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $49.00
Full SEMrush Report >>

Revenue report ▼

Google.com would generate approximately $1.5 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $45.9 and annual gross revenue of approximately $558.5. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $1.4K.

How much would skincareroutine.app make?

Daily Revenue:
$1.53
Monthly Revenue:
$45.90
Yearly Revenue:
$558.45
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
United States 299$1.45
 
Germany 57$0.08
 
India 2$0.00

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$0.28
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$8.50
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$103.44
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
71
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
2,127
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
25,875

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
United States 54$0.26
 
Germany 16$0.02
 
India 1$0.00

How much is skincareroutine.app worth?

Website Value:
$1.4K

Ad Experience Report ▼

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
skincareroutine.app
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
skincareroutine.app
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report ▼

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
skincareroutine.app
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is skincareroutine.app hosted? ▼

Skincareroutine.app may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
13.227.37.15
ASN:
AS16509 
ISP:
Amazon.com, Inc. 
Server Location:

United States, US
 

Other sites hosted on 13.227.37.15

How fast does skincareroutine.app load? ▼

The average loading time of skincareroutine.app is 48 ms. The Desktop speed index is 100 and mobile speed index is 92.
Average Load Time:
48 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

100
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)2ms 100% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 100% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)547ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 98% 1% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 1% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)546ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)2ms 100% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 100% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)547ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 98% 1% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 1% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)546ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0%

Lab Data

Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Max Potential First Input Delay 40 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Third parties  
Third party code can significantly impact load performance. to prioritize your page's content. Reduce and defer loading of third party code
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Largest Contentful Paint 0.3 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Minimize third-party usage  
Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading. Learn how to minimize third-party impact
Render blocking requests  
Requests are blocking the page's initial render, which may delay LCP. can move these network requests out of the critical path. Deferring or inlining
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
First Contentful Paint 0.3 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Speed Index 0.3 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Time to Interactive 0.3 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

92
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 100% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 90% 9% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 9% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)744ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 96% 1% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 1% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 1%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)761ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 97% 0% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 90% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 90% 9% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 9% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)744ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 96% 1% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 1% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 1%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)761ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 97% 0% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1%

Lab Data

INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Third parties  
Third party code can significantly impact load performance. to prioritize your page's content. Reduce and defer loading of third party code
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Largest Contentful Paint 1.4 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Time to Interactive 1.4 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Max Potential First Input Delay 50 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Render blocking requests  
Requests are blocking the page's initial render, which may delay LCP. can move these network requests out of the critical path. Deferring or inlining
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Minimize third-party usage  
Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading. Learn how to minimize third-party impact
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Speed Index 0.8 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
First Contentful Paint 0.8 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric

Does skincareroutine.app use compression? ▼

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on skincareroutine.app are reduced by 78%.
skincareroutine.app use gzip compression.
Original size: 41.15 KB
Compressed size: 9 KB
File reduced by: 32.14 KB (78%)

Google Safe Browsing ▼

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites.
Status:
  SAFE

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify ▼

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. skincareroutine.app supports HTTPS.
 skincareroutine.app supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: skincareroutine.app
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: Amazon RSA 2048 M03
Valid from: Dec 22 00:00:00 2024 GMT
Valid until: Jan 21 23:59:59 2026 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Common Name: Amazon RSA 2048 M03
Organization: Amazon
Location: US
Issuer: Amazon Root CA 1
Valid from: Aug 23 22:26:04 2022 GMT
Valid until: Aug 23 22:26:04 2030 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Common Name: Amazon Root CA 1
Organization: Amazon
Location: US
Issuer: Starfield Services Root Certificate Authority - G2
Valid from: May 25 12:00:00 2015 GMT
Valid until: Dec 31 01:00:00 2037 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 2048 Bits

Verify HTTP/2 Support ▼

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 skincareroutine.app supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header ▼

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server. 
content-type: text/html
content-length: 9221
date: Tue, 22 Apr 2025 06:18:18 GMT
cache-control: max-age=2419200
content-encoding: gzip
last-modified: Thu, 19 Sep 2024 16:46:17 GMT
etag: "f58e2ad15c9c187895d501d1eaf5daeb"
server: AmazonS3
x-cache: Hit from cloudfront
via: 1.1 b26db62dc161bb94e4a968e03b4d9f22.cloudfront.net (CloudFront)
x-amz-cf-pop: MSP50-C1
x-amz-cf-id: pP4rEA6Mn-aRtt2yiJHZf6dfYpIUruwUHcxjkl0y0jmk_77YyMM4dQ==
age: 444404

DNS Lookup ▼

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
TXT google-site-verification=PWIIMO3fltN11jDClGEDGjSX4hb9f9f89v5E-pJTDLc 300
MX aspmx.l.google.com 300
MX alt2.aspmx.l.google.com 300
MX alt1.aspmx.l.google.com 300
MX aspmx3.googlemail.com 300
MX aspmx2.googlemail.com 300
SOA 900
Mname ns-2042.awsdns-63.co.uk
Rname awsdns-hostmaster.amazon.com
Serial Number 1
Refresh 7200
Retry 900
Expire 1209600
Minimum TTL 86400
A 13.227.37.44 9
A 13.227.37.15 9
A 13.227.37.6 9
A 13.227.37.87 9
NS ns-2042.awsdns-63.co.uk 10749
NS ns-1461.awsdns-54.org 10749
NS ns-404.awsdns-50.com 10749
NS ns-730.awsdns-27.net 10749