shouldcosting.com Shouldcosting.com

   
Shouldcosting - Koste es, was es solle

Domain Summary

What is the traffic rank for Shouldcosting.com?

• Shouldcosting.com ranks #7,030,173 globally on HypeStat.

What percent of global Internet users visit Shouldcosting.com?

• 3.0E-7% of global Internet users visit Shouldcosting.com

How many people visit Shouldcosting.com each day?

• Shouldcosting.com receives approximately 12 visitors and 13 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Shouldcosting.com receive most of its visitors from?

• Shouldcosting.com is mostly visited by people located in Germany,India.

How much Shouldcosting.com can earn?

• Shouldcosting.com should earn about $0.01/day from advertising revenue.

What is Shouldcosting.com estimated value?

• Estimated value of Shouldcosting.com is $12.64.

What IP addresses does Shouldcosting.com resolve to?

• Shouldcosting.com resolves to the IP addresses 217.26.52.26.

Where are Shouldcosting.com servers located in?

• Shouldcosting.com has servers located in Switzerland.

shouldcosting.com Profile

Title:shouldcosting - Koste es, was es solle Description:AI-Driven, automatisiertes Warengruppenmanagement, automatisierte Kostenkalkulation, Einkauf 4.0 und Data-Driven Carbon Footprint - mit shouldcosting
Edit Site Info

What technologies does shouldcosting.com use?

These are the technologies used at shouldcosting.com. shouldcosting.com has a total of 6 technologies installed in 6 different categories.
Web Servers
Apache HTTP Server Apache HTTP Server
Search Engines
Awesomplete Awesomplete
CMS
Joomla Joomla
JavaScript Libraries
jQuery jQuery
UI frameworks
UIKit UIKit
Programming Languages
PHP PHP

shouldcosting.com Traffic Analysis

Shouldcosting.com is ranked #7,030,173 in the world. This website is viewed by an estimated 12 visitors daily, generating a total of 13 pageviews. This equates to about 363.6 monthly visitors. Shouldcosting.com traffic has decreased by 94.24% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors12
96.8%
Monthly Visits363.6
94.24%
Pages per Visit1.08
18.92%
Visit duration00:04
100%
Bounce Rate57.36%
30.43%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
12
Monthly Visits:
364
Pages per Visit:
1.08
Daily Pageviews:
13
Avg. visit duration:
00:04
Bounce rate:
57.36%
Global Reach:
3.0E-7%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
76
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
38
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
368
HypeRank:
7,030,173
SEMrush Rank:
5,090,712
SimilarWeb Rank:
24,903,708
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
50.00%
Referral:
0%
Search:
50.00%
Social:
0%
Paid:
0%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
100.00%
Mobile:
0%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

417
JUL
6.3K
AUG
363.6
SEP

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
Germany 58.88%
 
India 41.12%
Last update was 297 days ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with shouldcosting.com in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

Search Engine Indexes ▼

Search engine indexes are huge databases or collections of net pages that search engines like google like google and yahoo use to retrieve applicable facts while customers carry out searches. These indexes are created through search engines like google and yahoo through crawling and indexing net pages from throughout the internet.
Bing Index:
193

  ▼

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  shouldcosting.com
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  5,090,712
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  21
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  41
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $366.00
Full SEMrush Report >>

Revenue report ▼

Google.com would generate approximately $0 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $0.3 and annual gross revenue of approximately $3.7. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $12.6.

How much would shouldcosting.com make?

Daily Revenue:
$0.01
Monthly Revenue:
$0.30
Yearly Revenue:
$3.65
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
Germany 8$0.01
 
India 5$0.00

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
Germany 2$0.00
 
India 1$0.00

How much is shouldcosting.com worth?

Website Value:
$12.6

Ad Experience Report ▼

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
shouldcosting.com
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
shouldcosting.com
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report ▼

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
shouldcosting.com
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is shouldcosting.com hosted? ▼

Shouldcosting.com may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
217.26.52.26
ASN:
AS29097 
ISP:
Hostpoint AG 
Server Location:

Switzerland, CH
 

Other sites hosted on 217.26.52.26

How fast does shouldcosting.com load? ▼

The average loading time of shouldcosting.com is 776 ms. The Desktop speed index is 97 and mobile speed index is 52.
Average Load Time:
776 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

97
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0%

Lab Data

Minimize third-party usage  
Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading. Learn how to minimize third-party impact
Total Blocking Time 20 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Speed Index 1.7 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
First Contentful Paint 0.7 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Max Potential First Input Delay 100 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Largest Contentful Paint 0.8 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Time to Interactive 0.8 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

52
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0%

Lab Data

Time to Interactive 4.7 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Largest Contentful Paint 4.1 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Total Blocking Time 1,230 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Minimize third-party usage  
Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading. Learn how to minimize third-party impact
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
First Contentful Paint 3.2 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Speed Index 5.6 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Max Potential First Input Delay 660 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric

Does shouldcosting.com use compression? ▼

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on shouldcosting.com are reduced by 80%.
shouldcosting.com use gzip compression.
Original size: 62.04 KB
Compressed size: 12.34 KB
File reduced by: 49.7 KB (80%)

Google Safe Browsing ▼

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites.
Status:
  SAFE

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify ▼

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. shouldcosting.com supports HTTPS.
 shouldcosting.com supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: shouldcosting.com
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA
Valid from: Jun 19 00:00:00 2024 GMT
Valid until: Jul 17 23:59:59 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Common Name: Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA
Organization: Sectigo Limited
Location: Salford, Greater Manchester, GB
Issuer: USERTrust RSA Certification Authority
Valid from: Nov 2 00:00:00 2018 GMT
Valid until: Dec 31 23:59:59 2030 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Common Name: USERTrust RSA Certification Authority
Organization: The USERTRUST Network
Location: Jersey City, New Jersey, US
Issuer: USERTrust RSA Certification Authority
Valid from: Feb 1 00:00:00 2010 GMT
Valid until: Jan 18 23:59:59 2038 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 4096 Bits

Verify HTTP/2 Support ▼

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 shouldcosting.com supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header ▼

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server. 
set-cookie: 1153e5f2c25d1f5eb01c7e65dcc82e40=8mi3qai6g8q2d0j1ejinhh8lfg9klmfi; path=/; secure; HttpOnly
x-frame-options: SAMEORIGIN
referrer-policy: strict-origin-when-cross-origin
cross-origin-opener-policy: same-origin
cache-control: no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate, post-check=0, pre-check=0
expires: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 00:00:00 GMT
last-modified: Sun, 20 Oct 2024 10:10:34 GMT
pragma: no-cache
x-content-type-options: nosniff
location: https://shouldcosting.com/de/
content-type: text/html; charset=utf-8
date: Sun, 20 Oct 2024 10:10:34 GMT
server: Apache

HTTP/2 200 
set-cookie: 1153e5f2c25d1f5eb01c7e65dcc82e40=925t6906r2d6hhd3ekbuf91i0dqr6fs0; path=/; secure; HttpOnly
x-frame-options: SAMEORIGIN
referrer-policy: strict-origin-when-cross-origin
cross-origin-opener-policy: same-origin
content-encoding: gzip
vary: Accept-Encoding
x-content-encoded-by: Joomla
expires: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 00:00:00 GMT
last-modified: Sun, 20 Oct 2024 10:10:34 GMT
cache-control: no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate, post-check=0, pre-check=0
pragma: no-cache
x-content-type-options: nosniff
content-type: text/html; charset=utf-8
date: Sun, 20 Oct 2024 10:10:34 GMT
server: Apache

DNS Lookup ▼

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
TXT include:19528907.spf08.hubspotemail.net 300
TXT v=spf1 redirect=spf.mail.hostpoint.ch 300
MX mx1.mail.hostpoint.ch 3600
MX mx2.mail.hostpoint.ch 3600
SOA 3600
Mname ns-ch.hostpoint.ch
Rname hostmaster.hostpoint.ch
Serial Number 1729123200
Refresh 14400
Retry 1800
Expire 604800
Minimum TTL 3600
A 217.26.52.26 242
NS ns-ch.hostpoint.ch 300
NS ns-anycast2.hostpoint.ch 300
NS ns-anycast1.hostpoint.ch 300

Whois Lookup ▼

Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information. Domain registration for this website began on April 23, 2013 and will expire on April 23, 2025 if not renewed. This website is now assigned through the registrar Ascio Technologies, Inc. The WHOIS data for this website's domain was last updated on April 24, 2024.
Domain Created:
2013-04-23
Domain Expires:
2025-04-23
Domain Updated:
2024-04-24
Domain Age:
12 years 3 months 20 days
Domain Registrar:
Ascio Technologies, Inc
Domain Owner:
Swiss Domain Trustee AG
WhoIs:
 

Domain Name: shouldcosting.com
Registry Domain ID: 1796004842_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.ascio.com
Registrar URL: http://www.ascio.com 
Updated Date: 2024-04-24T00:40:07Z
Creation Date: 2013-04-23T05:58:42Z
Registrar Registration Expiration Date: 2025-04-23T00:00:00Z
Registrar: Ascio Technologies, Inc
Registrar IANA ID: 106
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: email
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +44 (20) 81583881
Domain Status: OK https://icann.org/epp#ok

Registry Registrant ID: 
Registrant Name: Swiss Domain Trustee AG
Registrant Organization: Swiss Domain Trustee AG
Registrant Street: Neue Jonastrasse 60
Registrant City: Rapperswil-Jona 
Registrant State/Province: SG
Registrant Postal Code: 8640
Registrant Country: CH
Registrant Phone: +41.844040404
Registrant Phone Ext:
Registrant Fax: 
Registrant Fax Ext:
Registrant Email: email

Registry Admin ID:
Admin Name: Dario Baumgartner
Admin Organization: Swiss Domain Trustee AG
Admin Street: Neue Jonastrasse 60
Admin City: Rapperswil-Jona
Admin State/Province: SG
Admin Postal Code: 8640
Admin Country: CH
Admin Phone: +41.844040404
Admin Phone Ext:
Admin Fax: 
Admin Fax Ext:
Admin Email: email

Registry Tech ID:
Tech Name: Dario Baumgartner
Tech Organization: Swiss Domain Trustee AG
Tech Street: Neue Jonastrasse 60
Tech City: Rapperswil-Jona 
Tech State/Province: SG
Tech Postal Code: 8640
Tech Country: CH
Tech Phone: +41.844040404
Tech Phone Ext:
Tech Fax:   
Tech Fax Ext: 
Tech Email: email

Name Server: ns-ch.hostpoint.ch
Name Server: ns-anycast1.hostpoint.ch
Name Server: ns-anycast2.hostpoint.ch
DNSSEC: signedDelegation
URL of the ICANN WHOIS Data Problem Reporting System: https://icann.org/wicf
>>> Last update of WHOIS database: 2024-10-20T10:11:31Z