share.google Share.google

   
share.google

Domain Summary

What is the traffic rank for Share.google?

• Share.google ranks #14,628 globally on HypeStat.

What percent of global Internet users visit Share.google?

• 0.0040245% of global Internet users visit Share.google

How many people visit Share.google each day?

• Share.google receives approximately 198.4K visitors and 282,598 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Share.google receive most of its visitors from?

• Share.google is mostly visited by people located in Japan,United States,Germany.

How much Share.google can earn?

• Share.google should earn about $313.19/day from advertising revenue.

What is Share.google estimated value?

• Estimated value of Share.google is $290,860.13.

What IP addresses does Share.google resolve to?

• Share.google resolves to the IP addresses 2001:4860:4802:32::1b, 216.239.32.27.

Where are Share.google servers located in?

• Share.google has servers located in California, United States.

share.google Profile

Title: share.google
Edit Site Info

share.google Traffic Analysis

Share.google is ranked #14,628 in the world. This website is viewed by an estimated 198.4K visitors daily, generating a total of 282.6K pageviews. This equates to about 6M monthly visitors. Share.google traffic has increased by 14561.99% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors198.4K
13375.69%
Monthly Visits6M
14561.99%
Pages per Visit1.42
19.13%
Visit duration01:18
26.88%
Bounce Rate75.45%
11.94%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
198,405
Monthly Visits:
6,011,672
Pages per Visit:
1.42
Daily Pageviews:
282,598
Avg. visit duration:
01:18
Bounce rate:
75.45%
Global Reach:
0.0040245%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
15,430,860
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
11,279,694
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
5,835,442
HypeRank:
14,628
SEMrush Rank:
4,170,031
SimilarWeb Rank:
14,628
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
98.77%
Referral:
0.13%
Search:
0.02%
Social:
1.08%
Paid:
0%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
1.08%
Mobile:
98.92%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

0
MAR
41K
APR
6M
MAY

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
Japan 82.04%
 
United States 15.86%
 
Germany 0.99%
 
India 0.50%
 
Canada 0.32%
Last update was 5 hours ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

Update will be available in 19 hours
*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with share.google in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

Search Engine Indexes ▼

Search engine indexes are huge databases or collections of net pages that search engines like google like google and yahoo use to retrieve applicable facts while customers carry out searches. These indexes are created through search engines like google and yahoo through crawling and indexing net pages from throughout the internet.
Bing Index:
25,100,000

  ▼

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  share.google
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  4,170,031
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  45
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  71
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $224.00
Full SEMrush Report >>

Revenue report ▼

Google.com would generate approximately $313.2 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $9.4K and annual gross revenue of approximately $114.3K. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $290.9K.

How much would share.google make?

Daily Revenue:
$313.19
Monthly Revenue:
$9,395.70
Yearly Revenue:
$114,314.35
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
United States 44,811$216.44
 
Japan 231,840$83.46
 
Canada 895$5.40
 
Germany 2,811$3.94
 
India 1,403$0.53

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$44.10
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$1,323.13
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$16,098.09
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
16,453
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
493,589
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
6,005,332

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
United States 8,066$38.96
 
Japan 6,955$2.50
 
Canada 224$1.35
 
Germany 815$1.14
 
India 393$0.15

How much is share.google worth?

Website Value:
$290.9K

Ad Experience Report ▼

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
share.google
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
share.google
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report ▼

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
share.google
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is share.google hosted? ▼

Share.google may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
2001:4860:4802:32::1b, 216.239.32.27
ASN:
AS15169 
ISP:
Google LLC 
Server Location:
California, CA
United States, US
 

Other sites hosted on 216.239.32.27

How fast does share.google load? ▼

The average loading time of share.google is 39 ms. The Desktop speed index is 100 and mobile speed index is 93.
Average Load Time:
39 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

100
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 98% 1% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 1% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)320ms 92% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 92% 5% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 5% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 2%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)718ms 93% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 93% 2% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 2% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 3%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)14ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 98% 0% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)714ms 95% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 95% 1% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)681ms 80% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 80% 14% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 14% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 5%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.2s 86% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 86% 7% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 7% 6% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 6%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)16ms 95% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 95% 1% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 1% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 2%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.4s 92% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 92% 3% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 3% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 3%

Lab Data

Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Max Potential First Input Delay 20 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
First Contentful Paint 0.7 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Duplicated JavaScript  
Remove large, duplicate JavaScript modules from bundles to reduce unnecessary bytes consumed by network activity.
Speed Index 0.7 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Largest Contentful Paint 0.7 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Time to Interactive 0.7 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Use efficient cache lifetimes  
A long cache lifetime can speed up repeat visits to your page. Learn more
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Legacy JavaScript  
Polyfills and transforms enable older browsers to use new JavaScript features. However, many aren't necessary for modern browsers. Consider modifying your JavaScript build process to not transpile features, unless you know you must support older browsers. Baseline Learn why most sites can deploy ES6+ code without transpiling
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

93
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 100% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)414ms 92% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 91% 6% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 6% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 2%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.2s 93% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 88% 7% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 7% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 3%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)68ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<200s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 96% 1% of loads for this page have an average (200s ~ 500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 1% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.2s 95% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 94% 3% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 3% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 100% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 100% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)854ms 72% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 72% 20% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 20% 6% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 6%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.7s 77% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 77% 14% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 14% 7% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 7%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)63ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.2s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 96% 2% of loads for this page have an average (0.2s ~ 0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 2% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.7s 88% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 88% 7% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 7% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 4%

Lab Data

Use efficient cache lifetimes  
A long cache lifetime can speed up repeat visits to your page. Learn more
Time to Interactive 2.6 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Speed Index 2.6 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Largest Contentful Paint 2.6 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
First Contentful Paint 2.6 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
Legacy JavaScript  
Polyfills and transforms enable older browsers to use new JavaScript features. However, many aren't necessary for modern browsers. Consider modifying your JavaScript build process to not transpile features, unless you know you must support older browsers. Baseline Learn why most sites can deploy ES6+ code without transpiling
Max Potential First Input Delay 20 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Duplicated JavaScript  
Remove large, duplicate JavaScript modules from bundles to reduce unnecessary bytes consumed by network activity.
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides

Does share.google use compression? ▼

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on share.google are reduced by 57%.
share.google use gzip compression.
Original size: 1.97 KB
Compressed size: 857 B
File reduced by: 1.13 KB (57%)

Google Safe Browsing ▼

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites. share.google has 80 Safety Reputations.
Status:
  SAFE
Safety Reputations:
  80
Safety Confidence:
  51

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify ▼

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. share.google supports HTTPS.
 share.google supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: misc.google.com
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: WE2
Valid from: Jun 2 08:36:03 2025 GMT
Valid until: Aug 25 08:36:02 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize:
Common Name: WE2
Organization: Google Trust Services
Location: US
Issuer: GTS Root R4
Valid from: Dec 13 09:00:00 2023 GMT
Valid until: Feb 20 14:00:00 2029 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize:
Common Name: GTS Root R4
Organization: Google Trust Services LLC
Location: US
Issuer: GlobalSign Root CA
Valid from: Nov 15 03:43:21 2023 GMT
Valid until: Jan 28 00:00:42 2028 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize:

Verify HTTP/2 Support ▼

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 share.google supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header ▼

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server. 
accept-ranges: bytes
vary: Accept-Encoding
content-type: text/html
content-security-policy: script-src 'nonce-adXc4MyNdL0xPMGjDkjX4A' 'report-sample' 'strict-dynamic' 'unsafe-eval' 'unsafe-inline' http: https:; object-src 'none'; report-uri https://csp.withgoogle.com/csp/share-google-eng-team; base-uri 'none'
content-security-policy: require-trusted-types-for 'script'; report-uri https://csp.withgoogle.com/csp/share-google-eng-team
cross-origin-opener-policy: same-origin; report-to="share-google-eng-team"
report-to: {"group":"share-google-eng-team","max_age":2592000,"endpoints":[{"url":"https://csp.withgoogle.com/csp/report-to/share-google-eng-team"}]}
content-length: 857
date: Tue, 01 Jul 2025 05:51:12 GMT
pragma: no-cache
expires: Fri, 01 Jan 1990 00:00:00 GMT
cache-control: no-cache, must-revalidate
last-modified: Tue, 15 Apr 2025 00:48:00 GMT
x-content-type-options: nosniff
content-encoding: gzip
server: sffe
x-xss-protection: 0
alt-svc: h3=":443"; ma=2592000,h3-29=":443"; ma=2592000

DNS Lookup ▼

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
A 216.239.32.27 258
AAAA 2001:4860:4802:32::1b 52