rocketpool.net Rocketpool.net

   
Rocket Pool - Decentralised Ethereum Liquid Staking Protocol

Domain Summary

What is the traffic rank for Rocketpool.net?

• Rocketpool.net ranks #966,041 globally on HypeStat.

What percent of global Internet users visit Rocketpool.net?

• 3.89E-5% of global Internet users visit Rocketpool.net

How many people visit Rocketpool.net each day?

• Rocketpool.net receives approximately 1.9K visitors and 5,546 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Rocketpool.net receive most of its visitors from?

• Rocketpool.net is mostly visited by people located in United States,Switzerland,Viet Nam.

How much Rocketpool.net can earn?

• Rocketpool.net should earn about $22.47/day from advertising revenue.

What is Rocketpool.net estimated value?

• Estimated value of Rocketpool.net is $22,376.48.

What IP addresses does Rocketpool.net resolve to?

• Rocketpool.net resolves to the IP addresses 2606:4700:20::ac43:4a97, 104.26.6.138.

Where are Rocketpool.net servers located in?

• Rocketpool.net has servers located in Ashburn, Virginia, 20149, United States.

rocketpool.net Profile

Title:Rocket Pool - Decentralised Ethereum Liquid Staking Protocol
Description:Rocket Pool is a decentralised staking protocol providing liquid & node staking products for the Ethereum (ETH) ecosystem.
Category:Finance / Other Finance
Edit Site Info

What technologies does rocketpool.net use?

These are the technologies used at rocketpool.net. rocketpool.net has a total of 4 technologies installed in 3 different categories.
CDN
CloudFlare CloudFlare
Security
HSTS HSTS
Miscellaneous
HTTP/3 HTTP/3
Open Graph Open Graph

rocketpool.net Traffic Analysis

Rocketpool.net is ranked #966,041 in the world. This website is viewed by an estimated 1.9K visitors daily, generating a total of 5.5K pageviews. This equates to about 58.1K monthly visitors. Rocketpool.net traffic has increased by 327.16% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors1.9K
333.24%
Monthly Visits58.1K
327.16%
Pages per Visit2.89
24.71%
Visit duration00:54
2.07%
Bounce Rate40.58%
30.36%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
1,918
Monthly Visits:
58,115
Pages per Visit:
2.89
Daily Pageviews:
5,546
Avg. visit duration:
00:54
Bounce rate:
40.58%
Global Reach:
3.89E-5%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
50,537
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
35,955
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
56,982
HypeRank:
966,041
SEMrush Rank:
743,766
SimilarWeb Rank:
530,915
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
38.92%
Referral:
3.47%
Search:
19.46%
Social:
38.14%
Paid:
0%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
45.70%
Mobile:
54.30%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

62.5K
DEC
13.6K
JAN
58.1K
FEB

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
United States 31.44%
 
Switzerland 7.54%
 
Viet Nam 5.99%
 
Netherlands 4.79%
 
United Kingdom 3.99%

Where do visitors go on rocketpool.net?

 
Reach%Pageviews%PerUser
docs.rocketpool.net
66.80%42.95%1
rocketpool.net
45.51%40.97%2
stake.rocketpool.net
31.42%16.04%1

Which sites are competitors to rocketpool.net?

Websites similar to rocketpool.net are sites similar on user interests and browsing behavior. Users can discover new websites that are similar to the ones they already enjoy or find useful.
Last update was 4 days ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with rocketpool.net in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

Search Engine Indexes ▼

Search engine indexes are huge databases or collections of net pages that search engines like google like google and yahoo use to retrieve applicable facts while customers carry out searches. These indexes are created through search engines like google and yahoo through crawling and indexing net pages from throughout the internet.
Google Index:
2,200
Bing Index:
1,370
Baidu Index:
6

  ▼

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  rocketpool.net
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  743,766
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  262
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  1,720
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $8,587.00
Full SEMrush Report >>

Revenue report ▼

Google.com would generate approximately $22.5 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $674.1 and annual gross revenue of approximately $8.2K. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $22.4K.

How much would rocketpool.net make?

Daily Revenue:
$22.47
Monthly Revenue:
$674.10
Yearly Revenue:
$8,201.55
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
United States 1,744$8.42
 
Switzerland 418$2.32
 
United Kingdom 221$0.59
 
Netherlands 266$0.51
 
Viet Nam 332$0.16

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$2.12
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$63.63
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$774.15
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
483
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
14,489
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
176,280

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
United States 314$1.52
 
Switzerland 75$0.42
 
United Kingdom 35$0.09
 
Netherlands 45$0.09
 
Viet Nam 13$0.01

How much is rocketpool.net worth?

Website Value:
$22.4K

Ad Experience Report ▼

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
rocketpool.net
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
rocketpool.net
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report ▼

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
rocketpool.net
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is rocketpool.net hosted? ▼

Rocketpool.net may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
2606:4700:20::ac43:4a97, 104.26.6.138
ASN:
AS13335 
ISP:
Cloudflare Inc 
Server Location:
Ashburn
Virginia, VA
20149
United States, US
 

Other sites hosted on 104.26.6.138

How fast does rocketpool.net load? ▼

The average loading time of rocketpool.net is 45 ms. The Desktop speed index is 98 and mobile speed index is 86.
Average Load Time:
45 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

98
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 98% 1% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 1% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)383ms 86% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 86% 11% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 11% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 2%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.8s 75% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 75% 14% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 14% 9% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 9%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)42ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 96% 1% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 1% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.0s 80% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 80% 10% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 10% 8% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 8%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 98% 1% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 1% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)466ms 83% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 83% 13% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 13% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 2%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.8s 74% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 74% 15% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 15% 9% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 9%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)42ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 96% 1% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 1% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.1s 80% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 80% 11% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 11% 7% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 7%

Lab Data

Preconnect to required origins  
Consider adding `preconnect` or `dns-prefetch` resource hints to establish early connections to important third-party origins. Learn how to preconnect to required origins
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Total Blocking Time 100 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Time to Interactive 0.9 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Optimize DOM size  
A large DOM can increase the duration of style calculations and layout reflows, impacting page responsiveness. A large DOM will also increase memory usage. Learn how to avoid an excessive DOM size
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
First Contentful Paint 0.3 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Speed Index 0.4 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Largest Contentful Paint 0.9 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Max Potential First Input Delay 120 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

86
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)1ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 91% 7% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 7% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 1%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)598ms 86% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 80% 13% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 13% 6% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 6%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)2.1s 75% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 70% 15% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 15% 14% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 14%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)117ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<200s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 90% 8% of loads for this page have an average (200s ~ 500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 8% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.4s 80% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 76% 11% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 11% 12% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 12%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)1ms 91% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 91% 6% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 6% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 1%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)670ms 78% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 78% 15% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 15% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 5%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)2.0s 70% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 70% 14% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 14% 14% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 14%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)122ms 89% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.2s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 89% 8% of loads for this page have an average (0.2s ~ 0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 8% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.3s 77% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 77% 11% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 11% 11% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 11%

Lab Data

Speed Index 1.6 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Max Potential First Input Delay 150 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Time to Interactive 3.8 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
First Contentful Paint 1.2 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Largest Contentful Paint 3.7 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Total Blocking Time 190 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Preconnect to required origins  
Consider adding `preconnect` or `dns-prefetch` resource hints to establish early connections to important third-party origins. Learn how to preconnect to required origins
Optimize DOM size  
A large DOM can increase the duration of style calculations and layout reflows, impacting page responsiveness. A large DOM will also increase memory usage. Learn how to avoid an excessive DOM size

Does rocketpool.net use compression? ▼

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on rocketpool.net are reduced by 65%.
rocketpool.net use br compression.
Original size: 6.83 KB
Compressed size: 2.39 KB
File reduced by: 4.44 KB (65%)

Google Safe Browsing ▼

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites.
Status:
  SAFE

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify ▼

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. rocketpool.net supports HTTPS.
 rocketpool.net supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: rocketpool.net
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: WE1
Valid from: Mar 7 04:47:39 2025 GMT
Valid until: Jun 5 05:47:35 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize:
Common Name: WE1
Organization: Google Trust Services
Location: US
Issuer: GTS Root R4
Valid from: Dec 13 09:00:00 2023 GMT
Valid until: Feb 20 14:00:00 2029 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize:
Common Name: GTS Root R4
Organization: Google Trust Services LLC
Location: US
Issuer: GlobalSign Root CA
Valid from: Nov 15 03:43:21 2023 GMT
Valid until: Jan 28 00:00:42 2028 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize:

Verify HTTP/2 Support ▼

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 rocketpool.net supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header ▼

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server. 
date: Sat, 15 Mar 2025 17:35:23 GMT
content-type: text/html
access-control-allow-origin: *
cache-control: max-age=31536000
last-modified: Thu, 13 Mar 2025 00:23:02 GMT
vary: accept-encoding
vary: origin, access-control-request-method, access-control-request-headers
cf-cache-status: HIT
age: 136942
report-to: {"endpoints":[{"url":"https://a.nel.cloudflare.com/report/v4?s=bgR%2BPyTP7YpBN%2BLHJlppUXBX1Jzre9h4aA1obKOtuFcPDwYHay8jzUwszvveMiEJf83xhx2bSVGXbbdwJQPqRgQxxxD8XL05CYM3s8%2BUnZW8gJcgH1siANguaYKeyKAT"}],"group":"cf-nel","max_age":604800}
nel: {"success_fraction":0,"report_to":"cf-nel","max_age":604800}
allow: GET,POST,HEAD
permissions-policy: camera=(), display-capture=(), fullscreen=(), geolocation=(), microphone=()
referrer-policy: no-referrer-when-downgrade
strict-transport-security: max-age=2592000; includeSubDomains
x-content-type-options: nosniff
x-frame-options: SAMEORIGIN
server: cloudflare
cf-ray: 920dc45e7d7e61d4-ORD
content-encoding: br
alt-svc: h3=":443"; ma=86400
server-timing: cfL4;desc="?proto=TCP&rtt=1359&min_rtt=1328&rtt_var=436&sent=8&recv=10&lost=0&retrans=0&sent_bytes=3537&recv_bytes=893&delivery_rate=3236959&cwnd=189&unsent_bytes=0&cid=18ba2aa8f1a16360&ts=42&x=0"

DNS Lookup ▼

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
AAAA 2606:4700:20::681a:68a 253
AAAA 2606:4700:20::681a:78a 253
AAAA 2606:4700:20::ac43:4a97 253
A 104.26.6.138 253
A 172.67.74.151 253
A 104.26.7.138 253
NS thea.ns.cloudflare.com 172753
NS anderson.ns.cloudflare.com 172753
HINFO 3600

Whois Lookup ▼

Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information. Domain registration for this website began on May 16, 2017 and will expire on May 16, 2027 if not renewed. This website is now assigned through the registrar Amazon Registrar, Inc.. The WHOIS data for this website's domain was last updated on January 18, 2023.
Domain Created:
2017-05-16
Domain Expires:
2027-05-16
Domain Updated:
2023-01-18
Domain Age:
7 years 10 months 4 days
Domain Registrar:
Amazon Registrar, Inc.
Domain Owner:
Identity Protection Service
WhoIs:
 

   Domain Name: ROCKETPOOL.NET
   Registry Domain ID: 2124798324_DOMAIN_NET-VRSN
   Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.registrar.amazon.com
   Registrar URL: http://registrar.amazon.com
   Updated Date: 2023-01-18T09:49:58Z
   Creation Date: 2017-05-16T06:59:53Z
   Registry Expiry Date: 2027-05-16T06:59:53Z
   Registrar: Amazon Registrar, Inc.
   Registrar IANA ID: 468
   Registrar Abuse Contact Email: email
   Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +1.2024422253
   Domain Status: clientDeleteProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientDeleteProhibited
   Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
   Domain Status: clientUpdateProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientUpdateProhibited
   Name Server: ANDERSON.NS.CLOUDFLARE.COM
   Name Server: THEA.NS.CLOUDFLARE.COM
   DNSSEC: unsigned
   URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form: https://www.icann.org/wicf/
>>> Last update of whois database: 2025-03-15T17:35:54Z