Reviewing.co.uk
Active Reviewing Guide: how to facilitate active learning
Domain Summary
What is the traffic rank for Reviewing.co.uk?
• Reviewing.co.uk ranks #5,661,590 globally on HypeStat.
What percent of global Internet users visit Reviewing.co.uk?
• 1.13E-5% of global Internet users visit Reviewing.co.uk
How many people visit Reviewing.co.uk each day?
• Reviewing.co.uk receives approximately 556 visitors and 103 page impressions per day.
Which countries does Reviewing.co.uk receive most of its visitors from?
• Reviewing.co.uk is mostly visited by people located in United States,Viet Nam,Indonesia.
How much Reviewing.co.uk can earn?
• Reviewing.co.uk should earn about $0.38/day from advertising revenue.
What is Reviewing.co.uk estimated value?
• Estimated value of Reviewing.co.uk is $425.65.
What IP addresses does Reviewing.co.uk resolve to?
• Reviewing.co.uk resolves to the IP addresses 92.205.12.5.
Where are Reviewing.co.uk servers located in?
• Reviewing.co.uk has servers located in Strasbourg, Bas-Rhin, France.
reviewing.co.uk Profile

Title:Active Reviewing Guide: how to facilitate active learning
Description:Discover how to facilitate learning from experience, how to engage everyone in meaningful reflection and how to make learning more transferable.
Tags:
Category:Science and Education / Education
About:
Reviewing.co.uk is a website designed for gathering and sharing user reviews across a variety of products and services. The platform aims to help consumers make informed purchasing decisions by providing detailed feedback from real customers. The categories covered are vast, including technology, home appliances, fashion, and more. One of the key features of Reviewing.co.uk is its user-friendly interface, which makes it easy to navigate between different sections and find the exact type of review you're looking for. Additionally, the site is known for its comprehensive and genuine reviews, as it encourages honesty and transparency from its contributors. This focus helps build a trustworthy community where users can rely on the shared experiences of others.
*This text is generated by artificial intelligence and may not be accurate. Edit Site Info
What technologies does reviewing.co.uk use?
These are the technologies used at reviewing.co.uk. reviewing.co.uk has a total of 1 technologies installed in 1 different categories.reviewing.co.uk Traffic Analysis
Reviewing.co.uk is ranked #5,661,590 in the world. This website is viewed by an estimated 556 visitors daily, generating a total of 103 pageviews. This equates to about 16.8K monthly visitors. Reviewing.co.uk traffic has decreased by 87.88% compared to last month.Daily Visitors556
87.54%
Monthly Visits16.8K
87.88%
Pages per Visit0.19
49.47%
Visit duration02:12
113.78%
Bounce Rate34.57%
73.78%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
- Daily Unique Visitors:
- 556
- Monthly Visits:
- 16,847
- Pages per Visit:
- 0.19
- Daily Pageviews:
- 103
- Avg. visit duration:
- 02:12
- Bounce rate:
- 34.57%
- Global Reach:
- 1.13E-5%
- Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
- 609
- Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
- 609
- Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
- 17,008
- HypeRank:
- 5,661,590
- SEMrush Rank:
- 2,148,588
- SimilarWeb Rank:
- 6,405,279
Traffic sources
- Direct:
- 0%
- Referral:
- 0%
- Search:
- 100.00%
- Social:
- 0%
- Paid:
- 0%
Desktop vs Mobile
- Desktop:
- 100.00%
- Mobile:
- 0%
Total Visits Last 3 Months
20.8K
APR
139K
MAY
16.8K
JUN
Visitors by country
- Country
- Users%
- United States 7.91%
- Viet Nam 5.75%
- Indonesia 4.68%
- Somalia 4.03%
- New Zealand 3.87%
Backlinks Report ▼
Reviewing.co.uk has a total of 4,845 backlinks from 519 referring domains and most of them comes from United States.- Total Backlinks:
- 4,845
- Follow Links:
- n/a
- Nofollow Links:
- n/a
- Referring Domains:
- 519
- Referring IPs:
- 545
- Authority Domain Score:
- 25
Backlinks by country
- Country
- Domains
- United States 208
- United Kingdom 34
- Germany 20
- Netherlands 11
- Italy 10
Backlinks by TLDs
- TLD Distribution
- Domains
- .com
- 272
- .org
- 40
- .uk
- 40
- .edu
- 6
- .gov
- 0
Which sites are competitors to reviewing.co.uk?
Websites similar to reviewing.co.uk are sites similar on user interests and browsing behavior. Users can discover new websites that are similar to the ones they already enjoy or find useful.- Domain
- CompareDaily Visitors
- k12.com
- Compare >1.2M
- mathsisfun.com
- Compare >186.1K
- lifehack.org
- Compare >182K
- alison.com
- Compare >175.2K
- proprofs.com
- Compare >142.7K
- ets.org
- Compare >131.5K
- sciencedaily.com
- Compare >112.2K
- mylife.com
- Compare >104.7K
- easybib.com
- Compare >91.1K
- mathplayground.com
- Compare >90.4K
- familyeducation.com
- Compare >63.5K
- 123helpme.com
- Compare >43.9K
- enchantedlearning.com
- Compare >21.6K
- eslcafe.com
- Compare >9.6K
- 4tests.com
- Compare >8.8K
- blurtit.com
- Compare >3.4K
- kusd.edu
- Compare >1.6K
- echalk.com
- Compare >823
- tigweb.org
- Compare >322
- whyville.net
- Compare >88
Last update was 238 days ago
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...
*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with reviewing.co.uk in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.
▼
SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.- Domain:
- reviewing.co.uk
- Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic) - 2,148,588
- Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP) - 270
- Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results) - 265
- Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords) - $367.00
Revenue report ▼
Google.com would generate approximately $0.4 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $11.4 and annual gross revenue of approximately $138.7. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $425.7.How much would reviewing.co.uk make?
- Daily Revenue:
- $0.38
- Monthly Revenue:
- $11.40
- Yearly Revenue:
- $138.70
Daily earning by country
- CountryPageviewsEarning
- United States 8$0.04
- New Zealand 4$0.02
- Viet Nam 6$0.00
- Somalia 4$0.00
- Indonesia 5$0.00
Loss of money due to Adblock?
- Daily Revenue Loss:
- $0.01
- Monthly Revenue Loss:
- $0.38
- Yearly Revenue Loss:
- $4.56
- Daily Pageviews Blocked:
- 6
- Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
- 166
- Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
- 2,021
Daily revenue loss by country
- CountryBlockedLost Money
- United States 1$0.01
- New Zealand 1$0.00
- Indonesia 3$0.00
- Viet Nam 0$0.00
- Somalia 0$0.00
How much is reviewing.co.uk worth?
- Website Value:
- $425.7
Ad Experience Report ▼
Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.Mobile summary
- Root domain:
- reviewing.co.uk
- Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.) - Off
- Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.) - Not reviewed
Desktop summary
- Root domain:
- reviewing.co.uk
- Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.) - Off
- Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.) - Not reviewed
Abusive Experience Report ▼
Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.- Root domain:
- reviewing.co.uk
- Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.) - Off
- Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.) - Not reviewed
Where is reviewing.co.uk hosted? ▼
Reviewing.co.uk may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.- Server IP:
- 92.205.12.5
- ASN:
- AS21499
- ISP:
- internet24 GmbH
- Server Location:
- Strasbourg
Bas-Rhin, 67
France, FR
Other sites hosted on 92.205.12.5
How fast does reviewing.co.uk load? ▼
The average loading time of reviewing.co.uk is 443 ms. The Desktop speed index is 100 and mobile speed index is 100.- Average Load Time:
- 443 ms
Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop
Field Data
Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.
Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms
Time To First Byte (TTFB)524ms
First Contentful Paint (FCP)741ms
First Input Delay (FID)3ms
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)40ms
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)792ms
Origin Data
All pages served from this origin have an FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.
Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms
Time To First Byte (TTFB)524ms
First Contentful Paint (FCP)741ms
First Input Delay (FID)3ms
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)40ms
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)792ms
Lab Data
Time to Interactive 0.4 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Speed Index 0.6 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
First Meaningful Paint 0.3 s
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Largest Contentful Paint 0.5 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Max Potential First Input Delay 20 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Does not have a `<meta name="viewport">` tag with `width` or `initial-scale`
A `<meta name="viewport">` not only optimizes your app for mobile screen sizes, but also prevents . a 300 millisecond delay to user input Learn more about using the viewport meta tag
A `<meta name="viewport">` not only optimizes your app for mobile screen sizes, but also prevents . a 300 millisecond delay to user input Learn more about using the viewport meta tag
First Contentful Paint 0.3 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Lazy load third-party resources with facades
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile
Field Data
Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.
Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.1s
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.6s
First Input Delay (FID)0
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)115ms
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.6s
Origin Data
All pages served from this origin have an AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.
Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.1s
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.6s
First Input Delay (FID)0
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)115ms
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.6s
Lab Data
Total Blocking Time 10 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Max Potential First Input Delay 70 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Time to Interactive 1.4 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Lazy load third-party resources with facades
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
First Meaningful Paint 1.3 s
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Speed Index 1.5 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Largest Contentful Paint 1.7 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
First Contentful Paint 1.3 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Does not have a `<meta name="viewport">` tag with `width` or `initial-scale`
A `<meta name="viewport">` not only optimizes your app for mobile screen sizes, but also prevents . a 300 millisecond delay to user input Learn more about using the viewport meta tag
A `<meta name="viewport">` not only optimizes your app for mobile screen sizes, but also prevents . a 300 millisecond delay to user input Learn more about using the viewport meta tag
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Does reviewing.co.uk use compression? ▼
Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on reviewing.co.uk are reduced by 79%.
reviewing.co.uk use br compression.
Original size: 55.99 KB
Compressed size: 11.42 KB
File reduced by: 44.57 KB (79%)
Compressed size: 11.42 KB
File reduced by: 44.57 KB (79%)
Google Safe Browsing ▼
Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious
MyWot.com Reputation Ratings
MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites. reviewing.co.uk has 62 Safety Reputations.- Status:
- SAFE
- Safety Reputations:
- 62
- Safety Confidence:
- 4
SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify ▼
An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. reviewing.co.uk supports HTTPS. reviewing.co.uk supports HTTPS
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: reviewing.co.uk
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: Starfield Secure Certificate Authority - G2
Valid from: Jul 6 09:16:40 2023 GMT
Valid until: Jul 12 19:44:59 2024 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: Starfield Secure Certificate Authority - G2
Valid from: Jul 6 09:16:40 2023 GMT
Valid until: Jul 12 19:44:59 2024 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Common Name: Starfield Secure Certificate Authority - G2
Organization: "Starfield Technologies, Inc.", OU = http://certs.starfieldtech.com/repository/
Location: Scottsdale, Arizona, US
Issuer: Starfield Root Certificate Authority - G2
Valid from: May 3 07:00:00 2011 GMT
Valid until: May 3 07:00:00 2031 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Organization: "Starfield Technologies, Inc.", OU = http://certs.starfieldtech.com/repository/
Location: Scottsdale, Arizona, US
Issuer: Starfield Root Certificate Authority - G2
Valid from: May 3 07:00:00 2011 GMT
Valid until: May 3 07:00:00 2031 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Verify HTTP/2 Support ▼
HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency. reviewing.co.uk supports HTTP/2
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...
Http Header ▼
HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server.last-modified: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 13:35:01 GMT
etag: "586172b-dff1-5aba8bd386b40-br"
accept-ranges: bytes
vary: Accept-Encoding
content-encoding: br
content-length: 11693
content-type: text/html
date: Thu, 25 Jul 2024 10:27:33 GMT
server: Apache
DNS Lookup ▼
DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.Type | Ip | Target/Txt | TTL |
TXT | 3600 | ||
TXT | 3600 | ||
TXT | 3600 | ||
MX | 3600 | ||
MX | 3600 | ||
SOA | 3600 | ||
Mname | ns67.domaincontrol.com | ||
Rname | dns.jomax.net | ||
Serial Number | 2024071500 | ||
Refresh | 28800 | ||
Retry | 7200 | ||
Expire | 604800 | ||
Minimum TTL | 600 | ||
A | 92.205.12.5 | 8547 | |
NS | 3600 | ||
NS | 3600 |
Whois Lookup ▼
Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information. Domain registration for this website began on December 19, 1998 and will expire on December 19, 2025 if not renewed. This website is now assigned through the registrar 123-Reg Limited t/a 123-reg [Tag = 123-REG]. The WHOIS data for this website's domain was last updated on March 17, 2024.- Domain Created:
- 1998-12-19
- Domain Expires:
- 2025-12-19
- Domain Updated:
- 2024-03-17
- Domain Age:
- 26 years 3 months 2 days
- Domain Registrar:
- 123-Reg Limited t/a 123-reg [Tag = 123-REG]
- WhoIs:
Domain name: reviewing.co.uk Data validation: Nominet was able to match the registrant's name and address against a 3rd party data source on 08-Jan-2024 Registrar: 123-Reg Limited t/a 123-reg [Tag = 123-REG] URL: https://www.123-reg.co.uk Relevant dates: Registered on: 19-Dec-1998 Expiry date: 19-Dec-2025 Last updated: 17-Mar-2024 Registration status: Registered until expiry date. Name servers: ns67.domaincontrol.com ns68.domaincontrol.com WHOIS lookup made at 11:28:22 25-Jul-2024 -- This WHOIS information is provided for free by Nominet UK the central registry for .uk domain names. This information and the .uk WHOIS are: Copyright Nominet UK 1996 - 2024. You may not access the .uk WHOIS or use any data from it except as permitted by the terms of use available in full at https://www.nominet.uk/whoisterms, which includes restrictions on: (A) use of the data for advertising, or its repackaging, recompilation, redistribution or reuse (B) obscuring, removing or hiding any or all of this notice and (C) exceeding query rate or volume limits. The data is provided on an 'as-is' basis and may lag behind the register. Access may be withdrawn or restricted at any time.