remem.me Remem.me

   
Remember Me. Bible Memory Joy - The Bible Memorization App

Domain Summary

What is the traffic rank for Remem.me?

• Remem.me ranks #572,603 globally on HypeStat.

What percent of global Internet users visit Remem.me?

• 3.02E-5% of global Internet users visit Remem.me

How many people visit Remem.me each day?

• Remem.me receives approximately 1.5K visitors and 7,517 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Remem.me receive most of its visitors from?

• Remem.me is mostly visited by people located in United States,Germany,Mexico.

How much Remem.me can earn?

• Remem.me should earn about $24.65/day from advertising revenue.

What is Remem.me estimated value?

• Estimated value of Remem.me is $25,073.44.

What IP addresses does Remem.me resolve to?

• Remem.me resolves to the IP addresses 2a00:b6e0:1:20:17::1, 185.31.40.26.

Where are Remem.me servers located in?

• Remem.me has servers located in France.

remem.me Profile

Title:Remember Me. Bible Memory Joy - The Bible Memorization App Description:Join over two million users who have discovered the joy of Bible memorization with Remember Me, the leading Bible memory app. Dive into a faith-building experience featuring games, audio, and images designed to help you learn God's Word by heart. This free Bible memorization app allows you to memorize Scripture from any Bible translation easily. Remember Me's smart review system ensures you retain your Bible memory verses for life.
Tags:
bible flashcards
bible verse memorization
biblical app
bible memory verses
bible memory
bible memorize
memory verses
bible memory app
bible study
scripture memory
memorize scripture
bible memorization
Category:Community and Society / Faith and Beliefs
Edit Site Info

What technologies does remem.me use?

These are the technologies used at remem.me. remem.me has a total of 4 technologies installed in 4 different categories.
Web Servers
Apache HTTP Server Apache HTTP Server
Analytics
Google Analytics Google Analytics
Miscellaneous
Open Graph Open Graph
Video Players
YouTube YouTube

remem.me Traffic Analysis

Remem.me is ranked #572,603 in the world. This website is viewed by an estimated 1.5K visitors daily, generating a total of 7.5K pageviews. This equates to about 45.1K monthly visitors. Remem.me traffic has decreased by 47.44% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors1.5K
16.9%
Monthly Visits45.1K
47.44%
Pages per Visit5.05
49.55%
Visit duration02:02
84.98%
Bounce Rate42.28%
12.01%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
1,487
Monthly Visits:
45,056
Pages per Visit:
5.05
Daily Pageviews:
7,517
Avg. visit duration:
02:02
Bounce rate:
42.28%
Global Reach:
3.02E-5%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
20,924
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
3,634
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
44,182
HypeRank:
572,603
SEMrush Rank:
2,096,550
SimilarWeb Rank:
572,603
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
85.39%
Referral:
12.86%
Search:
1.75%
Social:
0%
Paid:
0%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
96.95%
Mobile:
3.05%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

27K
JAN
85.7K
FEB
45.1K
MAR

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
United States 50.10%
 
Germany 17.09%
 
Mexico 8.76%
 
Korea, Republic of 7.10%
 
Brazil 5.05%

Which sites are competitors to remem.me?

Websites similar to remem.me are sites similar on user interests and browsing behavior. Users can discover new websites that are similar to the ones they already enjoy or find useful.
Last update was 46 days ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with remem.me in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

Search Engine Indexes ▼

Search engine indexes are huge databases or collections of net pages that search engines like google like google and yahoo use to retrieve applicable facts while customers carry out searches. These indexes are created through search engines like google and yahoo through crawling and indexing net pages from throughout the internet.
Google Index:
3,470

  ▼

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  remem.me
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  2,096,550
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  366
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  310
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $64.00
Full SEMrush Report >>

Revenue report ▼

Google.com would generate approximately $24.7 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $739.5 and annual gross revenue of approximately $9K. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $25.1K.

How much would remem.me make?

Daily Revenue:
$24.65
Monthly Revenue:
$739.50
Yearly Revenue:
$8,997.25
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
United States 3,766$18.19
 
Germany 1,284$1.80
 
Brazil 380$0.51
 
Korea, Republic of 533$0.32
 
Mexico 659$0.18

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$3.86
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$115.67
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$1,407.29
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
1,154
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
34,614
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
421,142

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
United States 678$3.27
 
Germany 372$0.52
 
Brazil 23$0.03
 
Mexico 59$0.02
 
Korea, Republic of 21$0.01

How much is remem.me worth?

Website Value:
$25.1K

Ad Experience Report ▼

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
remem.me
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
remem.me
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report ▼

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
remem.me
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is remem.me hosted? ▼

Remem.me may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
2a00:b6e0:1:20:17::1, 185.31.40.26
ASN:
AS60362 
ISP:
Alwaysdata Sarl 
Server Location:

France, FR
 

Other sites hosted on 185.31.40.26

How fast does remem.me load? ▼

The average loading time of remem.me is 883 ms. The Desktop speed index is 79 and mobile speed index is 62.
Average Load Time:
883 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

79
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 98% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 1%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.2s 55% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 55% 36% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 36% 7% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 7%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)2.3s 63% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 63% 25% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 25% 10% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 10%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.3s 80% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 80% 16% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 16% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 3%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)1ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 98% 1% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 1% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.0s 66% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 66% 27% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 27% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 5%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.9s 73% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 73% 19% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 19% 7% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 7%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)57ms 93% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 93% 2% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 2% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 3%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.1s 84% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 84% 12% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 12% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 3%

Lab Data

Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Time to Interactive 3.2 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Speed Index 2.5 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Max Potential First Input Delay 200 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Largest Contentful Paint 1.3 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
First Contentful Paint 0.8 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Total Blocking Time 280 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

62
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)2ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 95% 3% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 3% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 1%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)839ms 55% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 71% 22% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 22% 6% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 6%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.5s 63% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 79% 13% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 13% 6% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 6%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.1s 80% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 78% 16% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 16% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 4%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 93% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 93% 4% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 4% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 2%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)749ms 76% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 76% 20% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 20% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 3%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.4s 84% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 84% 11% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 11% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 4%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)119ms 85% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.2s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 85% 10% of loads for this page have an average (0.2s ~ 0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 10% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 4%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.0s 89% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 89% 7% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 7% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2%

Lab Data

Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Largest Contentful Paint 9.5 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Time to Interactive 15.8 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Max Potential First Input Delay 170 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Total Blocking Time 190 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
First Contentful Paint 2.5 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Speed Index 7.0 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric

Does remem.me use compression? ▼

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on remem.me are reduced by 73%.
remem.me use br compression.
Original size: 19.46 KB
Compressed size: 5.22 KB
File reduced by: 14.23 KB (73%)

Google Safe Browsing ▼

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites. remem.me has 61 Safety Reputations.
Status:
  SAFE
Safety Reputations:
  61
Safety Confidence:
  2

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify ▼

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. remem.me supports HTTPS.
 remem.me supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: www.remem.me
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: R11
Valid from: Apr 20 06:38:33 2025 GMT
Valid until: Jul 19 06:38:32 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Common Name: R11
Organization: Let's Encrypt
Location: US
Issuer: ISRG Root X1
Valid from: Mar 13 00:00:00 2024 GMT
Valid until: Mar 12 23:59:59 2027 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 2048 Bits

Verify HTTP/2 Support ▼

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 remem.me supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header ▼

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server. 
date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 08:16:02 GMT
server: Apache
location: https://www.remem.me
content-type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
via: 2.0 alproxy
content-length: 228

HTTP/2 200 
date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 08:16:03 GMT
server: Apache
last-modified: Sat, 29 Mar 2025 10:30:32 GMT
etag: "4dd3-63178ad348200-br"
accept-ranges: bytes
vary: Accept-Encoding
content-encoding: br
content-type: text/html
via: 2.0 alproxy
content-length: 5348

DNS Lookup ▼

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
SOA 300
Mname dns1.alwaysdata.com
Rname hostmaster.alwaysdata.com
Serial Number 1739440765
Refresh 3600
Retry 900
Expire 1209600
Minimum TTL 300
MX mx1.alwaysdata.com 300
MX mx2.alwaysdata.com 300
TXT v=spf1 include:_spf.alwaysdata.com ~all 300
TXT google-site-verification=Z7aon_dH2tqhw83b62e-iLJ9sDsZ7fD2dr9jOT-UJII 300
TXT google-site-verification=2sQdthA0IUteolQbsYmysJCemRl0MW3H27s5JUkWvVM 300
TXT google-site-verification=18CNH8OSa9zYBQhpuqr5GJ7LvN8WeS6AFvBzsLt2fpA 300
TXT google-site-verification=Y5yygTg4qbMsfzO58pPeXEvrHGGZN90PnD22Xmq88oQ 300
AAAA 2a00:b6e0:1:20:17::1 2
A 185.31.40.26 2
NS dns1.alwaysdata.com 300
NS dns2.alwaysdata.com 300

Whois Lookup ▼

Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information. Domain registration for this website began on October 2, 2013 and will expire on October 2, 2025 if not renewed. This website is now assigned through the registrar Gandi SAS. The WHOIS data for this website's domain was last updated on August 24, 2024.
Domain Created:
2013-10-02
Domain Expires:
2025-10-02
Domain Updated:
2024-08-24
Domain Age:
11 years 8 months 13 days
Domain Registrar:
Gandi SAS
Domain Owner:
REDACTED
WhoIs:
 

Domain Name: remem.me
Registry Domain ID: 224effc035c040318c3a95013e9d9048-DONUTS
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.gandi.net
Registrar URL: https://www.gandi.net
Updated Date: 2024-08-24T06:30:03Z
Creation Date: 2013-10-02T21:05:54Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2025-10-02T21:05:54Z
Registrar: Gandi SAS
Registrar IANA ID: 81
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: email
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +33.170377661
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Registry Registrant ID: REDACTED
Registrant Name: REDACTED
Registrant Organization: 
Registrant Street: REDACTED
Registrant City: REDACTED
Registrant State/Province: 
Registrant Postal Code: REDACTED
Registrant Country: CH
Registrant Phone: REDACTED
Registrant Phone Ext: REDACTED
Registrant Fax: REDACTED
Registrant Fax Ext: REDACTED
Registrant Email: REDACTED
Registry Admin ID: REDACTED
Admin Name: REDACTED
Admin Organization: REDACTED
Admin Street: REDACTED
Admin City: REDACTED
Admin State/Province: REDACTED
Admin Postal Code: REDACTED
Admin Country: REDACTED
Admin Phone: REDACTED
Admin Phone Ext: REDACTED
Admin Fax: REDACTED
Admin Fax Ext: REDACTED
Admin Email: REDACTED
Registry Tech ID: REDACTED
Tech Name: REDACTED
Tech Organization: REDACTED
Tech Street: REDACTED
Tech City: REDACTED
Tech State/Province: REDACTED
Tech Postal Code: REDACTED
Tech Country: REDACTED
Tech Phone: REDACTED
Tech Phone Ext: REDACTED
Tech Fax: REDACTED
Tech Fax Ext: REDACTED
Tech Email: REDACTED
Name Server: dns2.alwaysdata.com
Name Server: dns1.alwaysdata.com
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form: https://icann.org/wicf/
>>> Last update of WHOIS database: 2025-04-30T08:16:58Z