redmagic.com.co Redmagic.com.co

   
429 Too Many Requests

Domain Summary

What is the traffic rank for Redmagic.com.co?

• Redmagic.com.co ranks #841,998 globally on HypeStat.

What percent of global Internet users visit Redmagic.com.co?

1.96E-5% of global Internet users visit Redmagic.com.co

How many people visit Redmagic.com.co each day?

• Redmagic.com.co receives approximately 1K visitors and 2,874 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Redmagic.com.co receive most of its visitors from?

• Redmagic.com.co is mostly visited by people located in Colombia.

How much Redmagic.com.co can earn?

• Redmagic.com.co should earn about $1.98/day from advertising revenue.

What is Redmagic.com.co estimated value?

• Estimated value of Redmagic.com.co is $1,950.24.

What IP addresses does Redmagic.com.co resolve to?

• Redmagic.com.co resolves to the IP addresses 2607:f1c0:100f:f000::28a, 74.208.236.189.

Where are Redmagic.com.co servers located in?

• Redmagic.com.co has servers located in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19103, United States.

redmagic.com.co Profile

Title:429 Too Many Requests Description:el nuevo redmagic 9 pro ya casi está aquí. ¿estás listo para ver cómo redmagic está reinventando los juegos móviles haciéndolos más rápidos, más fuertes y mejores?
Category:Computers Electronics and Technology / Social Media Networks

redmagic.com.co Traffic Analysis

Redmagic.com.co is ranked #841,998 in the world. This website is viewed by an estimated 1K visitors daily, generating a total of 2.9K pageviews. This equates to about 29.3K monthly visitors. Redmagic.com.co traffic has decreased by 25.1% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors1K
4.88%
Monthly Visits29.3K
25.1%
Pages per Visit2.97
17.65%
Visit duration02:00
12.99%
Bounce Rate37.36%
19.96%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
967
Monthly Visits:
29,300
Pages per Visit:
2.97
Daily Pageviews:
2,874
Avg. visit duration:
02:00
Bounce rate:
37.36%
Global Reach:
1.96E-5%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
82,642
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
63,987
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
28,731
HypeRank:
841,998
SEMrush Rank:
8,495,370
SimilarWeb Rank:
841,998
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
65.22%
Referral:
0.26%
Search:
34.52%
Social:
0%
Paid:
0%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
8.33%
Mobile:
91.67%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

27.7K
DEC
39.1K
JAN
29.3K
FEB

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
Colombia 100.00%

Which sites are competitors to redmagic.com.co?

Websites similar to redmagic.com.co are sites similar on user interests and browsing behavior. Users can discover new websites that are similar to the ones they already enjoy or find useful.
Last update was 74 days ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with redmagic.com.co in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

 

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  redmagic.com.co
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  8,495,370
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  481
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  6
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $1.00

Revenue report

Google.com would generate approximately $2 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $59.4 and annual gross revenue of approximately $722.7. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $2K.

How much would redmagic.com.co make?

Daily Revenue:
$1.98
Monthly Revenue:
$59.40
Yearly Revenue:
$722.70
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
Colombia 2,874$1.98

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$0.16
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$4.76
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$57.91
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
230
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
6,898
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
83,921

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
Colombia 230$0.16

How much is redmagic.com.co worth?

Website Value:
$2K

Ad Experience Report

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
redmagic.com.co
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
redmagic.com.co
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
redmagic.com.co
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is redmagic.com.co hosted?

Redmagic.com.co may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
2607:f1c0:100f:f000::28a, 74.208.236.189
ASN:
AS8560 
ISP:
1&1 Internet SE 
Server Location:
Philadelphia
Pennsylvania, PA
19103
United States, US
 

Other sites hosted on 74.208.236.189

How fast does redmagic.com.co load?

The average loading time of redmagic.com.co is 69 ms. The Desktop speed index is 100 and mobile speed index is 100.
Average Load Time:
69 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

100
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a SLOW speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)10ms 67% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 67% 31% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 31% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)3.3s 19% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 19% 22% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 22% 58% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 58%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)5.3s 20% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 20% 19% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 19% 60% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 60%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)33ms 93% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 93% 2% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 2% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 4%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)6.2s 23% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 23% 26% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 26% 49% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 49%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an SLOW speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)6ms 79% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 79% 19% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 19% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)2.7s 30% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 30% 27% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 27% 41% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 41%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)4.6s 30% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 30% 18% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 18% 51% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 51%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)55ms 91% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 91% 4% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 4% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 4%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)5.5s 28% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 28% 27% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 27% 44% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 44%

Lab Data

Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Largest Contentful Paint 0.2 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Minimize third-party usage  
Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading. Learn how to minimize third-party impact
Max Potential First Input Delay 20 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
First Contentful Paint 0.2 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Speed Index 0.2 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Render blocking requests  
Requests are blocking the page's initial render, which may delay LCP. can move these network requests out of the critical path. Deferring or inlining
Time to Interactive 0.2 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Third parties  
Third party code can significantly impact load performance. to prioritize your page's content. Reduce and defer loading of third party code
Does not have a `<meta name="viewport">` tag with `width` or `initial-scale`  
A `<meta name="viewport">` not only optimizes your app for mobile screen sizes, but also prevents . a 300 millisecond delay to user input Learn more about using the viewport meta tag
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

100
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a SLOW speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)3ms 67% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 98% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)3.7s 19% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 14% 16% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 16% 68% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 68%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)6.7s 20% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 25% 8% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 8% 66% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 66%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)111ms 93% of loads for this page have a fast (<200s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 89% 4% of loads for this page have an average (200s ~ 500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 4% 6% of loads for this page have a slow (>500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 6%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)7.1s 23% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 30% 14% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 14% 55% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 55%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an SLOW speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)3ms 85% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 85% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 13% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 13%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)3.1s 28% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 28% 20% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 20% 51% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 51%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)5.8s 29% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 29% 9% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 9% 60% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 60%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)162ms 79% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.2s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 79% 11% of loads for this page have an average (0.2s ~ 0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 11% 8% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 8%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)6.5s 28% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 28% 18% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 18% 53% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 53%

Lab Data

Does not have a `<meta name="viewport">` tag with `width` or `initial-scale`  
A `<meta name="viewport">` not only optimizes your app for mobile screen sizes, but also prevents . a 300 millisecond delay to user input Learn more about using the viewport meta tag
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Render blocking requests  
Requests are blocking the page's initial render, which may delay LCP. can move these network requests out of the critical path. Deferring or inlining
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Minimize third-party usage  
Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading. Learn how to minimize third-party impact
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Largest Contentful Paint 0.8 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Third parties  
Third party code can significantly impact load performance. to prioritize your page's content. Reduce and defer loading of third party code
First Contentful Paint 0.8 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Time to Interactive 0.8 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Speed Index 0.8 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Max Potential First Input Delay 20 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs

Does redmagic.com.co use compression?

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on redmagic.com.co are reduced by %.
redmagic.com.co does not use compression.
Original size: 227 B
Compressed size: n/a
File reduced by: (%)

Google Safe Browsing

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites.
Status:
  UNKNOWN

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. redmagic.com.co supports HTTPS.
 redmagic.com.co supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: *.redmagic.com.co
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: Encryption Everywhere DV TLS CA - G2
Valid from: Jun 24 00:00:00 2024 GMT
Valid until: Jul 7 23:59:59 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Common Name: Encryption Everywhere DV TLS CA - G2
Organization: DigiCert Inc, OU = www.digicert.com
Location: US
Issuer: DigiCert Global Root G2
Valid from: Nov 27 12:46:40 2017 GMT
Valid until: Nov 27 12:46:40 2027 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 2048 Bits

Verify HTTP/2 Support

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 redmagic.com.co supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server.
content-type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
content-length: 227
x-ws-ratelimit-limit: 1000
x-ws-ratelimit-remaining: 998
date: Mon, 31 Mar 2025 12:27:41 GMT
server: Apache

DNS Lookup

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
SOA 86400
Mname ns1045.ui-dns.com
Rname hostmaster.1und1.com
Serial Number 2017060121
Refresh 28800
Retry 7200
Expire 604800
Minimum TTL 600
TXT google-site-verification=JefaL448rTuWaKNyGtQGI9_1vXxy0NBiQ2jB4N3rVGY 3600
TXT v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all 3600
MX alt4.aspmx.l.google.com 3600
MX alt2.aspmx.l.google.com 3600
MX aspmx.l.google.com 3600
MX alt1.aspmx.l.google.com 3600
MX alt3.aspmx.l.google.com 3600
AAAA 2607:f1c0:100f:f000::28a 3319
A 74.208.236.189 3319
NS ns1045.ui-dns.org 3319
NS ns1045.ui-dns.de 3319
NS ns1045.ui-dns.biz 3319
NS ns1045.ui-dns.com 3319

Whois Lookup

Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information. Domain registration for this website began on April 23, 2020 and will expire on April 23, 2025 if not renewed. This website is now assigned through the registrar Mi.com.co. The WHOIS data for this website's domain was last updated on April 21, 2024.
Domain Created:
2020-04-23
Domain Expires:
2025-04-23
Domain Updated:
2024-04-21
Domain Age:
5 years 1 months 21 days
Domain Registrar:
Mi.com.co
Domain Owner:
REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
WhoIs:
 

Domain Name: redmagic.com.co
Registry Domain ID: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrar WHOIS Server: Whois.mi.com.co
Registrar URL: www.mi.com.co
Updated Date: 2024-04-21T15:32:44Z
Creation Date: 2020-04-23T14:22:26Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2025-04-23T14:22:26Z
Registrar: Mi.com.co
Registrar IANA ID: 21607
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: email
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +57.3162928048
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Registry Registrant ID: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrant Name: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrant Organization: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrant Street: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrant Street: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrant Street: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrant City: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrant State/Province: DC
Registrant Postal Code: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrant Country: CO
Registrant Phone: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrant Phone Ext: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrant Fax: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrant Fax Ext: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrant Email: Please query the RDDS service of the Registrar of Record identified in this output for information on how to contact the Registrant, Admin, or Tech contact of the queried domain name.
Registry Admin ID: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Name: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Organization: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Street: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Street: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Street: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin City: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin State/Province: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Postal Code: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Country: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Phone: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Phone Ext: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Fax: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Fax Ext: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Email: Please query the RDDS service of the Registrar of Record identified in this output for information on how to contact the Registrant, Admin, or Tech contact of the queried domain name.
Registry Tech ID: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Name: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Organization: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Street: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Street: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Street: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech City: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech State/Province: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Postal Code: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Country: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Phone: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Phone Ext: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Fax: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Fax Ext: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Email: Please query the RDDS service of the Registrar of Record identified in this output for information on how to contact the Registrant, Admin, or Tech contact of the queried domain name.
Name Server: ns1045.ui-dns.com
Name Server: ns1045.ui-dns.biz
Name Server: ns1045.ui-dns.org
Name Server: ns1045.ui-dns.de
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form: https://www.icann.org/wicf/
>>> Last update of WHOIS database: 2025-03-31T12:28:22Z