razentl.com Razentl.com

   
WordPress › Error

Domain Summary

What is the traffic rank for Razentl.com?

• Razentl.com ranks #305,775 globally on HypeStat.

What percent of global Internet users visit Razentl.com?

• 5.9E-5% of global Internet users visit Razentl.com

How many people visit Razentl.com each day?

• Razentl.com receives approximately 2.9K visitors and 19,727 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Razentl.com receive most of its visitors from?

• Razentl.com is mostly visited by people located in France,United States,Belgium.

How much Razentl.com can earn?

• Razentl.com should earn about $35.40/day from advertising revenue.

What is Razentl.com estimated value?

• Estimated value of Razentl.com is $38,057.54.

What IP addresses does Razentl.com resolve to?

• Razentl.com resolves to the IP addresses 2602:faa9:3005:989:177c:3965:a55d:f59a, 193.108.130.12.

Where are Razentl.com servers located in?

• Razentl.com has servers located in Luxembourg.

razentl.com Profile

Title:WordPress › Error Description:Read Blossom Translation translated chapters. Only at Blossom Translation - BlossomTL. Black Corporation Joseon, Children of the Holy Emperor, Margrave's *** Son was the Emperor, Beacon of Light in the Dark Sea
Edit Site Info

razentl.com Traffic Analysis

Razentl.com is ranked #305,775 in the world. This website is viewed by an estimated 2.9K visitors daily, generating a total of 19.7K pageviews. This equates to about 88.1K monthly visitors. Razentl.com traffic has decreased by 30.36% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors2.9K
8.24%
Monthly Visits88.1K
30.36%
Pages per Visit6.78
165.69%
Visit duration21:58
67.21%
Bounce Rate39.08%
64.83%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
2,908
Monthly Visits:
88,112
Pages per Visit:
6.78
Daily Pageviews:
19,727
Avg. visit duration:
21:58
Bounce rate:
39.08%
Global Reach:
5.9E-5%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
231,384
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
54,845
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
86,370
HypeRank:
305,775
SEMrush Rank:
4,122,935
SimilarWeb Rank:
305,775
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
82.77%
Referral:
1.85%
Search:
15.31%
Social:
0.06%
Paid:
0%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
4.20%
Mobile:
95.80%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

880.2K
DEC
126.5K
JAN
88.1K
FEB

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
France 57.57%
 
United States 29.02%
 
Belgium 9.97%
 
Indonesia 3.44%
Last update was 105 days ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with razentl.com in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

  ▼

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  razentl.com
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  4,122,935
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  5
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  72
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $0.00
Full SEMrush Report >>

Revenue report ▼

Google.com would generate approximately $35.4 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $1.1K and annual gross revenue of approximately $12.9K. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $38.1K.

How much would razentl.com make?

Daily Revenue:
$35.40
Monthly Revenue:
$1,062.00
Yearly Revenue:
$12,921.00
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
United States 5,725$27.65
 
France 11,357$6.59
 
Belgium 1,967$1.08
 
Indonesia 678$0.07

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$5.87
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$176.25
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$2,144.35
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
2,909
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
87,271
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
1,061,802

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
United States 1,030$4.98
 
France 1,249$0.72
 
Belgium 236$0.13
 
Indonesia 393$0.04

How much is razentl.com worth?

Website Value:
$38.1K

Ad Experience Report ▼

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
razentl.com
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
razentl.com
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report ▼

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
razentl.com
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is razentl.com hosted? ▼

Razentl.com may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
2602:faa9:3005:989:177c:3965:a55d:f59a, 193.108.130.12
ASN:
AS53667 
ISP:
FranTech Solutions 
Server Location:

Luxembourg, LU
 

Other sites hosted on 193.108.130.12

How fast does razentl.com load? ▼

The average loading time of razentl.com is 590 ms. The Desktop speed index is 100 and mobile speed index is 100.
Average Load Time:
590 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

100
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 96% 1% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 1% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 2%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.2s 32% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 32% 60% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 60% 6% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 6%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.7s 79% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 79% 16% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 16% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 4%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)49ms 94% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 94% 2% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 2% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 2%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.7s 90% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 90% 6% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 6% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 96% 1% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 1% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 2%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.2s 32% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 32% 60% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 60% 6% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 6%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.7s 79% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 79% 16% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 16% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 4%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)49ms 94% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 94% 2% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 2% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 2%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.7s 90% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 90% 6% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 6% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2%

Lab Data

Time to Interactive 0.2 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Minimize third-party usage  
Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading. Learn how to minimize third-party impact
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Largest Contentful Paint 0.2 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Third parties  
Third party code can significantly impact load performance. to prioritize your page's content. Reduce and defer loading of third party code
Max Potential First Input Delay 20 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Render blocking requests  
Requests are blocking the page's initial render, which may delay LCP. can move these network requests out of the critical path. Deferring or inlining
Speed Index 0.3 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
First Contentful Paint 0.2 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

100
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.7s 32% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 28% 50% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 50% 20% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 20%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)2.3s 79% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 50% 37% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 37% 12% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 12%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)122ms 94% of loads for this page have a fast (<200s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 87% 9% of loads for this page have an average (200s ~ 500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 9% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 2%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.6s 90% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 72% 14% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 14% 13% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 13%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 91% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 91% 4% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 4% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 4%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.3s 23% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 23% 64% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 64% 12% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 12%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.9s 70% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 70% 21% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 21% 8% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 8%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)135ms 87% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.2s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 87% 8% of loads for this page have an average (0.2s ~ 0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 8% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 4%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.0s 84% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 84% 10% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 10% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 4%

Lab Data

Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Render blocking requests  
Requests are blocking the page's initial render, which may delay LCP. can move these network requests out of the critical path. Deferring or inlining
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
First Contentful Paint 0.8 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Time to Interactive 0.8 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Minimize third-party usage  
Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading. Learn how to minimize third-party impact
Max Potential First Input Delay 20 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Third parties  
Third party code can significantly impact load performance. to prioritize your page's content. Reduce and defer loading of third party code
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Largest Contentful Paint 0.8 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Speed Index 1.8 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric

Does razentl.com use compression? ▼

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on razentl.com are reduced by 57%.
razentl.com use gzip compression.
Original size: 2.48 KB
Compressed size: 1.06 KB
File reduced by: 1.42 KB (57%)

Google Safe Browsing ▼

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites. razentl.com has 80 Safety Reputations.
Status:
  SAFE
Safety Reputations:
  80
Safety Confidence:
  51

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify ▼

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. razentl.com supports HTTPS.
 razentl.com supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: *.razentl.com
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: R11
Valid from: Feb 6 15:36:37 2025 GMT
Valid until: May 7 15:36:36 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Common Name: R11
Organization: Let's Encrypt
Location: US
Issuer: ISRG Root X1
Valid from: Mar 13 00:00:00 2024 GMT
Valid until: Mar 12 23:59:59 2027 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 2048 Bits

Verify HTTP/2 Support ▼

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 razentl.com supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header ▼

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server. 
x-powered-by: PHP/8.2.27
set-cookie: PHPSESSID=9vtqgkhgpa55s20d3kh8akf7si; path=/; secure
pragma: no-cache
link: <https://razentl.com/wp-json/>; rel="https://api.w.org/"
link: <https://razentl.com/wp-json/wp/v2/pages/37>; rel="alternate"; title="JSON"; type="application/json"
link: <https://razentl.com/>; rel=shortlink
content-type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
expires: Wed, 11 Jan 1984 05:00:00 GMT
cache-control: no-cache, must-revalidate, max-age=0
x-litespeed-cache: miss
content-length: 1083
content-encoding: gzip
vary: Accept-Encoding
date: Mon, 31 Mar 2025 11:38:42 GMT
server: LiteSpeed
alt-svc: h3=":443"; ma=2592000, h3-29=":443"; ma=2592000, h3-Q050=":443"; ma=2592000, h3-Q046=":443"; ma=2592000, h3-Q043=":443"; ma=2592000, quic=":443"; ma=2592000; v="43,46"

DNS Lookup ▼

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
SOA 86400
Mname ns1.private-nameserver.net
Rname admin.namecrane.net
Serial Number 2025020601
Refresh 3600
Retry 1800
Expire 1209600
Minimum TTL 86400
TXT v=spf1 ip4:193.108.130.12 include:spf.mxyeet.net +a +mx ~all 14400
MX mx2.mxfilter.net 3600
MX mx1.mxfilter.net 3600
MX mx4.mxfilter.net 3600
MX mx3.mxfilter.net 3600
AAAA 2602:faa9:3005:989:177c:3965:a55d:f59a 14117
A 193.108.130.12 14117
NS ns2.private-nameserver.net 86400
NS ns4.private-nameserver.net 86400
NS ns1.private-nameserver.net 86400
NS ns3.private-nameserver.net 86400

Whois Lookup ▼

Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information. Domain registration for this website began on May 27, 2024 and will expire on May 27, 2025 if not renewed. This website is now assigned through the registrar GoDaddy.com, LLC. The WHOIS data for this website's domain was last updated on June 7, 2024.
Domain Created:
2024-05-27
Domain Expires:
2025-05-27
Domain Updated:
2024-06-07
Domain Age:
1 years 1 months 18 days
Domain Registrar:
GoDaddy.com, LLC
WhoIs:
 

   Domain Name: RAZENTL.COM
   Registry Domain ID: 2885008077_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN
   Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.godaddy.com
   Registrar URL: http://www.godaddy.com
   Updated Date: 2024-06-07T05:53:42Z
   Creation Date: 2024-05-27T05:52:56Z
   Registry Expiry Date: 2025-05-27T05:52:56Z
   Registrar: GoDaddy.com, LLC
   Registrar IANA ID: 146
   Registrar Abuse Contact Email: email
   Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: 480-624-2505
   Domain Status: clientDeleteProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientDeleteProhibited
   Domain Status: clientRenewProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientRenewProhibited
   Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
   Domain Status: clientUpdateProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientUpdateProhibited
   Name Server: NS1.PRIVATE-NAMESERVER.NET
   Name Server: NS2.PRIVATE-NAMESERVER.NET
   Name Server: NS3.PRIVATE-NAMESERVER.NET
   Name Server: NS4.PRIVATE-NAMESERVER.NET
   DNSSEC: unsigned
   URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form: https://www.icann.org/wicf/
>>> Last update of whois database: 2025-03-31T11:39:09Z