qo-kun.com Qo-kun.com

   

Domain Summary

What is the traffic rank for Qo-kun.com?

• Qo-kun.com ranks #470,414 globally on HypeStat.

What percent of global Internet users visit Qo-kun.com?

• 4.38E-5% of global Internet users visit Qo-kun.com

How many people visit Qo-kun.com each day?

• Qo-kun.com receives approximately 2.2K visitors and 8,076 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Qo-kun.com receive most of its visitors from?

• Qo-kun.com is mostly visited by people located in Japan.

How much Qo-kun.com can earn?

• Qo-kun.com should earn about $2.91/day from advertising revenue.

What is Qo-kun.com estimated value?

• Estimated value of Qo-kun.com is $2,976.06.

What IP addresses does Qo-kun.com resolve to?

• Qo-kun.com resolves to the IP addresses 13.113.95.103.

Where are Qo-kun.com servers located in?

• Qo-kun.com has servers located in Tokyo, Tokyo, 151-0053, Japan.

qo-kun.com Profile

Category:Arts and Entertainment / Other Arts and Entertainment
Edit Site Info

What technologies does qo-kun.com use?

These are the technologies used at qo-kun.com. qo-kun.com has a total of 5 technologies installed in 5 different categories.
Load balancers
Amazon ALB Amazon ALB
Web Servers
IIS IIS
Web Frameworks
Microsoft ASP.NET Microsoft ASP.NET
PaaS
Amazon Web Services Amazon Web Services
Operating Systems
Windows Server Windows Server

qo-kun.com Traffic Analysis

Qo-kun.com is ranked #470,414 in the world. This website is viewed by an estimated 2.2K visitors daily, generating a total of 8.1K pageviews. This equates to about 65.4K monthly visitors. Qo-kun.com traffic has increased by 138.69% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors2.2K
103.95%
Monthly Visits65.4K
138.69%
Pages per Visit3.74
88.95%
Visit duration08:23
182.96%
Bounce Rate36.48%
26.22%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
2,157
Monthly Visits:
65,357
Pages per Visit:
3.74
Daily Pageviews:
8,076
Avg. visit duration:
08:23
Bounce rate:
36.48%
Global Reach:
4.38E-5%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
89,294
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
53,978
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
64,082
HypeRank:
470,414
SEMrush Rank:
17,764,045
SimilarWeb Rank:
470,414
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
75.04%
Referral:
0.59%
Search:
2.61%
Social:
21.76%
Paid:
0%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
3.74%
Mobile:
96.26%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

98.6K
DEC
27.4K
JAN
65.4K
FEB

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
Japan 100.00%

Which sites are competitors to qo-kun.com?

Websites similar to qo-kun.com are sites similar on user interests and browsing behavior. Users can discover new websites that are similar to the ones they already enjoy or find useful.
Last update was 85 days ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with qo-kun.com in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

Search Engine Indexes ▼

Search engine indexes are huge databases or collections of net pages that search engines like google like google and yahoo use to retrieve applicable facts while customers carry out searches. These indexes are created through search engines like google and yahoo through crawling and indexing net pages from throughout the internet.
Google Index:
158

  ▼

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  qo-kun.com
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  17,764,045
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  7
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  0
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $0.00
Full SEMrush Report >>

Revenue report ▼

Google.com would generate approximately $2.9 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $87.3 and annual gross revenue of approximately $1.1K. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $3K.

How much would qo-kun.com make?

Daily Revenue:
$2.91
Monthly Revenue:
$87.30
Yearly Revenue:
$1,062.15
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
Japan 8,076$2.91

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$0.09
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$2.62
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$31.84
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
242
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
7,268
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
88,432

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
Japan 242$0.09

How much is qo-kun.com worth?

Website Value:
$3K

Ad Experience Report ▼

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
qo-kun.com
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
qo-kun.com
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report ▼

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
qo-kun.com
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is qo-kun.com hosted? ▼

Qo-kun.com may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
13.113.95.103
ASN:
AS16509 
ISP:
Amazon.com, Inc. 
Server Location:
Tokyo
Tokyo, 13
151-0053
Japan, JP
 

Other sites hosted on 13.113.95.103

There are no other sites hosted on this IP

How fast does qo-kun.com load? ▼

The average loading time of qo-kun.com is 487 ms. The Desktop speed index is 100 and mobile speed index is 100.
Average Load Time:
487 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

100
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)22ms 64% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 64% 13% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 13% 22% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 22%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)204ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 98% 1% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 1% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)553ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 98% 1% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 1% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)49ms 100% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 100% 0% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.4s 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 97% 2% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)22ms 64% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 64% 13% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 13% 22% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 22%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)204ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 98% 1% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 1% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)553ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 98% 1% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 1% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)49ms 100% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 100% 0% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.4s 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 97% 2% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0%

Lab Data

LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
First Contentful Paint 0.2 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
Minimize third-party usage  
Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading. Learn how to minimize third-party impact
Largest Contentful Paint 0.2 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Third parties  
Third party code can significantly impact load performance. to prioritize your page's content. Reduce and defer loading of third party code
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Speed Index 0.6 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Time to Interactive 0.2 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Max Potential First Input Delay 20 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

100
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a SLOW speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)26ms 64% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 55% 16% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 16% 28% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 28%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)276ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 95% 3% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 3% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 1%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)843ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 94% 3% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 3% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 1%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)99ms 100% of loads for this page have a fast (<200s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 96% 2% of loads for this page have an average (200s ~ 500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 2% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)903ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 96% 2% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an SLOW speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)26ms 55% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 55% 16% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 16% 28% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 28%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)276ms 95% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 95% 3% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 3% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 1%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)843ms 94% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 94% 3% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 3% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 1%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)99ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.2s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 96% 2% of loads for this page have an average (0.2s ~ 0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 2% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)903ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 96% 2% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1%

Lab Data

First Contentful Paint 0.8 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Max Potential First Input Delay 30 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Third parties  
Third party code can significantly impact load performance. to prioritize your page's content. Reduce and defer loading of third party code
Minimize third-party usage  
Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading. Learn how to minimize third-party impact
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Time to Interactive 0.8 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Speed Index 2.3 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Largest Contentful Paint 0.8 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors

Does qo-kun.com use compression? ▼

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on qo-kun.com are reduced by %.
qo-kun.com does not use compression.
Original size: 712 B
Compressed size: n/a
File reduced by: (%)

Google Safe Browsing ▼

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites.
Status:
  SAFE

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify ▼

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. qo-kun.com supports HTTPS.
 qo-kun.com supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: qo-kun.com
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: Amazon RSA 2048 M03
Valid from: Feb 9 00:00:00 2025 GMT
Valid until: Mar 11 23:59:59 2026 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Common Name: Amazon RSA 2048 M03
Organization: Amazon
Location: US
Issuer: Amazon Root CA 1
Valid from: Aug 23 22:26:04 2022 GMT
Valid until: Aug 23 22:26:04 2030 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Common Name: Amazon Root CA 1
Organization: Amazon
Location: US
Issuer: Starfield Services Root Certificate Authority - G2
Valid from: May 25 12:00:00 2015 GMT
Valid until: Dec 31 01:00:00 2037 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 2048 Bits

Verify HTTP/2 Support ▼

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 qo-kun.com supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header ▼

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server. 
date: Mon, 31 Mar 2025 09:44:02 GMT
content-type: text/html
content-length: 712
set-cookie: AWSALB=RLDUEoHjRShiF1IODJahAwA6qmM2I4xmhMmsu2y3SmOOfkyIub6UKKtq+CmdPVNR0wgOXRxXwxpaorHuO0vkLjJcSCY7InH6sUCixNeyfk7UpiwPQMHCnitqyfg7; Expires=Mon, 07 Apr 2025 09:44:02 GMT; Path=/
set-cookie: AWSALBCORS=RLDUEoHjRShiF1IODJahAwA6qmM2I4xmhMmsu2y3SmOOfkyIub6UKKtq+CmdPVNR0wgOXRxXwxpaorHuO0vkLjJcSCY7InH6sUCixNeyfk7UpiwPQMHCnitqyfg7; Expires=Mon, 07 Apr 2025 09:44:02 GMT; Path=/; SameSite=None; Secure
cache-control: private
server: Microsoft-IIS/10.0
set-cookie: ASPSESSIONIDQQDCBDDR=MANJEDHAFAHNJGCOABGPENOD; path=/
x-powered-by: ASP.NET

DNS Lookup ▼

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
TXT v=spf1 +mx include:spf.tapirs.co.jp include:amazonses.com ~all 1200
MX mx.securemx.jp 1200
SOA 900
Mname ns-1778.awsdns-30.co.uk
Rname awsdns-hostmaster.amazon.com
Serial Number 1
Refresh 7200
Retry 900
Expire 1209600
Minimum TTL 86400
A 18.176.119.215 11
A 13.113.95.103 11
A 52.192.134.148 11
NS ns-1468.awsdns-55.org 172751
NS ns-828.awsdns-39.net 172751
NS ns-37.awsdns-04.com 172751
NS ns-1778.awsdns-30.co.uk 172751

Whois Lookup ▼

Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information. Domain registration for this website began on August 31, 2020 and will expire on August 31, 2025 if not renewed. This website is now assigned through the registrar GMO Internet, Inc.. The WHOIS data for this website's domain was last updated on August 16, 2024.
Domain Created:
2020-08-31
Domain Expires:
2025-08-31
Domain Updated:
2024-08-16
Domain Age:
4 years 9 months 24 days
Domain Registrar:
GMO Internet, Inc.
Domain Owner:
Whois Privacy Protection Service by onamae.com
WhoIs:
 

Domain Name: qo-kun.com
Registry Domain ID: 2556681745_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.discount-domain.com
Registrar URL: http://www.onamae.com
Updated Date: 2024-08-16T07:06:14Z
Creation Date: 2020-08-31T01:15:23Z
Registrar Registration Expiration Date: 2025-08-31T01:15:22Z
Registrar: GMO Internet, Inc.
Registrar IANA ID: 49
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: email
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +81.337709199
Domain Status: ok https://icann.org/epp#ok
Registry Registrant ID: Not Available From Registry
Registrant Name: Whois Privacy Protection Service by onamae.com
Registrant Organization: Whois Privacy Protection Service by onamae.com
Registrant Street: 26-1 Sakuragaoka-cho
Registrant Street: Cerulean Tower 11F
Registrant City: Shibuya-ku
Registrant State/Province: Tokyo
Registrant Postal Code: 150-8512
Registrant Country: JP
Registrant Phone: +81.354562560
Registrant Phone Ext:
Registrant Fax:
Registrant Fax Ext:
Registrant Email: email
Registry Admin ID: Not Available From Registry
Admin Name: Whois Privacy Protection Service by onamae.com
Admin Organization: Whois Privacy Protection Service by onamae.com
Admin Street: 26-1 Sakuragaoka-cho
Admin Street: Cerulean Tower 11F
Admin City: Shibuya-ku
Admin State/Province: Tokyo
Admin Postal Code: 150-8512
Admin Country: JP
Admin Phone: +81.354562560
Admin Phone Ext:
Admin Fax:
Admin Fax Ext:
Admin Email: email
Registry Tech ID: Not Available From Registry
Tech Name: Whois Privacy Protection Service by onamae.com
Tech Organization: Whois Privacy Protection Service by onamae.com
Tech Street: 26-1 Sakuragaoka-cho
Tech Street: Cerulean Tower 11F
Tech City: Shibuya-ku
Tech State/Province: Tokyo
Tech Postal Code: 150-8512
Tech Country: JP
Tech Phone: +81.354562560
Tech Phone Ext:
Tech Fax:
Tech Fax Ext:
Tech Email: email
Name Server: ns-1778.awsdns-30.co.uk
Name Server: ns-37.awsdns-04.com
Name Server: ns-1468.awsdns-55.org
Name Server: ns-828.awsdns-39.net
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN WHOIS Data Problem Reporting System: http://wdprs.internic.net/
>>> Last update of WHOIS database: 2024-08-16T07:06:14Z