product-advisor.de Product-advisor.de

   
Product Advisor

Domain Summary

What is the traffic rank for Product-advisor.de?

• Product-advisor.de ranks #803,107 globally on HypeStat.

What percent of global Internet users visit Product-advisor.de?

2.73E-5% of global Internet users visit Product-advisor.de

How many people visit Product-advisor.de each day?

• Product-advisor.de receives approximately 1.3K visitors and 2,319 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Product-advisor.de receive most of its visitors from?

• Product-advisor.de is mostly visited by people located in Germany,Austria.

How much Product-advisor.de can earn?

• Product-advisor.de should earn about $3.46/day from advertising revenue.

What is Product-advisor.de estimated value?

• Estimated value of Product-advisor.de is $3,149.01.

What IP addresses does Product-advisor.de resolve to?

• Product-advisor.de resolves to the IP addresses 2600:9000:24d0:4c00:b:ca4b:3e00:93a1, 13.32.164.107.

Where are Product-advisor.de servers located in?

• Product-advisor.de has servers located in United States.

product-advisor.de Profile

Title:Product Advisor
Description:Product Advisor: Ihr Ratgeber für Online-Einkäufe. Wir wählen die besten Produkte nach Qualität und Preis aus. Finden Sie noch heute das perfekte Angebot.
Category:Sports / Other Sports

What technologies does product-advisor.de use?

These are the technologies used at product-advisor.de. product-advisor.de has a total of 6 technologies installed in 5 different categories.

product-advisor.de Traffic Analysis

Product-advisor.de is ranked #803,107 in the world. This website is viewed by an estimated 1.3K visitors daily, generating a total of 2.3K pageviews. This equates to about 40.8K monthly visitors. Product-advisor.de traffic has decreased by 67.15% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors1.3K
63.57%
Monthly Visits40.8K
67.15%
Pages per Visit1.72
52.78%
Visit duration01:25
587%
Bounce Rate69.79%
13.56%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
1,347
Monthly Visits:
40,814
Pages per Visit:
1.72
Daily Pageviews:
2,319
Avg. visit duration:
01:25
Bounce rate:
69.79%
Global Reach:
2.73E-5%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
11,222
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
10,353
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
39,605
HypeRank:
803,107
SEMrush Rank:
29,287,034
SimilarWeb Rank:
803,107
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
7.58%
Referral:
7.01%
Search:
14.02%
Social:
0.46%
Paid:
70.94%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
100.00%
Mobile:
0%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

6.5K
DEC
124.2K
JAN
40.8K
FEB

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
Germany 84.88%
 
Austria 15.12%

Which sites are competitors to product-advisor.de?

Websites similar to product-advisor.de are sites similar on user interests and browsing behavior. Users can discover new websites that are similar to the ones they already enjoy or find useful.
Last update was 6 hours ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

Update will be available in 18 hours
*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with product-advisor.de in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

Search Engine Indexes

Search engine indexes are huge databases or collections of net pages that search engines like google like google and yahoo use to retrieve applicable facts while customers carry out searches. These indexes are created through search engines like google and yahoo through crawling and indexing net pages from throughout the internet.
Google Index:
3

 

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  product-advisor.de
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  29,287,034
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  1
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  0
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $0.00

Revenue report

Google.com would generate approximately $3.5 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $103.8 and annual gross revenue of approximately $1.3K. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $3.1K.

How much would product-advisor.de make?

Daily Revenue:
$3.46
Monthly Revenue:
$103.80
Yearly Revenue:
$1,262.90
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
Germany 1,968$2.76
 
Austria 351$0.71

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$0.98
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$29.50
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$358.91
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
662
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
19,860
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
241,626

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
Germany 571$0.80
 
Austria 91$0.18

How much is product-advisor.de worth?

Website Value:
$3.1K

Ad Experience Report

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
product-advisor.de
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
product-advisor.de
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
product-advisor.de
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is product-advisor.de hosted?

Product-advisor.de may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
2600:9000:24d0:4c00:b:ca4b:3e00:93a1, 13.32.164.107
ASN:
AS16509 
ISP:
Amazon.com, Inc. 
Server Location:

United States, US
 

Other sites hosted on 13.32.164.107

How fast does product-advisor.de load?

The average loading time of product-advisor.de is 49 ms. The Desktop speed index is 99 and mobile speed index is 96.
Average Load Time:
49 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

99
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)976ms 44% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 44% 52% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 52% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 2%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.4s 88% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 88% 8% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 8% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 2%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)52ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 96% 1% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 1% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.4s 94% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 94% 4% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 4% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)976ms 44% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 44% 52% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 52% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 2%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.4s 88% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 88% 8% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 8% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 2%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)52ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 96% 1% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 1% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.4s 94% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 94% 4% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 4% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0%

Lab Data

Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Largest Contentful Paint 0.8 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Time to Interactive 0.8 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Optimize DOM size  
A large DOM can increase the duration of style calculations and layout reflows, impacting page responsiveness. A large DOM will also increase memory usage. Learn how to avoid an excessive DOM size
Speed Index 0.7 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
First Contentful Paint 0.7 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Max Potential First Input Delay 40 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

96
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.1s 44% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 36% 60% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 60% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 2%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.5s 88% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 89% 8% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 8% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 2%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)94ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<200s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 96% 2% of loads for this page have an average (200s ~ 500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 2% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.5s 94% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 96% 2% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.1s 36% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 36% 60% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 60% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 2%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.5s 89% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 89% 8% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 8% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 2%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)94ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.2s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 96% 2% of loads for this page have an average (0.2s ~ 0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 2% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.5s 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 96% 2% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1%

Lab Data

Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Largest Contentful Paint 2.3 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Speed Index 2.3 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Time to Interactive 2.3 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Max Potential First Input Delay 50 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
First Contentful Paint 2.3 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Optimize DOM size  
A large DOM can increase the duration of style calculations and layout reflows, impacting page responsiveness. A large DOM will also increase memory usage. Learn how to avoid an excessive DOM size
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading

Does product-advisor.de use compression?

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on product-advisor.de are reduced by 77%.
product-advisor.de use br compression.
Original size: 29.61 KB
Compressed size: 6.61 KB
File reduced by: 23 KB (77%)

Google Safe Browsing

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites.
Status:
  SAFE

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. product-advisor.de supports HTTPS.
 product-advisor.de supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: *.productadvisor.es
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: Amazon RSA 2048 M02
Valid from: Feb 16 00:00:00 2025 GMT
Valid until: Mar 17 23:59:59 2026 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Common Name: Amazon RSA 2048 M02
Organization: Amazon
Location: US
Issuer: Amazon Root CA 1
Valid from: Aug 23 22:25:30 2022 GMT
Valid until: Aug 23 22:25:30 2030 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Common Name: Amazon Root CA 1
Organization: Amazon
Location: US
Issuer: Starfield Services Root Certificate Authority - G2
Valid from: May 25 12:00:00 2015 GMT
Valid until: Dec 31 01:00:00 2037 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 2048 Bits

Verify HTTP/2 Support

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 product-advisor.de supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server.
server: CloudFront
date: Thu, 13 Mar 2025 23:16:41 GMT
content-length: 0
location: https://www.product-advisor.de/
x-cache: FunctionGeneratedResponse from cloudfront
via: 1.1 51e6f466f192ce588105b138cebcc0d0.cloudfront.net (CloudFront)
x-amz-cf-pop: ORD58-P1
alt-svc: h3=":443"; ma=86400
x-amz-cf-id: aDg_t_GKNQ3NOABLRHzEAR0ZtRCOayVRumCGdZ-jNCUlGlxQ8BUbqQ==

HTTP/2 200 
content-type: text/html;charset=utf-8
date: Thu, 13 Mar 2025 08:33:27 GMT
x-amzn-requestid: 18b3a901-a05a-45ea-ba42-3bdd66388b07
cache-control: no-cache
x-amzn-trace-id: Root=1-67d29857-558015330fd88f08244009c7;Parent=7fdb09314ad71262;Sampled=0;Lineage=1:80731404:0
content-encoding: br
vary: Accept-Encoding
x-cache: Hit from cloudfront
via: 1.1 51e6f466f192ce588105b138cebcc0d0.cloudfront.net (CloudFront)
x-amz-cf-pop: ORD58-P1
alt-svc: h3=":443"; ma=86400
x-amz-cf-id: a16gerCLY6RTJsCP2CPXVbdy119J6PVxPlNoT4bAGr5fAgj5Ei2wgw==
age: 52994

DNS Lookup

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
TXT google-site-verification=DTxm9Df-5WmZE26bKSSJJ7P9VKIrbt3ddz4UsQRKbMI 300
SOA 900
Mname ns-169.awsdns-21.com
Rname awsdns-hostmaster.amazon.com
Serial Number 1
Refresh 7200
Retry 900
Expire 1209600
Minimum TTL 86400
AAAA 2600:9000:24d0:3800:b:ca4b:3e00:93a1 15
AAAA 2600:9000:24d0:2a00:b:ca4b:3e00:93a1 15
AAAA 2600:9000:24d0:cc00:b:ca4b:3e00:93a1 15
AAAA 2600:9000:24d0:d800:b:ca4b:3e00:93a1 15
AAAA 2600:9000:24d0:1600:b:ca4b:3e00:93a1 15
AAAA 2600:9000:24d0:6a00:b:ca4b:3e00:93a1 15
AAAA 2600:9000:24d0:a600:b:ca4b:3e00:93a1 15
AAAA 2600:9000:24d0:4c00:b:ca4b:3e00:93a1 15
A 13.32.164.59 15
A 13.32.164.12 15
A 13.32.164.107 15
A 13.32.164.96 15
NS ns-925.awsdns-51.net 86355
NS ns-1075.awsdns-06.org 86355
NS ns-1614.awsdns-09.co.uk 86355
NS ns-169.awsdns-21.com 86355

Whois Lookup

Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information.
Domain Updated:
2024-06-17
WhoIs:
 

% Restricted rights.
% 
% Terms and Conditions of Use
% 
% The above data may only be used within the scope of technical or
% administrative necessities of Internet operation or to remedy legal
% problems.
% The use for other purposes, in particular for advertising, is not permitted.
% 
% The DENIC whois service on port 43 doesn't disclose any information concerning
% the domain holder, general request and abuse contact.
% This information can be obtained through use of our web-based whois service
% available at the DENIC website:
% http://www.denic.de/en/domains/whois-service/web-whois.html
% 
% 

Domain: product-advisor.de
Nserver: ns-1075.awsdns-06.org
Nserver: ns-1614.awsdns-09.co.uk
Nserver: ns-169.awsdns-21.com
Nserver: ns-925.awsdns-51.net
Status: connect
Changed: 2024-06-17T09:18:43+02:00