plant-lore.com Plant-lore.com

   
Security Verification

Domain Summary

What is the traffic rank for Plant-lore.com?

• Plant-lore.com ranks #2,285,055 globally on HypeStat.

What percent of global Internet users visit Plant-lore.com?

6.7E-6% of global Internet users visit Plant-lore.com

How many people visit Plant-lore.com each day?

• Plant-lore.com receives approximately 331 visitors and 479 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Plant-lore.com receive most of its visitors from?

• Plant-lore.com is mostly visited by people located in United States,United Kingdom.

How much Plant-lore.com can earn?

• Plant-lore.com should earn about $1.81/day from advertising revenue.

What is Plant-lore.com estimated value?

• Estimated value of Plant-lore.com is $1,831.77.

What IP addresses does Plant-lore.com resolve to?

• Plant-lore.com resolves to the IP addresses 185.151.30.183.

Where are Plant-lore.com servers located in?

• Plant-lore.com has servers located in United Kingdom.

plant-lore.com Profile

Title:Security Verification
Category:Hobbies and Leisure / Camping Scouting and Outdoors

plant-lore.com Traffic Analysis

Plant-lore.com is ranked #2,285,055 in the world. This website is viewed by an estimated 331 visitors daily, generating a total of 479 pageviews. This equates to about 10K monthly visitors. Plant-lore.com traffic has decreased by 71.12% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors331
63.89%
Monthly Visits10K
71.12%
Pages per Visit1.45
37.29%
Visit duration00:20
100%
Bounce Rate72.00%
51.13%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
331
Monthly Visits:
10,029
Pages per Visit:
1.45
Daily Pageviews:
479
Avg. visit duration:
00:20
Bounce rate:
72.00%
Global Reach:
6.7E-6%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
870
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
870
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
9,826
HypeRank:
2,285,055
SEMrush Rank:
2,136,698
SimilarWeb Rank:
2,285,055
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
39.54%
Referral:
0%
Search:
60.46%
Social:
0%
Paid:
0%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
99.77%
Mobile:
0.23%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

7.1K
MAR
34.7K
APR
10K
MAY

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
United States 51.08%
 
United Kingdom 48.92%

Which sites are competitors to plant-lore.com?

Websites similar to plant-lore.com are sites similar on user interests and browsing behavior. Users can discover new websites that are similar to the ones they already enjoy or find useful.
Last update was 4 hours ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

Update will be available in 20 hours
*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with plant-lore.com in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

Search Engine Indexes

Search engine indexes are huge databases or collections of net pages that search engines like google like google and yahoo use to retrieve applicable facts while customers carry out searches. These indexes are created through search engines like google and yahoo through crawling and indexing net pages from throughout the internet.
Bing Index:
96,400

 

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  plant-lore.com
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  2,136,698
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  1,225
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  298
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $56.00

Revenue report

Google.com would generate approximately $1.8 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $54.3 and annual gross revenue of approximately $660.7. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $1.8K.

How much would plant-lore.com make?

Daily Revenue:
$1.81
Monthly Revenue:
$54.30
Yearly Revenue:
$660.65
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
United States 245$1.18
 
United Kingdom 234$0.63

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$0.31
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$9.40
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$114.32
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
82
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
2,446
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
29,760

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
United States 44$0.21
 
United Kingdom 37$0.10

How much is plant-lore.com worth?

Website Value:
$1.8K

Ad Experience Report

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
plant-lore.com
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
plant-lore.com
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
plant-lore.com
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is plant-lore.com hosted?

Plant-lore.com may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
185.151.30.183
ASN:
AS48254 
ISP:
OSS Ural Ltd. 
Server Location:

United Kingdom, GB
 

Other sites hosted on 185.151.30.183

How fast does plant-lore.com load?

The average loading time of plant-lore.com is 73 ms. The Desktop speed index is 99 and mobile speed index is 85.
Average Load Time:
73 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

99
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 93% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 93% 5% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 5% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 1%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)905ms 69% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 69% 19% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 19% 11% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 11%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.1s 86% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 86% 7% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 7% 6% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 6%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)28ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.2s 89% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 89% 6% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 6% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 3%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 93% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 93% 5% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 5% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 1%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)905ms 69% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 69% 19% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 19% 11% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 11%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.1s 86% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 86% 7% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 7% 6% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 6%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)28ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.2s 89% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 89% 6% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 6% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 3%

Lab Data

Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Legacy JavaScript  
Polyfills and transforms enable older browsers to use new JavaScript features. However, many aren't necessary for modern browsers. Consider modifying your JavaScript build process to not transpile features, unless you know you must support older browsers. Baseline Learn why most sites can deploy ES6+ code without transpiling
Does not have a `<meta name="viewport">` tag with `width` or `initial-scale`  
A `<meta name="viewport">` not only optimizes your app for mobile screen sizes, but also prevents . a 300 millisecond delay to user input Learn more about using the viewport meta tag
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Max Potential First Input Delay 20 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Duplicated JavaScript  
Remove large, duplicate JavaScript modules from bundles to reduce unnecessary bytes consumed by network activity.
First Contentful Paint 0.7 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Time to Interactive 0.7 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Largest Contentful Paint 0.7 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Speed Index 0.8 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

85
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a SLOW speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 93% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)2.0s 69% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 36% 36% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 36% 27% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 27%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)2.3s 86% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 67% 14% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 14% 17% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 17%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)279ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<200s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 22% 76% of loads for this page have an average (200s ~ 500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 76% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.3s 89% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 76% 17% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 17% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 5%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an SLOW speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)2.0s 36% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 36% 36% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 36% 27% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 27%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)2.3s 67% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 67% 14% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 14% 17% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 17%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)279ms 22% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.2s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 22% 76% of loads for this page have an average (0.2s ~ 0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 76% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.3s 76% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 76% 17% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 17% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 5%

Lab Data

INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Does not have a `<meta name="viewport">` tag with `width` or `initial-scale`  
A `<meta name="viewport">` not only optimizes your app for mobile screen sizes, but also prevents . a 300 millisecond delay to user input Learn more about using the viewport meta tag
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Largest Contentful Paint 3.1 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
First Contentful Paint 2.4 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Max Potential First Input Delay 20 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Time to Interactive 3.1 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Speed Index 5.9 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Legacy JavaScript  
Polyfills and transforms enable older browsers to use new JavaScript features. However, many aren't necessary for modern browsers. Consider modifying your JavaScript build process to not transpile features, unless you know you must support older browsers. Baseline Learn why most sites can deploy ES6+ code without transpiling
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Duplicated JavaScript  
Remove large, duplicate JavaScript modules from bundles to reduce unnecessary bytes consumed by network activity.
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading

Does plant-lore.com use compression?

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on plant-lore.com are reduced by %.
plant-lore.com does not use compression.
Original size: 2.35 KB
Compressed size: n/a
File reduced by: (%)

Google Safe Browsing

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites.
Status:
  SAFE

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. plant-lore.com supports HTTPS.
 plant-lore.com supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: *.plant-lore.com
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: R10
Valid from: May 16 00:08:30 2025 GMT
Valid until: Aug 14 00:08:29 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Common Name: R10
Organization: Let's Encrypt
Location: US
Issuer: ISRG Root X1
Valid from: Mar 13 00:00:00 2024 GMT
Valid until: Mar 12 23:59:59 2027 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 2048 Bits

Verify HTTP/2 Support

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 plant-lore.com supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server.
date: Sun, 29 Jun 2025 10:18:41 GMT
content-type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
server: nginx
x-powered-by: PHP/7.4.33
x-stackprotect-id: 6861130261ce5
set-cookie: stackprotect=667592fa45889381642998b267547c3c3a10c565298753118aa0360192c7752e; expires=Sun, 29-Jun-2025 11:18:42 GMT; Max-Age=3600; path=/; domain=plant-lore.com; secure; HttpOnly
cache-control: Private
x-cdn-cache-status: EXPIRED
x-via: FRA1

DNS Lookup

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
A 185.151.30.183 3557

Whois Lookup

Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information. Domain registration for this website began on October 10, 2010 and will expire on October 10, 2025 if not renewed. This website is now assigned through the registrar TUCOWS, INC.. The WHOIS data for this website's domain was last updated on September 23, 2024.
Domain Created:
2010-10-10
Domain Expires:
2025-10-10
Domain Updated:
2024-09-23
Domain Age:
14 years 8 months 19 days
Domain Registrar:
TUCOWS, INC.
Domain Owner:
REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
WhoIs:
 

   Domain Name: PLANT-LORE.COM
   Registry Domain ID: 1619713915_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN
   Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.tucows.com
   Registrar URL: http://www.tucows.com
   Updated Date: 2024-09-23T11:52:56Z
   Creation Date: 2010-10-10T12:54:16Z
   Registry Expiry Date: 2025-10-10T12:54:16Z
   Registrar: Tucows Domains Inc.
   Registrar IANA ID: 69
   Registrar Abuse Contact Email: email
   Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +1.4165350123
   Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
   Domain Status: clientUpdateProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientUpdateProhibited
   Name Server: NS1.STACKDNS.COM
   Name Server: NS2.STACKDNS.COM
   Name Server: NS3.STACKDNS.COM
   Name Server: NS4.STACKDNS.COM
   DNSSEC: unsigned
   URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form: https://www.icann.org/wicf/
>>> Last update of whois database: 2025-06-29T10:19:05Z