openl.io Openl.io

   
OpenL Translate: Accurate AI Translation in 100+ Languages

Domain Summary

What is the traffic rank for Openl.io?

• Openl.io ranks #282,828 globally on HypeStat.

What percent of global Internet users visit Openl.io?

• 0.0008671% of global Internet users visit Openl.io

How many people visit Openl.io each day?

• Openl.io receives approximately 42.7K visitors and 82,536 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Openl.io receive most of its visitors from?

• Openl.io is mostly visited by people located in United States,India,Korea, Republic of.

How much Openl.io can earn?

• Openl.io should earn about $307.22/day from advertising revenue.

What is Openl.io estimated value?

• Estimated value of Openl.io is $284,260.95.

What IP addresses does Openl.io resolve to?

• Openl.io resolves to the IP addresses 2606:4700:3030::6815:1001, 104.21.16.1.

openl.io Profile

Title:OpenL Translate: Accurate AI Translation in 100+ Languages Description:Instantly translate texts, documents, images, and speech online for free with OpenL. Ideal for writing aid and grammar correction.
Category:Computers Electronics and Technology / Programming and Developer Software
Edit Site Info

What technologies does openl.io use?

These are the technologies used at openl.io. openl.io has a total of 11 technologies installed in 11 different categories.
PaaS
Amazon Web Services Amazon Web Services
Ecommerce
Cart Functionality Cart Functionality
CDN
CloudFlare CloudFlare
Security
Cloudflare Bot Management Cloudflare Bot Management
Analytics
Google Analytics Google Analytics
Miscellaneous
HTTP/3 HTTP/3
Open Graph Open Graph
PWA PWA
JavaScript Frameworks
Nuxt.js Nuxt.js
Vue.js Vue.js
Web Frameworks
Nuxt.js Nuxt.js
Web Servers
Nuxt.js Nuxt.js
Static Site Generator
Nuxt.js Nuxt.js
Programming Languages
Node.js Node.js

openl.io Traffic Analysis

Openl.io is ranked #282,828 in the world. This website is viewed by an estimated 42.7K visitors daily, generating a total of 82.5K pageviews. This equates to about 1.3M monthly visitors. Openl.io traffic has decreased by 1.23% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors42.7K
9.1%
Monthly Visits1.3M
1.23%
Pages per Visit1.93
1.36%
Visit duration01:14
9.37%
Bounce Rate57.35%
2.15%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
42,746
Monthly Visits:
1,295,204
Pages per Visit:
1.93
Daily Pageviews:
82,536
Avg. visit duration:
01:14
Bounce rate:
57.35%
Global Reach:
0.0008671%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
1,367,507
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
868,259
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
1,269,670
HypeRank:
282,828
SEMrush Rank:
27,853
SimilarWeb Rank:
56,657
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
47.86%
Referral:
3.23%
Search:
47.93%
Social:
0.35%
Paid:
0.63%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
43.18%
Mobile:
56.82%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

1.4M
JAN
1.3M
FEB
1.3M
MAR

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
United States 16.02%
 
India 5.98%
 
Korea, Republic of 3.66%
 
United Kingdom 3.28%
 
Germany 3.10%

Which sites are competitors to openl.io?

Websites similar to openl.io are sites similar on user interests and browsing behavior. Users can discover new websites that are similar to the ones they already enjoy or find useful.
Last update was 49 days ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with openl.io in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

  ▼

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  openl.io
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  27,853
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  51,385
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  79,682
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $63,068.00
Full SEMrush Report >>

Revenue report ▼

Google.com would generate approximately $307.2 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $9.2K and annual gross revenue of approximately $112.1K. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $284.3K.

How much would openl.io make?

Daily Revenue:
$307.22
Monthly Revenue:
$9,216.60
Yearly Revenue:
$112,135.30
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
United States 13,220$63.85
 
United Kingdom 2,709$7.26
 
Germany 2,559$3.58
 
India 4,937$1.88
 
Korea, Republic of 3,024$1.81

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$14.29
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$428.75
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$5,216.51
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
5,059
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
151,756
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
1,846,361

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
United States 2,380$11.49
 
United Kingdom 433$1.16
 
Germany 742$1.04
 
India 1,382$0.53
 
Korea, Republic of 121$0.07

How much is openl.io worth?

Website Value:
$284.3K

Ad Experience Report ▼

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
openl.io
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
openl.io
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report ▼

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
openl.io
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is openl.io hosted? ▼

Openl.io may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.

How fast does openl.io load? ▼

The average loading time of openl.io is 59 ms. The Desktop speed index is 74 and mobile speed index is 56.
Average Load Time:
59 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

74
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)6ms 85% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 85% 10% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 10% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 4%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)640ms 80% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 80% 13% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 13% 6% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 6%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.6s 78% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 78% 11% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 11% 10% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 10%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)148ms 81% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 81% 10% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 10% 7% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 7%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.2s 78% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 78% 10% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 10% 10% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 10%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)7ms 81% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 81% 13% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 13% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 5%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)595ms 82% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 82% 12% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 12% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 4%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.5s 82% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 82% 10% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 10% 7% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 7%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)117ms 86% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 86% 8% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 8% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 4%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.8s 85% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 85% 7% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 7% 7% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 7%

Lab Data

LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
Time to Interactive 2.6 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Largest Contentful Paint 0.5 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
First Contentful Paint 0.5 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Total Blocking Time 750 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Speed Index 0.9 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Max Potential First Input Delay 470 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Render blocking requests  
Requests are blocking the page's initial render, which may delay LCP. can move these network requests out of the critical path. Deferring or inlining

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

56
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a SLOW speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)17ms 85% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 64% 31% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 31% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 4%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)696ms 80% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 79% 14% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 14% 6% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 6%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)2.1s 78% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 67% 19% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 19% 13% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 13%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)599ms 81% of loads for this page have a fast (<200s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 39% 27% of loads for this page have an average (200s ~ 500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 27% 32% of loads for this page have a slow (>500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 32%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.4s 78% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 76% 13% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 13% 9% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 9%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)14ms 73% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 73% 20% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 20% 6% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 6%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)775ms 76% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 76% 17% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 17% 6% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 6%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)2.1s 67% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 67% 19% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 19% 13% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 13%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)499ms 46% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.2s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 46% 28% of loads for this page have an average (0.2s ~ 0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 28% 24% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 24%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.2s 80% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 80% 11% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 11% 7% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 7%

Lab Data

CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Time to Interactive 9.4 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Max Potential First Input Delay 230 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Render blocking requests  
Requests are blocking the page's initial render, which may delay LCP. can move these network requests out of the critical path. Deferring or inlining
First Contentful Paint 8.3 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Total Blocking Time 150 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Speed Index 8.3 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Largest Contentful Paint 9.1 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade

Does openl.io use compression? ▼

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on openl.io are reduced by 85%.
openl.io use br compression.
Original size: 128.47 KB
Compressed size: 18.73 KB
File reduced by: 109.74 KB (85%)

Google Safe Browsing ▼

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites. openl.io has 80 Safety Reputations.
Status:
  SAFE
Safety Reputations:
  80
Safety Confidence:
  51

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify ▼

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. openl.io supports HTTPS.
 openl.io supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: openl.io
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: WE1
Valid from: Mar 8 08:59:11 2025 GMT
Valid until: Jun 6 09:59:03 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize:
Common Name: WE1
Organization: Google Trust Services
Location: US
Issuer: GTS Root R4
Valid from: Dec 13 09:00:00 2023 GMT
Valid until: Feb 20 14:00:00 2029 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize:
Common Name: GTS Root R4
Organization: Google Trust Services LLC
Location: US
Issuer: GlobalSign Root CA
Valid from: Nov 15 03:43:21 2023 GMT
Valid until: Jan 28 00:00:42 2028 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize:

Verify HTTP/2 Support ▼

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 openl.io supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header ▼

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server. 
date: Sun, 27 Apr 2025 06:35:57 GMT
content-type: text/html; charset=utf-8
last-modified: Wed, 16 Apr 2025 03:11:56 GMT
x-rgw-object-type: Normal
x-amz-request-id: tx00000143b43ecace3fe43-0067ff2100-2b61f64e-nyc3d
cache-control: public,max-age=10,s-maxage=86400
x-do-app-origin: 432e5c5b-c647-465e-80d4-e5b741bd8c53
x-do-orig-status: 200
cf-cache-status: DYNAMIC
age: 10289
set-cookie: __cf_bm=6rSy0c5aO5DhXc85S42T2GpRBsQs28G_hMx8rht9tn8-1745735757-1.0.1.1-uetZDEmT5PKnU0hkgnUzRRKJ9LA5XBe.17d2g_qgBU6WrpbdmwSB5OkwVaL3v5BrPubw6eXrunOwtRx0LF8pmtHSjUw9JgYszlyeOe9gMNg; path=/; expires=Sun, 27-Apr-25 07:05:57 GMT; domain=.openl.io; HttpOnly; Secure; SameSite=None
vary: Accept-Encoding
report-to: {"endpoints":[{"url":"https://a.nel.cloudflare.com/report/v4?s=tIM9z0d9AyL%2BAOmTmI6uJxIX97AoG7SxU81nO4mT%2BC8L3%2FyD3cZoCj1Z4C2gxcv%2FU4I2G4AfbMZa4TSpNle%2Bh%2BbkZmMT%2FX3%2BOoeyskyj6sK%2FF8dzZnqblhkSJQ%3D%3D"}],"group":"cf-nel","max_age":604800}
nel: {"success_fraction":0,"report_to":"cf-nel","max_age":604800}
server: cloudflare
cf-ray: 936c4d82ee105c91-ORD
content-encoding: br
alt-svc: h3=":443"; ma=86400
server-timing: cfL4;desc="?proto=TCP&rtt=2318&min_rtt=2225&rtt_var=621&sent=7&recv=11&lost=0&retrans=0&sent_bytes=3386&recv_bytes=889&delivery_rate=1072195&cwnd=210&unsent_bytes=0&cid=d98fd605a853d3be&ts=52&x=0"

DNS Lookup ▼

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
AAAA 2606:4700:3030::6815:5001 201
AAAA 2606:4700:3030::6815:4001 201
AAAA 2606:4700:3030::6815:2001 201
AAAA 2606:4700:3030::6815:6001 201
AAAA 2606:4700:3030::6815:7001 201
AAAA 2606:4700:3030::6815:3001 201
AAAA 2606:4700:3030::6815:1001 201
A 104.21.96.1 201
A 104.21.32.1 201
A 104.21.80.1 201
A 104.21.16.1 201
A 104.21.48.1 201
A 104.21.64.1 201
A 104.21.112.1 201
NS steven.ns.cloudflare.com 3501
NS imani.ns.cloudflare.com 3501
HINFO 3600

Whois Lookup ▼

Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information. Domain registration for this website began on February 25, 2023 and will expire on February 25, 2026 if not renewed. This website is now assigned through the registrar Cloudflare, Inc. The WHOIS data for this website's domain was last updated on January 31, 2025.
Domain Created:
2023-02-25
Domain Expires:
2026-02-25
Domain Updated:
2025-01-31
Domain Age:
2 years 3 months 18 days
Domain Registrar:
Cloudflare, Inc
Domain Owner:
weizhen
WhoIs:
 

Domain Name: openl.io
Registry Domain ID: 28f6908f64164d329973331a9a658ac3-DONUTS
Registrar WHOIS Server: http://whois.cloudflare.com
Registrar URL: http://cloudflare.com
Updated Date: 2025-01-31T04:06:05Z
Creation Date: 2023-02-25T02:49:21Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2026-02-25T02:49:21Z
Registrar: Cloudflare, Inc
Registrar IANA ID: 1910
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: email
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: 
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Registry Registrant ID: REDACTED
Registrant Name: REDACTED
Registrant Organization: weizhen
Registrant Street: REDACTED
Registrant City: REDACTED
Registrant State/Province: 1
Registrant Postal Code: REDACTED
Registrant Country: CN
Registrant Phone: REDACTED
Registrant Phone Ext: REDACTED
Registrant Fax: REDACTED
Registrant Fax Ext: REDACTED
Registrant Email: REDACTED
Registry Admin ID: REDACTED
Admin Name: REDACTED
Admin Organization: REDACTED
Admin Street: REDACTED
Admin City: REDACTED
Admin State/Province: REDACTED
Admin Postal Code: REDACTED
Admin Country: REDACTED
Admin Phone: REDACTED
Admin Phone Ext: REDACTED
Admin Fax: REDACTED
Admin Fax Ext: REDACTED
Admin Email: REDACTED
Registry Tech ID: REDACTED
Tech Name: REDACTED
Tech Organization: REDACTED
Tech Street: REDACTED
Tech City: REDACTED
Tech State/Province: REDACTED
Tech Postal Code: REDACTED
Tech Country: REDACTED
Tech Phone: REDACTED
Tech Phone Ext: REDACTED
Tech Fax: REDACTED
Tech Fax Ext: REDACTED
Tech Email: REDACTED
Name Server: steven.ns.cloudflare.com
Name Server: imani.ns.cloudflare.com
DNSSEC: signedDelegation
URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form: https://icann.org/wicf/
>>> Last update of WHOIS database: 2025-04-27T06:37:36Z