misgif.app Misgif.app

   
Misgif: ai powered memes

Domain Summary

What is the traffic rank for Misgif.app?

• Misgif.app ranks #298,635 globally on HypeStat.

What percent of global Internet users visit Misgif.app?

• 7.38E-5% of global Internet users visit Misgif.app

How many people visit Misgif.app each day?

• Misgif.app receives approximately 3.6K visitors and 15,179 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Misgif.app receive most of its visitors from?

• Misgif.app is mostly visited by people located in India,United States,France.

How much Misgif.app can earn?

• Misgif.app should earn about $43.16/day from advertising revenue.

What is Misgif.app estimated value?

• Estimated value of Misgif.app is $41,347.04.

What IP addresses does Misgif.app resolve to?

• Misgif.app resolves to the IP addresses 76.76.21.21.

Where are Misgif.app servers located in?

• Misgif.app has servers located in Walnut, California, 91789, United States.

misgif.app Profile

Title:misgif: ai powered memes Description:We're making AI fun. Bring personalization, creativity, and surprise into your group chats
Edit Site Info

What technologies does misgif.app use?

These are the technologies used at misgif.app. misgif.app has a total of 3 technologies installed in 3 different categories.
Security
HSTS HSTS
Performance
Priority Hints Priority Hints
Web Servers
Vercel Vercel

misgif.app Traffic Analysis

Misgif.app is ranked #298,635 in the world. This website is viewed by an estimated 3.6K visitors daily, generating a total of 15.2K pageviews. This equates to about 110.2K monthly visitors. Misgif.app traffic has decreased by 67.33% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors3.6K
64%
Monthly Visits110.2K
67.33%
Pages per Visit4.17
10.4%
Visit duration01:24
8.71%
Bounce Rate39.71%
1.35%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
3,638
Monthly Visits:
110,231
Pages per Visit:
4.17
Daily Pageviews:
15,179
Avg. visit duration:
01:24
Bounce rate:
39.71%
Global Reach:
7.38E-5%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
45,427
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
40,270
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
108,051
HypeRank:
298,635
SEMrush Rank:
447,081
SimilarWeb Rank:
298,635
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
33.46%
Referral:
3.87%
Search:
61.79%
Social:
0.88%
Paid:
0%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
32.79%
Mobile:
67.21%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

224.7K
DEC
337.4K
JAN
110.2K
FEB

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
India 15.86%
 
United States 13.18%
 
France 12.11%
 
Brazil 6.10%
 
Germany 5.87%

Which sites are competitors to misgif.app?

Websites similar to misgif.app are sites similar on user interests and browsing behavior. Users can discover new websites that are similar to the ones they already enjoy or find useful.
Last update was 97 days ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with misgif.app in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

Search Engine Indexes ▼

Search engine indexes are huge databases or collections of net pages that search engines like google like google and yahoo use to retrieve applicable facts while customers carry out searches. These indexes are created through search engines like google and yahoo through crawling and indexing net pages from throughout the internet.
Google Index:
3

  ▼

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  misgif.app
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  447,081
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  1,012
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  3,359
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $15,094.00
Full SEMrush Report >>

Revenue report ▼

Google.com would generate approximately $43.2 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $1.3K and annual gross revenue of approximately $15.8K. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $41.3K.

How much would misgif.app make?

Daily Revenue:
$43.16
Monthly Revenue:
$1,294.80
Yearly Revenue:
$15,753.40
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
United States 2,001$9.66
 
Germany 890$1.25
 
Brazil 925$1.23
 
France 1,839$1.07
 
India 2,408$0.91

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$2.55
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$76.45
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$930.13
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
1,550
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
46,507
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
565,833

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
United States 360$1.74
 
Germany 258$0.36
 
India 674$0.26
 
France 202$0.12
 
Brazil 56$0.07

How much is misgif.app worth?

Website Value:
$41.3K

Ad Experience Report ▼

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
misgif.app
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
misgif.app
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report ▼

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
misgif.app
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is misgif.app hosted? ▼

Misgif.app may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
76.76.21.21
ASN:
AS16509 
ISP:
Amazon.com, Inc. 
Server Location:
Walnut
California, CA
91789
United States, US
 

Other sites hosted on 76.76.21.21

How fast does misgif.app load? ▼

The average loading time of misgif.app is 52 ms. The Desktop speed index is 76 and mobile speed index is 95.
Average Load Time:
52 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

76
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)10ms 71% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 71% 25% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 25% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 3%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)498ms 86% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 86% 8% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 8% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 4%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.1s 87% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 87% 6% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 6% 6% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 6%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)198ms 75% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 75% 17% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 17% 6% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 6%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.7s 86% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 86% 7% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 7% 6% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 6%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)10ms 70% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 70% 25% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 25% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 3%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)498ms 86% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 86% 9% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 9% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 4%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.1s 88% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 88% 6% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 6% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 5%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)198ms 75% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 75% 17% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 17% 6% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 6%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.7s 85% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 85% 8% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 8% 6% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 6%

Lab Data

Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Largest Contentful Paint 5.6 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Max Potential First Input Delay 80 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Time to Interactive 5.7 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
First Contentful Paint 0.2 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Total Blocking Time 30 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Speed Index 0.5 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Optimize DOM size  
A large DOM can increase the duration of style calculations and layout reflows, impacting page responsiveness. A large DOM will also increase memory usage. Learn how to avoid an excessive DOM size

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

95
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)5ms 71% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 89% 9% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 9% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)643ms 86% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 80% 12% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 12% 7% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 7%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.5s 87% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 81% 10% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 10% 8% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 8%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)369ms 75% of loads for this page have a fast (<200s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 46% 38% of loads for this page have an average (200s ~ 500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 38% 15% of loads for this page have a slow (>500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 15%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.5s 86% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 88% 6% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 6% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 5%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)5ms 89% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 89% 9% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 9% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)643ms 80% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 80% 12% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 12% 7% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 7%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.5s 81% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 81% 10% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 10% 8% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 8%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)369ms 46% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.2s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 46% 38% of loads for this page have an average (0.2s ~ 0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 38% 15% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 15%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.5s 88% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 88% 6% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 6% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 5%

Lab Data

Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Largest Contentful Paint 2.1 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Time to Interactive 9.1 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Speed Index 5.4 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Optimize DOM size  
A large DOM can increase the duration of style calculations and layout reflows, impacting page responsiveness. A large DOM will also increase memory usage. Learn how to avoid an excessive DOM size
First Contentful Paint 0.8 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Total Blocking Time 50 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Max Potential First Input Delay 120 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs

Does misgif.app use compression? ▼

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on misgif.app are reduced by 76%.
misgif.app use br compression.
Original size: 19.08 KB
Compressed size: 4.5 KB
File reduced by: 14.57 KB (76%)

Google Safe Browsing ▼

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites.
Status:
  SAFE

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify ▼

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. misgif.app supports HTTPS.
 misgif.app supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: misgif.app
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: R11
Valid from: Feb 17 00:44:28 2025 GMT
Valid until: May 18 00:44:27 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Common Name: R11
Organization: Let's Encrypt
Location: US
Issuer: ISRG Root X1
Valid from: Mar 13 00:00:00 2024 GMT
Valid until: Mar 12 23:59:59 2027 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 2048 Bits

Verify HTTP/2 Support ▼

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 misgif.app supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header ▼

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server. 
access-control-allow-origin: *
age: 9028123
cache-control: public, max-age=0, must-revalidate
content-disposition: inline
content-encoding: br
content-type: text/html; charset=utf-8
date: Sun, 23 Mar 2025 18:13:41 GMT
etag: W/"90b21ceef7cb0580bac29473ab4e2817"
server: Vercel
strict-transport-security: max-age=63072000
vary: RSC, Next-Router-State-Tree, Next-Router-Prefetch, Next-Url
x-matched-path: /
x-vercel-cache: HIT
x-vercel-id: cle1::w2hj6-1742753621761-3b929a626085

DNS Lookup ▼

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
A 76.76.21.21 1585
NS dns1.registrar-servers.com 10586
NS dns2.registrar-servers.com 10586
HINFO 3600

Whois Lookup ▼

Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information. Domain registration for this website began on September 17, 2023 and will expire on September 17, 2025 if not renewed. This website is now assigned through the registrar Namecheap Inc.. The WHOIS data for this website's domain was last updated on August 23, 2024.
Domain Created:
2023-09-17
Domain Expires:
2025-09-17
Domain Updated:
2024-08-23
Domain Age:
1 years 9 months 12 days
Domain Registrar:
Namecheap Inc.
Domain Owner:
Privacy service provided by Withheld for Privacy e
WhoIs:
 

Domain name: misgif.app
Registry Domain ID: DFCCE6144-APP
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.namecheap.com
Registrar URL: http://www.namecheap.com
Updated Date: 2024-08-18T17:28:18.50Z
Creation Date: 2023-09-17T19:21:40.00Z
Registrar Registration Expiration Date: 2025-09-17T19:21:40.00Z
Registrar: NAMECHEAP INC
Registrar IANA ID: 1068
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: email
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +1.9854014545
Reseller: NAMECHEAP INC
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Registry Registrant ID: 
Registrant Name: Redacted for Privacy
Registrant Organization: Privacy service provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf
Registrant Street: Kalkofnsvegur 2 
Registrant City: Reykjavik
Registrant State/Province: Capital Region
Registrant Postal Code: 101
Registrant Country: IS
Registrant Phone: +354.4212434
Registrant Phone Ext: 
Registrant Fax: 
Registrant Fax Ext: 
Registrant Email: email
Registry Admin ID: 
Admin Name: Redacted for Privacy
Admin Organization: Privacy service provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf
Admin Street: Kalkofnsvegur 2 
Admin City: Reykjavik
Admin State/Province: Capital Region
Admin Postal Code: 101
Admin Country: IS
Admin Phone: +354.4212434
Admin Phone Ext: 
Admin Fax: 
Admin Fax Ext: 
Admin Email: email
Registry Tech ID: 
Tech Name: Redacted for Privacy
Tech Organization: Privacy service provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf
Tech Street: Kalkofnsvegur 2 
Tech City: Reykjavik
Tech State/Province: Capital Region
Tech Postal Code: 101
Tech Country: IS
Tech Phone: +354.4212434
Tech Phone Ext: 
Tech Fax: 
Tech Fax Ext: 
Tech Email: email
Name Server: dns1.registrar-servers.com
Name Server: dns2.registrar-servers.com
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN WHOIS Data Problem Reporting System: http://wdprs.internic.net/
>>> Last update of WHOIS database: 2025-03-23T04:15:14.44Z