masternet.net.br Masternet.net.br

   
Bot Verification

Domain Summary

What is the traffic rank for Masternet.net.br?

• Masternet.net.br ranks #2,974,468 globally on HypeStat.

What percent of global Internet users visit Masternet.net.br?

• 1.8E-6% of global Internet users visit Masternet.net.br

How many people visit Masternet.net.br each day?

• Masternet.net.br receives approximately 87 visitors and 1,864 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Masternet.net.br receive most of its visitors from?

• Masternet.net.br is mostly visited by people located in Brazil.

How much Masternet.net.br can earn?

• Masternet.net.br should earn about $2.48/day from advertising revenue.

What is Masternet.net.br estimated value?

• Estimated value of Masternet.net.br is $3,086.07.

What IP addresses does Masternet.net.br resolve to?

• Masternet.net.br resolves to the IP addresses 2a02:4780:1:1009::2af5:4681:2, 109.106.251.181.

Where are Masternet.net.br servers located in?

• Masternet.net.br has servers located in Asheville, North Carolina, 28801, United States.

masternet.net.br Profile

Title:Bot Verification
Edit Site Info

What technologies does masternet.net.br use?

These are the technologies used at masternet.net.br. masternet.net.br has a total of 2 technologies installed in 2 different categories.
Web Servers
LiteSpeed LiteSpeed
Security
reCAPTCHA reCAPTCHA

masternet.net.br Traffic Analysis

Masternet.net.br is ranked #2,974,468 in the world. This website is viewed by an estimated 87 visitors daily, generating a total of 1.9K pageviews. This equates to about 2.6K monthly visitors. Masternet.net.br traffic has decreased by 16.09% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors87
16.09%
Monthly Visits2.6K
16.09%
Pages per Visit21.44
Visit duration20:09
Bounce Rate13.31%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
87
Monthly Visits:
2,636
Pages per Visit:
21.44
Daily Pageviews:
1,864
Avg. visit duration:
20:09
Bounce rate:
13.31%
Global Reach:
1.8E-6%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
193
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
193
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
2,583
HypeRank:
2,974,468
SimilarWeb Rank:
2,974,468
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
100.00%
Referral:
0%
Search:
0%
Social:
0%
Paid:
0%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
100.00%
Mobile:
0%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

9.4K
DEC
3.1K
JAN
2.6K
FEB

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
Brazil 100.00%
Last update was 126 days ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with masternet.net.br in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

Search Engine Indexes ▼

Search engine indexes are huge databases or collections of net pages that search engines like google like google and yahoo use to retrieve applicable facts while customers carry out searches. These indexes are created through search engines like google and yahoo through crawling and indexing net pages from throughout the internet.
Google Index:
8

  ▼

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  masternet.net.br
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  n/a
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  0
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  0
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $0.00
Full SEMrush Report >>

Revenue report ▼

Google.com would generate approximately $2.5 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $74.4 and annual gross revenue of approximately $0.9K. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $3.1K.

How much would masternet.net.br make?

Daily Revenue:
$2.48
Monthly Revenue:
$74.40
Yearly Revenue:
$905.20
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
Brazil 1,864$2.48

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$0.15
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$4.46
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$54.29
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
112
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
3,355
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
40,822

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
Brazil 112$0.15

How much is masternet.net.br worth?

Website Value:
$3.1K

Ad Experience Report ▼

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
masternet.net.br
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
masternet.net.br
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report ▼

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
masternet.net.br
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is masternet.net.br hosted? ▼

Masternet.net.br may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
2a02:4780:1:1009::2af5:4681:2, 109.106.251.181
ASN:
AS47583 
ISP:
Hostinger International Limited 
Server Location:
Asheville
North Carolina, NC
28801
United States, US
 

Other sites hosted on 109.106.251.181

How fast does masternet.net.br load? ▼

The average loading time of masternet.net.br is 142 ms. The Desktop speed index is 100 and mobile speed index is 100.
Average Load Time:
142 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

100
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)2ms 78% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 78% 15% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 15% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 5%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.5s 47% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 47% 31% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 31% 20% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 20%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)2.1s 69% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 69% 20% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 20% 9% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 9%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)48ms 95% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 95% 3% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 3% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.2s 81% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 81% 11% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 11% 6% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 6%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)2ms 78% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 78% 15% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 15% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 5%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.5s 47% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 47% 31% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 31% 20% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 20%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)2.1s 69% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 69% 20% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 20% 9% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 9%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)48ms 95% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 95% 3% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 3% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.2s 81% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 81% 11% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 11% 6% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 6%

Lab Data

Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Largest Contentful Paint 0.4 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Total Blocking Time 60 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
First Contentful Paint 0.2 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
Optimize DOM size  
A large DOM can increase the duration of style calculations and layout reflows, impacting page responsiveness. A large DOM will also increase memory usage. Learn how to avoid an excessive DOM size
Time to Interactive 1.2 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Render blocking requests  
Requests are blocking the page's initial render, which may delay LCP. can move these network requests out of the critical path. Deferring or inlining
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Max Potential First Input Delay 90 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Speed Index 0.4 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

100
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 78% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 85% 11% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 11% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 2%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.4s 47% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 53% 31% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 31% 14% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 14%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.8s 69% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 75% 18% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 18% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 5%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)151ms 95% of loads for this page have a fast (<200s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 86% 11% of loads for this page have an average (200s ~ 500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 11% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.8s 81% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 87% 9% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 9% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 85% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 85% 11% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 11% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 2%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.4s 53% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 53% 31% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 31% 14% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 14%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.8s 75% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 75% 18% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 18% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 5%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)151ms 86% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.2s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 86% 11% of loads for this page have an average (0.2s ~ 0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 11% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.8s 87% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 87% 9% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 9% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2%

Lab Data

Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Speed Index 1.2 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Optimize DOM size  
A large DOM can increase the duration of style calculations and layout reflows, impacting page responsiveness. A large DOM will also increase memory usage. Learn how to avoid an excessive DOM size
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Render blocking requests  
Requests are blocking the page's initial render, which may delay LCP. can move these network requests out of the critical path. Deferring or inlining
Total Blocking Time 80 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Max Potential First Input Delay 100 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Largest Contentful Paint 1.5 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
First Contentful Paint 0.8 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Time to Interactive 5.4 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements

Does masternet.net.br use compression? ▼

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on masternet.net.br are reduced by 42%.
masternet.net.br use gzip compression.
Original size: 1.65 KB
Compressed size: 974 B
File reduced by: 712 B (42%)

Google Safe Browsing ▼

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites.
Status:
  SAFE

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify ▼

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. masternet.net.br supports HTTPS.
 masternet.net.br supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: masternet.net.br
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: R11
Valid from: Feb 25 06:05:48 2025 GMT
Valid until: May 26 06:05:47 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize: 4096 Bits
Common Name: R11
Organization: Let's Encrypt
Location: US
Issuer: ISRG Root X1
Valid from: Mar 13 00:00:00 2024 GMT
Valid until: Mar 12 23:59:59 2027 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 2048 Bits

Verify HTTP/2 Support ▼

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 masternet.net.br supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header ▼

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server. 
content-type: text/html
content-length: 974
content-encoding: gzip
vary: Accept-Encoding
date: Wed, 19 Mar 2025 22:26:42 GMT
server: LiteSpeed
cache-control: no-cache,no-store
x-frame-options: SAMEORIGIN
alt-svc: h3=":443"; ma=2592000, h3-29=":443"; ma=2592000, h3-Q050=":443"; ma=2592000, h3-Q046=":443"; ma=2592000, h3-Q043=":443"; ma=2592000, quic=":443"; ma=2592000; v="43,46"

DNS Lookup ▼

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
MX mx1.hostinger.com.br 3600
SOA 300
Mname ns1.masternet.net.br
Rname postmaster.masternet.net.br
Serial Number 2024092416
Refresh 3600
Retry 800
Expire 86400
Minimum TTL 30
AAAA 2a02:4780:1:1009::2af5:4681:2 3556
A 109.106.251.181 3556
NS ns2.masternet.net.br 3555
NS ns1.masternet.net.br 3555

Whois Lookup ▼

Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information. Domain registration for this website began on February 2, 2017 and will expire on February 2, 2030 if not renewed. This website is now assigned through the registrar weuler luiz araujo sena. The WHOIS data for this website's domain was last updated on February 4, 2025.
Domain Created:
2017-02-02
Domain Expires:
2030-02-02
Domain Updated:
2025-02-04
Domain Age:
8 years 5 months 22 days
Domain Registrar:
weuler luiz araujo sena
Domain Owner:
master net ltda-me
WhoIs:
 

% Copyright (c) Nic.br - Use of this data is governed by the Use and
% Privacy Policy at https://registro.br/upp . Distribution,
% commercialization, reproduction, and use for advertising or similar
% purposes are expressly prohibited.
% 2025-03-19T19:27:25-03:00 - 108.178.0.234

domain:      masternet.net.br
owner:       master net ltda-me
ownerid:     25.000.121/0001-64
responsible: bruna santolin garcia
country:     BR
owner-c:     WLASE3
tech-c:      WLASE1
nserver:     ns1.masternet.net.br 45.161.157.228 2804:5274:cafe:cafe:45:161:157:228
nsstat:      20250319 AA
nslastaa:    20250319
nserver:     ns2.masternet.net.br 45.161.157.229 2804:5274:cafe:cafe:45:161:157:229
nsstat:      20250319 AA
nslastaa:    20250319
dsrecord:    52789 RSA-SHA-256 5D87F5B69319B1C7BB70ADD9A0F2AF89FC40D242F25E5DC8CEDDC8F391F8C1B9
dsstatus:    20250319 DSOK
dslastok:    20250319
saci:        yes
created:     20170202 #16597501
changed:     20250204
expires:     20300202
status:      published

nic-hdl-br:  WLASE3
person:      Weuler Luiz de Araujo Sena
e-mail:      email
country:     BR
created:     20180705
changed:     20240919

nic-hdl-br:  WLASE1
person:      weuler luiz araujo sena
e-mail:      email
country:     BR
created:     20170202
changed:     20240919

% Security and mail abuse issues should also be addressed to cert.br,
% respectivelly to email and email
%
% whois.registro.br only accepts exact match queries for domains,
% registrants, contacts, tickets, providers, IPs, and ASNs.