mag-apply.com Mag-apply.com

   
Application

Domain Summary

What is the traffic rank for Mag-apply.com?

• Mag-apply.com ranks #5,835,279 globally on HypeStat.

What percent of global Internet users visit Mag-apply.com?

• 3.1E-6% of global Internet users visit Mag-apply.com

How many people visit Mag-apply.com each day?

• Mag-apply.com receives approximately 154 visitors and 286 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Mag-apply.com receive most of its visitors from?

• Mag-apply.com is mostly visited by people located in Philippines.

How much Mag-apply.com can earn?

• Mag-apply.com should earn about $0.06/day from advertising revenue.

What is Mag-apply.com estimated value?

• Estimated value of Mag-apply.com is $53.32.

What IP addresses does Mag-apply.com resolve to?

• Mag-apply.com resolves to the IP addresses 2606:4700:130:436c:6f75:6466:6c61:7265, 104.21.17.37.

mag-apply.com Profile

Title:Application
Edit Site Info

What technologies does mag-apply.com use?

These are the technologies used at mag-apply.com. mag-apply.com has a total of 5 technologies installed in 5 different categories.
CDN
CloudFlare CloudFlare
Miscellaneous
HTTP/3 HTTP/3
JavaScript Libraries
jQuery jQuery
Programming Languages
PHP PHP
Web Frameworks
ThinkPHP ThinkPHP

mag-apply.com Traffic Analysis

Mag-apply.com is ranked #5,835,279 in the world. This website is viewed by an estimated 154 visitors daily, generating a total of 286 pageviews. This equates to about 4.7K monthly visitors. Mag-apply.com traffic has increased by 315.57% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors154
375.39%
Monthly Visits4.7K
315.57%
Pages per Visit1.86
573.67%
Visit duration04:01
150.99%
Bounce Rate47.89%
92.06%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
154
Monthly Visits:
4,666
Pages per Visit:
1.86
Daily Pageviews:
286
Avg. visit duration:
04:01
Bounce rate:
47.89%
Global Reach:
3.1E-6%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
4,351
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
1,835
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
4,565
HypeRank:
5,835,279
SimilarWeb Rank:
5,835,279
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
87.86%
Referral:
0%
Search:
0%
Social:
12.14%
Paid:
0%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
21.81%
Mobile:
78.19%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

16.9K
DEC
1.1K
JAN
4.7K
FEB

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
Philippines 100.00%
Last update was 87 days ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with mag-apply.com in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

Search Engine Indexes ▼

Search engine indexes are huge databases or collections of net pages that search engines like google like google and yahoo use to retrieve applicable facts while customers carry out searches. These indexes are created through search engines like google and yahoo through crawling and indexing net pages from throughout the internet.
Google Index:
6

  ▼

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  mag-apply.com
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  n/a
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  0
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  0
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $0.00
Full SEMrush Report >>

Revenue report ▼

Google.com would generate approximately $0.1 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $1.8 and annual gross revenue of approximately $21.9. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $53.3.

How much would mag-apply.com make?

Daily Revenue:
$0.06
Monthly Revenue:
$1.80
Yearly Revenue:
$21.90
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
Philippines 286$0.06

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
Philippines 20$0.00

How much is mag-apply.com worth?

Website Value:
$53.3

Ad Experience Report ▼

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
mag-apply.com
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
mag-apply.com
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report ▼

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
mag-apply.com
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is mag-apply.com hosted? ▼

Mag-apply.com may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.

How fast does mag-apply.com load? ▼

The average loading time of mag-apply.com is 1021 ms. The Desktop speed index is 98 and mobile speed index is 93.
Average Load Time:
1021 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

98
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)1ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 97% 2% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 2% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.1s 47% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 47% 47% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 47% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 5%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.4s 83% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 83% 10% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 10% 6% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 6%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)46ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 97% 0% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.4s 91% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 91% 5% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 5% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)1ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 98% 1% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 1% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.0s 53% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 53% 41% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 41% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 5%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.3s 85% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 85% 9% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 9% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 5%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)46ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 97% 1% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 1% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.4s 90% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 90% 5% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 5% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 3%

Lab Data

Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Speed Index 1.4 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Minimize third-party usage  
Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading. Learn how to minimize third-party impact
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Max Potential First Input Delay 20 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Largest Contentful Paint 0.8 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Time to Interactive 0.8 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Third parties  
Third party code can significantly impact load performance. to prioritize your page's content. Reduce and defer loading of third party code
First Contentful Paint 0.7 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

93
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 98% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 1%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.1s 47% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 43% 49% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 49% 6% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 6%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.5s 83% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 81% 12% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 12% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 5%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)110ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<200s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 90% 6% of loads for this page have an average (200s ~ 500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 6% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 3%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.5s 91% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 91% 6% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 6% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 98% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 1%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.0s 47% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 47% 46% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 46% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 5%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.5s 82% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 82% 12% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 12% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 5%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)116ms 88% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.2s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 88% 7% of loads for this page have an average (0.2s ~ 0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 7% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 3%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.5s 90% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 90% 6% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 6% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2%

Lab Data

Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
Largest Contentful Paint 2.7 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Max Potential First Input Delay 40 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Time to Interactive 2.7 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Minimize third-party usage  
Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading. Learn how to minimize third-party impact
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
First Contentful Paint 2.3 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Speed Index 2.8 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Third parties  
Third party code can significantly impact load performance. to prioritize your page's content. Reduce and defer loading of third party code

Does mag-apply.com use compression? ▼

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on mag-apply.com are reduced by 28%.
mag-apply.com use br compression.
Original size: 82.56 KB
Compressed size: 59.32 KB
File reduced by: 23.24 KB (28%)

Google Safe Browsing ▼

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites.
Status:
  UNKNOWN

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify ▼

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. mag-apply.com supports HTTPS.
 mag-apply.com supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: mag-apply.com
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: WE1
Valid from: Mar 27 08:10:12 2025 GMT
Valid until: Jun 25 09:06:47 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize:
Common Name: WE1
Organization: Google Trust Services
Location: US
Issuer: GTS Root R4
Valid from: Dec 13 09:00:00 2023 GMT
Valid until: Feb 20 14:00:00 2029 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize:
Common Name: GTS Root R4
Organization: Google Trust Services LLC
Location: US
Issuer: GlobalSign Root CA
Valid from: Nov 15 03:43:21 2023 GMT
Valid until: Jan 28 00:00:42 2028 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize:

Verify HTTP/2 Support ▼

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 mag-apply.com supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header ▼

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server. 
date: Sun, 30 Mar 2025 00:41:02 GMT
content-type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
set-cookie: PHPSESSID=u8s21d92s0seiuf5lur5tgo431; path=/
expires: Thu, 19 Nov 1981 08:52:00 GMT
cache-control: no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate, post-check=0, pre-check=0
pragma: no-cache
location: /index.php?m=User&a=login
cf-cache-status: DYNAMIC
report-to: {"endpoints":[{"url":"https://a.nel.cloudflare.com/report/v4?s=zIHwUStonHo1oWv%2BVH5eIfrM0NonnyBgOoTgZqLWmvas%2BfuQlOL4PDL%2FF%2B2mArVoENG9JbqEbfvPv8JkoeQqiU5m97W4gFuqzF6TKsWPhJDxdQhxLPiyZlhpCcyak2AR"}],"group":"cf-nel","max_age":604800}
nel: {"success_fraction":0,"report_to":"cf-nel","max_age":604800}
server: cloudflare
cf-ray: 92838f199c93514c-ORD
alt-svc: h3=":443"; ma=86400
server-timing: cfL4;desc="?proto=TCP&rtt=7742&min_rtt=2199&rtt_var=11529&sent=8&recv=11&lost=0&retrans=0&sent_bytes=3415&recv_bytes=893&delivery_rate=1316363&cwnd=254&unsent_bytes=0&cid=9ea95a59257f3c0a&ts=471&x=0"

HTTP/2 200 
date: Sun, 30 Mar 2025 00:41:02 GMT
content-type: text/html; charset=utf-8
server: cloudflare
vary: Accept-Encoding
expires: Thu, 19 Nov 1981 08:52:00 GMT
pragma: no-cache
cache-control: private
x-powered-by: ThinkPHP
cf-cache-status: DYNAMIC
content-encoding: br
set-cookie: PHPSESSID=1gqo7s68vlvrl5klcu3l8i8pu6; Path=/
cf-ray: 92838f1c7cd9514c-ORD
alt-svc: h3=":443"; ma=86400

DNS Lookup ▼

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
AAAA 2606:4700:130:436c:6f75:6466:6c61:7265 238
A 104.21.17.37 256
A 172.67.220.132 256
NS louis.ns.cloudflare.com 172756
NS arya.ns.cloudflare.com 172756
HINFO 3600

Whois Lookup ▼

Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information. Domain registration for this website began on October 1, 2024 and will expire on October 1, 2025 if not renewed. This website is now assigned through the registrar Gname.com Pte. Ltd.. The WHOIS data for this website's domain was last updated on March 28, 2025.
Domain Created:
2024-10-01
Domain Expires:
2025-10-01
Domain Updated:
2025-03-28
Domain Age:
8 months 24 days
Domain Registrar:
Gname.com Pte. Ltd.
Domain Owner:
Redacted for privacy
WhoIs:
 

Domain Name: MAG-APPLY.COM
Registry Domain ID: 2921638651_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.gname.com
Registrar URL: www.gname.com
Updated Date: 2025-03-28T13:09:54Z
Creation Date: 2024-10-01T07:20:23Z
Registrar Registration Expiration Date: 2025-10-01T07:20:23Z
Registrar: Gname.com Pte. Ltd.
Registrar IANA ID: 1923
Reseller:
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: email
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +65.31581931
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Registry Registrant ID: Redacted for privacy
Registrant Name: Redacted for privacy
Registrant Organization: Redacted for privacy
Registrant Street: Redacted for privacy
Registrant City: Redacted for privacy
Registrant State/Province: HONG KONG
Registrant Postal Code: Redacted for privacy
Registrant Country: HK,CN
Registrant Phone: Redacted for privacy
Registrant Fax: Redacted for privacy
Registrant Email: https://rdap.gname.com/extra/contact?type=registrant&domain=MAG-APPLY.COM
Admin Name: Redacted for privacy
Admin Organization: Redacted for privacy
Admin Street: Redacted for privacy
Admin City: Redacted for privacy
Admin State/Province: Redacted for privacy
Admin Postal Code: Redacted for privacy
Admin Country: Redacted for privacy
Admin Phone: Redacted for privacy
Admin Fax: Redacted for privacy
Admin Email: https://rdap.gname.com/extra/contact?type=admin&domain=MAG-APPLY.COM
Tech Name: Redacted for privacy
Tech Organization: Redacted for privacy
Tech Street: Redacted for privacy
Tech City: Redacted for privacy
Tech State/Province: Redacted for privacy
Tech Postal Code: Redacted for privacy
Tech Country: Redacted for privacy
Tech Phone: Redacted for privacy
Tech Fax: Redacted for privacy
Tech Email: https://rdap.gname.com/extra/contact?type=technical&domain=MAG-APPLY.COM
Name Server: ARYA.NS.CLOUDFLARE.COM
Name Server: LOUIS.NS.CLOUDFLARE.COM
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form: https://www.icann.org/wicf/
>>> Last update of whois database: 2025-03-28T13:09:54Z