litestar.dev Litestar.dev

   
Litestar | Effortlessly Build Performant APIs

Domain Summary

What is the traffic rank for Litestar.dev?

• Litestar.dev ranks #865,371 globally on HypeStat.

What percent of global Internet users visit Litestar.dev?

1.63E-5% of global Internet users visit Litestar.dev

How many people visit Litestar.dev each day?

• Litestar.dev receives approximately 803 visitors and 2,570 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Litestar.dev receive most of its visitors from?

• Litestar.dev is mostly visited by people located in Russian Federation,Viet Nam,United States.

How much Litestar.dev can earn?

• Litestar.dev should earn about $6.07/day from advertising revenue.

What is Litestar.dev estimated value?

• Estimated value of Litestar.dev is $5,840.81.

What IP addresses does Litestar.dev resolve to?

• Litestar.dev resolves to the IP addresses 2606:50c0:8001::153, 185.199.109.153.

Where are Litestar.dev servers located in?

• Litestar.dev has servers located in San Francisco, California, 94107, United States.

litestar.dev Profile

Title:Litestar | Effortlessly Build Performant APIs Description:Litestar | Effortlessly Build Performant APIs
Category:Computers Electronics and Technology / Programming and Developer Software

What technologies does litestar.dev use?

These are the technologies used at litestar.dev. litestar.dev has a total of 3 technologies installed in 3 different categories.

litestar.dev Traffic Analysis

Litestar.dev is ranked #865,371 in the world. This website is viewed by an estimated 803 visitors daily, generating a total of 2.6K pageviews. This equates to about 24.3K monthly visitors. Litestar.dev traffic has decreased by 58.95% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors803
43.94%
Monthly Visits24.3K
58.95%
Pages per Visit3.20
16.64%
Visit duration01:16
23.21%
Bounce Rate40.71%
24.21%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
803
Monthly Visits:
24,331
Pages per Visit:
3.20
Daily Pageviews:
2,570
Avg. visit duration:
01:16
Bounce rate:
40.71%
Global Reach:
1.63E-5%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
21,094
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
8,497
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
23,853
HypeRank:
865,371
SEMrush Rank:
1,255,849
SimilarWeb Rank:
865,371
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
52.33%
Referral:
12.98%
Search:
30.57%
Social:
3.98%
Paid:
0.15%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
100.00%
Mobile:
0%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

18K
FEB
59.3K
MAR
24.3K
APR

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
Russian Federation 22.25%
 
Viet Nam 15.18%
 
United States 9.22%
 
Taiwan 6.54%
 
Germany 6.33%

Which sites are competitors to litestar.dev?

Websites similar to litestar.dev are sites similar on user interests and browsing behavior. Users can discover new websites that are similar to the ones they already enjoy or find useful.
Last update was 24 days ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with litestar.dev in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

 

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  litestar.dev
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  1,255,849
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  132
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  772
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $13.00

Revenue report

Google.com would generate approximately $6.1 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $182.1 and annual gross revenue of approximately $2.2K. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $5.8K.

How much would litestar.dev make?

Daily Revenue:
$6.07
Monthly Revenue:
$182.10
Yearly Revenue:
$2,215.55
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
United States 237$1.14
 
Russian Federation 572$0.23
 
Germany 163$0.23
 
Viet Nam 390$0.18
 
Taiwan 168$0.04

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$0.30
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$8.99
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$109.33
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
167
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
4,998
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
60,810

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
United States 43$0.21
 
Germany 47$0.07
 
Russian Federation 34$0.01
 
Viet Nam 16$0.01
 
Taiwan 27$0.01

How much is litestar.dev worth?

Website Value:
$5.8K

Ad Experience Report

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
litestar.dev
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
litestar.dev
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
litestar.dev
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is litestar.dev hosted?

Litestar.dev may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
2606:50c0:8001::153, 185.199.109.153
ASN:
AS54113 
ISP:
Fastly 
Server Location:
San Francisco
California, CA
94107
United States, US
 

Other sites hosted on 185.199.109.153

How fast does litestar.dev load?

The average loading time of litestar.dev is 52 ms. The Desktop speed index is 100 and mobile speed index is 100.
Average Load Time:
52 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

100
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)655ms 80% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 80% 16% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 16% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 3%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)998ms 93% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 93% 5% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 5% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)15ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)974ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 97% 1% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)605ms 81% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 81% 15% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 15% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 2%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)982ms 93% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 93% 5% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 5% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 1%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)16ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)963ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 97% 1% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0%

Lab Data

INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
First Contentful Paint 0.2 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Legacy JavaScript  
Polyfills and transforms enable legacy browsers to use new JavaScript features. However, many aren't necessary for modern browsers. Consider modifying your JavaScript build process to not transpile features, unless you know you must support legacy browsers. Baseline Learn why most sites can deploy ES6+ code without transpiling
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
3rd parties  
3rd party code can significantly impact load performance. to prioritize your page's content. Reduce and defer loading of 3rd party code
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Duplicated JavaScript  
Remove large, duplicate JavaScript modules from bundles to reduce unnecessary bytes consumed by network activity.
Minimize third-party usage  
Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading. Learn how to minimize third-party impact
Speed Index 0.4 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Time to Interactive 0.3 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Max Potential First Input Delay 30 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Largest Contentful Paint 0.3 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

100
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)513ms 80% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 87% 10% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 10% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 2%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)820ms 93% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 95% 2% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 2% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 2%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)63ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<200s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (200s ~ 500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)880ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 97% 1% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)512ms 87% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 87% 10% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 10% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 2%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)820ms 95% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 95% 2% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 2% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 2%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)63ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.2s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.2s ~ 0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)874ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 97% 1% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0%

Lab Data

Minimize third-party usage  
Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading. Learn how to minimize third-party impact
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
Largest Contentful Paint 0.9 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Speed Index 0.9 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
First Contentful Paint 0.9 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
3rd parties  
3rd party code can significantly impact load performance. to prioritize your page's content. Reduce and defer loading of 3rd party code
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Max Potential First Input Delay 20 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Legacy JavaScript  
Polyfills and transforms enable legacy browsers to use new JavaScript features. However, many aren't necessary for modern browsers. Consider modifying your JavaScript build process to not transpile features, unless you know you must support legacy browsers. Baseline Learn why most sites can deploy ES6+ code without transpiling
Time to Interactive 0.9 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Duplicated JavaScript  
Remove large, duplicate JavaScript modules from bundles to reduce unnecessary bytes consumed by network activity.

Does litestar.dev use compression?

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on litestar.dev are reduced by 82%.
litestar.dev use gzip compression.
Original size: 56.74 KB
Compressed size: 10.04 KB
File reduced by: 46.7 KB (82%)

Google Safe Browsing

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites.
Status:
  SAFE

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. litestar.dev supports HTTPS.
 litestar.dev supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: litestar.dev
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: R10
Valid from: Apr 24 20:53:06 2025 GMT
Valid until: Jul 23 20:53:05 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Common Name: R10
Organization: Let's Encrypt
Location: US
Issuer: ISRG Root X1
Valid from: Mar 13 00:00:00 2024 GMT
Valid until: Mar 12 23:59:59 2027 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 2048 Bits

Verify HTTP/2 Support

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 litestar.dev supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server.
server: GitHub.com
content-type: text/html; charset=utf-8
last-modified: Wed, 07 May 2025 11:42:00 GMT
access-control-allow-origin: *
etag: W/"681b4708-e2f7"
expires: Mon, 26 May 2025 10:05:41 GMT
cache-control: max-age=600
content-encoding: gzip
x-proxy-cache: MISS
x-github-request-id: A86B:2638E4:85A09F:8F851E:68343A9A
accept-ranges: bytes
age: 0
date: Mon, 26 May 2025 10:00:41 GMT
via: 1.1 varnish
x-served-by: cache-chi-klot8100163-CHI
x-cache: HIT
x-cache-hits: 0
x-timer: S1748253642.632898,VS0,VE33
vary: Accept-Encoding
x-fastly-request-id: 92e176ed8995e4a2bb57cc4dc3b0a4273a05dea6
content-length: 10286

DNS Lookup

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
AAAA 2606:50c0:8002::153 247
AAAA 2606:50c0:8003::153 247
AAAA 2606:50c0:8000::153 247
AAAA 2606:50c0:8001::153 247
A 185.199.108.153 247
A 185.199.109.153 247
A 185.199.110.153 247
A 185.199.111.153 247
NS trey.ns.cloudflare.com 10747
NS hera.ns.cloudflare.com 10747
HINFO 3600