linux.do Linux.do

   
Just a moment...

Domain Summary

What is the traffic rank for Linux.do?

• Linux.do ranks #26,328 globally on HypeStat.

What percent of global Internet users visit Linux.do?

0.004231% of global Internet users visit Linux.do

How many people visit Linux.do each day?

• Linux.do receives approximately 208.6K visitors and 4,921,865 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Linux.do receive most of its visitors from?

• Linux.do is mostly visited by people located in China,Taiwan,United States.

How much Linux.do can earn?

• Linux.do should earn about $3,511.62/day from advertising revenue.

What is Linux.do estimated value?

• Estimated value of Linux.do is $4,121,771.91.

What IP addresses does Linux.do resolve to?

• Linux.do resolves to the IP addresses 2606:4700:10::ac43:24c9, 104.22.59.188.

Where are Linux.do servers located in?

• Linux.do has servers located in United States.

linux.do Profile

Title:Just a moment... Description:Where possible begins.
About: linux.do is a website dedicated to providing resources, news, and tutorials for Linux users and enthusiasts. It covers a wide range of topics including in-depth guides on different Linux distributions, troubleshooting tips, command-line utilities, and software recommendations. The site aims to be a comprehensive reference for both beginners and experienced users, offering insights into system administration, security practices, and the latest developments in the Linux world. Through its articles and community contributions, linux.do helps users to enhance their knowledge and efficiently manage their Linux systems.
*This text is generated by artificial intelligence and may not be accurate. Edit Site Info

What technologies does linux.do use?

These are the technologies used at linux.do. linux.do has a total of 6 technologies installed in 6 different categories.

linux.do Traffic Analysis

Linux.do is ranked #26,328 in the world. This website is viewed by an estimated 208.6K visitors daily, generating a total of 4.9M pageviews. This equates to about 6.3M monthly visitors. Linux.do traffic has decreased by 9.66% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors208.6K
10.55%
Monthly Visits6.3M
9.66%
Pages per Visit23.60
6.54%
Visit duration11:27
8.81%
Bounce Rate26.24%
1.98%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
208,584
Monthly Visits:
6,320,095
Pages per Visit:
23.60
Daily Pageviews:
4,921,865
Avg. visit duration:
11:27
Bounce rate:
26.24%
Global Reach:
0.004231%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
3,437,649
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
870,756
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
6,134,816
HypeRank:
26,328
SEMrush Rank:
101,437
SimilarWeb Rank:
4,144
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
65.70%
Referral:
10.24%
Search:
21.67%
Social:
1.59%
Paid:
0.81%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
96.98%
Mobile:
3.02%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

5.7M
FEB
7M
MAR
6.3M
APR

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
China 75.48%
 
Taiwan 6.32%
 
United States 5.91%
 
Hong Kong 3.57%
 
Singapore 2.58%

Which sites are competitors to linux.do?

Websites similar to linux.do are sites similar on user interests and browsing behavior. Users can discover new websites that are similar to the ones they already enjoy or find useful.
Last update was 19 days ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with linux.do in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

Search Engine Indexes

Search engine indexes are huge databases or collections of net pages that search engines like google like google and yahoo use to retrieve applicable facts while customers carry out searches. These indexes are created through search engines like google and yahoo through crawling and indexing net pages from throughout the internet.
Google Index:
281,000
Bing Index:
2,230

 

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  linux.do
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  101,437
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  32,076
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  19,020
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $1,513.00

Revenue report

Google.com would generate approximately $3.5K per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $105.3K and annual gross revenue of approximately $1.3M. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $4.1M.

How much would linux.do make?

Daily Revenue:
$3,511.62
Monthly Revenue:
$105,348.60
Yearly Revenue:
$1,281,741.30
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
United States 290,760$1,404.37
 
China 3,715,226$371.52
 
Singapore 126,952$238.67
 
Hong Kong 175,845$193.43
 
Taiwan 311,102$71.55

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$401.09
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$12,032.72
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$146,398.12
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
639,493
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
19,184,795
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
233,415,008

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
United States 52,337$252.79
 
Singapore 36,816$69.21
 
China 482,979$48.30
 
Hong Kong 17,584$19.34
 
Taiwan 49,776$11.45

How much is linux.do worth?

Website Value:
$4.1M

Ad Experience Report

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
linux.do
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
linux.do
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
linux.do
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is linux.do hosted?

Linux.do may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
2606:4700:10::ac43:24c9, 104.22.59.188
ASN:
AS13335 
ISP:
Cloudflare Inc 
Server Location:

United States, US
 

Other sites hosted on 104.22.59.188

How fast does linux.do load?

The average loading time of linux.do is 32 ms. The Desktop speed index is 98 and mobile speed index is 83.
Average Load Time:
32 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

98
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)5ms 81% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 81% 8% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 8% 9% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 9%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.4s 26% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 26% 58% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 58% 14% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 14%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)2.3s 58% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 58% 27% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 27% 14% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 14%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)107ms 87% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 87% 8% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 8% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 4%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.4s 76% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 76% 15% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 15% 7% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 7%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)1ms 89% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 89% 4% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 4% 6% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 6%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.2s 33% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 33% 57% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 57% 8% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 8%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.9s 70% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 70% 20% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 20% 8% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 8%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)78ms 92% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 92% 5% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 5% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 2%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.3s 80% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 80% 14% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 14% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 5%

Lab Data

INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Largest Contentful Paint 1.0 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Max Potential First Input Delay 20 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
First Contentful Paint 0.7 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Time to Interactive 1.0 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Speed Index 1.0 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

83
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)8ms 81% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 77% 9% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 9% 13% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 13%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.6s 26% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 19% 60% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 60% 19% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 19%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)2.7s 58% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 43% 37% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 37% 18% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 18%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)186ms 87% of loads for this page have a fast (<200s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 78% 17% of loads for this page have an average (200s ~ 500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 17% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 4%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)3.2s 76% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 58% 27% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 27% 13% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 13%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)5ms 83% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 83% 7% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 7% 9% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 9%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.4s 36% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 36% 50% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 50% 13% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 13%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)2.5s 52% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 52% 31% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 31% 16% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 16%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)174ms 80% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.2s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 80% 15% of loads for this page have an average (0.2s ~ 0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 15% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 4%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.9s 67% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 67% 21% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 21% 11% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 11%

Lab Data

Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
First Contentful Paint 3.4 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Max Potential First Input Delay 50 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Speed Index 3.4 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Largest Contentful Paint 3.7 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Legacy JavaScript  
Polyfills and transforms enable legacy browsers to use new JavaScript features. However, many aren't necessary for modern browsers. Consider modifying your JavaScript build process to not transpile features, unless you know you must support legacy browsers. Baseline Learn why most sites can deploy ES6+ code without transpiling
Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Time to Interactive 3.8 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Duplicated JavaScript  
Remove large, duplicate JavaScript modules from bundles to reduce unnecessary bytes consumed by network activity.

Does linux.do use compression?

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on linux.do are reduced by 42%.
linux.do use br compression.
Original size: 22.37 KB
Compressed size: 12.8 KB
File reduced by: 9.57 KB (42%)

Google Safe Browsing

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites. linux.do has 80 Safety Reputations.
Status:
  SAFE
Safety Reputations:
  80
Safety Confidence:
  51

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. linux.do supports HTTPS.
 linux.do supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: linux.do
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: Cloudflare TLS Issuing ECC CA 1
Valid from: Apr 10 08:58:59 2025 GMT
Valid until: Jul 9 09:05:00 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize:
Common Name: Cloudflare TLS Issuing ECC CA 1
Organization: "CLOUDFLARE, INC."
Location: US
Issuer: SSL.com TLS Transit ECC CA R2
Valid from: Oct 31 17:17:49 2023 GMT
Valid until: Oct 28 17:17:48 2033 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize:
Common Name: SSL.com TLS Transit ECC CA R2
Organization: SSL Corporation
Location: US
Issuer: AAA Certificate Services
Valid from: Jun 21 00:00:00 2024 GMT
Valid until: Dec 31 23:59:59 2028 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize:

Verify HTTP/2 Support

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 linux.do supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server.
date: Mon, 26 May 2025 04:35:35 GMT
content-type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
accept-ch: Sec-CH-UA-Bitness, Sec-CH-UA-Arch, Sec-CH-UA-Full-Version, Sec-CH-UA-Mobile, Sec-CH-UA-Model, Sec-CH-UA-Platform-Version, Sec-CH-UA-Full-Version-List, Sec-CH-UA-Platform, Sec-CH-UA, UA-Bitness, UA-Arch, UA-Full-Version, UA-Mobile, UA-Model, UA-Platform-Version, UA-Platform, UA
cf-mitigated: challenge
critical-ch: Sec-CH-UA-Bitness, Sec-CH-UA-Arch, Sec-CH-UA-Full-Version, Sec-CH-UA-Mobile, Sec-CH-UA-Model, Sec-CH-UA-Platform-Version, Sec-CH-UA-Full-Version-List, Sec-CH-UA-Platform, Sec-CH-UA, UA-Bitness, UA-Arch, UA-Full-Version, UA-Mobile, UA-Model, UA-Platform-Version, UA-Platform, UA
cross-origin-embedder-policy: require-corp
cross-origin-opener-policy: same-origin
cross-origin-resource-policy: same-origin
origin-agent-cluster: ?1
permissions-policy: accelerometer=(),autoplay=(),browsing-topics=(),camera=(),clipboard-read=(),clipboard-write=(),geolocation=(),gyroscope=(),hid=(),interest-cohort=(),magnetometer=(),microphone=(),payment=(),publickey-credentials-get=(),screen-wake-lock=(),serial=(),sync-xhr=(),usb=()
referrer-policy: same-origin
server-timing: chlray;desc="945a91137d55f167"
x-content-type-options: nosniff
x-frame-options: SAMEORIGIN
cache-control: private, max-age=0, no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate, post-check=0, pre-check=0
expires: Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:01 GMT
vary: Accept-Encoding
strict-transport-security: max-age=15552000; includeSubDomains; preload
server: cloudflare
cf-ray: 945a91137d55f167-ORD
content-encoding: br

DNS Lookup

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
AAAA 2606:4700:10::6816:3bbc 219
AAAA 2606:4700:10::6816:3abc 219
AAAA 2606:4700:10::ac43:24c9 219
A 172.67.36.201 219
A 104.22.58.188 219
A 104.22.59.188 219
NS dahlia.ns.cloudflare.com 3519
NS marek.ns.cloudflare.com 3519
HINFO 3600

Whois Lookup

Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information. Domain registration for this website began on May 27, 2022 and will expire on May 27, 2026 if not renewed. This website is now assigned through the registrar Registrar NIC .DO (midominio.do). The WHOIS data for this website's domain was last updated on April 18, 2025.
Domain Created:
2022-05-27
Domain Expires:
2026-05-27
Domain Updated:
2025-04-18
Domain Age:
3 years 18 days
Domain Registrar:
Registrar NIC .DO (midominio.do)
Domain Owner:
N/A
WhoIs:
 

Domain Name: linux.do
Registrar URL: 
Updated Date: 2025-04-18T10:17:21.605Z
Creation Date: 2022-05-27T06:35:49.6Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2026-05-27T06:35:49.100Z
Registrar Registration Expiration Date: 2026-05-27T06:35:49.100Z
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Registry Registrant ID: Redacted | Registry Policy
Registrant Name: CK
Registrant Organization: N/A
Registrant Street: Redacted | Registry Policy
Registrant City: Redacted | Registry Policy
Registrant State/Province: Redacted | Registry Policy
Registrant Postal Code: Redacted | Registry Policy
Registrant Country: Redacted | Registry Policy
Registrant Phone: Redacted | Registry Policy
Registrant Email: Redacted | Registry Policy
Registry Admin ID: Redacted | Registry Policy
Admin Name: CK
Admin Organization: N/A
Admin Street: Redacted | Registry Policy
Admin City: Redacted | Registry Policy
Admin State/Province: Redacted | Registry Policy
Admin Postal Code: Redacted | Registry Policy
Admin Country: Redacted | Registry Policy
Admin Phone: Redacted | Registry Policy
Admin Email: Redacted | Registry Policy
Registry Tech ID: Redacted | Registry Policy
Tech Name: CK
Tech Organization: N/A
Tech Street: Redacted | Registry Policy
Tech City: Redacted | Registry Policy
Tech State/Province: Redacted | Registry Policy
Tech Postal Code: Redacted | Registry Policy
Tech Country: Redacted | Registry Policy
Tech Phone: Redacted | Registry Policy
Tech Email: Redacted | Registry Policy
Registry Billing ID: FZYW9-fhFTc
Billing Name: CK
Billing Organization: N/A
Billing Street: Redacted | Registry Policy
Billing City: Redacted | Registry Policy
Billing State/Province: Redacted | Registry Policy
Billing Postal Code: Redacted | Registry Policy
Billing Country: Redacted | Registry Policy
Billing Phone: Redacted | Registry Policy
Billing Email: Redacted | Registry Policy
Registrar: Registrar NIC .DO (midominio.do)
Registrar Country: DO
Registrar Phone: 8095350111
Registrar Fax: 8092860012
Registrar Customer Service Contact: email
Registrar Customer Service Email: email
Name Server: marek.ns.cloudflare.com
Name Server: dahlia.ns.cloudflare.com
DNSSEC: unsigned
>>> Last update of WHOIS database: 2025-05-26T02:43:04.352Z