jbs.al Jbs.al

   
403 Forbidden

Domain Summary

What is the traffic rank for Jbs.al?

• Jbs.al ranks #139,938 globally on HypeStat.

What percent of global Internet users visit Jbs.al?

• 0.0001872% of global Internet users visit Jbs.al

How many people visit Jbs.al each day?

• Jbs.al receives approximately 9.2K visitors and 41,243 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Jbs.al receive most of its visitors from?

• Jbs.al is mostly visited by people located in United States,Germany,Japan.

How much Jbs.al can earn?

• Jbs.al should earn about $120.82/day from advertising revenue.

What is Jbs.al estimated value?

• Estimated value of Jbs.al is $120,138.16.

What IP addresses does Jbs.al resolve to?

• Jbs.al resolves to the IP addresses 2606:4700:3031::ac43:8918, 104.21.62.164.

jbs.al Profile

Title:403 Forbidden
Category:Adult / Adult
Edit Site Info

jbs.al Traffic Analysis

Jbs.al is ranked #139,938 in the world. This website is viewed by an estimated 9.2K visitors daily, generating a total of 41.2K pageviews. This equates to about 279.6K monthly visitors. Jbs.al traffic has decreased by 33.35% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors9.2K
6.2%
Monthly Visits279.6K
33.35%
Pages per Visit4.47
40.97%
Visit duration07:13
57.57%
Bounce Rate27.08%
37.07%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
9,227
Monthly Visits:
279,578
Pages per Visit:
4.47
Daily Pageviews:
41,243
Avg. visit duration:
07:13
Bounce rate:
27.08%
Global Reach:
0.0001872%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
255,655
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
160,686
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
274,060
HypeRank:
139,938
SimilarWeb Rank:
139,938
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
88.17%
Referral:
11.83%
Search:
0%
Social:
0%
Paid:
0%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
30.58%
Mobile:
69.42%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

181.8K
DEC
419.5K
JAN
279.6K
FEB

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
United States 35.41%
 
Germany 25.63%
 
Japan 11.60%
 
Netherlands 7.24%
 
Russian Federation 3.83%

Which sites are competitors to jbs.al?

Websites similar to jbs.al are sites similar on user interests and browsing behavior. Users can discover new websites that are similar to the ones they already enjoy or find useful.
Last update was 75 days ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with jbs.al in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

  ▼

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  jbs.al
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  n/a
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  0
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  0
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $0.00
Full SEMrush Report >>

Revenue report ▼

Google.com would generate approximately $120.8 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $3.6K and annual gross revenue of approximately $44.1K. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $120.1K.

How much would jbs.al make?

Daily Revenue:
$120.82
Monthly Revenue:
$3,624.60
Yearly Revenue:
$44,099.30
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
United States 14,605$70.54
 
Germany 10,570$14.80
 
Netherlands 2,985$5.70
 
Japan 4,785$1.72
 
Russian Federation 1,579$0.65

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$18.05
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$541.47
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$6,587.83
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
6,440
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
193,202
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
2,350,619

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
United States 2,629$12.70
 
Germany 3,065$4.29
 
Netherlands 507$0.97
 
Japan 144$0.05
 
Russian Federation 95$0.04

How much is jbs.al worth?

Website Value:
$120.1K

Ad Experience Report ▼

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
jbs.al
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
jbs.al
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report ▼

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
jbs.al
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is jbs.al hosted? ▼

Jbs.al may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.

How fast does jbs.al load? ▼

The average loading time of jbs.al is 574 ms. The Desktop speed index is 100 and mobile speed index is 100.
Average Load Time:
574 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

100
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 100% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 100% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)983ms 59% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 59% 34% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 34% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 5%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.2s 88% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 88% 7% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 7% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 3%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)43ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 96% 2% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 2% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.3s 94% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 94% 3% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 3% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 100% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 100% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)983ms 59% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 59% 34% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 34% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 5%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.2s 88% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 88% 7% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 7% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 3%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)43ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 96% 2% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 2% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.3s 94% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 94% 3% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 3% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1%

Lab Data

Largest Contentful Paint 0.2 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Speed Index 0.5 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Third parties  
Third party code can significantly impact load performance. to prioritize your page's content. Reduce and defer loading of third party code
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
First Contentful Paint 0.2 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Optimize DOM size  
A large DOM can increase the duration of style calculations and layout reflows, impacting page responsiveness. A large DOM will also increase memory usage. Learn how to avoid an excessive DOM size
Minimize third-party usage  
Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading. Learn how to minimize third-party impact
Time to Interactive 0.2 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Render blocking requests  
Requests are blocking the page's initial render, which may delay LCP. can move these network requests out of the critical path. Deferring or inlining
Max Potential First Input Delay 20 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

100
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 100% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 98% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.1s 59% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 52% 40% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 40% 6% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 6%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.3s 88% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 87% 9% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 9% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 3%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)319ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<200s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 5% 93% of loads for this page have an average (200s ~ 500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 93% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.5s 94% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 93% 4% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 4% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 98% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.1s 52% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 52% 40% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 40% 6% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 6%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.3s 87% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 87% 9% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 9% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 3%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)319ms 5% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.2s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 5% 93% of loads for this page have an average (0.2s ~ 0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 93% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.5s 93% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 93% 4% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 4% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1%

Lab Data

Render blocking requests  
Requests are blocking the page's initial render, which may delay LCP. can move these network requests out of the critical path. Deferring or inlining
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Third parties  
Third party code can significantly impact load performance. to prioritize your page's content. Reduce and defer loading of third party code
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Time to Interactive 0.8 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
First Contentful Paint 0.8 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Largest Contentful Paint 0.8 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Speed Index 1.3 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Optimize DOM size  
A large DOM can increase the duration of style calculations and layout reflows, impacting page responsiveness. A large DOM will also increase memory usage. Learn how to avoid an excessive DOM size
Minimize third-party usage  
Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading. Learn how to minimize third-party impact
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Max Potential First Input Delay 20 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric

Does jbs.al use compression? ▼

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on jbs.al are reduced by 30%.
jbs.al use br compression.
Original size: 146 B
Compressed size: 101 B
File reduced by: 45 B (30%)

Google Safe Browsing ▼

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites.
Status:
  SAFE
Child Safety Reputations:
  10
Child Safety Confidence:
  51

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify ▼

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. jbs.al supports HTTPS.
 jbs.al supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: jbs.al
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: WE1
Valid from: Feb 20 15:47:54 2025 GMT
Valid until: May 21 16:46:14 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize:
Common Name: WE1
Organization: Google Trust Services
Location: US
Issuer: GTS Root R4
Valid from: Dec 13 09:00:00 2023 GMT
Valid until: Feb 20 14:00:00 2029 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize:
Common Name: GTS Root R4
Organization: Google Trust Services LLC
Location: US
Issuer: GlobalSign Root CA
Valid from: Nov 15 03:43:21 2023 GMT
Valid until: Jan 28 00:00:42 2028 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize:

Verify HTTP/2 Support ▼

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 jbs.al supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header ▼

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server. 
date: Thu, 03 Apr 2025 14:31:42 GMT
content-type: text/html; charset=utf-8
x-content-type-options: "nosniff" always
x-xss-protection: "1; mode=block" always
strict-transport-security: "max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload" always
referrer-policy: no-referrer-when-downgrade
cf-cache-status: DYNAMIC
report-to: {"endpoints":[{"url":"https://a.nel.cloudflare.com/report/v4?s=wS0Y5s4Leru6oyDtpbTDya2%2B33%2B5bUxeVCEoEwv%2BRFOhsUeH%2BFcxTXxeiQBKP3762z0lF3KS7ICIe3dlHN9IIEnCXe9GmON3LGMME3sb5QeWalphAPhj2%2BA%3D"}],"group":"cf-nel","max_age":604800}
nel: {"success_fraction":0,"report_to":"cf-nel","max_age":604800}
server: cloudflare
cf-ray: 92a945681b4fe1c7-ORD
content-encoding: br
alt-svc: h3=":443"; ma=86400
server-timing: cfL4;desc="?proto=TCP&rtt=7358&min_rtt=1985&rtt_var=11142&sent=8&recv=11&lost=0&retrans=0&sent_bytes=3390&recv_bytes=888&delivery_rate=1442949&cwnd=141&unsent_bytes=0&cid=748771c14f817840&ts=561&x=0"

DNS Lookup ▼

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
AAAA 2606:4700:3031::6815:3ea4 299
AAAA 2606:4700:3031::ac43:8918 299
A 104.21.62.164 299
A 172.67.137.24 299
NS ishaan.ns.cloudflare.com 17999
NS stevie.ns.cloudflare.com 17999
HINFO 3600