intercec.com.ar Intercec.com.ar

   

Domain Summary

What percent of global Internet users visit Intercec.com.ar?

• 3.29E-5% of global Internet users visit Intercec.com.ar

How many people visit Intercec.com.ar each day?

• Intercec.com.ar receives approximately 1.6K visitors and 3,291 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Intercec.com.ar receive most of its visitors from?

• Intercec.com.ar is mostly visited by people located in Argentina.

How much Intercec.com.ar can earn?

• Intercec.com.ar should earn about $0.82/day from advertising revenue.

What is Intercec.com.ar estimated value?

• Estimated value of Intercec.com.ar is $863.54.

What IP addresses does Intercec.com.ar resolve to?

• Intercec.com.ar resolves to the IP addresses 167.250.5.3.

Where are Intercec.com.ar servers located in?

• Intercec.com.ar has servers located in Argentina.

intercec.com.ar Profile

Category:Finance / Financial Planning and Management
Edit Site Info

What technologies does intercec.com.ar use?

These are the technologies used at intercec.com.ar. intercec.com.ar has a total of 1 technologies installed in 1 different categories.
Web Servers
Apache HTTP Server Apache HTTP Server

intercec.com.ar Traffic Analysis

This website is viewed by an estimated 1.6K visitors daily, generating a total of 3.3K pageviews. This equates to about 49.2K monthly visitors. Intercec.com.ar traffic has decreased by 63.46% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors1.6K
38.49%
Monthly Visits49.2K
63.46%
Pages per Visit2.03
35.91%
Visit duration02:37
42.5%
Bounce Rate64.78%
15.95%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
1,624
Monthly Visits:
49,207
Pages per Visit:
2.03
Daily Pageviews:
3,291
Avg. visit duration:
02:37
Bounce rate:
64.78%
Global Reach:
3.29E-5%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
55,910
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
33,832
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
49,209
HypeRank:
n/a
SEMrush Rank:
7,734,372
SimilarWeb Rank:
650,678
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
52.79%
Referral:
3.32%
Search:
40.56%
Social:
2.30%
Paid:
1.04%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
44.70%
Mobile:
55.30%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

86.3K
DEC
134.7K
JAN
49.2K
FEB

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
Argentina 100.00%

Which sites are competitors to intercec.com.ar?

Websites similar to intercec.com.ar are sites similar on user interests and browsing behavior. Users can discover new websites that are similar to the ones they already enjoy or find useful.
Last update was 77 days ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with intercec.com.ar in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

Search Engine Indexes ▼

Search engine indexes are huge databases or collections of net pages that search engines like google like google and yahoo use to retrieve applicable facts while customers carry out searches. These indexes are created through search engines like google and yahoo through crawling and indexing net pages from throughout the internet.
Google Index:
2

  ▼

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  intercec.com.ar
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  7,734,372
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  69
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  9
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $0.00
Full SEMrush Report >>

Revenue report ▼

Google.com would generate approximately $0.8 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $24.6 and annual gross revenue of approximately $299.3. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $863.5.

How much would intercec.com.ar make?

Daily Revenue:
$0.82
Monthly Revenue:
$24.60
Yearly Revenue:
$299.30
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
Argentina 3,291$0.82

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$0.12
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$3.46
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$42.04
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
461
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
13,822
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
168,170

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
Argentina 461$0.12

How much is intercec.com.ar worth?

Website Value:
$863.5

Ad Experience Report ▼

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
intercec.com.ar
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
intercec.com.ar
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report ▼

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
intercec.com.ar
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is intercec.com.ar hosted? ▼

Intercec.com.ar may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.

How fast does intercec.com.ar load? ▼

The average loading time of intercec.com.ar is 582 ms. The Desktop speed index is 95 and mobile speed index is 91.
Average Load Time:
582 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

95
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 100% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 100% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)336ms 92% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 92% 2% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 2% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 4%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)723ms 89% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 89% 2% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 2% 7% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 7%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)14ms 100% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 100% 0% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)737ms 91% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 91% 5% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 5% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 3%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)1ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 98% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 1%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)221ms 95% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 95% 3% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 3% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 1%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)447ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 96% 1% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 1% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 1%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)61ms 92% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 92% 1% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 1% 6% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 6%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)453ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 97% 1% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1%

Lab Data

Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Render blocking requests  
Requests are blocking the page's initial render, which may delay LCP. can move these network requests out of the critical path. Deferring or inlining
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Speed Index 2.4 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
First Contentful Paint 0.4 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Minimize third-party usage  
Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading. Learn how to minimize third-party impact
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Third parties  
Third party code can significantly impact load performance. to prioritize your page's content. Reduce and defer loading of third party code
Largest Contentful Paint 0.5 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Does not have a `<meta name="viewport">` tag with `width` or `initial-scale`  
A `<meta name="viewport">` not only optimizes your app for mobile screen sizes, but also prevents . a 300 millisecond delay to user input Learn more about using the viewport meta tag
Time to Interactive 0.5 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Max Potential First Input Delay 20 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

91
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 100% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 100% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)506ms 92% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 85% 8% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 8% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 5%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)847ms 89% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 92% 4% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 4% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 3%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)331ms 100% of loads for this page have a fast (<200s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0% 95% of loads for this page have an average (200s ~ 500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 95% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 3%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)920ms 91% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 94% 2% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 3%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)312ms 92% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 92% 5% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 5% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 2%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)627ms 94% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 94% 3% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 3% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 1%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)319ms 2% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.2s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 2% 93% of loads for this page have an average (0.2s ~ 0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 93% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 4%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)636ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 97% 1% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1%

Lab Data

Time to Interactive 1.5 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Speed Index 9.0 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Third parties  
Third party code can significantly impact load performance. to prioritize your page's content. Reduce and defer loading of third party code
Minimize third-party usage  
Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading. Learn how to minimize third-party impact
Render blocking requests  
Requests are blocking the page's initial render, which may delay LCP. can move these network requests out of the critical path. Deferring or inlining
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Max Potential First Input Delay 20 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Does not have a `<meta name="viewport">` tag with `width` or `initial-scale`  
A `<meta name="viewport">` not only optimizes your app for mobile screen sizes, but also prevents . a 300 millisecond delay to user input Learn more about using the viewport meta tag
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
First Contentful Paint 0.9 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Largest Contentful Paint 1.5 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric

Does intercec.com.ar use compression? ▼

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on intercec.com.ar are reduced by %.
intercec.com.ar does not use compression.
Original size: 108 B
Compressed size: n/a
File reduced by: (%)

Google Safe Browsing ▼

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites.
Status:
  SAFE

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify ▼

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. intercec.com.ar supports HTTPS.
 intercec.com.ar supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: *.siecocha.com.ar
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: R11
Valid from: Mar 5 14:51:14 2025 GMT
Valid until: Jun 3 14:51:13 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Common Name: R11
Organization: Let's Encrypt
Location: US
Issuer: ISRG Root X1
Valid from: Mar 13 00:00:00 2024 GMT
Valid until: Mar 12 23:59:59 2027 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 2048 Bits

Verify HTTP/2 Support ▼

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 intercec.com.ar supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header ▼

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server. 
content-length: 108
content-type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
date: Sat, 29 Mar 2025 05:11:24 GMT
server: Apache

DNS Lookup ▼

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
MX intercec.com.ar 14400
SOA 86400
Mname dns1.servidoraweb.net
Rname mario_pulgini.yahoo.com.ar
Serial Number 2025030502
Refresh 3600
Retry 1800
Expire 1209600
Minimum TTL 86400
TXT v=spf1 +a +mx +ip4:167.250.5.3 include:servidoraweb.net ~all 14400
A 167.250.5.3 14337
NS dns2.servidoraweb.net 7136
NS dns1.servidoraweb.net 7136

Whois Lookup ▼

Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information. Domain registration for this website began on November 19, 2008 and will expire on November 19, 2025 if not renewed. This website is now assigned through the registrar nicar. The WHOIS data for this website's domain was last updated on November 4, 2024.
Domain Created:
2008-11-19
Domain Expires:
2025-11-19
Domain Updated:
2024-11-04
Domain Age:
16 years 6 months 25 days
Domain Registrar:
nicar
Domain Owner:
PULGINI MARIO DANIEL
WhoIs:
 

% La información a la que estás accediendo se provee exclusivamente para
% fines relacionados con operaciones sobre nombres de dominios y DNS,
% quedando absolutamente prohibido su uso para otros fines.
%
% La DIRECCIÓN NACIONAL DEL REGISTRO DE DOMINIOS DE INTERNET es depositaria
% de la información que los usuarios declaran con la sola finalidad de
% registrar nombres de dominio en ‘.ar’, para ser publicada en el sitio web
% de NIC Argentina.
%
% La información personal que consta en la base de datos generada a partir
% del sistema de registro de nombres de dominios se encuentra amparada por
% la Ley N° 25326 “Protección de Datos Personales” y el Decreto
% Reglamentario 1558/01.

domain:		intercec.com.ar
registrant:	20225764906
registrar:	nicar
registered:	2008-11-19 00:00:00
changed:	2024-11-04 11:42:41.149105
expire:		2025-11-19 00:00:00

contact:	20225764906
name:		PULGINI MARIO DANIEL
registrar:	nicar
created:	2013-08-23 00:00:00
changed:	2025-01-06 10:04:38.156623

nserver:	dns2.aycle.com ()
nserver:	dns1.aycle.com ()
registrar:	nicar
created:	2016-06-30 22:59:30.765524