goodtape.io Goodtape.io

   
Good Tape — Secure and automatic transcription

Domain Summary

What is the traffic rank for Goodtape.io?

• Goodtape.io ranks #138,469 globally on HypeStat.

What percent of global Internet users visit Goodtape.io?

• 0.0002471% of global Internet users visit Goodtape.io

How many people visit Goodtape.io each day?

• Goodtape.io receives approximately 12.2K visitors and 41,681 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Goodtape.io receive most of its visitors from?

• Goodtape.io is mostly visited by people located in Denmark,Netherlands,Taiwan.

How much Goodtape.io can earn?

• Goodtape.io should earn about $101.87/day from advertising revenue.

What is Goodtape.io estimated value?

• Estimated value of Goodtape.io is $96,947.12.

What IP addresses does Goodtape.io resolve to?

• Goodtape.io resolves to the IP addresses 51.158.56.81.

Where are Goodtape.io servers located in?

• Goodtape.io has servers located in Paris, Paris, 75001, France.

goodtape.io Profile

Title:Good Tape — Secure and automatic transcription
Description:Good Tape is an automatic transcription service that makes it easy for journalists (and others) to turn audio recordings into text, regardless of language or sound quality. We save you time and effort so you can focus on what really matters.
Category:Lifestyle / Fashion and Apparel
Edit Site Info

What technologies does goodtape.io use?

These are the technologies used at goodtape.io. goodtape.io has a total of 3 technologies installed in 2 different categories.
Security
HSTS HSTS
reCAPTCHA reCAPTCHA
Miscellaneous
Open Graph Open Graph

goodtape.io Traffic Analysis

Goodtape.io is ranked #138,469 in the world. This website is viewed by an estimated 12.2K visitors daily, generating a total of 41.7K pageviews. This equates to about 369.2K monthly visitors. Goodtape.io traffic has decreased by 20.12% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors12.2K
0.34%
Monthly Visits369.2K
20.12%
Pages per Visit3.42
12.69%
Visit duration03:25
0.71%
Bounce Rate42.78%
13.71%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
12,184
Monthly Visits:
369,175
Pages per Visit:
3.42
Daily Pageviews:
41,681
Avg. visit duration:
03:25
Bounce rate:
42.78%
Global Reach:
0.0002471%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
476,866
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
244,363
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
361,895
HypeRank:
138,469
SEMrush Rank:
1,147,503
SimilarWeb Rank:
138,469
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
62.54%
Referral:
8.56%
Search:
7.36%
Social:
0.51%
Paid:
21.03%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
70.55%
Mobile:
29.45%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

482.6K
NOV
462.2K
DEC
369.2K
JAN

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
Denmark 19.60%
 
Netherlands 17.50%
 
Taiwan 10.96%
 
Spain 4.89%
 
Viet Nam 4.23%

Which sites are competitors to goodtape.io?

Websites similar to goodtape.io are sites similar on user interests and browsing behavior. Users can discover new websites that are similar to the ones they already enjoy or find useful.
Domain
CompareDaily Visitors
lookupsmart.com
Compare >12.5K
Last update was 2 hours ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

Update will be available in 22 hours
*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with goodtape.io in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

Search Engine Indexes ▼

Search engine indexes are huge databases or collections of net pages that search engines like google like google and yahoo use to retrieve applicable facts while customers carry out searches. These indexes are created through search engines like google and yahoo through crawling and indexing net pages from throughout the internet.
Google Index:
106

  ▼

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  goodtape.io
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  1,147,503
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  911
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  910
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $554.00
Full SEMrush Report >>

Revenue report ▼

Google.com would generate approximately $101.9 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $3.1K and annual gross revenue of approximately $37.2K. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $96.9K.

How much would goodtape.io make?

Daily Revenue:
$101.87
Monthly Revenue:
$3,056.10
Yearly Revenue:
$37,182.55
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
Netherlands 7,296$13.94
 
Denmark 8,168$12.25
 
Taiwan 4,567$1.05
 
Spain 2,038$0.98
 
Viet Nam 1,762$0.83

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$5.82
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$174.57
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$2,123.90
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
4,471
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
134,116
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
1,631,742

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
Denmark 2,042$3.06
 
Netherlands 1,240$2.37
 
Spain 387$0.19
 
Taiwan 731$0.17
 
Viet Nam 70$0.03

How much is goodtape.io worth?

Website Value:
$96.9K

Ad Experience Report ▼

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
goodtape.io
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
goodtape.io
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report ▼

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
goodtape.io
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is goodtape.io hosted? ▼

Goodtape.io may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
51.158.56.81
ASN:
AS12876 
ISP:
Online S.a.s. 
Server Location:
Paris
Paris, 75
75001
France, FR
 

Other sites hosted on 51.158.56.81

There are no other sites hosted on this IP

How fast does goodtape.io load? ▼

The average loading time of goodtape.io is 619 ms. The Desktop speed index is 77 and mobile speed index is 68.
Average Load Time:
619 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

77
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)18ms 50% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 50% 35% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 35% 13% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 13%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.3s 37% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 37% 49% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 49% 13% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 13%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)2.6s 49% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 49% 31% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 31% 18% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 18%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)97ms 90% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 90% 5% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 5% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 3%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)3.7s 49% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 49% 29% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 29% 20% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 20%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an SLOW speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)14ms 67% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 67% 22% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 22% 9% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 9%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)2.2s 29% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 29% 38% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 38% 31% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 31%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)4.0s 38% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 38% 26% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 26% 34% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 34%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)111ms 88% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 88% 7% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 7% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 4%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)5.0s 42% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 42% 23% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 23% 33% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 33%

Lab Data

Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Speed Index 2.1 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Optimize DOM size  
A large DOM can increase the duration of style calculations and layout reflows, impacting page responsiveness. A large DOM will also increase memory usage. Learn how to avoid an excessive DOM size
Time to Interactive 2.2 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Max Potential First Input Delay 180 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Total Blocking Time 210 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
First Contentful Paint 0.7 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Largest Contentful Paint 2.2 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

68
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a SLOW speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)1ms 50% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 96% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 2%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.7s 37% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 36% 39% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 39% 23% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 23%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)3.3s 49% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 43% 28% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 28% 28% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 28%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)195ms 90% of loads for this page have a fast (<200s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 75% 15% of loads for this page have an average (200s ~ 500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 15% 8% of loads for this page have a slow (>500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 8%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)3.7s 49% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 56% 21% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 21% 21% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 21%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an SLOW speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 92% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 92% 2% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 2% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 5%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.7s 39% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 39% 36% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 36% 23% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 23%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)3.9s 38% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 38% 26% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 26% 34% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 34%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)353ms 52% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.2s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 52% 31% of loads for this page have an average (0.2s ~ 0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 31% 16% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 16%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)5.9s 35% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 35% 24% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 24% 39% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 39%

Lab Data

Optimize DOM size  
A large DOM can increase the duration of style calculations and layout reflows, impacting page responsiveness. A large DOM will also increase memory usage. Learn how to avoid an excessive DOM size
Time to Interactive 6.9 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Total Blocking Time 20 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Speed Index 5.7 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
First Contentful Paint 3.1 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Max Potential First Input Delay 80 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Largest Contentful Paint 5.9 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow

Does goodtape.io use compression? ▼

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on goodtape.io are reduced by 56%.
goodtape.io use gzip compression.
Original size: 18.63 KB
Compressed size: 8.19 KB
File reduced by: 10.44 KB (56%)

Google Safe Browsing ▼

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites. goodtape.io has 80 Safety Reputations.
Status:
  SAFE
Safety Reputations:
  80
Safety Confidence:
  51

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify ▼

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. goodtape.io supports HTTPS.
 goodtape.io supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: goodtape.io
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: R11
Valid from: Jan 30 10:53:39 2025 GMT
Valid until: Apr 30 10:53:38 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Common Name: R11
Organization: Let's Encrypt
Location: US
Issuer: ISRG Root X1
Valid from: Mar 13 00:00:00 2024 GMT
Valid until: Mar 12 23:59:59 2027 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 2048 Bits

Verify HTTP/2 Support ▼

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 goodtape.io supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header ▼

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server. 
date: Tue, 04 Mar 2025 18:24:22 GMT
content-type: text/html; charset=utf-8
x-forwarded-host: web-deploy-584dc4b44f-frqqr
vary: Origin, Accept-Encoding
content-encoding: gzip
strict-transport-security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains

DNS Lookup ▼

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
SOA 900
Mname kiki.bunny.net
Rname hostmaster.bunny.net
Serial Number 2020032201
Refresh 7200
Retry 900
Expire 1209600
Minimum TTL 86400
A 51.158.56.81 12
NS kiki.bunny.net 3545

Whois Lookup ▼

Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information. Domain registration for this website began on May 18, 2023 and will expire on May 18, 2025 if not renewed. This website is now assigned through the registrar One.com A/S. The WHOIS data for this website's domain was last updated on July 2, 2024.
Domain Created:
2023-05-18
Domain Expires:
2025-05-18
Domain Updated:
2024-07-02
Domain Age:
1 years 9 months 17 days
Domain Registrar:
One.com A/S
Domain Owner:
Good Tape ApS
WhoIs:
 

Domain Name: goodtape.io
Registry Domain ID: 3992bc04a68244cdb4391b9bdf7a1bce-DONUTS
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.one.com
Registrar URL: http://www.one.com
Updated Date: 2024-07-02T08:13:13Z
Creation Date: 2023-05-18T08:12:22Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2025-05-18T08:12:22Z
Registrar: One.com A/S
Registrar IANA ID: 1462
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: email
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +45.44451220
Domain Status: ok https://icann.org/epp#ok
Registry Registrant ID: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrant Name: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrant Organization: Good Tape ApS
Registrant Street: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrant City: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrant State/Province: 
Registrant Postal Code: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrant Country: DK
Registrant Phone: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrant Phone Ext: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrant Fax: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrant Fax Ext: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrant Email: Please query the RDDS service of the Registrar of Record identified in this output for information on how to contact the Registrant, Admin, or Tech contact of the queried domain name.
Registry Admin ID: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Name: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Organization: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Street: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin City: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin State/Province: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Postal Code: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Country: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Phone: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Phone Ext: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Fax: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Fax Ext: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Email: Please query the RDDS service of the Registrar of Record identified in this output for information on how to contact the Registrant, Admin, or Tech contact of the queried domain name.
Registry Tech ID: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Name: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Organization: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Street: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech City: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech State/Province: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Postal Code: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Country: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Phone: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Phone Ext: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Fax: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Fax Ext: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Email: Please query the RDDS service of the Registrar of Record identified in this output for information on how to contact the Registrant, Admin, or Tech contact of the queried domain name.
Name Server: kiki.bunny.net
Name Server: coco.bunny.net
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form: https://www.icann.org/wicf/
>>> Last update of WHOIS database: 2025-03-04T18:25:15Z