garantiefacom.fr Garantiefacom.fr

   
Garantie FACOM

Domain Summary

What is the traffic rank for Garantiefacom.fr?

• Garantiefacom.fr ranks #6,471,359 globally on HypeStat.

What percent of global Internet users visit Garantiefacom.fr?

1.5E-6% of global Internet users visit Garantiefacom.fr

How many people visit Garantiefacom.fr each day?

• Garantiefacom.fr receives approximately 74 visitors and 369 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Garantiefacom.fr receive most of its visitors from?

• Garantiefacom.fr is mostly visited by people located in France.

How much Garantiefacom.fr can earn?

• Garantiefacom.fr should earn about $0.21/day from advertising revenue.

What is Garantiefacom.fr estimated value?

• Estimated value of Garantiefacom.fr is $195.90.

What IP addresses does Garantiefacom.fr resolve to?

• Garantiefacom.fr resolves to the IP addresses 2600:1407:3c00:cb::172d:2eea, 23.66.127.150.

Where are Garantiefacom.fr servers located in?

• Garantiefacom.fr has servers located in Chicago, Illinois, 60602, United States.

garantiefacom.fr Profile

Title:Garantie FACOM Description:Garantie Facom

What technologies does garantiefacom.fr use?

These are the technologies used at garantiefacom.fr. garantiefacom.fr has a total of 2 technologies installed in 2 different categories.

garantiefacom.fr Traffic Analysis

Garantiefacom.fr is ranked #6,471,359 in the world. This website is viewed by an estimated 74 visitors daily, generating a total of 369 pageviews. This equates to about 2.2K monthly visitors. Garantiefacom.fr traffic has increased by 243.48% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors74
26.05%
Monthly Visits2.2K
243.48%
Pages per Visit4.99
63.9%
Visit duration02:32
70.72%
Bounce Rate51.08%
1237.33%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
74
Monthly Visits:
2,242
Pages per Visit:
4.99
Daily Pageviews:
369
Avg. visit duration:
02:32
Bounce rate:
51.08%
Global Reach:
1.5E-6%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
11,170
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
2,869
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
2,243
HypeRank:
6,471,359
SimilarWeb Rank:
4,760,788
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
51.38%
Referral:
38.90%
Search:
0%
Social:
0%
Paid:
9.72%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
71.30%
Mobile:
28.70%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

20.2K
DEC
652.8
JAN
2.2K
FEB

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
France 100.00%
Last update was 293 days ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with garantiefacom.fr in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

Search Engine Indexes

Search engine indexes are huge databases or collections of net pages that search engines like google like google and yahoo use to retrieve applicable facts while customers carry out searches. These indexes are created through search engines like google and yahoo through crawling and indexing net pages from throughout the internet.
Google Index:
8

 

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  garantiefacom.fr
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  n/a
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  0
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  0
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $0.00

Revenue report

Google.com would generate approximately $0.2 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $6.3 and annual gross revenue of approximately $76.7. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $195.9.

How much would garantiefacom.fr make?

Daily Revenue:
$0.21
Monthly Revenue:
$6.30
Yearly Revenue:
$76.65
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
France 369$0.21

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$0.02
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$0.71
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$8.59
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
41
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
1,218
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
14,815

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
France 41$0.02

How much is garantiefacom.fr worth?

Website Value:
$195.9

Ad Experience Report

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
garantiefacom.fr
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
garantiefacom.fr
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
garantiefacom.fr
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is garantiefacom.fr hosted?

Garantiefacom.fr may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.

How fast does garantiefacom.fr load?

The average loading time of garantiefacom.fr is 392 ms. The Desktop speed index is 67 and mobile speed index is 51.
Average Load Time:
392 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

67
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a SLOW speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)33ms 59% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 59% 10% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 10% 29% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 29%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)588ms 85% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 85% 8% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 8% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 5%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.5s 80% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 80% 11% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 11% 8% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 8%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)66ms 95% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 95% 2% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 2% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)4.1s 21% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 21% 52% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 52% 26% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 26%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an SLOW speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)41ms 53% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 53% 10% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 10% 36% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 36%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)525ms 90% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 90% 5% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 5% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 4%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.1s 88% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 88% 6% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 6% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 4%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)65ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 97% 1% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 1% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)3.6s 33% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 33% 50% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 50% 16% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 16%

Lab Data

First Contentful Paint 1.5 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Optimize DOM size  
A large DOM can increase the duration of style calculations and layout reflows, impacting page responsiveness. A large DOM will also increase memory usage. Learn how to avoid an excessive DOM size
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Max Potential First Input Delay 50 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Speed Index 1.8 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Largest Contentful Paint 2.0 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Time to Interactive 2.0 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

51
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a SLOW speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)18ms 59% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 35% 55% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 55% 9% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 9%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)790ms 85% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 75% 18% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 18% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 5%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.7s 80% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 76% 16% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 16% 7% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 7%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)184ms 95% of loads for this page have a fast (<200s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 77% 19% of loads for this page have an average (200s ~ 500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 19% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 2%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)4.3s 21% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 13% 55% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 55% 30% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 30%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)11ms 68% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 68% 24% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 24% 7% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 7%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)670ms 82% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 82% 13% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 13% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 4%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.4s 83% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 83% 11% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 11% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 5%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)179ms 79% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.2s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 79% 16% of loads for this page have an average (0.2s ~ 0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 16% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 3%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)3.9s 27% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 27% 50% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 50% 22% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 22%

Lab Data

Total Blocking Time 120 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Speed Index 5.8 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Max Potential First Input Delay 160 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Largest Contentful Paint 8.6 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
First Contentful Paint 5.0 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Optimize DOM size  
A large DOM can increase the duration of style calculations and layout reflows, impacting page responsiveness. A large DOM will also increase memory usage. Learn how to avoid an excessive DOM size
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Time to Interactive 8.6 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors

Does garantiefacom.fr use compression?

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on garantiefacom.fr are reduced by 51%.
garantiefacom.fr use gzip compression.
Original size: 2.18 KB
Compressed size: 1.05 KB
File reduced by: 1.13 KB (51%)

Google Safe Browsing

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites.
Status:
  SAFE

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. garantiefacom.fr supports HTTPS.
 garantiefacom.fr supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: www.dewalt.cz
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: R10
Valid from: Jan 21 11:12:14 2025 GMT
Valid until: Apr 21 11:12:13 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Common Name: R10
Organization: Let's Encrypt
Location: US
Issuer: ISRG Root X1
Valid from: Mar 13 00:00:00 2024 GMT
Valid until: Mar 12 23:59:59 2027 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 2048 Bits

Verify HTTP/2 Support

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 garantiefacom.fr supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server.
content-length: 0
location: https://www.garantiefacom.fr/
expires: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 11:06:02 GMT
cache-control: max-age=0, no-cache, no-store
pragma: no-cache
date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 11:06:02 GMT
alt-svc: h3=":443"; ma=93600
strict-transport-security: max-age=31536000 ; includeSubDomains
x-content-type-options: nosniff

HTTP/2 200 
content-type: text/html
last-modified: Wed, 29 Jan 2025 17:37:16 GMT
etag: "679a674c-8bd"
accept-ranges: bytes
vary: Accept-Encoding
content-encoding: gzip
expires: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 11:06:02 GMT
cache-control: max-age=0, no-cache, no-store
pragma: no-cache
date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 11:06:02 GMT
alt-svc: h3=":443"; ma=93600
content-length: 1080
strict-transport-security: max-age=31536000 ; includeSubDomains
x-content-type-options: nosniff

DNS Lookup

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
SOA 86400
Mname a1-56.akam.net
Rname hostmaster.garantiefacom.fr
Serial Number 2023061340
Refresh 3600
Retry 600
Expire 604800
Minimum TTL 300
MX mx2.mail.ovh.net 3600
MX mx3.mail.ovh.net 3600
MX mx1.mail.ovh.net 3600
TXT v=spf1 include:%{ir}.%{v}.%{d}.spf.has.pphosted.com -all 600
AAAA 2600:1407:3c00:cb::172d:2eef 20
AAAA 2600:1407:3c00:cb::172d:2eea 20
A 23.66.127.150 20
A 23.66.127.135 20
A 23.66.127.144 20
A 23.66.127.164 20
NS a1-56.akam.net 3527
NS a11-66.akam.net 3527
NS a4-67.akam.net 3527
NS a10-64.akam.net 3527
NS a3-65.akam.net 3527
NS a28-64.akam.net 3527

Whois Lookup

Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information. Domain registration for this website began on April 24, 2020 and will expire on April 24, 2026 if not renewed. This website is now assigned through the registrar MARKMONITOR Inc.. The WHOIS data for this website's domain was last updated on June 16, 2023.
Domain Created:
2020-04-24
Domain Expires:
2026-04-24
Domain Updated:
2023-06-16
Domain Age:
5 years 8 months 4 days
Domain Registrar:
MARKMONITOR Inc.
Domain Owner:
Stanley Black & Decker France S.A.S.
WhoIs:
 

%%
%% This is the AFNIC Whois server.
%%
%% complete date format: YYYY-MM-DDThh:mm:ssZ
%%
%% Rights restricted by copyright.
%% See https://www.afnic.fr/en/domain-names-and-support/everything-there-is-to-know-about-domain-names/find-a-domain-name-or-a-holder-using-whois/
%%
%%

domain:                        garantiefacom.fr
status:                        ACTIVE
eppstatus:                     clientUpdateProhibited
eppstatus:                     clientTransferProhibited
eppstatus:                     clientDeleteProhibited
hold:                          NO
holder-c:                      SBDF24-FRNIC
admin-c:                       SBDF24-FRNIC
tech-c:                        MI3669-FRNIC
registrar:                     MARKMONITOR Inc.
Expiry Date:                   2026-04-24T14:28:43Z
created:                       2020-04-24T14:28:43Z
last-update:                   2023-06-16T14:36:46.186191Z
source:                        FRNIC

nserver:                       a1-56.akam.net
nserver:                       a10-64.akam.net
nserver:                       a11-66.akam.net
nserver:                       a28-64.akam.net
nserver:                       a3-65.akam.net
nserver:                       a4-67.akam.net
source:                        FRNIC

registrar:                     MARKMONITOR Inc.
address:                       2150 S. Bonito Way, Suite 150
address:                       ID 83642 MERIDIAN
country:                       US
phone:                         +1.2083895740
fax-no:                        +1.2083895771
e-mail:                        email
website:                       http://www.markmonitor.com
anonymous:                     No
registered:                    2002-01-07T00:00:00Z
source:                        FRNIC

nic-hdl:                       SBDF24-FRNIC
type:                          ORGANIZATION
contact:                       Stanley Black & Decker France S.A.S.
address:                       5 allée des Hêtres
address:                       69760 LIMONEST
country:                       FR
phone:                         +33.472203993
e-mail:                        email
registrar:                     MARKMONITOR Inc.
changed:                       2024-10-02T11:46:03.592771Z
anonymous:                     NO
obsoleted:                     NO
eppstatus:                     associated
eppstatus:                     active
eligstatus:                    not identified
reachstatus:                   ok
reachmedia:                    email
reachsource:                   REGISTRAR
reachdate:                     2018-03-31T00:00:00Z
source:                        FRNIC

nic-hdl:                       MI3669-FRNIC
type:                          ORGANIZATION
contact:                       MarkMonitor Inc.
address:                       2150 S. Bonito Way, Suite 150
address:                       83642 Meridian
country:                       US
phone:                         +1.2083895740
fax-no:                        +1.2083895771
e-mail:                        email
registrar:                     MARKMONITOR Inc.
changed:                       2025-03-07T16:07:24.084212Z
anonymous:                     NO
obsoleted:                     NO
eppstatus:                     associated
eppstatus:                     active
eligstatus:                    ok
eligsource:                    REGISTRAR
eligdate:                      2021-10-05T00:00:00Z
reachstatus:                   ok
reachmedia:                    email
reachsource:                   REGISTRAR
reachdate:                     2021-10-05T00:00:00Z
source:                        FRNIC

>>> Last update of WHOIS database: 2025-03-10T11:07:13.844862Z