fujisat.cm Fujisat.cm

   
GRAPHICS SYSTEM - FUJISAT | Connexion

Domain Summary

What percent of global Internet users visit Fujisat.cm?

• 0.0001538% of global Internet users visit Fujisat.cm

How many people visit Fujisat.cm each day?

• Fujisat.cm receives approximately 7.6K visitors and 21,795 page impressions per day.

How much Fujisat.cm can earn?

• Fujisat.cm should earn about $88.93/day from advertising revenue.

What is Fujisat.cm estimated value?

• Estimated value of Fujisat.cm is $78,761.84.

What IP addresses does Fujisat.cm resolve to?

• Fujisat.cm resolves to the IP addresses 51.161.196.63.

Where are Fujisat.cm servers located in?

• Fujisat.cm has servers located in Melbourne, Victoria, 3011, Australia.

fujisat.cm Profile

Title:GRAPHICS SYSTEM - FUJISAT | Connexion
Edit Site Info

What technologies does fujisat.cm use?

These are the technologies used at fujisat.cm. fujisat.cm has a total of 6 technologies installed in 5 different categories.
Security
HSTS HSTS
Web Servers
IIS IIS
JavaScript Libraries
jQuery jQuery
SweetAlert2 SweetAlert2
Web Frameworks
Microsoft ASP.NET Microsoft ASP.NET
Operating Systems
Windows Server Windows Server

fujisat.cm Traffic Analysis

This website is viewed by an estimated 7.6K visitors daily, generating a total of 21.8K pageviews. This equates to about 229.8K monthly visitors. Fujisat.cm traffic has decreased by 98.18% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors7.6K
99%
Monthly Visits229.8K
98.18%
Pages per Visit2.87
54.2%
Visit duration00:53
170.73%
Bounce Rate77.50%
60.21%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
7,584
Monthly Visits:
229,795
Pages per Visit:
2.87
Daily Pageviews:
21,795
Avg. visit duration:
00:53
Bounce rate:
77.50%
Global Reach:
0.0001538%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
5
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
1
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
232,158
HypeRank:
n/a
SEMrush Rank:
24,077,474
SimilarWeb Rank:
178,972
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
100.00%
Referral:
0%
Search:
0%
Social:
0%
Paid:
0%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
100.00%
Mobile:
0%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

156K
DEC
12.6M
JAN
229.8K
FEB
Last update was 131 days ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with fujisat.cm in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

Search Engine Indexes ▼

Search engine indexes are huge databases or collections of net pages that search engines like google like google and yahoo use to retrieve applicable facts while customers carry out searches. These indexes are created through search engines like google and yahoo through crawling and indexing net pages from throughout the internet.
Google Index:
3

  ▼

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  fujisat.cm
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  24,077,474
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  2
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  0
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $0.00
Full SEMrush Report >>

Revenue report ▼

Google.com would generate approximately $88.9 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $2.7K and annual gross revenue of approximately $32.5K. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $78.8K.

How much would fujisat.cm make?

Daily Revenue:
$88.93
Monthly Revenue:
$2,667.90
Yearly Revenue:
$32,459.45
*All earnings values are estimates only.

How much is fujisat.cm worth?

Website Value:
$78.8K

Ad Experience Report ▼

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
fujisat.cm
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
fujisat.cm
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report ▼

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
fujisat.cm
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is fujisat.cm hosted? ▼

Fujisat.cm may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
51.161.196.63
ASN:
AS16276 
ISP:
OVH SAS 
Server Location:
Melbourne
Victoria, VIC
3011
Australia, AU
 

Other sites hosted on 51.161.196.63

There are no other sites hosted on this IP

How fast does fujisat.cm load? ▼

The average loading time of fujisat.cm is 1288 ms. The Desktop speed index is 85 and mobile speed index is 56.
Average Load Time:
1288 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

85
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a SLOW speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 96% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 4%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)3.5s 5% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 5% 46% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 46% 48% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 48%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)5.6s 41% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 41% 18% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 18% 39% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 39%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)65ms 93% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 93% 1% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 1% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 4%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)5.2s 53% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 53% 10% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 10% 35% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 35%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an SLOW speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)17ms 72% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 72% 13% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 13% 13% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 13%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)3.9s 18% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 18% 33% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 33% 48% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 48%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)4.7s 45% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 45% 17% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 17% 37% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 37%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)82ms 93% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 93% 2% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 2% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 3%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)8.0s 44% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 44% 15% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 15% 40% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 40%

Lab Data

Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
First Contentful Paint 1.7 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Minimize third-party usage  
Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading. Learn how to minimize third-party impact
Max Potential First Input Delay 20 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Largest Contentful Paint 1.7 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Third parties  
Third party code can significantly impact load performance. to prioritize your page's content. Reduce and defer loading of third party code
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Speed Index 1.7 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Time to Interactive 1.7 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

56
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a SLOW speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)2.4s 5% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 21% 41% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 41% 37% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 37%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)3.2s 41% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 44% 28% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 28% 27% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 27%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)176ms 93% of loads for this page have a fast (<200s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 80% 14% of loads for this page have an average (200s ~ 500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 14% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 5%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)3.2s 53% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 66% 14% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 14% 19% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 19%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an SLOW speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)2.3s 32% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 32% 33% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 33% 34% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 34%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)2.7s 58% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 58% 19% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 19% 22% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 22%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)178ms 79% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.2s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 79% 13% of loads for this page have an average (0.2s ~ 0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 13% 7% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 7%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)4.2s 56% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 56% 17% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 17% 26% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 26%

Lab Data

Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Speed Index 10.2 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
First Contentful Paint 10.2 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Third parties  
Third party code can significantly impact load performance. to prioritize your page's content. Reduce and defer loading of third party code
Time to Interactive 10.2 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Minimize third-party usage  
Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading. Learn how to minimize third-party impact
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Max Potential First Input Delay 20 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Largest Contentful Paint 10.2 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric

Does fujisat.cm use compression? ▼

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on fujisat.cm are reduced by %.
fujisat.cm does not use compression.
Original size: 10.68 KB
Compressed size: n/a
File reduced by: (%)

Google Safe Browsing ▼

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites.
Status:
  SUSPICIOUS

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify ▼

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. fujisat.cm supports HTTPS.
 fujisat.cm supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: fujisat.cm
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: ZeroSSL RSA Domain Secure Site CA
Valid from: Mar 4 00:00:00 2025 GMT
Valid until: Mar 4 23:59:59 2026 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Common Name: ZeroSSL RSA Domain Secure Site CA
Organization: ZeroSSL
Location: AT
Issuer: USERTrust RSA Certification Authority
Valid from: Jan 30 00:00:00 2020 GMT
Valid until: Jan 29 23:59:59 2030 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 4096 Bits

Verify HTTP/2 Support ▼

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 fujisat.cm supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header ▼

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server. 
cache-control: no-cache, no-store
pragma: no-cache
content-type: text/html; charset=utf-8
expires: Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 GMT
server: Microsoft-IIS/10.0
strict-transport-security: max-age=2592000
set-cookie: FujisatSessionCookies=; expires=Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 GMT; path=/; secure; samesite=lax; httponly
set-cookie: .AspNetCore.Antiforgery.rIPmmhTSjDc=CfDJ8PrRZxE2JgtKgqlY0K-m4rSt6IW_KYoA0tNxFPJkR8vHxU75WDDst4Ayx9w3j1WvyUATXUKUc3jdvOYipeSQdTkWRvOIMiT8Ou6MqOmKuRk40qXCO3U-iUy0Fi6udIcyeE2PYqxOBUez9Ax-GIDGBKc; path=/; samesite=strict; httponly
set-cookie: .AspNetCore.Mvc.CookieTempDataProvider=; expires=Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 GMT; path=/; samesite=lax; httponly
x-frame-options: SAMEORIGIN
x-powered-by: ASP.NET
date: Fri, 28 Mar 2025 12:31:05 GMT
content-length: 10940

DNS Lookup ▼

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
SOA 86400
Mname ns1.dnshostservices.com
Rname cpanel-sysadmin.lws.info
Serial Number 2025031901
Refresh 3600
Retry 1800
Expire 1209600
Minimum TTL 86400
MX mail.fujisat.cm 14400
TXT v=spf1 ip4:91.234.195.179 include:premiumsmtp.dnshostservices.com +a +mx +ip4:91.234.195.185 ~all 14400
A 51.161.196.63 14343
NS ns1.dnshostservices.com 3543
NS ns3.dnshostservices.com 3543
NS ns2.dnshostservices.com 3543
NS ns4.dnshostservices.com 3543

Whois Lookup ▼

Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information. Domain registration for this website began on July 15, 2022 and will expire on July 15, 2025 if not renewed. This website is now assigned through the registrar CAMOO SARL. The WHOIS data for this website's domain was last updated on July 10, 2024.
Domain Created:
2022-07-15
Domain Expires:
2025-07-15
Domain Updated:
2024-07-10
Domain Age:
3 years 23 days
Domain Registrar:
CAMOO SARL
Domain Owner:
KDO Labcenter
WhoIs:
 

Domain Name: fujisat.cm
Registry Domain ID: 1028431-RegCM
Registrar URL: https://www.camoo.hosting
Updated Date: 2024-07-10T10:13:34.823Z
Creation Date: 2022-07-15T11:45:20.363Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2025-07-15T11:45:20.498Z
Registrar Registration Expiration Date: 2025-07-15T11:45:20.498Z
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Registry Registrant ID: iaFFK-A1rNz
Registrant Name: Ets KDO LABCENTER
Registrant Organization: KDO Labcenter
Registrant Street: Douala
Registrant City: Douala
Registrant State/Province: Littoral
Registrant Postal Code: 6296
Registrant Country: CM
Registrant Phone: +237.691921601
Registrant Email: email
Registry Admin ID: lF0vy-ROLgZ
Admin Name: Ets KDO LABCENTER
Admin Organization: KDO Labcenter
Admin Street: Douala
Admin City: Douala
Admin State/Province: Littoral
Admin Postal Code: 6296
Admin Country: CM
Admin Phone: +237.691921601
Admin Email: email
Registry Tech ID: 0nfjC-lmgV0
Tech Name: Achille Frankie Ndjimi
Tech Organization: CAMOO SARL
Tech Street: Rue d'Elig Efa 3389
Tech City: Yaounde
Tech State/Province: Centre
Tech Postal Code: 3891
Tech Country: CM
Tech Phone: +222.312027
Tech Phone Ext: N/A
Tech Email: email
Registry Billing ID: bjYC7-KpCmt
Billing Name: Achille Frankie Ndjimi
Billing Organization: CAMOO SARL
Billing Street: Rue d'Elig Efa 3389
Billing City: Yaounde
Billing State/Province: Centre
Billing Postal Code: 3891
Billing Country: CM
Billing Phone: +222.312027
Billing Phone Ext: N/A
Billing Email: email
Registrar: CAMOO SARL
Name Server: ns1.dnshostservices.com
Name Server: ns2.dnshostservices.com
>>> Last update of WHOIS database: 2025-03-28T12:24:06.152Z