freek.to Freek.to

   
Freek

Domain Summary

What is the traffic rank for Freek.to?

• Freek.to ranks #8,412,225 globally on HypeStat.

What percent of global Internet users visit Freek.to?

• 0.0115949% of global Internet users visit Freek.to

How many people visit Freek.to each day?

• Freek.to receives approximately 571.6K visitors and 2,288,438 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Freek.to receive most of its visitors from?

• Freek.to is mostly visited by people located in United States,United Kingdom,Canada.

How much Freek.to can earn?

• Freek.to should earn about $9,600.76/day from advertising revenue.

What is Freek.to estimated value?

• Estimated value of Freek.to is $9,533,753.80.

What IP addresses does Freek.to resolve to?

• Freek.to resolves to the IP addresses 2606:4700:3034::6815:39b0, 104.21.57.176.

freek.to Profile

Title:Freek
Category:Arts and Entertainment / Streaming & Online TV
Edit Site Info

What technologies does freek.to use?

These are the technologies used at freek.to. freek.to has a total of 2 technologies installed in 2 different categories.
CDN
CloudFlare CloudFlare
Miscellaneous
HTTP/3 HTTP/3

freek.to Traffic Analysis

Freek.to is ranked #8,412,225 in the world. This website is viewed by an estimated 571.6K visitors daily, generating a total of 2.3M pageviews. This equates to about 17.3M monthly visitors. Freek.to traffic has increased by 18.36% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors571.6K
1.44%
Monthly Visits17.3M
18.36%
Pages per Visit4.00
8.08%
Visit duration05:22
10.33%
Bounce Rate37.56%
5.52%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
571,619
Monthly Visits:
17,320,056
Pages per Visit:
4.00
Daily Pageviews:
2,288,438
Avg. visit duration:
05:22
Bounce rate:
37.56%
Global Reach:
0.0115949%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
20,167,582
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
4,496,664
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
17,498,548
HypeRank:
8,412,225
SEMrush Rank:
132,890
SimilarWeb Rank:
3,764
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
90.26%
Referral:
3.66%
Search:
4.12%
Social:
1.94%
Paid:
0.02%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
30.94%
Mobile:
69.06%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

19.4M
JAN
14.6M
FEB
17.3M
MAR

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
United States 40.05%
 
United Kingdom 15.45%
 
Canada 7.91%
 
Australia 6.24%
 
India 4.59%

Which sites are competitors to freek.to?

Websites similar to freek.to are sites similar on user interests and browsing behavior. Users can discover new websites that are similar to the ones they already enjoy or find useful.
Last update was 46 days ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with freek.to in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

Search Engine Indexes ▼

Search engine indexes are huge databases or collections of net pages that search engines like google like google and yahoo use to retrieve applicable facts while customers carry out searches. These indexes are created through search engines like google and yahoo through crawling and indexing net pages from throughout the internet.
Google Index:
52,900

  ▼

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  freek.to
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  132,890
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  503
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  14,046
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $1,727.00
Full SEMrush Report >>

Revenue report ▼

Google.com would generate approximately $9.6K per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $288K and annual gross revenue of approximately $3.5M. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $9.5M.

How much would freek.to make?

Daily Revenue:
$9,600.76
Monthly Revenue:
$288,022.80
Yearly Revenue:
$3,504,277.40
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
United States 916,528$4,426.83
 
Canada 181,036$1,093.46
 
United Kingdom 353,607$947.67
 
Australia 142,755$688.08
 
India 105,104$39.94

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$1,370.62
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$41,118.57
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$500,276.00
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
324,791
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
9,743,738
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
118,548,815

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
United States 164,975$796.83
 
Canada 45,259$273.36
 
United Kingdom 56,577$151.63
 
Australia 28,551$137.62
 
India 29,429$11.18

How much is freek.to worth?

Website Value:
$9.5M

Ad Experience Report ▼

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
freek.to
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
freek.to
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report ▼

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
freek.to
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is freek.to hosted? ▼

Freek.to may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.

How fast does freek.to load? ▼

The average loading time of freek.to is 254 ms. The Desktop speed index is 100 and mobile speed index is 100.
Average Load Time:
254 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

100
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)9ms 78% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 78% 19% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 19% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 2%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)724ms 78% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 78% 16% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 16% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 4%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.6s 80% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 80% 12% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 12% 7% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 7%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)210ms 73% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 73% 20% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 20% 6% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 6%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)3.6s 52% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 52% 28% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 28% 19% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 19%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0%

Lab Data

Speed Index 0.5 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Max Potential First Input Delay 20 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Time to Interactive 0.4 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Largest Contentful Paint element  
This is the largest contentful element painted within the viewport. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint element
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Largest Contentful Paint 0.4 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Render blocking requests  
Requests are blocking the page's initial render, which may delay LCP. can move these network requests out of the critical path. Deferring or inlining
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
First Contentful Paint 0.4 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

100
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a SLOW speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)14ms 78% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 71% 13% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 13% 14% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 14%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)965ms 78% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 66% 25% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 25% 7% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 7%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)2.3s 80% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 63% 21% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 21% 14% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 14%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)307ms 73% of loads for this page have a fast (<200s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 56% 31% of loads for this page have an average (200s ~ 500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 31% 12% of loads for this page have a slow (>500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 12%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)4.1s 52% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 49% 24% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 24% 26% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 26%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0%

Lab Data

CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Largest Contentful Paint 1.5 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Render blocking requests  
Requests are blocking the page's initial render, which may delay LCP. can move these network requests out of the critical path. Deferring or inlining
Largest Contentful Paint element  
This is the largest contentful element painted within the viewport. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint element
Time to Interactive 1.5 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Speed Index 1.5 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
First Contentful Paint 1.5 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Max Potential First Input Delay 20 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow

Does freek.to use compression? ▼

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on freek.to are reduced by 51%.
freek.to use br compression.
Original size: 484 B
Compressed size: 237 B
File reduced by: 247 B (51%)

Google Safe Browsing ▼

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites. freek.to has 80 Safety Reputations.
Status:
  SAFE
Safety Reputations:
  80
Safety Confidence:
  51

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify ▼

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. freek.to supports HTTPS.
 freek.to supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: freeky.to
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: Cloudflare TLS Issuing ECC CA 1
Valid from: Apr 18 13:06:04 2025 GMT
Valid until: Jul 17 13:13:30 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize:
Common Name: Cloudflare TLS Issuing ECC CA 1
Organization: "CLOUDFLARE, INC."
Location: US
Issuer: SSL.com TLS Transit ECC CA R2
Valid from: Oct 31 17:17:49 2023 GMT
Valid until: Oct 28 17:17:48 2033 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize:
Common Name: SSL.com TLS Transit ECC CA R2
Organization: SSL Corporation
Location: US
Issuer: AAA Certificate Services
Valid from: Jun 21 00:00:00 2024 GMT
Valid until: Dec 31 23:59:59 2028 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize:

Verify HTTP/2 Support ▼

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 freek.to supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header ▼

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server. 
date: Mon, 28 Apr 2025 14:20:19 GMT
location: https://freeky.to/
server: cloudflare
cf-ray: 9377331dad978a1f-ORD

HTTP/2 200 
date: Mon, 28 Apr 2025 14:20:19 GMT
content-type: text/html
server: cloudflare
last-modified: Fri, 18 Apr 2025 13:55:27 GMT
vary: accept-encoding
cf-cache-status: DYNAMIC
content-encoding: br
cf-ray: 9377331ddecf58ee-ORD
alt-svc: h3=":443"; ma=86400

DNS Lookup ▼

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
AAAA 2606:4700:3032::ac43:a542 253
AAAA 2606:4700:3034::6815:39b0 253
A 104.21.57.176 253
A 172.67.165.66 253
NS rory.ns.cloudflare.com 86353
NS luciana.ns.cloudflare.com 86353
HINFO 3600