exeo-tech.co.jp Exeo-tech.co.jp

   
株式会社エクシオテック　EXEO TECH

Domain Summary

What percent of global Internet users visit Exeo-tech.co.jp?

• 5.2E-6% of global Internet users visit Exeo-tech.co.jp

How many people visit Exeo-tech.co.jp each day?

• Exeo-tech.co.jp receives approximately 256 visitors and 732 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Exeo-tech.co.jp receive most of its visitors from?

• Exeo-tech.co.jp is mostly visited by people located in Japan.

How much Exeo-tech.co.jp can earn?

• Exeo-tech.co.jp should earn about $0.26/day from advertising revenue.

What is Exeo-tech.co.jp estimated value?

• Estimated value of Exeo-tech.co.jp is $255.12.

What IP addresses does Exeo-tech.co.jp resolve to?

• Exeo-tech.co.jp resolves to the IP addresses 122.17.146.32.

Where are Exeo-tech.co.jp servers located in?

• Exeo-tech.co.jp has servers located in Japan.

exeo-tech.co.jp Profile

Title:株式会社エクシオテック　EXEO TECH Description:株式会社エクシオテックは、「通信インフラ事業」「ｉｃｔソリューション事業」「環境・社会イノベーション事業」のコア事業を核に、様々なお客様のニーズに対応した事業環境、及び安心・安全で暮らしを豊かにする生活環境を創り出す企業集団として社会に貢献していきます。
Tags:
視覚障がい者
音声案内
磁気ループ
緊急避難
シグナルエイド
聴覚障がい
音声誘導
小型送信機
視覚障がい
音声
Category:Heavy Industry and Engineering / Construction and Maintenance
Edit Site Info

What technologies does exeo-tech.co.jp use?

These are the technologies used at exeo-tech.co.jp. exeo-tech.co.jp has a total of 2 technologies installed in 2 different categories.
Web Servers
Apache HTTP Server Apache HTTP Server
JavaScript Libraries
jQuery jQuery

exeo-tech.co.jp Traffic Analysis

This website is viewed by an estimated 256 visitors daily, generating a total of 732 pageviews. This equates to about 7.8K monthly visitors.
Daily Visitors256
Monthly Visits7.8K
Pages per Visit2.86
Visit duration00:41
Bounce Rate56.47%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
256
Monthly Visits:
7,757
Pages per Visit:
2.86
Daily Pageviews:
732
Avg. visit duration:
00:41
Bounce rate:
56.47%
Global Reach:
5.2E-6%
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
7,839
HypeRank:
n/a
SEMrush Rank:
22,471,424
SimilarWeb Rank:
2,318,326
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Total Visits Last 3 Months

5.1K
JAN
7.8K
FEB
7.8K
MAR

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
Japan 100.00%

Which sites are competitors to exeo-tech.co.jp?

Websites similar to exeo-tech.co.jp are sites similar on user interests and browsing behavior. Users can discover new websites that are similar to the ones they already enjoy or find useful.
Last update was 67 days ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with exeo-tech.co.jp in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

Search Engine Indexes ▼

Search engine indexes are huge databases or collections of net pages that search engines like google like google and yahoo use to retrieve applicable facts while customers carry out searches. These indexes are created through search engines like google and yahoo through crawling and indexing net pages from throughout the internet.
Google Index:
319

  ▼

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  exeo-tech.co.jp
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  22,471,424
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  3
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  0
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $0.00
Full SEMrush Report >>

Revenue report ▼

Google.com would generate approximately $0.3 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $7.8 and annual gross revenue of approximately $94.9. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $255.1.

How much would exeo-tech.co.jp make?

Daily Revenue:
$0.26
Monthly Revenue:
$7.80
Yearly Revenue:
$94.90
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
Japan 732$0.26

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$0.01
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$0.24
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$2.89
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
22
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
659
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
8,015

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
Japan 22$0.01

How much is exeo-tech.co.jp worth?

Website Value:
$255.1

Ad Experience Report ▼

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
exeo-tech.co.jp
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
exeo-tech.co.jp
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report ▼

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
exeo-tech.co.jp
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is exeo-tech.co.jp hosted? ▼

Exeo-tech.co.jp may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
122.17.146.32
ASN:
AS4713 
ISP:
NTT Communications Corporation 
Server Location:

Japan, JP
 

Other sites hosted on 122.17.146.32

There are no other sites hosted on this IP

How fast does exeo-tech.co.jp load? ▼

The average loading time of exeo-tech.co.jp is 708 ms. The Desktop speed index is 81 and mobile speed index is 65.
Average Load Time:
708 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

81
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)6ms 85% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 85% 8% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 8% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 5%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)188ms 92% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 92% 7% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 7% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)431ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 96% 2% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 2% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)672ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 97% 1% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)6ms 85% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 85% 8% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 8% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 5%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)188ms 92% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 92% 7% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 7% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)431ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 96% 2% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 2% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)672ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 97% 1% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0%

Lab Data

Largest Contentful Paint 1.7 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Minimize third-party usage  
Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading. Learn how to minimize third-party impact
First Contentful Paint 0.5 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Third parties  
Third party code can significantly impact load performance. to prioritize your page's content. Reduce and defer loading of third party code
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Speed Index 1.6 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Time to Interactive 1.7 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Max Potential First Input Delay 20 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

65
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 85% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 89% 9% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 9% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)282ms 92% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 90% 7% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 7% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 1%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)629ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 94% 3% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 3% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 1%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)955ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 96% 1% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 89% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 89% 9% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 9% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)282ms 90% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 90% 7% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 7% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 1%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)629ms 94% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 94% 3% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 3% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 1%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)955ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 96% 1% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2%

Lab Data

Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Max Potential First Input Delay 30 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Time to Interactive 7.0 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Largest Contentful Paint 6.9 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Third parties  
Third party code can significantly impact load performance. to prioritize your page's content. Reduce and defer loading of third party code
Speed Index 9.7 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Minimize third-party usage  
Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading. Learn how to minimize third-party impact
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
First Contentful Paint 2.0 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric

Does exeo-tech.co.jp use compression? ▼

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on exeo-tech.co.jp are reduced by %.
exeo-tech.co.jp does not use compression.
Original size: 15.35 KB
Compressed size: n/a
File reduced by: (%)

Google Safe Browsing ▼

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites.
Status:
  SAFE

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify ▼

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. exeo-tech.co.jp supports HTTPS.
 exeo-tech.co.jp supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: www.exeo-tech.co.jp
Organization: Exeo Tech Corporation
Location: OTA, TOKYO, JP
Issuer: JPRS Organization Validation Authority - G4
Valid from: Dec 1 00:12:04 2024 GMT
Valid until: Dec 31 14:59:59 2025 GMT
Authority:
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Common Name: JPRS Organization Validation Authority - G4
Organization: "Japan Registry Services Co., Ltd."
Location: JP
Issuer:
Valid from: Jul 22 10:23:28 2020 GMT
Valid until: May 29 05:00:39 2029 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 2048 Bits

Verify HTTP/2 Support ▼

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 exeo-tech.co.jp does not support HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header ▼

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server. 
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2025 16:26:05 GMT
Server: Apache/2.4.37 (Rocky Linux)
Last-Modified: Wed, 26 Feb 2025 05:08:18 GMT
ETag: "3d62-62f048fc2414f"
Accept-Ranges: bytes
Content-Length: 15714
Content-Type: text/html

DNS Lookup ▼

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
TXT MS=7A39487371C719DD5DC2F376C940D0816C2D0E02 300
TXT MS=ms55419181 300
TXT v=spf1 ip4:180.12.173.96/29 ip4:180.12.173.104 ip4:180.12.173.105 ip4:211.6.68.96/29 ip4:211.6.68.104 ip4:211.6.68.105 +a include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:_spf.mwprem.net ~all 300
SOA 60
Mname dns101-1.jp1.ecl.ntt.com
Rname ecl.ntt.com
Serial Number 1
Refresh 7200
Retry 900
Expire 1209600
Minimum TTL 86400
MX mxb-00354d01.gslb.pphosted.com 300
MX mxa-00354d01.gslb.pphosted.com 300
A 122.17.146.32 229
NS dns101-1.jp1.ecl.ntt.com 60
NS dns101-3.us1.ecl.ntt.com 60
NS dns101-2.uk1.ecl.ntt.com 60
NS dns101-4.sg1.ecl.ntt.com 60

Whois Lookup ▼

Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information. Domain registration for this website began on May 27, 2015 and will expire on June 21, 2025 if not renewed. This website is now assigned through the registrar . The WHOIS data for this website's domain was last updated on May 31, 2024.
Domain Created:
2015-05-27
Domain Updated:
2024-05-31
Domain Age:
10 years 25 days
Domain Owner:
EXEO TECH CORPORATION
WhoIs:
 

[ JPRS database provides information on network administration. Its use is    ]
[ restricted to network administration purposes. For further information,     ]
[ use 'whois -h whois.jprs.jp help'. To suppress Japanese output, add'/e'     ]
[ at the end of command, e.g. 'whois -h whois.jprs.jp ***/e'.                 ]
Domain Information:
a. [Domain Name]                EXEO-TECH.CO.JP
g. [Organization]               EXEO TECH CORPORATION
l. [Organization Type]          Corporation
m. [Administrative Contact]     HK33217JP
n. [Technical Contact]          HK33217JP
p. [Name Server]                dns101-1.jp1.ecl.ntt.com
p. [Name Server]                dns101-2.uk1.ecl.ntt.com
p. [Name Server]                dns101-3.us1.ecl.ntt.com
p. [Name Server]                dns101-4.sg1.ecl.ntt.com
s. [Signing Key]                
[State]                         Connected (2025/05/31)
[Registered Date]               2015/05/27
[Connected Date]                2015/05/28
[Last Update]                   2024/06/01 01:06:33 (JST)