egiving.org.au Egiving.org.au

   
EGiving - Seventh-day Adventist Church Giving

Domain Summary

What is the traffic rank for Egiving.org.au?

• Egiving.org.au ranks #1,976,663 globally on HypeStat.

What percent of global Internet users visit Egiving.org.au?

• 6.2E-6% of global Internet users visit Egiving.org.au

How many people visit Egiving.org.au each day?

• Egiving.org.au receives approximately 306 visitors and 1,324 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Egiving.org.au receive most of its visitors from?

• Egiving.org.au is mostly visited by people located in Australia.

How much Egiving.org.au can earn?

• Egiving.org.au should earn about $6.38/day from advertising revenue.

What is Egiving.org.au estimated value?

• Estimated value of Egiving.org.au is $6,108.42.

What IP addresses does Egiving.org.au resolve to?

• Egiving.org.au resolves to the IP addresses 2606:4700::6812:1b7, 104.18.1.183.

egiving.org.au Profile

Title:eGiving - Seventh-day Adventist Church Giving
Description:The Seventh-day Adventist Church eGiving site is a way for your gift to arrive at it's destination the fastest way possible. eGiving allows you to return tithe and give offerings using your Credit/Debit Card or via BPAY.
Category:Community and Society / Faith and Beliefs
Edit Site Info

What technologies does egiving.org.au use?

These are the technologies used at egiving.org.au. egiving.org.au has a total of 4 technologies installed in 4 different categories.
CDN
CloudFlare CloudFlare
Security
HSTS HSTS
JavaScript Libraries
jQuery jQuery
Miscellaneous
Open Graph Open Graph

egiving.org.au Traffic Analysis

Egiving.org.au is ranked #1,976,663 in the world. This website is viewed by an estimated 306 visitors daily, generating a total of 1.3K pageviews. This equates to about 9.3K monthly visitors. Egiving.org.au traffic has increased by 32.83% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors306
14.18%
Monthly Visits9.3K
32.83%
Pages per Visit4.33
30.8%
Visit duration01:54
76.13%
Bounce Rate35.52%
32.21%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
306
Monthly Visits:
9,272
Pages per Visit:
4.33
Daily Pageviews:
1,324
Avg. visit duration:
01:54
Bounce rate:
35.52%
Global Reach:
6.2E-6%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
1,153
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
797
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
8,998
HypeRank:
1,976,663
SEMrush Rank:
3,802,905
SimilarWeb Rank:
1,976,663
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
44.58%
Referral:
0%
Search:
55.42%
Social:
0%
Paid:
0%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
100.00%
Mobile:
0%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

11.6K
JAN
7K
FEB
9.3K
MAR

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
Australia 100.00%

Which sites are competitors to egiving.org.au?

Websites similar to egiving.org.au are sites similar on user interests and browsing behavior. Users can discover new websites that are similar to the ones they already enjoy or find useful.
Last update was 5 hours ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

Update will be available in 19 hours
*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with egiving.org.au in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

  ▼

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  egiving.org.au
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  3,802,905
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  287
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  86
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $300.00
Full SEMrush Report >>

Revenue report ▼

Google.com would generate approximately $6.4 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $191.4 and annual gross revenue of approximately $2.3K. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $6.1K.

How much would egiving.org.au make?

Daily Revenue:
$6.38
Monthly Revenue:
$191.40
Yearly Revenue:
$2,328.70
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
Australia 1,324$6.38

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$1.28
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$38.29
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$465.86
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
265
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
7,944
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
96,652

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
Australia 265$1.28

How much is egiving.org.au worth?

Website Value:
$6.1K

Ad Experience Report ▼

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
egiving.org.au
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
egiving.org.au
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report ▼

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
egiving.org.au
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is egiving.org.au hosted? ▼

Egiving.org.au may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
2606:4700::6812:1b7, 104.18.1.183
ASN:
AS13335 
ISP:
Cloudflare Inc 
Server Location:


 

Other sites hosted on 104.18.1.183

How fast does egiving.org.au load? ▼

The average loading time of egiving.org.au is 1223 ms. The Desktop speed index is 94 and mobile speed index is 83.
Average Load Time:
1223 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

94
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a SLOW speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 97% 2% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 2% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)2.3s 67% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 67% 6% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 6% 26% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 26%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)2.5s 72% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 72% 5% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 5% 22% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 22%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)67ms 93% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 93% 4% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 4% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 2%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.7s 74% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 74% 9% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 9% 16% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 16%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an SLOW speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.9s 61% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 61% 12% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 12% 25% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 25%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)2.2s 72% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 72% 9% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 9% 18% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 18%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)62ms 94% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 94% 3% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 3% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.3s 76% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 76% 12% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 12% 10% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 10%

Lab Data

Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
First Contentful Paint 0.4 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Total Blocking Time 10 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Largest Contentful Paint 1.2 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Max Potential First Input Delay 60 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Time to Interactive 1.2 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Speed Index 2.0 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

83
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)2ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 82% 16% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 16% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 1%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)820ms 67% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 74% 8% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 8% 16% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 16%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.4s 72% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 80% 4% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 4% 14% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 14%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)138ms 93% of loads for this page have a fast (<200s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 88% 9% of loads for this page have an average (200s ~ 500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 9% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.5s 74% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 82% 6% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 6% 10% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 10%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an SLOW speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 95% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 95% 4% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 4% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.9s 65% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 65% 8% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 8% 25% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 25%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)2.1s 73% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 73% 8% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 8% 17% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 17%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)154ms 84% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.2s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 84% 13% of loads for this page have an average (0.2s ~ 0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 13% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 2%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.2s 77% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 77% 14% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 14% 8% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 8%

Lab Data

Largest Contentful Paint 3.6 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Time to Interactive 4.5 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Max Potential First Input Delay 70 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Speed Index 5.2 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
First Contentful Paint 2.5 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Total Blocking Time 10 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading

Does egiving.org.au use compression? ▼

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on egiving.org.au are reduced by 83%.
egiving.org.au use gzip compression.
Original size: 70.26 KB
Compressed size: 11.37 KB
File reduced by: 58.89 KB (83%)

Google Safe Browsing ▼

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites.
Status:
  SAFE

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify ▼

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. egiving.org.au supports HTTPS.
 egiving.org.au supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: egiving.org.au
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: WE1
Valid from: Apr 11 05:22:49 2025 GMT
Valid until: Jul 10 06:22:39 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize:
Common Name: WE1
Organization: Google Trust Services
Location: US
Issuer: GTS Root R4
Valid from: Dec 13 09:00:00 2023 GMT
Valid until: Feb 20 14:00:00 2029 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize:
Common Name: GTS Root R4
Organization: Google Trust Services LLC
Location: US
Issuer: GlobalSign Root CA
Valid from: Nov 15 03:43:21 2023 GMT
Valid until: Jan 28 00:00:42 2028 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize:

Verify HTTP/2 Support ▼

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 egiving.org.au supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header ▼

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server. 
date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 15:54:23 GMT
content-type: text/html; charset=utf-8
cache-control: private
set-cookie: egv.wizV2.v1=Key`c8a52991-f37b-4329-8ea7-b3e45a0dab20|Payload`; path=/; secure; HttpOnly
strict-transport-security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
x-content-type-options: nosniff
x-frame-options: SAMEORIGIN
cf-cache-status: DYNAMIC
server: cloudflare
cf-ray: 938837a3b913e81a-ORD
content-encoding: gzip

DNS Lookup ▼

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
AAAA 2606:4700::6812:b7 232
AAAA 2606:4700::6812:1b7 232
A 104.18.0.183 232
A 104.18.1.183 232
NS michelle.ns.cloudflare.com 3532
NS james.ns.cloudflare.com 3532
HINFO 3600

Whois Lookup ▼

Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information.
Domain Updated:
2025-03-29
Domain Registrar:
Domain Directors Pty Ltd trading as Instra
Domain Owner:
SOUTH PACIFIC DIVISION OF THE SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTIS
WhoIs:
 

Domain Name: egiving.org.au
Registry Domain ID: ef2bee25ad874fb1a6aeae6676d4a710-AU
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.auda.org.au
Registrar URL: https://www.instra.com/en/about-us/contact-us
Last Modified: 2025-03-29T05:39:25Z
Registrar Name: Domain Directors Pty Ltd trading as Instra
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: email
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +49.68949396850
Reseller Name: 
Status: clientDeleteProhibited https://identitydigital.au/get-au/whois-status-codes#clientDeleteProhibited
Status: clientUpdateProhibited https://identitydigital.au/get-au/whois-status-codes#clientUpdateProhibited
Registrant Contact ID: f8ab2e207e3b4af1bcf24069d5942ac8-AU
Registrant Contact Name: Domain Admin
Tech Contact ID: a4ae1ac2a54f4cf9ace5187671f468ea-AU
Tech Contact Name: Domain Admin
Name Server: james.ns.cloudflare.com
Name Server: michelle.ns.cloudflare.com
DNSSEC: unsigned
Registrant: SOUTH PACIFIC DIVISION OF THE SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTIST CHURCH
Eligibility Type: Incorporated Association
Eligibility ID: ABN 67096202433
>>> Last update of WHOIS database: 2025-04-30T15:55:29Z