desdemo.date Desdemo.date

   
Support for Your Dating Journey

Domain Summary

What percent of global Internet users visit Desdemo.date?

• 0.0001304% of global Internet users visit Desdemo.date

How many people visit Desdemo.date each day?

• Desdemo.date receives approximately 6.4K visitors and 43,887 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Desdemo.date receive most of its visitors from?

• Desdemo.date is mostly visited by people located in United Kingdom,Canada,New Zealand.

How much Desdemo.date can earn?

• Desdemo.date should earn about $188.19/day from advertising revenue.

What is Desdemo.date estimated value?

• Estimated value of Desdemo.date is $184,376.66.

What IP addresses does Desdemo.date resolve to?

• Desdemo.date resolves to the IP addresses 2606:4700:3031::ac43:c46b, 172.67.196.107.

Where are Desdemo.date servers located in?

• Desdemo.date has servers located in United States.

desdemo.date Profile

Title:Support for Your Dating Journey Description:Desdemo Date | Join a community of local singles looking to find love online and find real relationships or companionships. Chat, flirt and date singles who share your interests and passions for life.
Tags:
desdemo
desdemo date
online dating
Category:Community and Society / Dating and Relationships
Edit Site Info

What technologies does desdemo.date use?

These are the technologies used at desdemo.date. desdemo.date has a total of 8 technologies installed in 5 different categories.
CDN
CloudFlare CloudFlare
cdnjs cdnjs
Font Scripts
Font Awesome Font Awesome
Miscellaneous
HTTP/3 HTTP/3
PWA PWA
Web Frameworks
Microsoft ASP.NET Microsoft ASP.NET
JavaScript Libraries
Slick Slick
jQuery jQuery

desdemo.date Traffic Analysis

This website is viewed by an estimated 6.4K visitors daily, generating a total of 43.9K pageviews. This equates to about 194.7K monthly visitors. Desdemo.date traffic has increased by 27.55% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors6.4K
94.07%
Monthly Visits194.7K
27.55%
Pages per Visit6.83
53.64%
Visit duration04:50
5.87%
Bounce Rate32.89%
7.44%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
6,427
Monthly Visits:
194,738
Pages per Visit:
6.83
Daily Pageviews:
43,887
Avg. visit duration:
04:50
Bounce rate:
32.89%
Global Reach:
0.0001304%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
938,144
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
214,562
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
194,765
HypeRank:
n/a
SEMrush Rank:
3,484,765
SimilarWeb Rank:
164,754
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
90.27%
Referral:
8.85%
Search:
0.38%
Social:
0.48%
Paid:
0.01%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
60.68%
Mobile:
39.32%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

229.3K
DEC
152.7K
JAN
194.7K
FEB

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
United Kingdom 48.67%
 
Canada 41.59%
 
New Zealand 8.99%
 
India 0.39%
 
South Africa 0.37%

Which sites are competitors to desdemo.date?

Websites similar to desdemo.date are sites similar on user interests and browsing behavior. Users can discover new websites that are similar to the ones they already enjoy or find useful.
Last update was 97 days ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with desdemo.date in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

Search Engine Indexes ▼

Search engine indexes are huge databases or collections of net pages that search engines like google like google and yahoo use to retrieve applicable facts while customers carry out searches. These indexes are created through search engines like google and yahoo through crawling and indexing net pages from throughout the internet.
Google Index:
73

  ▼

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  desdemo.date
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  3,484,765
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  13
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  111
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $213.00
Full SEMrush Report >>

Revenue report ▼

Google.com would generate approximately $188.2 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $5.6K and annual gross revenue of approximately $68.7K. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $184.4K.

How much would desdemo.date make?

Daily Revenue:
$188.19
Monthly Revenue:
$5,645.70
Yearly Revenue:
$68,689.35
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
Canada 18,253$110.25
 
United Kingdom 21,358$57.24
 
New Zealand 3,944$20.51
 
South Africa 161$0.13
 
India 170$0.06

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$41.66
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$1,249.91
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$15,207.28
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
8,978
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
269,344
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
3,277,018

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
Canada 4,563$27.56
 
United Kingdom 3,417$9.16
 
New Zealand 947$4.92
 
India 48$0.02
 
South Africa 3$0.00

How much is desdemo.date worth?

Website Value:
$184.4K

Ad Experience Report ▼

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
desdemo.date
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
desdemo.date
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report ▼

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
desdemo.date
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is desdemo.date hosted? ▼

Desdemo.date may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
2606:4700:3031::ac43:c46b, 172.67.196.107
ASN:
AS13335 
ISP:
Cloudflare Inc 
Server Location:

United States, US
 

Other sites hosted on 172.67.196.107

How fast does desdemo.date load? ▼

The average loading time of desdemo.date is 438 ms. The Desktop speed index is 81 and mobile speed index is 70.
Average Load Time:
438 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

81
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0%

Lab Data

Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Largest Contentful Paint 1.7 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Max Potential First Input Delay 50 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Optimize DOM size  
A large DOM can increase the duration of style calculations and layout reflows, impacting page responsiveness. A large DOM will also increase memory usage. Learn how to avoid an excessive DOM size
Speed Index 0.8 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
First Contentful Paint 0.8 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Time to Interactive 1.7 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Does not have a `<meta name="viewport">` tag with `width` or `initial-scale`  
A `<meta name="viewport">` not only optimizes your app for mobile screen sizes, but also prevents . a 300 millisecond delay to user input Learn more about using the viewport meta tag

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

70
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a SLOW speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)6ms 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 86% 13% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 13% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.8s 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 37% 37% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 37% 25% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 25%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)3.1s 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 52% 21% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 21% 25% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 25%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)103ms 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<200s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 90% 7% of loads for this page have an average (200s ~ 500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 7% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)4.0s 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 57% 17% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 17% 24% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 24%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an SLOW speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)6ms 86% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 86% 13% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 13% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.8s 37% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 37% 37% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 37% 25% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 25%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)3.1s 52% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 52% 21% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 21% 25% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 25%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)103ms 90% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.2s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 90% 7% of loads for this page have an average (0.2s ~ 0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 7% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)4.0s 57% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 57% 17% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 17% 24% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 24%

Lab Data

Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Optimize DOM size  
A large DOM can increase the duration of style calculations and layout reflows, impacting page responsiveness. A large DOM will also increase memory usage. Learn how to avoid an excessive DOM size
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Speed Index 2.9 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Largest Contentful Paint 13.5 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
First Contentful Paint 2.9 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Total Blocking Time 40 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Time to Interactive 13.5 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Does not have a `<meta name="viewport">` tag with `width` or `initial-scale`  
A `<meta name="viewport">` not only optimizes your app for mobile screen sizes, but also prevents . a 300 millisecond delay to user input Learn more about using the viewport meta tag
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Max Potential First Input Delay 90 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric

Does desdemo.date use compression? ▼

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on desdemo.date are reduced by 78%.
desdemo.date use br compression.
Original size: 28.05 KB
Compressed size: 6.1 KB
File reduced by: 21.95 KB (78%)

Google Safe Browsing ▼

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites. desdemo.date has 80 Safety Reputations.
Status:
  SAFE
Safety Reputations:
  80
Safety Confidence:
  51

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify ▼

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. desdemo.date supports HTTPS.
 desdemo.date supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: desdemo.date
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: WE1
Valid from: Feb 4 11:59:51 2025 GMT
Valid until: May 5 12:58:01 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize:
Common Name: WE1
Organization: Google Trust Services
Location: US
Issuer: GTS Root R4
Valid from: Dec 13 09:00:00 2023 GMT
Valid until: Feb 20 14:00:00 2029 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize:
Common Name: GTS Root R4
Organization: Google Trust Services LLC
Location: US
Issuer: GlobalSign Root CA
Valid from: Nov 15 03:43:21 2023 GMT
Valid until: Jan 28 00:00:42 2028 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize:

Verify HTTP/2 Support ▼

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 desdemo.date supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header ▼

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server. 
date: Sun, 09 Mar 2025 12:00:42 GMT
content-type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
set-cookie: hubp-landerCORS=2b0cfb5bf8ccc5d1caa9774ee7dc515c; Path=/; SameSite=None; Secure
set-cookie: hubp-lander=2b0cfb5bf8ccc5d1caa9774ee7dc515c; Path=/
set-cookie: ck=1; path=/
cache-control: private
x-frame-options: SAMEORIGIN
x-powered-by: ASP.NET
cf-cache-status: DYNAMIC
vary: accept-encoding
report-to: {"endpoints":[{"url":"https://a.nel.cloudflare.com/report/v4?s=qtqefLEG%2FbASQzVpwe24y5QmG1mv2gAo9ZfhEpsqRN74yfo03Fg12t0H%2FFcwbgLElNIbz0QsqBzPwAg0TKi8SxsRA7olZZ2ccntkcnEcDdx8AlqPv5XlHoz8kk5YCE8%3D"}],"group":"cf-nel","max_age":604800}
nel: {"success_fraction":0,"report_to":"cf-nel","max_age":604800}
server: cloudflare
cf-ray: 91da69d4afc51d04-ORD
content-encoding: br
alt-svc: h3=":443"; ma=86400
server-timing: cfL4;desc="?proto=TCP&rtt=8512&min_rtt=2571&rtt_var=12386&sent=8&recv=11&lost=0&retrans=0&sent_bytes=3411&recv_bytes=892&delivery_rate=1126409&cwnd=254&unsent_bytes=0&cid=2daf0862d60e7d8e&ts=429&x=0"

DNS Lookup ▼

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
AAAA 2606:4700:3033::6815:1532 247
AAAA 2606:4700:3031::ac43:c46b 247
A 172.67.196.107 247
A 104.21.21.50 247
NS maxim.ns.cloudflare.com 3547
NS iris.ns.cloudflare.com 3547
HINFO 3600

Whois Lookup ▼

Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information. Domain registration for this website began on October 28, 2022 and will expire on October 28, 2025 if not renewed. This website is now assigned through the registrar Safenames Ltd. The WHOIS data for this website's domain was last updated on October 12, 2024.
Domain Created:
2022-10-28
Domain Expires:
2025-10-28
Domain Updated:
2024-10-12
Domain Age:
2 years 7 months 17 days
Domain Registrar:
Safenames Ltd
Domain Owner:
Desdemona Limited
WhoIs:
 

Domain Name: desdemo.date
Registry Domain ID: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.safenames.net
Registrar URL: whois.safenames.net
Updated Date: 2024-10-12T16:41:18Z
Creation Date: 2022-10-28T15:43:36Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2025-10-28T15:43:36Z
Registrar: Safenames Ltd
Registrar IANA ID: 447
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: email
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +44.1908200022
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Domain Status: clientUpdateProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientUpdateProhibited
Domain Status: clientDeleteProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientDeleteProhibited
Registry Registrant ID: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrant Name: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrant Organization: Desdemona Limited
Registrant Street: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrant Street: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrant Street: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrant City: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrant State/Province:
Registrant Postal Code: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrant Country: IE
Registrant Phone: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrant Phone Ext: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrant Fax: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrant Fax Ext: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrant Email: Please query the RDDS service of the Registrar of Record identified in this output for information on how to contact the Registrant, Admin, or Tech contact of the queried domain name.
Registry Admin ID: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Name: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Organization: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Street: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Street: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Street: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin City: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin State/Province: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Postal Code: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Country: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Phone: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Phone Ext: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Fax: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Fax Ext: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Email: Please query the RDDS service of the Registrar of Record identified in this output for information on how to contact the Registrant, Admin, or Tech contact of the queried domain name.
Registry Tech ID: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Name: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Organization: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Street: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Street: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Street: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech City: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech State/Province: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Postal Code: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Country: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Phone: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Phone Ext: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Fax: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Fax Ext: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Email: Please query the RDDS service of the Registrar of Record identified in this output for information on how to contact the Registrant, Admin, or Tech contact of the queried domain name.
Name Server: iris.ns.cloudflare.com
Name Server: maxim.ns.cloudflare.com
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form: https://www.icann.org/wicf/
>>> Last update of WHOIS database: 2025-03-09T12:01:33Z