craig-wood.com Craig-wood.com

   

Domain Summary

What percent of global Internet users visit Craig-wood.com?

• 2.2E-6% of global Internet users visit Craig-wood.com

How many people visit Craig-wood.com each day?

• Craig-wood.com receives approximately 110 visitors and 166 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Craig-wood.com receive most of its visitors from?

• Craig-wood.com is mostly visited by people located in United States,United Kingdom,Australia.

How much Craig-wood.com can earn?

• Craig-wood.com should earn about $0.65/day from advertising revenue.

What is Craig-wood.com estimated value?

• Estimated value of Craig-wood.com is $751.53.

What IP addresses does Craig-wood.com resolve to?

• Craig-wood.com resolves to the IP addresses 37.27.12.198.

Where are Craig-wood.com servers located in?

• Craig-wood.com has servers located in Helsinki, Uusimaa, 00131, Finland.

craig-wood.com Profile

Category:Computers Electronics and Technology / Programming and Developer Software
Edit Site Info

What technologies does craig-wood.com use?

These are the technologies used at craig-wood.com. craig-wood.com has a total of 1 technologies installed in 1 different categories.
Web Servers
Apache HTTP Server Apache HTTP Server

craig-wood.com Traffic Analysis

This website is viewed by an estimated 110 visitors daily, generating a total of 166 pageviews. This equates to about 3.3K monthly visitors. Craig-wood.com traffic has decreased by 24.13% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors110
48.31%
Monthly Visits3.3K
24.13%
Pages per Visit1.51
29.61%
Visit duration00:22
670.27%
Bounce Rate49.02%
5.03%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
110
Monthly Visits:
3,333
Pages per Visit:
1.51
Daily Pageviews:
166
Avg. visit duration:
00:22
Bounce rate:
49.02%
Global Reach:
2.2E-6%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
657
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
413
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
3,354
HypeRank:
n/a
SEMrush Rank:
3,278,450
SimilarWeb Rank:
4,443,063
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
55.71%
Referral:
26.03%
Search:
18.26%
Social:
0%
Paid:
0%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
100.00%
Mobile:
0%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

3.2K
FEB
4.4K
MAR
3.3K
APR

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
United States 54.60%
 
United Kingdom 19.10%
 
Australia 11.09%
 
Czech Republic 7.58%
 
Netherlands 4.61%

Which sites are competitors to craig-wood.com?

Websites similar to craig-wood.com are sites similar on user interests and browsing behavior. Users can discover new websites that are similar to the ones they already enjoy or find useful.
Last update was 23 days ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with craig-wood.com in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

Search Engine Indexes ▼

Search engine indexes are huge databases or collections of net pages that search engines like google like google and yahoo use to retrieve applicable facts while customers carry out searches. These indexes are created through search engines like google and yahoo through crawling and indexing net pages from throughout the internet.
Google Index:
422

  ▼

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  craig-wood.com
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  3,278,450
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  135
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  125
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $3.00
Full SEMrush Report >>

Revenue report ▼

Google.com would generate approximately $0.7 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $19.5 and annual gross revenue of approximately $237.3. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $751.5.

How much would craig-wood.com make?

Daily Revenue:
$0.65
Monthly Revenue:
$19.50
Yearly Revenue:
$237.25
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
United States 91$0.44
 
Australia 18$0.09
 
United Kingdom 32$0.08
 
Netherlands 8$0.01
 
Czech Republic 13$0.01

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$0.11
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$3.40
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$41.33
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
28
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
829
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
10,086

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
United States 16$0.08
 
Australia 4$0.02
 
United Kingdom 5$0.01
 
Netherlands 1$0.00
 
Czech Republic 1$0.00

How much is craig-wood.com worth?

Website Value:
$751.5

Ad Experience Report ▼

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
craig-wood.com
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
craig-wood.com
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report ▼

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
craig-wood.com
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is craig-wood.com hosted? ▼

Craig-wood.com may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
37.27.12.198
ASN:
AS24940 
ISP:
Hetzner Online GmbH 
Server Location:
Helsinki
Uusimaa, 18
00131
Finland, FI
 

Other sites hosted on 37.27.12.198

There are no other sites hosted on this IP

How fast does craig-wood.com load? ▼

The average loading time of craig-wood.com is 593 ms. The Desktop speed index is 100 and mobile speed index is 100.
Average Load Time:
593 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

100
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0%

Lab Data

First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
First Contentful Paint 0.4 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Render blocking requests  
Requests are blocking the page's initial render, which may delay LCP. can move these network requests out of the critical path. Deferring or inlining
Use efficient cache lifetimes  
A long cache lifetime can speed up repeat visits to your page. Learn more
Max Potential First Input Delay 20 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Speed Index 0.9 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Minimize third-party usage  
Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading. Learn how to minimize third-party impact
Time to Interactive 0.4 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
3rd parties  
3rd party code can significantly impact load performance. to prioritize your page's content. Reduce and defer loading of 3rd party code
Duplicated JavaScript  
Remove large, duplicate JavaScript modules from bundles to reduce unnecessary bytes consumed by network activity.
Legacy JavaScript  
Polyfills and transforms enable legacy browsers to use new JavaScript features. However, many aren't necessary for modern browsers. Consider modifying your JavaScript build process to not transpile features, unless you know you must support legacy browsers. Baseline Learn why most sites can deploy ES6+ code without transpiling
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Does not have a `<meta name="viewport">` tag with `width` or `initial-scale`  
A `<meta name="viewport">` not only optimizes your app for mobile screen sizes, but also prevents . a 300 millisecond delay to user input Learn more about using the viewport meta tag
Largest Contentful Paint 0.4 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

100
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0%

Lab Data

3rd parties  
3rd party code can significantly impact load performance. to prioritize your page's content. Reduce and defer loading of 3rd party code
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Duplicated JavaScript  
Remove large, duplicate JavaScript modules from bundles to reduce unnecessary bytes consumed by network activity.
First Contentful Paint 1.4 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Time to Interactive 1.4 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Use efficient cache lifetimes  
A long cache lifetime can speed up repeat visits to your page. Learn more
Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
Minimize third-party usage  
Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading. Learn how to minimize third-party impact
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Does not have a `<meta name="viewport">` tag with `width` or `initial-scale`  
A `<meta name="viewport">` not only optimizes your app for mobile screen sizes, but also prevents . a 300 millisecond delay to user input Learn more about using the viewport meta tag
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Legacy JavaScript  
Polyfills and transforms enable legacy browsers to use new JavaScript features. However, many aren't necessary for modern browsers. Consider modifying your JavaScript build process to not transpile features, unless you know you must support legacy browsers. Baseline Learn why most sites can deploy ES6+ code without transpiling
Speed Index 1.8 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Render blocking requests  
Requests are blocking the page's initial render, which may delay LCP. can move these network requests out of the critical path. Deferring or inlining
Largest Contentful Paint 1.4 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Max Potential First Input Delay 20 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric

Does craig-wood.com use compression? ▼

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on craig-wood.com are reduced by %.
craig-wood.com does not use compression.
Original size: 24 B
Compressed size: n/a
File reduced by: (%)

Google Safe Browsing ▼

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites. craig-wood.com has 82 Safety Reputations.
Status:
  SAFE
Safety Reputations:
  82
Safety Confidence:
  9

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify ▼

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. craig-wood.com supports HTTPS.
 craig-wood.com supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: box.craig-wood.com
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: E6
Valid from: Apr 27 22:10:20 2025 GMT
Valid until: Jul 26 22:10:19 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize:
Common Name: box.craig-wood.com
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: E6
Valid from: Apr 27 22:10:20 2025 GMT
Valid until: Jul 26 22:10:19 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize:
Common Name: E6
Organization: Let's Encrypt
Location: US
Issuer: ISRG Root X1
Valid from: Mar 13 00:00:00 2024 GMT
Valid until: Mar 12 23:59:59 2027 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize:

Verify HTTP/2 Support ▼

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 craig-wood.com does not support HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header ▼

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server. 
Date: Mon, 26 May 2025 04:10:01 GMT
Server: Apache/2.4.59
Location: http://www.craig-wood.com/
Content-Length: 210
Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1

HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Date: Mon, 26 May 2025 04:10:02 GMT
Server: Apache/2.4.59
Last-Modified: Fri, 10 Apr 2020 10:07:22 GMT
ETag: "18-5a2ece63fb598"
Accept-Ranges: bytes
Content-Length: 24
Content-Type: text/html

DNS Lookup ▼

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
A 37.27.12.198 549
NS maceio.ns.porkbun.com 172749
NS curitiba.ns.porkbun.com 172749
NS salvador.ns.porkbun.com 172749
NS fortaleza.ns.porkbun.com 172749
HINFO 3600

Whois Lookup ▼

Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information. Domain registration for this website began on January 3, 1997 and will expire on January 2, 2026 if not renewed. This website is now assigned through the registrar Porkbun LLC. The WHOIS data for this website's domain was last updated on April 24, 2024.
Domain Created:
1997-01-03
Domain Expires:
2026-01-02
Domain Updated:
2024-04-24
Domain Age:
28 years 5 months 15 days
Domain Registrar:
Porkbun LLC
WhoIs:
 

   Domain Name: CRAIG-WOOD.COM
   Registry Domain ID: 1979580_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN
   Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.porkbun.com
   Registrar URL: http://porkbun.com
   Updated Date: 2024-04-24T18:56:44Z
   Creation Date: 1997-01-03T05:00:00Z
   Registry Expiry Date: 2026-01-02T05:00:00Z
   Registrar: Porkbun LLC
   Registrar IANA ID: 1861
   Registrar Abuse Contact Email: email
   Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: 5038508351
   Domain Status: clientDeleteProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientDeleteProhibited
   Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
   Name Server: CURITIBA.NS.PORKBUN.COM
   Name Server: FORTALEZA.NS.PORKBUN.COM
   Name Server: MACEIO.NS.PORKBUN.COM
   Name Server: SALVADOR.NS.PORKBUN.COM
   DNSSEC: unsigned
   URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form: https://www.icann.org/wicf/
>>> Last update of whois database: 2025-05-26T04:10:40Z