bibleref.com Bibleref.com

   
Online Bible Commentary | BibleRef.com

Domain Summary

What is the traffic rank for Bibleref.com?

• Bibleref.com ranks #30,070 globally on HypeStat.

What percent of global Internet users visit Bibleref.com?

0.0032136% of global Internet users visit Bibleref.com

How many people visit Bibleref.com each day?

• Bibleref.com receives approximately 158.4K visitors and 426,475 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Bibleref.com receive most of its visitors from?

• Bibleref.com is mostly visited by people located in United States,United Kingdom,Australia.

How much Bibleref.com can earn?

• Bibleref.com should earn about $1,897.38/day from advertising revenue.

What is Bibleref.com estimated value?

• Estimated value of Bibleref.com is $2,108,577.54.

What IP addresses does Bibleref.com resolve to?

• Bibleref.com resolves to the IP addresses 128.136.204.149.

Where are Bibleref.com servers located in?

• Bibleref.com has servers located in Atlanta, Georgia, 30307, United States.

bibleref.com Profile

Title:Online Bible Commentary | BibleRef.com Description:BibleRef.com is an online Bible commentary that focuses on helping people to understand God's Word. Our goal is to be a Bible commentary that is comprehensive and easy-to-understand.
Tags:
Category:Community and Society / Faith and Beliefs
About: Bibleref.com is an online resource dedicated to providing detailed explanations and interpretations of biblical verses and passages. The platform aims to help readers gain a deeper understanding of the Bible by offering context, insights, and commentary on various books and chapters. Each verse is analyzed to explain its meaning, historical background, and relevance to broader biblical themes. The site serves as a useful tool for both casual readers and serious students of the Bible, offering clear and concise interpretations that are accessible to a wide audience.
*This text is generated by artificial intelligence and may not be accurate. Edit Site Info

What technologies does bibleref.com use?

These are the technologies used at bibleref.com. bibleref.com has a total of 4 technologies installed in 4 different categories.

bibleref.com Traffic Analysis

Bibleref.com is ranked #30,070 in the world. This website is viewed by an estimated 158.4K visitors daily, generating a total of 426.5K pageviews. This equates to about 4.8M monthly visitors. Bibleref.com traffic has increased by 15.99% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors158.4K
9.43%
Monthly Visits4.8M
15.99%
Pages per Visit2.69
14.75%
Visit duration02:22
12.63%
Bounce Rate57.86%
0.39%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
158,426
Monthly Visits:
4,800,308
Pages per Visit:
2.69
Daily Pageviews:
426,475
Avg. visit duration:
02:22
Bounce rate:
57.86%
Global Reach:
0.0032136%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
5,539,169
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
3,121,567
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
4,705,715
HypeRank:
30,070
SEMrush Rank:
917
SimilarWeb Rank:
14,922
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
54.51%
Referral:
8.14%
Search:
36.69%
Social:
0.21%
Paid:
0.46%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
37.77%
Mobile:
62.23%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

5M
JAN
4.1M
FEB
4.8M
MAR

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
United States 59.39%
 
United Kingdom 4.48%
 
Australia 4.33%
 
Canada 4.07%
 
Philippines 3.23%

Where do visitors go on bibleref.com?

 
Reach%Pageviews%PerUser
bibleref.com
100.00%100.00%1.2

Which sites are competitors to bibleref.com?

Websites similar to bibleref.com are sites similar on user interests and browsing behavior. Users can discover new websites that are similar to the ones they already enjoy or find useful.
Last update was 52 days ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with bibleref.com in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

 

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  bibleref.com
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  917
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  907,457
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  3,300,504
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $771,573.00

Revenue report

Google.com would generate approximately $1.9K per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $56.9K and annual gross revenue of approximately $692.5K. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $2.1M.

How much would bibleref.com make?

Daily Revenue:
$1,897.38
Monthly Revenue:
$56,921.40
Yearly Revenue:
$692,543.70
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
United States 253,266$1,223.27
 
Canada 17,357$104.83
 
Australia 18,448$88.92
 
United Kingdom 19,103$51.19
 
Philippines 13,794$2.76

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$272.57
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$8,176.97
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$99,486.47
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
57,639
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
1,729,155
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
21,038,057

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
United States 45,588$220.19
 
Canada 4,339$26.21
 
Australia 3,690$17.78
 
United Kingdom 3,056$8.19
 
Philippines 966$0.19

How much is bibleref.com worth?

Website Value:
$2.1M

Ad Experience Report

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
bibleref.com
Last Change Time:
(The last time that the site changed status.)
2025-04-21 19:01:44
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Passing

Desktop summary

Root domain:
bibleref.com
Last Change Time:
(The last time that the site changed status.)
2025-04-21 19:01:44
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Passing

Abusive Experience Report

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
bibleref.com
Last Change Time:
(The last time that the site changed status.)
2025-04-21 19:01:44
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Passing

Where is bibleref.com hosted?

Bibleref.com may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
128.136.204.149
ASN:
AS13649 
ISP:
ViaWest 
Server Location:
Atlanta
Georgia, GA
30307
United States, US
 

Other sites hosted on 128.136.204.149

There are no other sites hosted on this IP

How fast does bibleref.com load?

The average loading time of bibleref.com is 184 ms. The Desktop speed index is 94 and mobile speed index is 77.
Average Load Time:
184 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

94
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a SLOW speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)38ms 44% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 44% 21% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 21% 34% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 34%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)466ms 85% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 85% 10% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 10% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 3%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)993ms 89% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 89% 6% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 6% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 4%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)51ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 97% 1% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 1% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.6s 88% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 88% 6% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 6% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 5%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an SLOW speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)31ms 60% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 60% 11% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 11% 28% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 28%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)275ms 92% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 92% 6% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 6% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 1%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)592ms 95% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 95% 3% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 3% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 1%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)37ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 98% 0% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)784ms 95% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 95% 2% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2%

Lab Data

Largest Contentful Paint 1.1 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Time to Interactive 1.4 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
First Contentful Paint 0.6 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Speed Index 1.2 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Max Potential First Input Delay 60 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

77
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 44% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 85% 11% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 11% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 3%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)462ms 85% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 84% 12% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 12% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 3%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.1s 89% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 89% 6% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 6% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 3%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)109ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<200s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 92% 5% of loads for this page have an average (200s ~ 500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 5% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 2%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.1s 88% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 94% 3% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 3% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 85% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 85% 11% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 11% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 3%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)705ms 78% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 78% 16% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 16% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 5%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.3s 84% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 84% 10% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 10% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 5%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)105ms 93% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.2s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 93% 4% of loads for this page have an average (0.2s ~ 0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 4% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 2%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.4s 91% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 91% 5% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 5% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 3%

Lab Data

Total Blocking Time 10 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Largest Contentful Paint 3.0 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Speed Index 2.0 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Max Potential First Input Delay 70 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Time to Interactive 5.6 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
First Contentful Paint 2.0 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric

Does bibleref.com use compression?

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on bibleref.com are reduced by 73%.
bibleref.com use gzip compression.
Original size: 19.98 KB
Compressed size: 5.39 KB
File reduced by: 14.59 KB (73%)

Google Safe Browsing

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites. bibleref.com has 80 Safety Reputations.
Status:
  SAFE
Safety Reputations:
  80
Safety Confidence:
  51

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. bibleref.com supports HTTPS.
 bibleref.com supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: bibleref.com
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: E5
Valid from: Mar 13 16:06:34 2025 GMT
Valid until: Jun 11 16:06:33 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize:
Common Name: E5
Organization: Let's Encrypt
Location: US
Issuer: ISRG Root X1
Valid from: Mar 13 00:00:00 2024 GMT
Valid until: Mar 12 23:59:59 2027 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize:

Verify HTTP/2 Support

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 bibleref.com does not support HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server.
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Location: https://www.bibleref.com/
Server: Microsoft-IIS/10.0
Referrer-Policy: strict-origin-when-cross-origin
X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2025 20:28:27 GMT
Content-Length: 148

HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Cache-Control: max-age=604800
Content-Type: text/html
Content-Encoding: gzip
Last-Modified: Tue, 15 Apr 2025 19:29:17 GMT
Accept-Ranges: bytes
ETag: "80e484ad3caedb1:0"
Vary: Accept-Encoding
Server: Microsoft-IIS/10.0
Referrer-Policy: strict-origin-when-cross-origin
X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2025 20:28:27 GMT
Content-Length: 5516

DNS Lookup

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
SOA 3600
Mname ns1.maximtech.com
Rname domainadmin2.maximtech.com
Serial Number 2024101601
Refresh 28800
Retry 7200
Expire 604800
Minimum TTL 3600
TXT v=spf1 include:spf.maximtech.com include:icpbounce.com ~all 3600
MX mail2.maximtech.com 3600
MX mail1.maximtech.com 3600
MX mail3.maximtech.com 3600
A 128.136.204.149 95
NS ns1.maximtech.com 3600
NS ns2.maximtech.com 3600
NS ns3.maximtech.com 3600
CAA letsencrypt.org 1800

Whois Lookup

Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information. Domain registration for this website began on June 29, 2004 and will expire on June 29, 2029 if not renewed. This website is now assigned through the registrar GoDaddy.com, LLC. The WHOIS data for this website's domain was last updated on September 18, 2022.
Domain Created:
2004-06-29
Domain Expires:
2029-06-29
Domain Updated:
2022-09-18
Domain Age:
20 years 15 days
Domain Registrar:
GoDaddy.com, LLC
Domain Owner:
Domains By Proxy, LLC
WhoIs:
 

   Domain Name: BIBLEREF.COM
   Registry Domain ID: 123740848_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN
   Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.godaddy.com
   Registrar URL: http://www.godaddy.com
   Updated Date: 2022-09-18T20:36:04Z
   Creation Date: 2004-06-29T18:30:41Z
   Registry Expiry Date: 2029-06-29T18:30:41Z
   Registrar: GoDaddy.com, LLC
   Registrar IANA ID: 146
   Registrar Abuse Contact Email: email
   Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: 480-624-2505
   Domain Status: clientDeleteProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientDeleteProhibited
   Domain Status: clientRenewProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientRenewProhibited
   Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
   Domain Status: clientUpdateProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientUpdateProhibited
   Name Server: NS1.MAXIMTECH.COM
   Name Server: NS2.MAXIMTECH.COM
   Name Server: NS3.MAXIMTECH.COM
   DNSSEC: unsigned
   URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form: https://www.icann.org/wicf/
>>> Last update of whois database: 2025-04-22T20:29:04Z