balancer.fi Balancer.fi

   
Balancer DeFi AMMs made easy

Domain Summary

What is the traffic rank for Balancer.fi?

• Balancer.fi ranks #802,246 globally on HypeStat.

What percent of global Internet users visit Balancer.fi?

• 6.92E-5% of global Internet users visit Balancer.fi

How many people visit Balancer.fi each day?

• Balancer.fi receives approximately 3.4K visitors and 14,531 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Balancer.fi receive most of its visitors from?

• Balancer.fi is mostly visited by people located in United States,Viet Nam,United Kingdom.

How much Balancer.fi can earn?

• Balancer.fi should earn about $57.77/day from advertising revenue.

What is Balancer.fi estimated value?

• Estimated value of Balancer.fi is $60,528.41.

What IP addresses does Balancer.fi resolve to?

• Balancer.fi resolves to the IP addresses 76.76.21.21.

Where are Balancer.fi servers located in?

• Balancer.fi has servers located in Walnut, California, 91789, United States.

balancer.fi Profile

Title:Balancer DeFi AMMs made easy
Description:DeFi's most extensive AMM product suite—Balancer is a decentralized Automated Market Maker protocol built on Ethereum with a clear focus on fungible and yield-bearing liquidity.
Category:Finance / Investing
About: Balancer.fi is a decentralized finance (DeFi) protocol that facilitates automated portfolio management and liquidity provision on the Ethereum blockchain. With its unique multi-token automated market maker (AMM) mechanism, Balancer allows users to create and manage liquidity pools containing multiple tokens, which can help in optimizing their investment strategies. By utilizing smart contracts, it autonomously rebalances portfolios, ensuring that users don't need to constantly adjust their holdings. Investors can benefit from trading fees collected by the pools, while traders gain access to a diverse range of assets and liquidity. Through its innovative approach, Balancer aims to make DeFi more accessible and efficient for all participants.
*This text is generated by artificial intelligence and may not be accurate. Edit Site Info

What technologies does balancer.fi use?

These are the technologies used at balancer.fi. balancer.fi has a total of 9 technologies installed in 7 different categories.
Security
HSTS HSTS
Web Frameworks
Next.js Next.js
Web Servers
Next.js Next.js
Vercel Vercel
Miscellaneous
Open Graph Open Graph
PWA PWA
webpack webpack
Performance
Priority Hints Priority Hints
JavaScript Frameworks
React React
Programming Languages
Node.js Node.js

balancer.fi Traffic Analysis

Balancer.fi is ranked #802,246 in the world. This website is viewed by an estimated 3.4K visitors daily, generating a total of 14.5K pageviews. This equates to about 103.4K monthly visitors. Balancer.fi traffic has increased by 0.84% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors3.4K
15.5%
Monthly Visits103.4K
0.84%
Pages per Visit4.26
35.73%
Visit duration02:13
11%
Bounce Rate42.54%
21.95%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
3,412
Monthly Visits:
103,384
Pages per Visit:
4.26
Daily Pageviews:
14,531
Avg. visit duration:
02:13
Bounce rate:
42.54%
Global Reach:
6.92E-5%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
99,960
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
52,398
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
101,361
HypeRank:
802,246
SEMrush Rank:
1,190,275
SimilarWeb Rank:
308,839
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
62.93%
Referral:
17.91%
Search:
10.59%
Social:
8.54%
Paid:
0.02%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
91.07%
Mobile:
8.93%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

135.4K
DEC
102.5K
JAN
103.4K
FEB

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
United States 53.25%
 
Viet Nam 5.94%
 
United Kingdom 5.85%
 
Netherlands 4.10%
 
Malta 3.70%

Where do visitors go on balancer.fi?

 
Reach%Pageviews%PerUser
app.balancer.fi
58.76%37.41%1.6
balancer.fi
49.43%21.12%1
polygon.balancer.fi
41.12%38.52%2.4
OTHER
0%2.95%0

Which sites are competitors to balancer.fi?

Websites similar to balancer.fi are sites similar on user interests and browsing behavior. Users can discover new websites that are similar to the ones they already enjoy or find useful.
Last update was 3 days ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with balancer.fi in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

Search Engine Indexes ▼

Search engine indexes are huge databases or collections of net pages that search engines like google like google and yahoo use to retrieve applicable facts while customers carry out searches. These indexes are created through search engines like google and yahoo through crawling and indexing net pages from throughout the internet.
Google Index:
1,820
Bing Index:
2,010

  ▼

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  balancer.fi
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  1,190,275
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  844
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  850
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $2,040.00
Full SEMrush Report >>

Revenue report ▼

Google.com would generate approximately $57.8 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $1.7K and annual gross revenue of approximately $21.1K. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $60.5K.

How much would balancer.fi make?

Daily Revenue:
$57.77
Monthly Revenue:
$1,733.10
Yearly Revenue:
$21,086.05
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
United States 7,738$37.37
 
United Kingdom 850$2.28
 
Netherlands 595$1.14
 
Malta 537$0.47
 
Viet Nam 863$0.41

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$7.38
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$221.45
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$2,694.26
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
1,756
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
52,675
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
640,876

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
United States 1,393$6.73
 
United Kingdom 136$0.36
 
Netherlands 101$0.19
 
Malta 91$0.08
 
Viet Nam 35$0.02

How much is balancer.fi worth?

Website Value:
$60.5K

Ad Experience Report ▼

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
balancer.fi
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
balancer.fi
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report ▼

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
balancer.fi
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is balancer.fi hosted? ▼

Balancer.fi may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
76.76.21.21
ASN:
AS16509 
ISP:
Amazon.com, Inc. 
Server Location:
Walnut
California, CA
91789
United States, US
 

Other sites hosted on 76.76.21.21

How fast does balancer.fi load? ▼

The average loading time of balancer.fi is 1140 ms. The Desktop speed index is 77 and mobile speed index is 38.
Average Load Time:
1140 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

77
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 95% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 95% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 4%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)956ms 67% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 67% 25% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 25% 7% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 7%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)2.1s 68% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 68% 19% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 19% 11% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 11%
First Input Delay (FID)2ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<100ms) First Input Delay (FID) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (100ms ~ 300ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>300ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)45ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 98% 1% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 1% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.8s 70% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 70% 15% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 15% 14% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 14%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 94% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 94% 1% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 1% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 4%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)922ms 69% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 69% 23% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 23% 6% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 6%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)2.0s 70% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 70% 18% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 18% 11% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 11%
First Input Delay (FID)2ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<100ms) First Input Delay (FID) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average 100ms ~ 300ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>300ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)46ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 98% 1% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 1% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.7s 70% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 70% 15% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 15% 13% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 13%

Lab Data

First Meaningful Paint 0.9 s
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Total Blocking Time 340 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
First Contentful Paint 0.9 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Speed Index 1.4 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Largest Contentful Paint 1.6 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Time to Interactive 1.4 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

38
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a SLOW speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)2ms 95% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 86% 7% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 7% 6% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 6%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.0s 67% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 64% 26% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 26% 8% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 8%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)4.1s 68% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 37% 25% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 25% 36% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 36%
First Input Delay (FID)25ms 87% of loads for this page have a fast (<100ms) First Input Delay (FID) 87% 7% of loads for this page have an average (100ms ~ 300ms) First Input Delay (FID) 7% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>300ms) First Input Delay (FID) 5%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)495ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<200s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 40% 34% of loads for this page have an average (200s ~ 500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 34% 24% of loads for this page have a slow (>500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 24%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)4.2s 70% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 49% 23% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 23% 27% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 27%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an SLOW speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)2ms 87% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 87% 6% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 6% 6% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 6%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.1s 62% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 62% 26% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 26% 11% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 11%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)4.1s 37% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 37% 26% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 26% 36% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 36%
First Input Delay (FID)24ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<100ms) First Input Delay (FID) 88% 6% of loads for this page have an average 100ms ~ 300ms) First Input Delay (FID) 6% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>300ms) First Input Delay (FID) 5%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)487ms 42% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.2s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 42% 33% of loads for this page have an average (0.2s ~ 0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 33% 23% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 23%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)4.2s 49% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 49% 23% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 23% 27% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 27%

Lab Data

Largest Contentful Paint 12.9 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Speed Index 6.9 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Total Blocking Time 10,540 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
First Meaningful Paint 4.9 s
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Time to Interactive 20.5 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
First Contentful Paint 1.7 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Max Potential First Input Delay 2,540 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading

Does balancer.fi use compression? ▼

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on balancer.fi are reduced by 81%.
balancer.fi use br compression.
Original size: 1.97 MB
Compressed size: 380.71 KB
File reduced by: 1.6 MB (81%)

Google Safe Browsing ▼

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites. balancer.fi has 65 Safety Reputations.
Status:
  SAFE
Safety Reputations:
  65
Safety Confidence:
  4

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify ▼

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. balancer.fi supports HTTPS.
 balancer.fi supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: balancer.fi
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: R10
Valid from: Feb 1 07:52:41 2025 GMT
Valid until: May 2 07:52:40 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Common Name: R10
Organization: Let's Encrypt
Location: US
Issuer: ISRG Root X1
Valid from: Mar 13 00:00:00 2024 GMT
Valid until: Mar 12 23:59:59 2027 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 2048 Bits

Verify HTTP/2 Support ▼

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 balancer.fi supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header ▼

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server. 
age: 0
cache-control: private, no-cache, no-store, max-age=0, must-revalidate
content-encoding: br
content-type: text/html; charset=utf-8
date: Sat, 15 Mar 2025 17:36:46 GMT
link: </_next/static/media/0d87c97aae65b4fc-s.p.woff2>; rel=preload; as="font"; crossorigin=""; type="font/woff2", </_next/static/media/12084922609e6532-s.p.woff2>; rel=preload; as="font"; crossorigin=""; type="font/woff2", </_next/static/media/17afee50ac86a1b9-s.p.woff2>; rel=preload; as="font"; crossorigin=""; type="font/woff2", </_next/static/media/22539d17f3707926-s.p.woff2>; rel=preload; as="font"; crossorigin=""; type="font/woff2", </_next/static/media/3eb4bb530f30483c-s.p.woff2>; rel=preload; as="font"; crossorigin=""; type="font/woff2"
server: Vercel
strict-transport-security: max-age=63072000
vary: RSC, Next-Router-State-Tree, Next-Router-Prefetch
x-matched-path: /
x-powered-by: Next.js
x-vercel-cache: MISS
x-vercel-id: cle1::lhr1::llksp-1742060206518-eb94a60cc221

DNS Lookup ▼

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
A 76.76.21.21 201
NS alexia.ns.cloudflare.com 21501
NS alex.ns.cloudflare.com 21501
HINFO 3600

Whois Lookup ▼

Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information. Domain registration for this website began on May 9, 2007 and will expire on May 9, 2028 if not renewed. This website is now assigned through the registrar Key-Systems GmbH. The WHOIS data for this website's domain was last updated on June 27, 2024.
Domain Created:
2007-05-09
Domain Expires:
2028-05-09
Domain Updated:
2024-06-27
Domain Age:
17 years 10 months 9 days
Domain Registrar:
Key-Systems GmbH
Domain Owner:
Balancer OpCo Limited
WhoIs:
 

domain.............: balancer.fi
status.............: Registered
created............: 9.5.2007 12:14:52
expires............: 9.5.2028 12:14:52
available..........: 9.6.2028 12:14:52
modified...........: 27.6.2024 17:34:46
holder transfer....: 24.11.2023 11:04:19
RegistryLock.......: no

Nameservers

nserver............: alexia.ns.cloudflare.com [OK]
nserver............: alex.ns.cloudflare.com [OK]

DNSSEC

dnssec.............: no

Holder

name...............: Balancer OpCo Limited
register number....: 14832230
address............: Floor 4, Banco Popular Building
postal.............: VG1110
city...............: Road Town
country............: British Virgin Islands
phone..............: 
holder email.......: 

Registrar

registrar..........: Key-Systems GmbH
www................: www.key-systems.net/tld/fi

>>> Last update of WHOIS database: 15.3.2025 19:30:30 (EET)