antiwork.com Antiwork.com

   
Antiwork

Domain Summary

What is the traffic rank for Antiwork.com?

• Antiwork.com ranks #2,410,822 globally on HypeStat.

What percent of global Internet users visit Antiwork.com?

• 2.63E-5% of global Internet users visit Antiwork.com

How many people visit Antiwork.com each day?

• Antiwork.com receives approximately 1.3K visitors and 3,865 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Antiwork.com receive most of its visitors from?

• Antiwork.com is mostly visited by people located in India,United States,Brazil.

How much Antiwork.com can earn?

• Antiwork.com should earn about $9.65/day from advertising revenue.

What is Antiwork.com estimated value?

• Estimated value of Antiwork.com is $10,554.27.

What IP addresses does Antiwork.com resolve to?

• Antiwork.com resolves to the IP addresses 66.33.60.67.

Where are Antiwork.com servers located in?

• Antiwork.com has servers located in Canada.

antiwork.com Profile

Title:Antiwork Description:on a mission to make Work play. we build software that liberates creative builders from what they consider toil
Category:Computers Electronics and Technology / Other Computers Electronics and Technology
Edit Site Info

What technologies does antiwork.com use?

These are the technologies used at antiwork.com. antiwork.com has a total of 3 technologies installed in 3 different categories.
Security
HSTS HSTS
Performance
Priority Hints Priority Hints
Web Servers
Vercel Vercel

antiwork.com Traffic Analysis

Antiwork.com is ranked #2,410,822 in the world. This website is viewed by an estimated 1.3K visitors daily, generating a total of 3.9K pageviews. This equates to about 39.2K monthly visitors. Antiwork.com traffic has increased by 2442.16% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors1.3K
2620.43%
Monthly Visits39.2K
2442.16%
Pages per Visit2.98
26.55%
Visit duration00:51
19850%
Bounce Rate60.81%
0.44%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
1,295
Monthly Visits:
39,239
Pages per Visit:
2.98
Daily Pageviews:
3,865
Avg. visit duration:
00:51
Bounce rate:
60.81%
Global Reach:
2.63E-5%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
23,820
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
22,906
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
38,467
HypeRank:
2,410,822
SEMrush Rank:
4,884,501
SimilarWeb Rank:
713,840
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
6.88%
Referral:
10.36%
Search:
3.04%
Social:
79.72%
Paid:
0%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
23.65%
Mobile:
76.35%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

28.9K
DEC
1.5K
JAN
39.2K
FEB

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
India 41.73%
 
United States 32.32%
 
Brazil 4.83%
 
United Kingdom 4.34%
 
Singapore 3.98%

Which sites are competitors to antiwork.com?

Websites similar to antiwork.com are sites similar on user interests and browsing behavior. Users can discover new websites that are similar to the ones they already enjoy or find useful.
Last update was 284 days ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with antiwork.com in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

Search Engine Indexes ▼

Search engine indexes are huge databases or collections of net pages that search engines like google like google and yahoo use to retrieve applicable facts while customers carry out searches. These indexes are created through search engines like google and yahoo through crawling and indexing net pages from throughout the internet.
Google Index:
3

  ▼

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  antiwork.com
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  4,884,501
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  15
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  45
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $0.00
Full SEMrush Report >>

Revenue report ▼

Google.com would generate approximately $9.7 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $289.5 and annual gross revenue of approximately $3.5K. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $10.6K.

How much would antiwork.com make?

Daily Revenue:
$9.65
Monthly Revenue:
$289.50
Yearly Revenue:
$3,522.25
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
United States 1,249$6.03
 
India 1,613$0.61
 
United Kingdom 168$0.45
 
Singapore 154$0.29
 
Brazil 187$0.25

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$1.43
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$42.85
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$521.37
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
759
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
22,773
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
277,073

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
United States 225$1.09
 
India 452$0.17
 
Singapore 45$0.08
 
United Kingdom 27$0.07
 
Brazil 11$0.01

How much is antiwork.com worth?

Website Value:
$10.6K

Ad Experience Report ▼

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
antiwork.com
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
antiwork.com
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report ▼

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
antiwork.com
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is antiwork.com hosted? ▼

Antiwork.com may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
66.33.60.67
ASN:
 
ISP:
 
Server Location:

Canada, CA
 

Other sites hosted on 66.33.60.67

How fast does antiwork.com load? ▼

The average loading time of antiwork.com is 58 ms. The Desktop speed index is 100 and mobile speed index is 98.
Average Load Time:
58 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

100
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 100% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 100% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)299ms 94% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 94% 4% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 4% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 1%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)540ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 97% 1% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 1% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)38ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)736ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 98% 1% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 100% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 100% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)312ms 93% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 93% 4% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 4% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 1%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)552ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 97% 1% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 1% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)44ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)730ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 98% 1% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0%

Lab Data

CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Time to Interactive 0.4 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
Largest Contentful Paint 0.4 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
First Contentful Paint 0.2 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Third parties  
Third party code can significantly impact load performance. to prioritize your page's content. Reduce and defer loading of third party code
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Speed Index 0.5 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Optimize DOM size  
A large DOM can increase the duration of style calculations and layout reflows, impacting page responsiveness. A large DOM will also increase memory usage. Learn how to avoid an excessive DOM size
Max Potential First Input Delay 50 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Minimize third-party usage  
Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading. Learn how to minimize third-party impact

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

98
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 100% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 100% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)539ms 94% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 86% 8% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 8% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 5%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)683ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 94% 3% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 3% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 1%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)63ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<200s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 96% 3% of loads for this page have an average (200s ~ 500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 3% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.0s 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 94% 3% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 3% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 98% 1% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 1% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)493ms 87% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 87% 8% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 8% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 4%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)672ms 94% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 94% 3% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 3% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 1%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)63ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.2s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 96% 2% of loads for this page have an average (0.2s ~ 0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 2% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)905ms 95% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 95% 2% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1%

Lab Data

Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Time to Interactive 1.5 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Speed Index 3.8 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Minimize third-party usage  
Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading. Learn how to minimize third-party impact
Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Total Blocking Time 10 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
First Contentful Paint 1.1 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Largest Contentful Paint 1.5 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Third parties  
Third party code can significantly impact load performance. to prioritize your page's content. Reduce and defer loading of third party code
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Optimize DOM size  
A large DOM can increase the duration of style calculations and layout reflows, impacting page responsiveness. A large DOM will also increase memory usage. Learn how to avoid an excessive DOM size
Max Potential First Input Delay 60 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric

Does antiwork.com use compression? ▼

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on antiwork.com are reduced by 61%.
antiwork.com use br compression.
Original size: 5.16 KB
Compressed size: 2 KB
File reduced by: 3.15 KB (61%)

Google Safe Browsing ▼

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites.
Status:
  SAFE

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify ▼

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. antiwork.com supports HTTPS.
 antiwork.com supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: antiwork.com
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: R11
Valid from: Feb 7 11:22:37 2025 GMT
Valid until: May 8 11:22:36 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Common Name: R11
Organization: Let's Encrypt
Location: US
Issuer: ISRG Root X1
Valid from: Mar 13 00:00:00 2024 GMT
Valid until: Mar 12 23:59:59 2027 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 2048 Bits

Verify HTTP/2 Support ▼

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 antiwork.com supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header ▼

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server. 
access-control-allow-origin: *
age: 525201
cache-control: public, max-age=0, must-revalidate
content-disposition: inline
content-encoding: br
content-type: text/html; charset=utf-8
date: Wed, 19 Mar 2025 22:53:01 GMT
etag: W/"709275852490c1e19df5f2b427e067c3"
server: Vercel
strict-transport-security: max-age=63072000
vary: RSC, Next-Router-State-Tree, Next-Router-Prefetch, Next-Router-Segment-Prefetch
x-matched-path: /
x-nextjs-prerender: 1
x-nextjs-stale-time: 4294967294
x-vercel-cache: HIT
x-vercel-id: cle1::m7zh2-1742424781880-d43520e334fb

DNS Lookup ▼

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
A 66.33.60.193 258
A 66.33.60.67 258
NS venus.ns.cloudflare.com 172758
NS jeff.ns.cloudflare.com 172758
HINFO 3600

Whois Lookup ▼

Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information. Domain registration for this website began on March 23, 2000 and will expire on March 23, 2026 if not renewed. This website is now assigned through the registrar Cloudflare, Inc.. The WHOIS data for this website's domain was last updated on October 14, 2024.
Domain Created:
2000-03-23
Domain Expires:
2026-03-23
Domain Updated:
2024-10-14
Domain Age:
25 years 9 months 5 days
Domain Registrar:
Cloudflare, Inc.
Domain Owner:
DATA REDACTED
WhoIs:
 

Domain Name: ANTIWORK.COM
Registry Domain ID: 23131172_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.cloudflare.com
Registrar URL: https://www.cloudflare.com
Updated Date: 2024-10-14T20:42:26Z
Creation Date: 2000-03-23T07:43:56Z
Registrar Registration Expiration Date: 2026-03-23T06:43:56Z
Registrar: Cloudflare, Inc.
Registrar IANA ID: 1910
Domain Status: clienttransferprohibited https://icann.org/epp#clienttransferprohibited
Registry Registrant ID:
Registrant Name: DATA REDACTED 
Registrant Organization: DATA REDACTED
Registrant Street: DATA REDACTED
Registrant City: DATA REDACTED
Registrant State/Province: California
Registrant Postal Code: DATA REDACTED
Registrant Country: US
Registrant Phone: DATA REDACTED
Registrant Phone Ext: DATA REDACTED
Registrant Fax: DATA REDACTED
Registrant Fax Ext: DATA REDACTED
Registrant Email: https://domaincontact.cloudflareregistrar.com/antiwork.com
Registry Admin ID:
Admin Name: DATA REDACTED 
Admin Organization: DATA REDACTED
Admin Street: DATA REDACTED
Admin City: DATA REDACTED
Admin State/Province: DATA REDACTED
Admin Postal Code: DATA REDACTED
Admin Country: DATA REDACTED
Admin Phone: DATA REDACTED
Admin Phone Ext: DATA REDACTED
Admin Fax: DATA REDACTED
Admin Fax Ext: DATA REDACTED
Admin Email: https://domaincontact.cloudflareregistrar.com/antiwork.com
Registry Tech ID:
Tech Name: DATA REDACTED 
Tech Organization: DATA REDACTED
Tech Street: DATA REDACTED
Tech City: DATA REDACTED
Tech State/Province: DATA REDACTED
Tech Postal Code: DATA REDACTED
Tech Country: DATA REDACTED
Tech Phone: DATA REDACTED
Tech Phone Ext: DATA REDACTED
Tech Fax: DATA REDACTED
Tech Fax Ext: DATA REDACTED
Tech Email: https://domaincontact.cloudflareregistrar.com/antiwork.com
Registry Billing ID:
Billing Name: DATA REDACTED 
Billing Organization: DATA REDACTED
Billing Street: DATA REDACTED
Billing City: DATA REDACTED
Billing State/Province: DATA REDACTED
Billing Postal Code: DATA REDACTED
Billing Country: DATA REDACTED
Billing Phone: DATA REDACTED
Billing Phone Ext: DATA REDACTED
Billing Fax: DATA REDACTED
Billing Fax Ext: DATA REDACTED
Billing Email: https://domaincontact.cloudflareregistrar.com/antiwork.com
Name Server: jeff.ns.cloudflare.com
Name Server: venus.ns.cloudflare.com
DNSSEC: unsigned
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: email
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +1.4153197517
URL of the ICANN WHOIS Data Problem Reporting System: http://wdprs.internic.net/
>>> Last update of WHOIS database: 2025-03-19T22:53:43Z