alfter.de Alfter.de

   
Gemeinde Alfter :: Startseite

Domain Summary

What is the traffic rank for Alfter.de?

• Alfter.de ranks #2,114,835 globally on HypeStat.

What percent of global Internet users visit Alfter.de?

• 7.1E-6% of global Internet users visit Alfter.de

How many people visit Alfter.de each day?

• Alfter.de receives approximately 348 visitors and 744 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Alfter.de receive most of its visitors from?

• Alfter.de is mostly visited by people located in Germany.

How much Alfter.de can earn?

• Alfter.de should earn about $1.04/day from advertising revenue.

What is Alfter.de estimated value?

• Estimated value of Alfter.de is $968.67.

What IP addresses does Alfter.de resolve to?

• Alfter.de resolves to the IP addresses 185.237.66.100.

Where are Alfter.de servers located in?

• Alfter.de has servers located in Germany.

alfter.de Profile

Title:Gemeinde Alfter :: Startseite
Category:Health / Other Health
Edit Site Info

What technologies does alfter.de use?

These are the technologies used at alfter.de. alfter.de has a total of 3 technologies installed in 3 different categories.
Web Servers
Apache HTTP Server Apache HTTP Server
CMS
TYPO3 CMS TYPO3 CMS
Programming Languages
PHP PHP

alfter.de Traffic Analysis

Alfter.de is ranked #2,114,835 in the world. This website is viewed by an estimated 348 visitors daily, generating a total of 744 pageviews. This equates to about 10.5K monthly visitors. Alfter.de traffic has increased by 3.85% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors348
10.74%
Monthly Visits10.5K
3.85%
Pages per Visit2.14
93.26%
Visit duration00:18
12.9%
Bounce Rate51.76%
69.53%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
348
Monthly Visits:
10,544
Pages per Visit:
2.14
Daily Pageviews:
744
Avg. visit duration:
00:18
Bounce rate:
51.76%
Global Reach:
7.1E-6%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
9,607
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
8,013
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
10,224
HypeRank:
2,114,835
SEMrush Rank:
15,340,169
SimilarWeb Rank:
2,114,835
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
0.77%
Referral:
3.58%
Search:
95.65%
Social:
0%
Paid:
0%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
37.92%
Mobile:
62.08%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

17.9K
JAN
10.2K
FEB
10.5K
MAR

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
Germany 100.00%

Which sites are competitors to alfter.de?

Websites similar to alfter.de are sites similar on user interests and browsing behavior. Users can discover new websites that are similar to the ones they already enjoy or find useful.
Last update was 55 days ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with alfter.de in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

Search Engine Indexes ▼

Search engine indexes are huge databases or collections of net pages that search engines like google like google and yahoo use to retrieve applicable facts while customers carry out searches. These indexes are created through search engines like google and yahoo through crawling and indexing net pages from throughout the internet.
Google Index:
1,520

  ▼

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  alfter.de
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  15,340,169
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  12
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  0
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $0.00
Full SEMrush Report >>

Revenue report ▼

Google.com would generate approximately $1 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $31.2 and annual gross revenue of approximately $379.6. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $1K.

How much would alfter.de make?

Daily Revenue:
$1.04
Monthly Revenue:
$31.20
Yearly Revenue:
$379.60
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
Germany 744$1.04

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$0.30
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$9.06
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$110.25
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
216
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
6,473
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
78,752

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
Germany 216$0.30

How much is alfter.de worth?

Website Value:
$1K

Ad Experience Report ▼

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
alfter.de
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
alfter.de
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report ▼

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
alfter.de
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is alfter.de hosted? ▼

Alfter.de may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
185.237.66.100
ASN:
AS15817 
ISP:
Mittwald CM Service GmbH und Co.KG 
Server Location:

Germany, DE
 

Other sites hosted on 185.237.66.100

How fast does alfter.de load? ▼

The average loading time of alfter.de is 817 ms. The Desktop speed index is 96 and mobile speed index is 84.
Average Load Time:
817 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

96
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 98% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)447ms 78% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 78% 20% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 20% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 1%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)866ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 96% 2% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 2% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)57ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 96% 2% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 2% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.0s 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 98% 0% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 98% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)447ms 78% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 78% 20% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 20% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 1%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)866ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 96% 2% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 2% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)57ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 96% 2% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 2% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.0s 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 98% 0% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0%

Lab Data

Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Third parties  
Third party code can significantly impact load performance. to prioritize your page's content. Reduce and defer loading of third party code
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
First Contentful Paint 0.7 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Largest Contentful Paint 0.9 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Minimize third-party usage  
Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading. Learn how to minimize third-party impact
Speed Index 1.9 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Max Potential First Input Delay 40 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Time to Interactive 0.9 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

84
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 96% 2% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 2% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 1%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)376ms 78% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 85% 13% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 13% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 1%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)736ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 94% 4% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 4% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 1%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)120ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<200s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 91% 7% of loads for this page have an average (200s ~ 500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 7% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)842ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 97% 1% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 96% 2% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 2% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 1%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)376ms 85% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 85% 13% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 13% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 1%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)736ms 94% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 94% 4% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 4% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 1%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)120ms 91% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.2s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 91% 7% of loads for this page have an average (0.2s ~ 0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 7% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)842ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 97% 1% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0%

Lab Data

CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
First Contentful Paint 2.7 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Third parties  
Third party code can significantly impact load performance. to prioritize your page's content. Reduce and defer loading of third party code
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Total Blocking Time 10 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Minimize third-party usage  
Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading. Learn how to minimize third-party impact
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Largest Contentful Paint 3.7 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Speed Index 4.0 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Time to Interactive 5.8 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Max Potential First Input Delay 70 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric

Does alfter.de use compression? ▼

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on alfter.de are reduced by 90%.
alfter.de use gzip compression.
Original size: 156.17 KB
Compressed size: 15.57 KB
File reduced by: 140.6 KB (90%)

Google Safe Browsing ▼

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites.
Status:
  SAFE

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify ▼

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. alfter.de supports HTTPS.
 alfter.de supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: www.alfter.de
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: R11
Valid from: Apr 3 21:55:55 2025 GMT
Valid until: Jul 2 21:55:54 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Common Name: R11
Organization: Let's Encrypt
Location: US
Issuer: ISRG Root X1
Valid from: Mar 13 00:00:00 2024 GMT
Valid until: Mar 12 23:59:59 2027 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 2048 Bits

Verify HTTP/2 Support ▼

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 alfter.de supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header ▼

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server. 
location: https://www.alfter.de/
cache-control: max-age=0
expires: Fri, 25 Apr 2025 13:21:03 GMT
content-length: 230
content-type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
date: Fri, 25 Apr 2025 13:21:03 GMT
server: Apache

HTTP/2 307 
content-encoding: gzip
vary: Accept-Encoding,User-Agent
location: https://www.alfter.de/startseite/
cache-control: max-age=0
expires: Fri, 25 Apr 2025 13:21:04 GMT
x-ua-compatible: IE=edge
x-content-type-options: nosniff
content-type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
date: Fri, 25 Apr 2025 13:21:04 GMT
server: Apache

HTTP/2 200 
vary: User-Agent,Accept-Encoding
last-modified: Fri, 25 Apr 2025 06:14:32 GMT
accept-ranges: bytes
content-length: 15947
cache-control: max-age=60808
expires: Sat, 26 Apr 2025 06:14:32 GMT
x-ua-compatible: IE=edge
x-content-type-options: nosniff
x-cache: StaticFileCache
content-encoding: gzip
content-type: text/html; charset=utf-8
date: Fri, 25 Apr 2025 13:21:04 GMT
server: Apache

DNS Lookup ▼

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
TXT MS=ms51304846 172800
TXT apple-domain-verification=56eqOUM8Ppcpezdg 172800
TXT v=spf1 mx ip4:195.243.56.0/24 ip4:195.243.129.128/26 include:agenturserver.de ?all 172800
TXT _globalsign-domain-verification=hp6ioYD4wRKWyGzCGBOhB0BCRJNDc6sDfAWPL-s56o 172800
TXT _acme-challenge.alfter.de=fIt5biX11afX7q93CG9DJvjG8zuR7xP6mKzj0UxJKRw 172800
MX gw12.civitec.de 172800
MX gw11.civitec.de 172800
SOA 3600
Mname dns01.regioit-aachen.de
Rname hostmaster.civitec.de
Serial Number 2023081503
Refresh 86400
Retry 7200
Expire 3600000
Minimum TTL 172800
A 185.237.66.100 172717
NS dns-relaix.regioit-aachen.de 3600
NS dns01.regioit-aachen.de 3600

Whois Lookup ▼

Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information.
Domain Updated:
2023-11-15
WhoIs:
 

% Restricted rights.
% 
% Terms and Conditions of Use
% 
% The above data may only be used within the scope of technical or
% administrative necessities of Internet operation or to remedy legal
% problems.
% The use for other purposes, in particular for advertising, is not permitted.
% 
% The DENIC whois service on port 43 doesn't disclose any information concerning
% the domain holder, general request and abuse contact.
% This information can be obtained through use of our web-based whois service
% available at the DENIC website:
% http://www.denic.de/en/domains/whois-service/web-whois.html
% 
% 

Domain: alfter.de
Nserver: dns01.regioit-aachen.de
Nserver: dns-relaix.regioit-aachen.de
Status: connect
Changed: 2023-11-15T16:19:24+01:00