affcfms.ph Affcfms.ph

   
Log in | Electronic PaySlip

Domain Summary

What is the traffic rank for Affcfms.ph?

• Affcfms.ph ranks #492,866 globally on HypeStat.

What percent of global Internet users visit Affcfms.ph?

• 3.09E-5% of global Internet users visit Affcfms.ph

How many people visit Affcfms.ph each day?

• Affcfms.ph receives approximately 1.5K visitors and 7,713 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Affcfms.ph receive most of its visitors from?

• Affcfms.ph is mostly visited by people located in Philippines.

How much Affcfms.ph can earn?

• Affcfms.ph should earn about $1.54/day from advertising revenue.

What is Affcfms.ph estimated value?

• Estimated value of Affcfms.ph is $1,498.85.

What IP addresses does Affcfms.ph resolve to?

• Affcfms.ph resolves to the IP addresses 119.92.113.204.

Where are Affcfms.ph servers located in?

• Affcfms.ph has servers located in Manila, Metro Manila, 1012, Philippines.

affcfms.ph Profile

Title:Log in | Electronic PaySlip
Category:Law and Government / National Security
Edit Site Info

affcfms.ph Traffic Analysis

Affcfms.ph is ranked #492,866 in the world. This website is viewed by an estimated 1.5K visitors daily, generating a total of 7.7K pageviews. This equates to about 46.1K monthly visitors. Affcfms.ph traffic has decreased by 4.9% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors1.5K
19.84%
Monthly Visits46.1K
4.9%
Pages per Visit5.07
65.29%
Visit duration02:50
5.82%
Bounce Rate20.11%
1599.51%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
1,523
Monthly Visits:
46,147
Pages per Visit:
5.07
Daily Pageviews:
7,713
Avg. visit duration:
02:50
Bounce rate:
20.11%
Global Reach:
3.09E-5%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
23,936
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
11,351
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
44,786
HypeRank:
492,866
SEMrush Rank:
6,481,687
SimilarWeb Rank:
492,866
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
77.79%
Referral:
2.70%
Search:
15.24%
Social:
3.86%
Paid:
0.40%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
35.99%
Mobile:
64.01%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

35.7K
DEC
48.5K
JAN
46.1K
FEB

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
Philippines 100.00%

Which sites are competitors to affcfms.ph?

Websites similar to affcfms.ph are sites similar on user interests and browsing behavior. Users can discover new websites that are similar to the ones they already enjoy or find useful.
Last update was 84 days ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with affcfms.ph in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

Search Engine Indexes ▼

Search engine indexes are huge databases or collections of net pages that search engines like google like google and yahoo use to retrieve applicable facts while customers carry out searches. These indexes are created through search engines like google and yahoo through crawling and indexing net pages from throughout the internet.
Google Index:
1

  ▼

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  affcfms.ph
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  6,481,687
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  74
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  18
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $15.00
Full SEMrush Report >>

Revenue report ▼

Google.com would generate approximately $1.5 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $46.2 and annual gross revenue of approximately $562.1. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $1.5K.

How much would affcfms.ph make?

Daily Revenue:
$1.54
Monthly Revenue:
$46.20
Yearly Revenue:
$562.10
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
Philippines 7,713$1.54

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$0.11
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$3.24
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$39.41
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
540
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
16,197
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
197,067

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
Philippines 540$0.11

How much is affcfms.ph worth?

Website Value:
$1.5K

Ad Experience Report ▼

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
affcfms.ph
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
affcfms.ph
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report ▼

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
affcfms.ph
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is affcfms.ph hosted? ▼

Affcfms.ph may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
119.92.113.204
ASN:
AS9299 
ISP:
Philippine Long Distance Telephone Company 
Server Location:
Manila
Metro Manila, 00
1012
Philippines, PH
 

Other sites hosted on 119.92.113.204

There are no other sites hosted on this IP

How fast does affcfms.ph load? ▼

The average loading time of affcfms.ph is 907 ms. The Desktop speed index is 91 and mobile speed index is 91.
Average Load Time:
907 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

91
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 95% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 95% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 4%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)677ms 77% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 77% 7% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 7% 14% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 14%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.1s 81% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 81% 5% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 5% 12% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 12%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)46ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 96% 1% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 1% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.1s 86% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 86% 4% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 4% 9% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 9%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)4ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 96% 1% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 1% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 2%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)753ms 76% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 76% 9% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 9% 13% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 13%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.0s 83% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 83% 3% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 3% 12% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 12%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)40ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 97% 1% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 1% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.4s 81% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 81% 3% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 3% 14% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 14%

Lab Data

Time to Interactive 0.4 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Largest Contentful Paint 0.4 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Third parties  
Third party code can significantly impact load performance. to prioritize your page's content. Reduce and defer loading of third party code
Optimize DOM size  
A large DOM can increase the duration of style calculations and layout reflows, impacting page responsiveness. A large DOM will also increase memory usage. Learn how to avoid an excessive DOM size
Max Potential First Input Delay 20 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
First Contentful Paint 0.4 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Speed Index 4.0 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Minimize third-party usage  
Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading. Learn how to minimize third-party impact

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

91
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a SLOW speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 95% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)3.0s 77% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 56% 12% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 12% 30% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 30%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)3.0s 81% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 66% 8% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 8% 25% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 25%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)109ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<200s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 92% 6% of loads for this page have an average (200s ~ 500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 6% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)3.0s 86% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 72% 6% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 6% 21% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 21%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an SLOW speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 93% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 93% 6% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 6% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)2.1s 64% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 64% 9% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 9% 26% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 26%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)2.0s 73% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 73% 4% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 4% 21% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 21%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)101ms 91% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.2s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 91% 6% of loads for this page have an average (0.2s ~ 0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 6% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.5s 75% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 75% 4% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 4% 20% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 20%

Lab Data

Max Potential First Input Delay 20 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Time to Interactive 1.7 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Speed Index 9.0 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Optimize DOM size  
A large DOM can increase the duration of style calculations and layout reflows, impacting page responsiveness. A large DOM will also increase memory usage. Learn how to avoid an excessive DOM size
First Contentful Paint 1.5 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Minimize third-party usage  
Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading. Learn how to minimize third-party impact
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Largest Contentful Paint 1.7 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Third parties  
Third party code can significantly impact load performance. to prioritize your page's content. Reduce and defer loading of third party code

Does affcfms.ph use compression? ▼

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on affcfms.ph are reduced by 63%.
affcfms.ph use gzip compression.
Original size: 5.09 KB
Compressed size: 1.86 KB
File reduced by: 3.23 KB (63%)

Google Safe Browsing ▼

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites.
Status:
  SAFE

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify ▼

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. affcfms.ph supports HTTPS.
 affcfms.ph supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: affcfms.ph
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA
Valid from: Feb 18 00:00:00 2025 GMT
Valid until: Feb 18 23:59:59 2026 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize: 2048 Bits

Verify HTTP/2 Support ▼

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 affcfms.ph does not support HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header ▼

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server. 
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2025 10:09:49 GMT
Server: Apache/2.4.41 (Ubuntu)
X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff
Cache-Control: max-age=600, public
X-Drupal-Dynamic-Cache: MISS
X-UA-Compatible: IE=edge
Content-language: en
X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff
X-Frame-Options: ALLOW-FROM *
Permissions-Policy: interest-cohort=()
Expires: Sun, 19 Nov 1978 05:00:00 GMT
Last-Modified: Tue, 18 Feb 2025 06:45:24 GMT
ETag: "1739861124-gzip"
Vary: Cookie,Accept-Encoding
X-Generator: Drupal 9 (https://www.drupal.org)
X-Drupal-Cache: HIT
Content-Encoding: gzip
Content-Length: 1901
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8

DNS Lookup ▼

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
SOA 14400
Mname dns1.domains.ph
Rname sysadmin.domains.ph
Serial Number 2025021801
Refresh 10800
Retry 3600
Expire 604800
Minimum TTL 3600
A 119.92.113.204 14196
NS dns2.domains.ph 14400
NS dns1.domains.ph 14400