vi.to Vi.to

   
Vito

Domain Summary

What is the traffic rank for Vi.to?

• Vi.to ranks #2,577,663 globally on HypeStat.

What percent of global Internet users visit Vi.to?

• 6.6E-6% of global Internet users visit Vi.to

How many people visit Vi.to each day?

• Vi.to receives approximately 326 visitors and 529 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Vi.to receive most of its visitors from?

• Vi.to is mostly visited by people located in United States,Germany,United Kingdom.

How much Vi.to can earn?

• Vi.to should earn about $1.69/day from advertising revenue.

What is Vi.to estimated value?

• Estimated value of Vi.to is $1,527.68.

What IP addresses does Vi.to resolve to?

• Vi.to resolves to the IP addresses 52.48.68.48.

Where are Vi.to servers located in?

• Vi.to has servers located in Dublin, Leinster, D02, Ireland.

vi.to Profile

Title:Vito
Description:Vito is a platform for running community-first online events.
Category:Computers Electronics and Technology / Programming and Developer Software
Edit Site Info

What technologies does vi.to use?

These are the technologies used at vi.to. vi.to has a total of 5 technologies installed in 5 different categories.
Font Scripts
Font Awesome Font Awesome
Security
HSTS HSTS
Miscellaneous
Open Graph Open Graph
Web Frameworks
Ruby on Rails Ruby on Rails
Programming Languages
Ruby Ruby

vi.to Traffic Analysis

Vi.to is ranked #2,577,663 in the world. This website is viewed by an estimated 326 visitors daily, generating a total of 529 pageviews. This equates to about 9.9K monthly visitors. Vi.to traffic has increased by 47.94% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors326
64.16%
Monthly Visits9.9K
47.94%
Pages per Visit1.62
206.16%
Visit duration00:15
112.93%
Bounce Rate45.19%
3.14%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
326
Monthly Visits:
9,878
Pages per Visit:
1.62
Daily Pageviews:
529
Avg. visit duration:
00:15
Bounce rate:
45.19%
Global Reach:
6.6E-6%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
11,196
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
2,185
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
9,587
HypeRank:
2,577,663
SEMrush Rank:
3,507,850
SimilarWeb Rank:
2,577,663
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
97.68%
Referral:
2.32%
Search:
0%
Social:
0%
Paid:
0%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
100.00%
Mobile:
0%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

9.6K
OCT
6.7K
NOV
9.9K
DEC

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
United States 26.81%
 
Germany 12.28%
 
United Kingdom 11.25%
 
Denmark 9.61%
 
India 9.26%

Which sites are competitors to vi.to?

Websites similar to vi.to are sites similar on user interests and browsing behavior. Users can discover new websites that are similar to the ones they already enjoy or find useful.
Last update was 9 hours ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

Update will be available in 15 hours
*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with vi.to in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

  ▼

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  vi.to
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  3,507,850
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  141
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  122
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $56.00
Full SEMrush Report >>

Revenue report ▼

Google.com would generate approximately $1.7 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $50.7 and annual gross revenue of approximately $616.9. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $1.5K.

How much would vi.to make?

Daily Revenue:
$1.69
Monthly Revenue:
$50.70
Yearly Revenue:
$616.85
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
United States 142$0.68
 
United Kingdom 60$0.16
 
Germany 65$0.09
 
Denmark 51$0.08
 
India 49$0.02

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$0.20
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$5.98
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$72.80
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
80
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
2,409
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
29,315

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
United States 26$0.12
 
Germany 19$0.03
 
United Kingdom 10$0.03
 
Denmark 13$0.02
 
India 14$0.01

How much is vi.to worth?

Website Value:
$1.5K

Ad Experience Report ▼

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
vi.to
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
vi.to
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report ▼

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
vi.to
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is vi.to hosted? ▼

Vi.to may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
52.48.68.48
ASN:
AS16509 
ISP:
Amazon.com, Inc. 
Server Location:
Dublin
Leinster, L
D02
Ireland, IE
 

Other sites hosted on 52.48.68.48

There are no other sites hosted on this IP

How fast does vi.to load? ▼

The average loading time of vi.to is 541 ms. The Desktop speed index is 76 and mobile speed index is 72.
Average Load Time:
541 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

76
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)5ms 86% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 86% 8% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 8% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 5%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.1s 53% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 53% 42% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 42% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 3%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)2.8s 54% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 54% 22% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 22% 23% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 23%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)5ms 86% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 86% 8% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 8% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 5%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.1s 53% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 53% 42% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 42% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 3%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)2.8s 54% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 54% 22% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 22% 23% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 23%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0%

Lab Data

Max Potential First Input Delay 120 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
First Contentful Paint 0.5 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Total Blocking Time 70 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Time to Interactive 4.4 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Speed Index 1.4 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Largest Contentful Paint 4.4 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

72
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)8ms 86% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 76% 13% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 13% 9% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 9%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.1s 53% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 53% 37% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 37% 8% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 8%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)2.8s 54% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 50% 30% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 30% 19% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 19%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)8ms 76% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 76% 13% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 13% 9% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 9%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.1s 53% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 53% 37% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 37% 8% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 8%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)2.8s 50% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 50% 30% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 30% 19% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 19%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0%

Lab Data

Speed Index 4.3 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Max Potential First Input Delay 100 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Time to Interactive 24.7 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Total Blocking Time 40 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Largest Contentful Paint 24.7 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
First Contentful Paint 1.8 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements

Does vi.to use compression? ▼

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on vi.to are reduced by %.
vi.to does not use compression.
Original size: 15.74 KB
Compressed size: n/a
File reduced by: (%)

Google Safe Browsing ▼

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites. vi.to has 50 Safety Reputations.
Status:
  SAFE
Safety Reputations:
  50
Safety Confidence:
  2

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify ▼

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. vi.to supports HTTPS.
 vi.to supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: vito.community
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: R11
Valid from: Nov 12 18:55:41 2024 GMT
Valid until: Feb 10 18:55:40 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Common Name: R11
Organization: Let's Encrypt
Location: US
Issuer: ISRG Root X1
Valid from: Mar 13 00:00:00 2024 GMT
Valid until: Mar 12 23:59:59 2027 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 2048 Bits

Verify HTTP/2 Support ▼

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 vi.to supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header ▼

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server. 
date: Thu, 09 Jan 2025 17:50:32 GMT
content-type: text/html; charset=utf-8
x-frame-options: SAMEORIGIN
x-xss-protection: 0
x-content-type-options: nosniff
x-download-options: noopen
x-permitted-cross-domain-policies: none
referrer-policy: strict-origin-when-cross-origin
link: <https://assets.vi.to/packs/css/application-a3b36a16.css>; rel=preload; as=style; nopush
etag: W/"62b82f5b70a40ee15e51e8e93f73ae84"
cache-control: max-age=0, private, must-revalidate
set-cookie: _vito_session=mDIZHpdL5faC9NBUKXPSSX3pTkqOdV3Uy702oV2UffAY8ZVQA47ocdkhEYqg6%2BO5lzg6AoCs0gehnl1vEOOIbQXqgKrTbA%2FHLbN9pJRy7vyWO65%2BrYrnFZTML8RlMGuWJcOfni94xSGrwBCGybfAtOwH0chLqnDLIV26jao6YO4b2czNpo66Jzj80TQE26lFwv2IEeLpXyQSMkwu0VcipTlEE85faWi6MVY9mqrhF92K8hFgvi7zRjRgf2Dhilfs7dwg%2FfTlC1jaB0C%2BPJqHrUZ05qJG--z74uFDuxqa2nRPKk--dI4JxqlNm%2Fq5FTztHOZ6GA%3D%3D; path=/; secure; HttpOnly; SameSite=Lax
x-request-id: a08c2b67c1a8c69534767b6aeedb51f7
x-runtime: 0.119497
strict-transport-security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
vary: Accept, Origin

DNS Lookup ▼

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
TXT google-site-verification=ZhlNOQu6OB91A_PAxVDntVHczoC98YAMWd_-7d2Kv1Y 300
TXT v=spf1 include:mailgun.org include:amazonses.com ~all 300
MX mxb.eu.mailgun.org 300
MX mxa.eu.mailgun.org 300
SOA 900
Mname ns-984.awsdns-59.net
Rname awsdns-hostmaster.amazon.com
Serial Number 1
Refresh 7200
Retry 900
Expire 1209600
Minimum TTL 86400
A 52.208.86.228 247
A 52.48.68.48 247
A 63.33.32.43 247
NS ns-1433.awsdns-51.org 86347
NS ns-445.awsdns-55.com 86347
NS ns-984.awsdns-59.net 86347
NS ns-1801.awsdns-33.co.uk 86347