Thejewelryreview.Net - Info thejewelryreview.net

thejewelryreview.net receives about n/a unique visitors and n/a page views per day which should earn about n/a/day from advertising revenue. Estimated site value is n/a. According to Alexa Traffic Rank thejewelryreview.net is ranked number 0 in the world and 0% of global Internet users visit it. Site is hosted in Dallas, Texas, 75247, United States and links to network IP address 66.221.58.61. This server doesn't support HTTPS and doesn't support HTTP/2.

About - thejewelryreview.net


Technologies used on Website

Web Servers
Apache
Font Scripts
Font Awesome
Google Font API
Miscellaneous
Gravatar
CMS
WordPress
Blogs
WordPress
JavaScript Libraries
jQuery Migrate
jQuery
Programming Languages
PHP
Databases
MySQL

thejewelryreview.net Profile

Title: The Jewelry Review & Blog – Jewlery Reviews – Jewelry, Gold, Diamonds and more
Last update was 22 days ago
loader
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

*HypeStat.com is not linking to, promoting or affiliated with thejewelryreview.net in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

How popular is thejewelryreview.net?

Is this your site?
Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
 n/a
Monthly Unique Visitors:
n/a
Pages per Visit:
n/a
Daily Pageviews:
n/a
Alexa Rank:
Currently Not Available visit alexa
Alexa Reach:
n/a   (of global internet users)
Avg. visit duration:
00:00
Bounce rate:
n/a
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Alexa Traffic Ranks
Search Traffic

Visitors by country

Currently Not Available

Where do visitors go on this site?

Currently Not Available

Competitive Data

SEMrush
Domain:
  thejewelryreview.net
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  38,641,945
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  7
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  0
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $0.00
Adwords Keywords:
(Keywords a website is buying in Google AdWords for ads that appear in paid search results)
  0
Adwords Traffic:
(Number of visitors brought to the website via paid search results)
  0
Adwords Cost:
(Estimated budget spent for buying keywords in Google AdWords for ads that appear in paid search results - monthly estimation)
  $0.00

+ Moz Data

Domain Authority:
  n/a
Page Authority:
  n/a
MozRank:
  n/a

+ How socially engaged is thejewelryreview.net?

Facebook:
  0
Google +:
  0
Linkedin:
  0
Stumbles:
  0
Buffer:
  0
Pins:
  0

+ Ad Experience Report

Summary of the ad experience rating of a site for a specific platform.

Desktop summary

Root domain:
thejewelryreview.net
Region:
(The Ad Standard region to which this site has been assigned.)
Pending
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed


Mobile summary

Region:
(The Ad Standard region to which this site has been assigned.)
Pending
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

+ Abusive Experience Report

Root domain:
thejewelryreview.net
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

+ How much thejewelryreview.net can earn?

Daily Revenue:
n/a
Monthly Revenue:
n/a
Yearly Revenue:
n/a
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

Currently Not Available

How much money do thejewelryreview.net lose due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
n/a
Monthly Revenue Loss:
n/a
Yearly Revenue Loss:
n/a
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
n/a
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
n/a
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
n/a
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily revenue loss by country

Currently Not Available

How much is thejewelryreview.net worth?

Website Value:
n/a

+ Where is thejewelryreview.net hosted?

Server IP:
66.221.58.61
ASN:
AS54489 
ISP:
CoreSpace, Inc. 
Server Location:
Dallas
Texas, TX
75247
United States, US
 

Other sites hosted on 66.221.58.61

There are no other sites hosted on this IP

+ How fast does thejewelryreview.net load?

Average Load Time:
n/a ms n/a % of sites are slower

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

82
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Lab Data

Time to Interactive 1.3 s
Time to interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more.
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds.
Estimated Input Latency 10 ms
Estimated Input Latency is an estimate of how long your app takes to respond to user input, in milliseconds, during the busiest 5s window of page load. If your latency is higher than 50 ms, users may perceive your app as laggy. Learn more.
Speed Index 2.0 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more.
First CPU Idle 1.3 s
First CPU Idle marks the first time at which the page's main thread is quiet enough to handle input. Learn more.
First Contentful Paint 1.3 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more.
Performance budget
Keep the quantity and size of network requests under the targets set by the provided performance budget. Learn more.
First Meaningful Paint 1.3 s
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more.
Max Potential First Input Delay 20 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration, in milliseconds, of the longest task. Learn more.

Screenshot Thumbnails

This is what the load of your site looked like.

Third-Party usage - Third-party code blocked the main thread for 0 ms
Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading. Learn more.

Third-Party
SizeMain-Thread Blocking Time
0 KB0 ms
Tasks
Lists the toplevel main thread tasks that executed during page load.

Start Time
End Time
721 ms
6 ms
730 ms
42 ms
1001 ms
6 ms
1029 ms
17 ms
1051 ms
5 ms
1057 ms
45 ms
1110 ms
22 ms
1137 ms
25 ms
1163 ms
7 ms
1170 ms
7 ms
1182 ms
13 ms
1307 ms
18 ms
1455 ms
22 ms
1578 ms
7 ms
1677 ms
7 ms
1860 ms
14 ms
Ensure text remains visible during webfont load
Leverage the font-display CSS feature to ensure text is user-visible while webfonts are loading. Learn more.

URL
Potential Savings
http://fonts.gstatic.com/s/robotocondensed/v18/ieVi2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-32meGCQYbw.woff2
32 ms
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/themes/ad_mag_lite_1.0.0/fonts/awesome/fontawesome-webfont.woff
221 ms
http://fonts.gstatic.com/s/roboto/v20/KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxK.woff2
41 ms
http://fonts.gstatic.com/s/robotocondensed/v18/ieVl2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-19K7DQ.woff2
3 ms
http://fonts.gstatic.com/s/roboto/v20/KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc4.woff2
3 ms
http://fonts.gstatic.com/s/roboto/v20/KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51S7ACc6CsQ.woff2
3 ms
Minify CSS - Potential savings of 10 KB
Minifying CSS files can reduce network payload sizes. Learn more.

URL
SizePotential Savings
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/themes/ad_mag_lite_1.0.0/style.css?ver=4.9.9
29 KB7 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/themes/ad_mag_lite_1.0.0/css/bootstrap.css?ver=4.9.9
18 KB3 KB
JavaScript execution time - 0.1 s
Consider reducing the time spent parsing, compiling, and executing JS. You may find delivering smaller JS payloads helps with this. Learn more.

URL
Total CPU TimeScript EvaluationScript Parse
Other
379 ms7 ms1 ms
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/themes/ad_mag_lite_1.0.0/js/modernizr.custom.js
95 ms67 ms1 ms
Remove unused CSS - Potential savings of 44 KB
Remove dead rules from stylesheets and defer the loading of CSS not used for above-the-fold content to reduce unnecessary bytes consumed by network activity. Learn more.

URL
SizePotential Savings
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/themes/ad_mag_lite_1.0.0/style.css?ver=4.9.9
29 KB26 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/themes/ad_mag_lite_1.0.0/css/bootstrap.css?ver=4.9.9
18 KB17 KB
Avoids enormous network payloads - Total size was 723 KB
Large network payloads cost users real money and are highly correlated with long load times. Learn more.

URL
Size
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/bggoldheader1.jpg
185 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/themes/ad_mag_lite_1.0.0/fonts/awesome/fontawesome-webfont.woff
64 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-includes/js/jquery/jquery.js?ver=1.12.4
33 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/thejewelryreview-logo.png
32 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/themes/ad_mag_lite_1.0.0/style.css?ver=4.9.9
29 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/The-Millennial-Movement-375x190.jpg
25 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Pearl-Quality-375x190.jpg
24 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/pimpin-375x190.jpg
23 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Bridal-Jewelry-375x190.jpg
20 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/How-to-Clean-Jewelery-at-Home-375x190.jpg
19 KB
Minimizes main-thread work - 0.6 s
Consider reducing the time spent parsing, compiling and executing JS. You may find delivering smaller JS payloads helps with this.

Category
Time Spent
Script Evaluation
149 ms
Style & Layout
141 ms
Rendering
119 ms
Other
112 ms
Parse HTML & CSS
28 ms
Script Parsing & Compilation
11 ms
Serve images in next-gen formats - Potential savings of 181 KB
Image formats like JPEG 2000, JPEG XR, and WebP often provide better compression than PNG or JPEG, which means faster downloads and less data consumption. Learn more.

URL
SizePotential Savings
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/bggoldheader1.jpg
185 KB139 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/thejewelryreview-logo.png
31 KB25 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Pearl-Quality-375x190.jpg
24 KB9 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Bridal-Jewelry-375x190.jpg
20 KB8 KB
Avoids an excessive DOM size - 344 elements
Browser engineers recommend pages contain fewer than ~1,500 DOM elements. The sweet spot is a tree depth < 32 elements and fewer than 60 children/parent element. A large DOM can increase memory usage, cause longer [style calculations](https://developers.google.com/web/fundamentals/performance/rendering/reduce-the-scope-and-complexity-of-style-calculations), and produce costly [layout reflows](https://developers.google.com/speed/articles/reflow). Learn more.

Statistic
ElementValue
Total DOM Elements
344
Maximum DOM Depth
15
Maximum Child Elements
15
Minify JavaScript - Potential savings of 3 KB
Minifying JavaScript files can reduce payload sizes and script parse time. Learn more.

URL
SizePotential Savings
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/themes/ad_mag_lite_1.0.0/js/custom.js
6 KB3 KB
Avoid multiple page redirects - Potential savings of 190 ms
Redirects introduce additional delays before the page can be loaded. Learn more.

URL
Time Spent
(Initial: http://thejewelryreview.net/)
0
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/
190
Keep request counts low and transfer sizes small - 69 requests • 723 KB
To set budgets for the quantity and size of page resources, add a budget.json file. Learn more.

Resource Type
RequestsTransfer Size
Total
69723 KB
Image
27434 KB
Font
6129 KB
Script
1779 KB
Stylesheet
1773 KB
Document
18 KB
Other
10 KB
Media
00 KB
Third-party
1070 KB
Eliminate render-blocking resources - Potential savings of 1,040 ms
Resources are blocking the first paint of your page. Consider delivering critical JS/CSS inline and deferring all non-critical JS/styles. Learn more.

URL
SizePotential Savings
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/accesspress-social-share/css/font-awesome/font-awesome.min.css?ver=4.3.5
7 KB110
http://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Open+Sans&ver=4.9.9
1 KB190
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/accesspress-social-share/css/frontend.css?ver=4.3.5
4 KB110
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/delete-comments/public/css/gm-delete-comments-public.css?ver=1.0.0
0 KB110
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/social-media-widget/social_widget.css?ver=4.9.9
1 KB110
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/themes/ad_mag_lite_1.0.0/css/bootstrap.css?ver=4.9.9
18 KB270
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/themes/ad_mag_lite_1.0.0/css/font-awesome.css?ver=4.9.9
5 KB150
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/themes/ad_mag_lite_1.0.0/css/superfish.css?ver=4.9.9
1 KB70
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/themes/ad_mag_lite_1.0.0/css/megafish.css?ver=4.9.9
1 KB70
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/themes/ad_mag_lite_1.0.0/css/jquery.navgoco.css?ver=4.9.9
1 KB70
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/themes/ad_mag_lite_1.0.0/css/owl.theme.css?ver=4.9.9
1 KB70
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/themes/ad_mag_lite_1.0.0/css/bootstrap-slider.css?ver=4.9.9
1 KB70
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/themes/ad_mag_lite_1.0.0/style.css?ver=4.9.9
29 KB230
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/themes/ad_mag_lite_1.0.0/css/extra.css?ver=4.9.9
0 KB70
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-includes/js/jquery/jquery.js?ver=1.12.4
33 KB230
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-includes/js/jquery/jquery-migrate.min.js?ver=1.4.1
4 KB70
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/delete-comments/public/js/gm-delete-comments-public.js?ver=1.0.0
1 KB70
Efficiently encode images - Potential savings of 112 KB
Optimized images load faster and consume less cellular data. Learn more.

URL
SizePotential Savings
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/bggoldheader1.jpg
185 KB112 KB
Network Requests
Lists the network requests that were made during page load.

URL
Start TimeEnd TimeTransfer SizeResource SizeStatus CodeMIME TypeResource Type
http://thejewelryreview.net/
0 ms294 ms0 KB0 KB301text/html
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/
295 ms696 ms8 KB46 KB200text/htmlDocument
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/accesspress-social-share/css/font-awesome/font-awesome.min.css?ver=4.3.5
707 ms791 ms7 KB30 KB200text/cssStylesheet
http://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Open+Sans&ver=4.9.9
707 ms732 ms1 KB2 KB200text/cssStylesheet
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/accesspress-social-share/css/frontend.css?ver=4.3.5
708 ms795 ms4 KB23 KB200text/cssStylesheet
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/delete-comments/public/css/gm-delete-comments-public.css?ver=1.0.0
708 ms790 ms0 KB0 KB200text/cssStylesheet
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/social-media-widget/social_widget.css?ver=4.9.9
708 ms791 ms1 KB2 KB200text/cssStylesheet
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/themes/ad_mag_lite_1.0.0/css/bootstrap.css?ver=4.9.9
708 ms839 ms18 KB120 KB200text/cssStylesheet
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/themes/ad_mag_lite_1.0.0/css/font-awesome.css?ver=4.9.9
708 ms793 ms5 KB26 KB200text/cssStylesheet
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/themes/ad_mag_lite_1.0.0/css/superfish.css?ver=4.9.9
708 ms893 ms1 KB2 KB200text/cssStylesheet
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/themes/ad_mag_lite_1.0.0/css/megafish.css?ver=4.9.9
708 ms870 ms1 KB1 KB200text/cssStylesheet
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/themes/ad_mag_lite_1.0.0/css/jquery.navgoco.css?ver=4.9.9
709 ms889 ms1 KB1 KB200text/cssStylesheet
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/themes/ad_mag_lite_1.0.0/css/owl.carousel.css?ver=4.9.9
708 ms795 ms0 KB0 KB-1Stylesheet
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/themes/ad_mag_lite_1.0.0/css/owl.theme.css?ver=4.9.9
709 ms873 ms1 KB2 KB200text/cssStylesheet
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/themes/ad_mag_lite_1.0.0/css/bootstrap-slider.css?ver=4.9.9
709 ms886 ms1 KB4 KB200text/cssStylesheet
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/themes/ad_mag_lite_1.0.0/style.css?ver=4.9.9
709 ms976 ms29 KB206 KB200text/cssStylesheet
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/themes/ad_mag_lite_1.0.0/css/extra.css?ver=4.9.9
709 ms949 ms0 KB0 KB200text/cssStylesheet
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-includes/js/jquery/jquery.js?ver=1.12.4
710 ms998 ms33 KB95 KB200application/javascriptScript
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-includes/js/jquery/jquery-migrate.min.js?ver=1.4.1
710 ms981 ms4 KB10 KB200application/javascriptScript
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/delete-comments/public/js/gm-delete-comments-public.js?ver=1.0.0
710 ms968 ms1 KB1 KB200application/javascriptScript
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/thejewelryreview-logo.png
710 ms1022 ms32 KB31 KB200image/pngImage
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/How-to-Clean-Jewelery-at-Home-375x190.jpg
710 ms1066 ms19 KB19 KB200image/jpegImage
http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/58107855b51f2290bd089a990a2ec0fd?s=20&d=mm&r=g
1030 ms1104 ms1 KB1 KB200image/jpegImage
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Bridal-Jewelry-375x190.jpg
1030 ms1236 ms20 KB20 KB200image/jpegImage
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/proposal-375x190.jpg
1030 ms1234 ms18 KB17 KB200image/jpegImage
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Pearl-Quality-375x190.jpg
1030 ms1236 ms24 KB24 KB200image/jpegImage
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/Cubic-Zirconia-375x190.jpg
1031 ms1239 ms18 KB18 KB200image/jpegImage
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/black-turquoise-375x190.jpg
1031 ms1229 ms15 KB15 KB200image/jpegImage
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/35-375x190.jpg
1031 ms1311 ms14 KB14 KB200image/jpegImage
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/The-Millennial-Movement-375x190.jpg
1031 ms1359 ms25 KB25 KB200image/jpegImage
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/pimpin-375x190.jpg
1031 ms1354 ms23 KB23 KB200image/jpegImage
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/jewelry2-375x190.jpg
711 ms1241 ms0 KB0 KB-1Image
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/accesspress-social-share/js/frontend.js?ver=4.3.5
1024 ms1105 ms1 KB1 KB200application/javascriptScript
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/themes/ad_mag_lite_1.0.0/js/modernizr.custom.js
1029 ms1111 ms5 KB12 KB200application/javascriptScript
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/themes/ad_mag_lite_1.0.0/js/bootstrap.min.js
1029 ms1112 ms7 KB27 KB200application/javascriptScript
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/themes/ad_mag_lite_1.0.0/js/custom.js
1029 ms1113 ms6 KB35 KB200application/javascriptScript
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/themes/ad_mag_lite_1.0.0/js/easypaginate.js
711 ms1078 ms0 KB0 KB-1Script
http://maps.google.com/maps/api/js?sensor=true
711 ms1079 ms0 KB0 KB-1Script
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-includes/js/wp-embed.min.js?ver=4.9.9
1030 ms1111 ms1 KB1 KB200application/javascriptScript
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-includes/js/wp-emoji-release.min.js?ver=4.9.9
1031 ms1148 ms5 KB12 KB200application/javascriptScript
http://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Roboto:400,100,100italic,300,300italic,400italic,500,500italic,700,700italic,900,900italic
979 ms997 ms2 KB27 KB200text/cssStylesheet
http://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Roboto+Condensed:300italic,400italic,700italic,400,300,700
979 ms1000 ms1 KB16 KB200text/cssStylesheet
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/bggoldheader1.jpg
1043 ms1474 ms185 KB185 KB200image/jpegImage
http://fonts.gstatic.com/s/robotocondensed/v18/ieVi2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-32meGCQYbw.woff2
1048 ms1080 ms0 KB0 KB-1Font
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/themes/ad_mag_lite_1.0.0/fonts/awesome/fontawesome-webfont.woff
1049 ms1269 ms64 KB64 KB200font/woffFont
http://fonts.gstatic.com/s/roboto/v20/KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxK.woff2
1050 ms1090 ms16 KB15 KB200font/woff2Font
http://fonts.gstatic.com/s/robotocondensed/v18/ieVl2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-19K7DQ.woff2
1051 ms1055 ms16 KB15 KB200font/woff2Font
http://fonts.gstatic.com/s/roboto/v20/KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc4.woff2
1052 ms1055 ms16 KB15 KB200font/woff2Font
http://fonts.gstatic.com/s/roboto/v20/KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51S7ACc6CsQ.woff2
1053 ms1057 ms17 KB17 KB200font/woff2Font
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/themes/ad_mag_lite_1.0.0/js/superfish.min.js
1168 ms1321 ms2 KB4 KB200application/javascriptImage
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/themes/ad_mag_lite_1.0.0/js/jquery.navgoco.min.js
1168 ms1349 ms3 KB8 KB200application/javascriptImage
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/themes/ad_mag_lite_1.0.0/js/owl.carousel.min.js
1169 ms1393 ms7 KB14 KB200application/javascriptImage
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/themes/ad_mag_lite_1.0.0/js/jquery.ticker.js
1169 ms1401 ms5 KB16 KB200application/javascriptImage
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/themes/ad_mag_lite_1.0.0/js/site.js
1169 ms1453 ms1 KB1 KB200application/javascriptImage
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/themes/ad_mag_lite_1.0.0/js/masonry.pkgd.min.js
1169 ms1455 ms8 KB26 KB200application/javascriptImage
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/themes/ad_mag_lite_1.0.0/js/imagesloaded.js
1169 ms1475 ms3 KB7 KB200application/javascriptImage
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/themes/ad_mag_lite_1.0.0/js/jquery.zaccordion.min.js
1169 ms1486 ms4 KB12 KB200application/javascriptImage
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/themes/ad_mag_lite_1.0.0/js/matchMedia.js
1169 ms1508 ms1 KB2 KB200application/javascriptImage
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/themes/ad_mag_lite_1.0.0/js/matchMedia.addListener.js
1169 ms1513 ms1 KB3 KB200application/javascriptImage
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/themes/ad_mag_lite_1.0.0/js/enquire.min.js
1170 ms1526 ms1 KB2 KB200application/javascriptImage
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/themes/ad_mag_lite_1.0.0/js/jquery.matchHeight-min.js
1170 ms1553 ms1 KB3 KB200application/javascriptImage
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/themes/ad_mag_lite_1.0.0/js/waypoints.js
1170 ms1566 ms4 KB16 KB200application/javascriptImage
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/themes/ad_mag_lite_1.0.0/js/waypoints-sticky.js
1170 ms1591 ms1 KB1 KB200application/javascriptImage
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/themes/ad_mag_lite_1.0.0/js/superfish.min.js
1323 ms1428 ms2 KB4 KB200application/javascriptScript
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/themes/ad_mag_lite_1.0.0/js/jquery.navgoco.min.js
1456 ms1552 ms3 KB8 KB200application/javascriptScript
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/themes/ad_mag_lite_1.0.0/js/owl.carousel.min.js
1563 ms1653 ms7 KB14 KB200application/javascriptScript
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/themes/ad_mag_lite_1.0.0/js/jquery.ticker.js
1664 ms1749 ms5 KB16 KB200application/javascriptScript
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/themes/ad_mag_lite_1.0.0/js/site.js
1754 ms1834 ms1 KB1 KB200application/javascriptScript
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/themes/ad_mag_lite_1.0.0/js/masonry.pkgd.min.js
1853 ms1855 ms0 KB0 KB-1Script
Serve static assets with an efficient cache policy - 54 resources found
A long cache lifetime can speed up repeat visits to your page. Learn more.

URL
Cache TTLSize
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/bggoldheader1.jpg
0 ms185 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/themes/ad_mag_lite_1.0.0/fonts/awesome/fontawesome-webfont.woff
0 ms64 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-includes/js/jquery/jquery.js?ver=1.12.4
0 ms33 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/thejewelryreview-logo.png
0 ms32 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/themes/ad_mag_lite_1.0.0/style.css?ver=4.9.9
0 ms29 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/The-Millennial-Movement-375x190.jpg
0 ms25 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Pearl-Quality-375x190.jpg
0 ms24 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/pimpin-375x190.jpg
0 ms23 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Bridal-Jewelry-375x190.jpg
0 ms20 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/How-to-Clean-Jewelery-at-Home-375x190.jpg
0 ms19 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/Cubic-Zirconia-375x190.jpg
0 ms18 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/themes/ad_mag_lite_1.0.0/css/bootstrap.css?ver=4.9.9
0 ms18 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/proposal-375x190.jpg
0 ms18 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/black-turquoise-375x190.jpg
0 ms15 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/35-375x190.jpg
0 ms14 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/themes/ad_mag_lite_1.0.0/js/masonry.pkgd.min.js
0 ms8 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/themes/ad_mag_lite_1.0.0/js/bootstrap.min.js
0 ms7 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/accesspress-social-share/css/font-awesome/font-awesome.min.css?ver=4.3.5
0 ms7 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/themes/ad_mag_lite_1.0.0/js/owl.carousel.min.js
0 ms7 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/themes/ad_mag_lite_1.0.0/js/owl.carousel.min.js
0 ms7 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/themes/ad_mag_lite_1.0.0/js/custom.js
0 ms6 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/themes/ad_mag_lite_1.0.0/css/font-awesome.css?ver=4.9.9
0 ms5 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/themes/ad_mag_lite_1.0.0/js/modernizr.custom.js
0 ms5 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/themes/ad_mag_lite_1.0.0/js/jquery.ticker.js
0 ms5 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/themes/ad_mag_lite_1.0.0/js/jquery.ticker.js
0 ms5 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-includes/js/wp-emoji-release.min.js?ver=4.9.9
0 ms5 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-includes/js/jquery/jquery-migrate.min.js?ver=1.4.1
0 ms4 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/themes/ad_mag_lite_1.0.0/js/waypoints.js
0 ms4 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/accesspress-social-share/css/frontend.css?ver=4.3.5
0 ms4 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/themes/ad_mag_lite_1.0.0/js/jquery.zaccordion.min.js
0 ms4 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/themes/ad_mag_lite_1.0.0/js/jquery.navgoco.min.js
0 ms3 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/themes/ad_mag_lite_1.0.0/js/jquery.navgoco.min.js
0 ms3 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/themes/ad_mag_lite_1.0.0/js/imagesloaded.js
0 ms3 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/themes/ad_mag_lite_1.0.0/js/superfish.min.js
0 ms2 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/themes/ad_mag_lite_1.0.0/js/superfish.min.js
0 ms2 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/themes/ad_mag_lite_1.0.0/js/jquery.matchHeight-min.js
0 ms1 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/themes/ad_mag_lite_1.0.0/js/enquire.min.js
0 ms1 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/themes/ad_mag_lite_1.0.0/js/matchMedia.addListener.js
0 ms1 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/themes/ad_mag_lite_1.0.0/css/bootstrap-slider.css?ver=4.9.9
0 ms1 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-includes/js/wp-embed.min.js?ver=4.9.9
0 ms1 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/themes/ad_mag_lite_1.0.0/js/matchMedia.js
0 ms1 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/themes/ad_mag_lite_1.0.0/js/waypoints-sticky.js
0 ms1 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/themes/ad_mag_lite_1.0.0/css/owl.theme.css?ver=4.9.9
0 ms1 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/accesspress-social-share/js/frontend.js?ver=4.3.5
0 ms1 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/social-media-widget/social_widget.css?ver=4.9.9
0 ms1 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/themes/ad_mag_lite_1.0.0/css/superfish.css?ver=4.9.9
0 ms1 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/delete-comments/public/js/gm-delete-comments-public.js?ver=1.0.0
0 ms1 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/themes/ad_mag_lite_1.0.0/css/jquery.navgoco.css?ver=4.9.9
0 ms1 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/themes/ad_mag_lite_1.0.0/css/megafish.css?ver=4.9.9
0 ms1 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/themes/ad_mag_lite_1.0.0/js/site.js
0 ms1 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/themes/ad_mag_lite_1.0.0/js/site.js
0 ms1 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/delete-comments/public/css/gm-delete-comments-public.css?ver=1.0.0
0 ms0 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/themes/ad_mag_lite_1.0.0/css/extra.css?ver=4.9.9
0 ms0 KB
http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/58107855b51f2290bd089a990a2ec0fd?s=20&d=mm&r=g
300000 ms1 KB
Network Round Trip Times - 0 ms
Network round trip times (RTT) have a large impact on performance. If the RTT to an origin is high, it's an indication that servers closer to the user could improve performance. Learn more.

Preconnect to required origins
Consider adding `preconnect` or `dns-prefetch` resource hints to establish early connections to important third-party origins. Learn more.

Defer offscreen images
Consider lazy-loading offscreen and hidden images after all critical resources have finished loading to lower time to interactive. Learn more.

Server Backend Latencies - 0 ms
Server latencies can impact web performance. If the server latency of an origin is high, it's an indication the server is overloaded or has poor backend performance. Learn more.

Properly size images
Serve images that are appropriately-sized to save cellular data and improve load time. Learn more.

Minimize Critical Requests Depth - 33 chains found
The Critical Request Chains below show you what resources are loaded with a high priority. Consider reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Learn more.

Preload key requests
Consider using `` to prioritize fetching resources that are currently requested later in page load. Learn more.

User Timing marks and measures
Consider instrumenting your app with the User Timing API to measure your app's real-world performance during key user experiences. Learn more.

Use video formats for animated content
Large GIFs are inefficient for delivering animated content. Consider using MPEG4/WebM videos for animations and PNG/WebP for static images instead of GIF to save network bytes. Learn more.

Server response times are low (TTFB) - Root document took 400 ms
Time To First Byte identifies the time at which your server sends a response. Learn more.

Enable text compression
Text-based resources should be served with compression (gzip, deflate or brotli) to minimize total network bytes. Learn more.


Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

67
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Lab Data

First Meaningful Paint 3.0 s
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more.
Max Potential First Input Delay 130 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration, in milliseconds, of the longest task. Learn more.
Time to Interactive 6.8 s
Time to interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more.
Third-Party usage
Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading. Learn more.
First Contentful Paint (3G) 5972.5 ms
First Contentful Paint 3G marks the time at which the first text or image is painted while on a 3G network. Learn more.
Estimated Input Latency 10 ms
Estimated Input Latency is an estimate of how long your app takes to respond to user input, in milliseconds, during the busiest 5s window of page load. If your latency is higher than 50 ms, users may perceive your app as laggy. Learn more.
Total Blocking Time 60 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds.
Speed Index 5.2 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more.
First CPU Idle 3.3 s
First CPU Idle marks the first time at which the page's main thread is quiet enough to handle input. Learn more.
First Contentful Paint 3.0 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more.
Performance budget
Keep the quantity and size of network requests under the targets set by the provided performance budget. Learn more.

Screenshot Thumbnails

This is what the load of your site looked like.

Keep request counts low and transfer sizes small - 56 requests • 429 KB
To set budgets for the quantity and size of page resources, add a budget.json file. Learn more.

Resource Type
RequestsTransfer Size
Total
56429 KB
Image
17290 KB
Script
2573 KB
Font
437 KB
Stylesheet
820 KB
Document
18 KB
Other
10 KB
Media
00 KB
Third-party
526 KB
Eliminate render-blocking resources - Potential savings of 1,290 ms
Resources are blocking the first paint of your page. Consider delivering critical JS/CSS inline and deferring all non-critical JS/styles. Learn more.

URL
SizePotential Savings
http://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Montserrat%3A400%7CMuli%3A400%2C400italic&ver=07078a97d66756f213dbca3e379bf084
1 KB630
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/wptouch/themes/foundation/default/style.css?ver=35ab29a995245f7ab56eba430a75d35f
7 KB630
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/accesspress-social-share/css/font-awesome/font-awesome.min.css?ver=4.3.5
7 KB780
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/delete-comments/public/css/gm-delete-comments-public.css?ver=1.0.0
0 KB330
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/social-media-widget/social_widget.css?ver=4.9.9
1 KB330
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/wptouch/themes/bauhaus/default/style.css?ver=35ab29a995245f7ab56eba430a75d35f
4 KB480
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-includes/js/jquery/jquery.js?ver=1.12.4
33 KB930
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-includes/js/jquery/jquery-migrate.min.js?ver=1.4.1
4 KB330
Network Requests
Lists the network requests that were made during page load.

URL
Start TimeEnd TimeTransfer SizeResource SizeStatus CodeMIME TypeResource Type
http://thejewelryreview.net/
0 ms362 ms0 KB0 KB301text/html
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/
363 ms655 ms8 KB40 KB200text/htmlDocument
http://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Montserrat%3A400%7CMuli%3A400%2C400italic&ver=07078a97d66756f213dbca3e379bf084
669 ms689 ms1 KB4 KB200text/cssStylesheet
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/wptouch/themes/foundation/default/style.css?ver=35ab29a995245f7ab56eba430a75d35f
669 ms753 ms7 KB20 KB200text/cssStylesheet
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/accesspress-social-share/css/font-awesome/font-awesome.min.css?ver=4.3.5
669 ms754 ms7 KB30 KB200text/cssStylesheet
http://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Open+Sans&ver=4.9.9
669 ms724 ms0 KB0 KB-1Stylesheet
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/accesspress-social-share/css/frontend.css?ver=4.3.5
670 ms724 ms0 KB0 KB-1Stylesheet
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/delete-comments/public/css/gm-delete-comments-public.css?ver=1.0.0
670 ms751 ms0 KB0 KB200text/cssStylesheet
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/social-media-widget/social_widget.css?ver=4.9.9
670 ms750 ms1 KB2 KB200text/cssStylesheet
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/wptouch/themes/bauhaus/default/style.css?ver=35ab29a995245f7ab56eba430a75d35f
671 ms753 ms4 KB17 KB200text/cssStylesheet
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-includes/js/jquery/jquery.js?ver=1.12.4
671 ms797 ms33 KB95 KB200application/javascriptScript
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-includes/js/jquery/jquery-migrate.min.js?ver=1.4.1
671 ms830 ms4 KB10 KB200application/javascriptScript
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/delete-comments/public/js/gm-delete-comments-public.js?ver=1.0.0
671 ms752 ms0 KB0 KB-1Script
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/How-to-Clean-Jewelery-at-Home-144x144.jpg
671 ms831 ms5 KB5 KB200image/jpegImage
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Bridal-Jewelry-144x144.jpg
672 ms833 ms7 KB7 KB200image/jpegImage
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/proposal-144x144.jpg
842 ms1171 ms7 KB7 KB200image/jpegImage
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Pearl-Quality-144x144.jpg
842 ms1259 ms8 KB8 KB200image/jpegImage
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/Cubic-Zirconia-144x144.jpg
842 ms1234 ms7 KB6 KB200image/jpegImage
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/black-turquoise-144x144.jpg
842 ms1237 ms7 KB7 KB200image/jpegImage
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/35-144x144.jpg
842 ms1284 ms6 KB6 KB200image/jpegImage
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/The-Millennial-Movement-144x144.jpg
672 ms1236 ms0 KB0 KB-1Image
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/pimpin-144x144.jpg
843 ms1251 ms8 KB8 KB200image/jpegImage
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/jewelry2-144x144.jpg
843 ms1325 ms5 KB5 KB200image/jpegImage
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Jewelry-Gift-144x144.jpg
843 ms1314 ms6 KB6 KB200image/jpegImage
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/jewelry-1-144x144.jpg
672 ms1245 ms0 KB0 KB-1Image
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/necklace2-144x144.jpg
843 ms1317 ms6 KB6 KB200image/jpegImage
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/fashion-jewelry-2-144x144.jpg
843 ms1340 ms7 KB7 KB200image/jpegImage
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/CUBIC-ZIRCONIA-STONES-144x144.gif
672 ms1269 ms0 KB0 KB-1Image
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/wptouch/themes/bauhaus/default/bauhaus.min.js?ver=2.2.3
836 ms917 ms1 KB3 KB200application/javascriptScript
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/wptouch/themes/foundation/modules/spinjs/spin.min.js?ver=07078a97d66756f213dbca3e379bf084
837 ms917 ms2 KB4 KB200application/javascriptScript
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/wptouch/themes/foundation/modules/spinjs/spin-jquery.min.js?ver=07078a97d66756f213dbca3e379bf084
838 ms919 ms1 KB0 KB200application/javascriptScript
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/wptouch/themes/foundation/modules/menu/menu.min.js?ver=07078a97d66756f213dbca3e379bf084
839 ms923 ms1 KB1 KB200application/javascriptScript
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/wptouch/themes/foundation/modules/base/base.min.js?ver=07078a97d66756f213dbca3e379bf084
839 ms923 ms2 KB4 KB200application/javascriptScript
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/wptouch/themes/foundation/modules/base/base-public.min.js?ver=07078a97d66756f213dbca3e379bf084
839 ms926 ms1 KB1 KB200application/javascriptScript
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/wptouch/themes/foundation/modules/google-fonts/google-fonts.min.js?ver=07078a97d66756f213dbca3e379bf084
839 ms995 ms0 KB0 KB200application/javascriptScript
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/wptouch/themes/foundation/modules/load-more/load-more.min.js?ver=07078a97d66756f213dbca3e379bf084
839 ms996 ms1 KB3 KB200application/javascriptScript
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/wptouch/themes/foundation/modules/media/fitvids.min.js?ver=07078a97d66756f213dbca3e379bf084
839 ms999 ms1 KB2 KB200application/javascriptScript
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/wptouch/themes/foundation/modules/media/media.min.js?ver=07078a97d66756f213dbca3e379bf084
839 ms1005 ms1 KB1 KB200application/javascriptScript
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/wptouch/themes/foundation/modules/flickity/flickity.pkgd.min.js?ver=07078a97d66756f213dbca3e379bf084
840 ms1013 ms13 KB52 KB200application/javascriptScript
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/wptouch/themes/foundation/modules/flickity/flickity-wptouch.min.js?ver=07078a97d66756f213dbca3e379bf084
840 ms1004 ms0 KB0 KB200application/javascriptScript
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/wptouch/themes/foundation/modules/tappable/tappable.min.js?ver=07078a97d66756f213dbca3e379bf084
840 ms1075 ms1 KB1 KB200application/javascriptScript
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/wptouch/themes/foundation/modules/tappable/wptouch.tappable.min.js?ver=07078a97d66756f213dbca3e379bf084
840 ms1074 ms0 KB0 KB200application/javascriptScript
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/wptouch/themes/foundation/modules/fastclick/wptouch.fastclick.min.js?ver=07078a97d66756f213dbca3e379bf084
840 ms1079 ms0 KB0 KB200application/javascriptScript
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/wptouch/themes/foundation/modules/fastclick/fastclick.min.js?ver=07078a97d66756f213dbca3e379bf084
840 ms1159 ms3 KB8 KB200application/javascriptScript
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/wptouch/themes/foundation/modules/slideout/slideout.min.js?ver=07078a97d66756f213dbca3e379bf084
673 ms1007 ms0 KB0 KB-1Script
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/wptouch/themes/foundation/modules/slideout/slideout-helper.min.js?ver=07078a97d66756f213dbca3e379bf084
841 ms1085 ms1 KB1 KB200application/javascriptScript
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/wptouch/include/js/wptouch.min.js?ver=35ab29a995245f7ab56eba430a75d35f
841 ms1092 ms1 KB1 KB200application/javascriptScript
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/accesspress-social-share/js/frontend.js?ver=4.3.5
841 ms1155 ms1 KB1 KB200application/javascriptScript
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-includes/js/wp-embed.min.js?ver=4.9.9
842 ms1154 ms1 KB1 KB200application/javascriptScript
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-includes/js/wp-emoji-release.min.js?ver=4.9.9
844 ms1159 ms5 KB12 KB200application/javascriptScript
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/wptouch/themes/foundation/modules/wptouch-icons/font/wptouch-icons.woff?64777116
853 ms1178 ms11 KB11 KB200font/woffFont
http://fonts.gstatic.com/s/montserrat/v14/JTUSjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459WlhyyTh89Y.woff2
854 ms858 ms14 KB13 KB200font/woff2Font
http://fonts.gstatic.com/s/muli/v16/7Auwp_0qiz-afTLGLQjUwkQ.woff2
855 ms858 ms12 KB11 KB200font/woff2Font
http://fonts.gstatic.com/s/muli/v16/7Au-p_0qiz-afTf2LwLT4EYFOA.woff2
872 ms887 ms0 KB0 KB-1Font
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/How-to-Clean-Jewelery-at-Home.jpg
1231 ms1411 ms48 KB48 KB200image/jpegImage
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Bridal-Jewelry-900x900.jpg
1231 ms1487 ms162 KB162 KB200image/jpegImage
Serve static assets with an efficient cache policy - 43 resources found
A long cache lifetime can speed up repeat visits to your page. Learn more.

URL
Cache TTLSize
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Bridal-Jewelry-900x900.jpg
0 ms162 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/How-to-Clean-Jewelery-at-Home.jpg
0 ms48 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-includes/js/jquery/jquery.js?ver=1.12.4
0 ms33 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/wptouch/themes/foundation/modules/flickity/flickity.pkgd.min.js?ver=07078a97d66756f213dbca3e379bf084
0 ms13 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/wptouch/themes/foundation/modules/wptouch-icons/font/wptouch-icons.woff?64777116
0 ms11 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Pearl-Quality-144x144.jpg
0 ms8 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/pimpin-144x144.jpg
0 ms8 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/accesspress-social-share/css/font-awesome/font-awesome.min.css?ver=4.3.5
0 ms7 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Bridal-Jewelry-144x144.jpg
0 ms7 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/black-turquoise-144x144.jpg
0 ms7 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/fashion-jewelry-2-144x144.jpg
0 ms7 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/proposal-144x144.jpg
0 ms7 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/wptouch/themes/foundation/default/style.css?ver=35ab29a995245f7ab56eba430a75d35f
0 ms7 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/Cubic-Zirconia-144x144.jpg
0 ms7 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Jewelry-Gift-144x144.jpg
0 ms6 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/necklace2-144x144.jpg
0 ms6 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/35-144x144.jpg
0 ms6 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/How-to-Clean-Jewelery-at-Home-144x144.jpg
0 ms5 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/jewelry2-144x144.jpg
0 ms5 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-includes/js/wp-emoji-release.min.js?ver=4.9.9
0 ms5 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-includes/js/jquery/jquery-migrate.min.js?ver=1.4.1
0 ms4 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/wptouch/themes/bauhaus/default/style.css?ver=35ab29a995245f7ab56eba430a75d35f
0 ms4 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/wptouch/themes/foundation/modules/fastclick/fastclick.min.js?ver=07078a97d66756f213dbca3e379bf084
0 ms3 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/wptouch/themes/foundation/modules/spinjs/spin.min.js?ver=07078a97d66756f213dbca3e379bf084
0 ms2 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/wptouch/themes/foundation/modules/base/base.min.js?ver=07078a97d66756f213dbca3e379bf084
0 ms2 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/wptouch/themes/bauhaus/default/bauhaus.min.js?ver=2.2.3
0 ms1 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/wptouch/themes/foundation/modules/media/fitvids.min.js?ver=07078a97d66756f213dbca3e379bf084
0 ms1 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-includes/js/wp-embed.min.js?ver=4.9.9
0 ms1 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/wptouch/themes/foundation/modules/load-more/load-more.min.js?ver=07078a97d66756f213dbca3e379bf084
0 ms1 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/wptouch/themes/foundation/modules/menu/menu.min.js?ver=07078a97d66756f213dbca3e379bf084
0 ms1 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/accesspress-social-share/js/frontend.js?ver=4.3.5
0 ms1 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/wptouch/include/js/wptouch.min.js?ver=35ab29a995245f7ab56eba430a75d35f
0 ms1 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/wptouch/themes/foundation/modules/base/base-public.min.js?ver=07078a97d66756f213dbca3e379bf084
0 ms1 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/social-media-widget/social_widget.css?ver=4.9.9
0 ms1 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/wptouch/themes/foundation/modules/tappable/tappable.min.js?ver=07078a97d66756f213dbca3e379bf084
0 ms1 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/wptouch/themes/foundation/modules/slideout/slideout-helper.min.js?ver=07078a97d66756f213dbca3e379bf084
0 ms1 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/wptouch/themes/foundation/modules/media/media.min.js?ver=07078a97d66756f213dbca3e379bf084
0 ms1 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/wptouch/themes/foundation/modules/spinjs/spin-jquery.min.js?ver=07078a97d66756f213dbca3e379bf084
0 ms1 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/wptouch/themes/foundation/modules/google-fonts/google-fonts.min.js?ver=07078a97d66756f213dbca3e379bf084
0 ms0 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/wptouch/themes/foundation/modules/tappable/wptouch.tappable.min.js?ver=07078a97d66756f213dbca3e379bf084
0 ms0 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/delete-comments/public/css/gm-delete-comments-public.css?ver=1.0.0
0 ms0 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/wptouch/themes/foundation/modules/fastclick/wptouch.fastclick.min.js?ver=07078a97d66756f213dbca3e379bf084
0 ms0 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/wptouch/themes/foundation/modules/flickity/flickity-wptouch.min.js?ver=07078a97d66756f213dbca3e379bf084
0 ms0 KB
Tasks
Lists the toplevel main thread tasks that executed during page load.

Start Time
End Time
682 ms
8 ms
693 ms
55 ms
828 ms
24 ms
862 ms
7 ms
869 ms
37 ms
912 ms
12 ms
1041 ms
5 ms
1195 ms
65 ms
1270 ms
13 ms
1533 ms
6 ms
Ensure text remains visible during webfont load
Leverage the font-display CSS feature to ensure text is user-visible while webfonts are loading. Learn more.

URL
Potential Savings
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/wptouch/themes/foundation/modules/wptouch-icons/font/wptouch-icons.woff?64777116
325 ms
http://fonts.gstatic.com/s/montserrat/v14/JTUSjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459WlhyyTh89Y.woff2
4 ms
http://fonts.gstatic.com/s/muli/v16/7Auwp_0qiz-afTLGLQjUwkQ.woff2
4 ms
http://fonts.gstatic.com/s/muli/v16/7Au-p_0qiz-afTf2LwLT4EYFOA.woff2
15 ms
JavaScript execution time - 0.6 s
Consider reducing the time spent parsing, compiling, and executing JS. You may find delivering smaller JS payloads helps with this. Learn more.

URL
Total CPU TimeScript EvaluationScript Parse
Other
762 ms26 ms4 ms
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-includes/js/jquery/jquery.js?ver=1.12.4
345 ms263 ms8 ms
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/
201 ms197 ms3 ms
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/wptouch/themes/foundation/modules/flickity/flickity.pkgd.min.js?ver=07078a97d66756f213dbca3e379bf084
65 ms49 ms4 ms
Defer offscreen images - Potential savings of 44 KB
Consider lazy-loading offscreen and hidden images after all critical resources have finished loading to lower time to interactive. Learn more.

URL
SizePotential Savings
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/pimpin-144x144.jpg
8 KB8 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/black-turquoise-144x144.jpg
7 KB7 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/fashion-jewelry-2-144x144.jpg
7 KB7 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Jewelry-Gift-144x144.jpg
6 KB6 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/necklace2-144x144.jpg
6 KB6 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/35-144x144.jpg
6 KB6 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/jewelry2-144x144.jpg
5 KB5 KB
Avoids enormous network payloads - Total size was 429 KB
Large network payloads cost users real money and are highly correlated with long load times. Learn more.

URL
Size
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Bridal-Jewelry-900x900.jpg
162 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/How-to-Clean-Jewelery-at-Home.jpg
48 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-includes/js/jquery/jquery.js?ver=1.12.4
33 KB
http://fonts.gstatic.com/s/montserrat/v14/JTUSjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459WlhyyTh89Y.woff2
14 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/wptouch/themes/foundation/modules/flickity/flickity.pkgd.min.js?ver=07078a97d66756f213dbca3e379bf084
13 KB
http://fonts.gstatic.com/s/muli/v16/7Auwp_0qiz-afTLGLQjUwkQ.woff2
12 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/wptouch/themes/foundation/modules/wptouch-icons/font/wptouch-icons.woff?64777116
11 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Pearl-Quality-144x144.jpg
8 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/
8 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/pimpin-144x144.jpg
8 KB
Minimizes main-thread work - 1.4 s
Consider reducing the time spent parsing, compiling and executing JS. You may find delivering smaller JS payloads helps with this.

Category
Time Spent
Script Evaluation
577 ms
Style & Layout
312 ms
Other
295 ms
Rendering
114 ms
Parse HTML & CSS
97 ms
Script Parsing & Compilation
46 ms
Serve images in next-gen formats - Potential savings of 103 KB
Image formats like JPEG 2000, JPEG XR, and WebP often provide better compression than PNG or JPEG, which means faster downloads and less data consumption. Learn more.

URL
SizePotential Savings
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Bridal-Jewelry-900x900.jpg
162 KB82 KB
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/How-to-Clean-Jewelery-at-Home.jpg
48 KB21 KB
Avoids an excessive DOM size - 227 elements
Browser engineers recommend pages contain fewer than ~1,500 DOM elements. The sweet spot is a tree depth < 32 elements and fewer than 60 children/parent element. A large DOM can increase memory usage, cause longer [style calculations](https://developers.google.com/web/fundamentals/performance/rendering/reduce-the-scope-and-complexity-of-style-calculations), and produce costly [layout reflows](https://developers.google.com/speed/articles/reflow). Learn more.

Statistic
ElementValue
Total DOM Elements
227
Maximum DOM Depth
10
Maximum Child Elements
26
Avoid multiple page redirects - Potential savings of 630 ms
Redirects introduce additional delays before the page can be loaded. Learn more.

URL
Time Spent
(Initial: http://thejewelryreview.net/)
0
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/
630
User Timing marks and measures
Consider instrumenting your app with the User Timing API to measure your app's real-world performance during key user experiences. Learn more.

Use video formats for animated content
Large GIFs are inefficient for delivering animated content. Consider using MPEG4/WebM videos for animations and PNG/WebP for static images instead of GIF to save network bytes. Learn more.

Server response times are low (TTFB) - Root document took 290 ms
Time To First Byte identifies the time at which your server sends a response. Learn more.

Efficiently encode images
Optimized images load faster and consume less cellular data. Learn more.

Enable text compression
Text-based resources should be served with compression (gzip, deflate or brotli) to minimize total network bytes. Learn more.

Network Round Trip Times - 0 ms
Network round trip times (RTT) have a large impact on performance. If the RTT to an origin is high, it's an indication that servers closer to the user could improve performance. Learn more.

Preconnect to required origins
Consider adding `preconnect` or `dns-prefetch` resource hints to establish early connections to important third-party origins. Learn more.

Minify CSS
Minifying CSS files can reduce network payload sizes. Learn more.

Server Backend Latencies - 0 ms
Server latencies can impact web performance. If the server latency of an origin is high, it's an indication the server is overloaded or has poor backend performance. Learn more.

Properly size images
Serve images that are appropriately-sized to save cellular data and improve load time. Learn more.

Remove unused CSS
Remove dead rules from stylesheets and defer the loading of CSS not used for above-the-fold content to reduce unnecessary bytes consumed by network activity. Learn more.

Minimize Critical Requests Depth - 36 chains found
The Critical Request Chains below show you what resources are loaded with a high priority. Consider reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Learn more.

Preload key requests
Consider using `` to prioritize fetching resources that are currently requested later in page load. Learn more.

Minify JavaScript
Minifying JavaScript files can reduce payload sizes and script parse time. Learn more.

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - v2

Suggestions Summary

Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content

Your page has 24 blocking script resources and 8 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.

None of the above-the-fold content on your page could be rendered without waiting for the following resources to load. Try to defer or asynchronously load blocking resources, or inline the critical portions of those resources directly in the HTML.Remove render-blocking JavaScript:

http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-includes/js/jquery/jquery.js?ver=1.12.4
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-includes/js/jquery/jquery-migrate.min.js?ver=1.4.1
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/delete-comments/public/js/gm-delete-comments-public.js?ver=1.0.0
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/wptouch/themes/bauhaus/default/bauhaus.min.js?ver=2.2.3
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/wptouch/themes/foundation/modules/spinjs/spin.min.js?ver=07078a97d66756f213dbca3e379bf084
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/wptouch/themes/foundation/modules/spinjs/spin-jquery.min.js?ver=07078a97d66756f213dbca3e379bf084
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/wptouch/themes/foundation/modules/menu/menu.min.js?ver=07078a97d66756f213dbca3e379bf084
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/wptouch/themes/foundation/modules/base/base.min.js?ver=07078a97d66756f213dbca3e379bf084
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/wptouch/themes/foundation/modules/base/base-public.min.js?ver=07078a97d66756f213dbca3e379bf084
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/wptouch/themes/foundation/modules/google-fonts/google-fonts.min.js?ver=07078a97d66756f213dbca3e379bf084
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/wptouch/themes/foundation/modules/load-more/load-more.min.js?ver=07078a97d66756f213dbca3e379bf084
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/wptouch/themes/foundation/modules/media/fitvids.min.js?ver=07078a97d66756f213dbca3e379bf084
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/wptouch/themes/foundation/modules/media/media.min.js?ver=07078a97d66756f213dbca3e379bf084
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/wptouch/themes/foundation/modules/flickity/flickity.pkgd.min.js?ver=07078a97d66756f213dbca3e379bf084
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/wptouch/themes/foundation/modules/flickity/flickity-wptouch.min.js?ver=07078a97d66756f213dbca3e379bf084
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/wptouch/themes/foundation/modules/tappable/tappable.min.js?ver=07078a97d66756f213dbca3e379bf084
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/wptouch/themes/foundation/modules/tappable/wptouch.tappable.min.js?ver=07078a97d66756f213dbca3e379bf084
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/wptouch/themes/foundation/modules/fastclick/wptouch.fastclick.min.js?ver=07078a97d66756f213dbca3e379bf084
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/wptouch/themes/foundation/modules/fastclick/fastclick.min.js?ver=07078a97d66756f213dbca3e379bf084
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/wptouch/themes/foundation/modules/slideout/slideout.min.js?ver=07078a97d66756f213dbca3e379bf084
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/wptouch/themes/foundation/modules/slideout/slideout-helper.min.js?ver=07078a97d66756f213dbca3e379bf084
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/wptouch/include/js/wptouch.min.js?ver=35ab29a995245f7ab56eba430a75d35f
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/accesspress-social-share/js/frontend.js?ver=4.3.5
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-includes/js/wp-embed.min.js?ver=4.9.9
Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:

http://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Montserrat%3A400%7CMuli%3A400%2C400italic&ver=07078a97d66756f213dbca3e379bf084
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/wptouch/themes/foundation/default/style.css?ver=35ab29a995245f7ab56eba430a75d35f
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/accesspress-social-share/css/font-awesome/font-awesome.min.css?ver=4.3.5
http://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Open+Sans&ver=4.9.9
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/accesspress-social-share/css/frontend.css?ver=4.3.5
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/delete-comments/public/css/gm-delete-comments-public.css?ver=1.0.0
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/social-media-widget/social_widget.css?ver=4.9.9
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/wptouch/themes/bauhaus/default/style.css?ver=35ab29a995245f7ab56eba430a75d35f

Leverage browser caching

Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.

Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:

http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Bridal-Jewelry-144x144.jpg (expiration not specified)
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Bridal-Jewelry-900x900.jpg (expiration not specified)
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/How-to-Clean-Jewelery-at-Home-144x144.jpg (expiration not specified)
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/How-to-Clean-Jewelery-at-Home.jpg (expiration not specified)
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Pearl-Quality-144x144.jpg (expiration not specified)
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/Cubic-Zirconia-144x144.jpg (expiration not specified)
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/fashion-jewelry-2-144x144.jpg (expiration not specified)
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/necklace2-144x144.jpg (expiration not specified)
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/jewelry-1-144x144.jpg (expiration not specified)
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Jewelry-Gift-144x144.jpg (expiration not specified)
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/proposal-144x144.jpg (expiration not specified)
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/pimpin-144x144.jpg (expiration not specified)
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/CUBIC-ZIRCONIA-STONES-144x144.gif (expiration not specified)
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/jewelry2-144x144.jpg (expiration not specified)
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/35-144x144.jpg (expiration not specified)
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/The-Millennial-Movement-144x144.jpg (expiration not specified)
http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/black-turquoise-144x144.jpg (expiration not specified)

Prioritize visible content

Your page requires additional network round trips to render the above-the-fold content. For best performance, reduce the amount of HTML needed to render above-the-fold content.

The entire HTML response was not sufficient to render the above-the-fold content. This usually indicates that additional resources, loaded after HTML parsing, were required to render above-the-fold content. Prioritize visible content that is needed for rendering above-the-fold by including it directly in the HTML response.

Only about 31% of the final above-the-fold content could be rendered with the full HTML response.
Click to see the screenshot with only the HTML response:

Optimize images

Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.

Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 42.4KiB (19% reduction).

Compressing http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Bridal-Jewelry-900x900.jpg could save 28.5KiB (18% reduction).
Compressing http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/How-to-Clean-Jewelery-at-Home.jpg could save 10.4KiB (22% reduction).
Compressing http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Pearl-Quality-144x144.jpg could save 1.3KiB (17% reduction).
Compressing http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Bridal-Jewelry-144x144.jpg could save 1.2KiB (19% reduction).
Compressing http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/How-to-Clean-Jewelery-at-Home-144x144.jpg could save 993B (19% reduction).

Reduce server response time

In our test, your server responded in 0.36 seconds.

There are many factors that can slow down your server response time. Please read our recommendations to learn how you can monitor and measure where your server is spending the most time.

Minify CSS

Compacting CSS code can save many bytes of data and speed up download and p*** times.

Minify CSS for the following resources to reduce their size by 610B (19% reduction).

Minifying http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/accesspress-social-share/css/frontend.css?ver=4.3.5 could save 610B (19% reduction) after compression.

Minify JavaScript

Compacting JavaScript code can save many bytes of data and speed up downloading, parsing, and *** time.

Minify JavaScript for the following resources to reduce their size by 396B (87% reduction).

Minifying http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-content/plugins/delete-comments/public/js/gm-delete-comments-public.js?ver=1.0.0 could save 396B (87% reduction) after compression.
Avoid landing page redirects
Your page has no redirects. Learn more about avoiding landing page redirects.
Avoid plugins
Your page does not appear to use plugins, which would prevent content from being usable on many platforms. Learn more about the importance of avoiding plugins.
Configure the viewport
Your page specifies a viewport matching the device's size, which allows it to render properly on all devices. Learn more about configuring viewports.
Enable compression
You have compression enabled. Learn more about enabling compression.
Minify HTML
Your HTML is minified. Learn more about minifying HTML.
Size content to viewport
The contents of your page fit within the viewport. Learn more about sizing content to the viewport.
Size tap targets appropriately
All of your page's links/buttons are large enough for a user to easily tap on a touchscreen. Learn more about sizing tap targets appropriately.
Use legible font sizes
The text on your page is legible. Learn more about using legible font sizes.
Download optimized image, JavaScript, and CSS resources for this page.

+ Does thejewelryreview.net use compression?

thejewelryreview.net use gzip compression.
Original size: 45.84 KB
Compressed size: 7.27 KB
File reduced by: 38.57 KB (84%)

+ Google Safe Browsing

This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

Trustworthiness:
  n/a
Vendor reliability:
  n/a
Privacy:
  n/a
Child safety:
  n/a

+ SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify

thejewelryreview.net does not support HTTPS
loader
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...

+ Verify HTTP/2 Support

thejewelryreview.net does not support HTTP/2
loader
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

+ Site Categories (dmoz)

Currently Not Available

+ Http Header

Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 16:14:36 GMT
Server: Apache
Location: http://www.thejewelryreview.net/
Vary: User-Agent
Content-Length: 0
Connection: close
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8

HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 16:14:36 GMT
Server: Apache
Link: <http://www.thejewelryreview.net/wp-json/>; rel="https://api.w.org/"
Vary: Accept-Encoding,User-Agent
Content-Encoding: gzip
Content-Length: 7444
Connection: close
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8

+ DNS Lookup

Type Ip Target TTL
MX thejewelryreview.net 3600
SOA 3600
Mname ns1.softicom.net
Rname brian.submitexpress.com
Serial Number 2019102100
Refresh 3600
Retry 7200
Expire 1209600
Minimum TTL 0
A 66.221.58.61 3573
NS ns2.softicom.net 3573
NS ns1.softicom.net 3573

+ Whois Lookup

Domain Created:
2009-03-26
Domain Age:
10 years 6 months 26 days  
WhoIs:
 

whois lookup at whois.uniregistrar.com...
Domain Name: THEJEWELRYREVIEW.NET
Registry Domain ID: 1549461355_DOMAIN_NET-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.uniregistrar.net
Registrar URL: http://uniregistry.com
Updated Date: 2019-04-02-T15:42:03Z
Creation Date: 2009-03-26-T03:38:23Z
Registrar Registration Expiration Date: 2020-03-26-T03:38:23Z
Registrar: UNIREGISTRAR CORP
Registrar IANA ID: 1659
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: email
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +1.4426008800
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited http://www.icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Registry Registrant ID:
Registrant Name: PRIVACYDOTLINK CUSTOMER 347452
Registrant Organization:
Registrant Street: PO BOX 30485
Registrant City: SEVEN MILE BEACH
Registrant State/Province: GRAND CAYMAN
Registrant Postal Code: KY1-1202
Registrant Country: KY
Registrant Phone: +1.3457495465
Registrant Phone Ext:
Registrant Fax:
Registrant Fax Ext:
Registrant Email: email
Registry Admin ID:
Admin Name: PRIVACYDOTLINK CUSTOMER 347452
Admin Organization:
Admin Street: PO BOX 30485
Admin City: SEVEN MILE BEACH
Admin State/Province: GRAND CAYMAN
Admin Postal Code: KY1-1202
Admin Country: KY
Admin Phone: +1.3457495465
Admin Phone Ext:
Admin Fax:
Admin Fax Ext:
Admin Email: email
Registry Tech ID:
Tech Name: PRIVACYDOTLINK CUSTOMER 347452
Tech Organization:
Tech Street: PO BOX 30485
Tech City: SEVEN MILE BEACH
Tech State/Province: GRAND CAYMAN
Tech Postal Code: KY1-1202
Tech Country: KY
Tech Phone: +1.3457495465
Tech Phone Ext:
Tech Fax:
Tech Fax Ext:
Tech Email: email
Name Server: ns1.add2.net
Name Server: ns2.add2.net
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN WHOIS Data Problem Reporting System: http://wdprs.internic.net/

>>> Last update of WHOIS database: 2019-10-21T16:15:02.971Z <<<

For more information on Whois status codes, please visit
https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/epp-status-codes-2014-06-16-en

TERMS OF USE: You are not authorized to access or query our Whois
database through the use of high volume automated processes. Access to
the Whois database is provided solely to obtain information about or
related to a domain name registration record, and no warranty is made
as to its accuracy or fitness for any particular purpose.. You agree
that you may use this Data only for lawful purposes and that under no
cir***stances will you use this data to allow, enable, or otherwise
support the transmission of mass unsolicited, commercial advertising
or solicitations via e-mail, telephone, or facsimile. Compilation,
repackaging, dissemination or other use of this Data is expressly
prohibited without the prior written consent of Uniregistrar,
Uniregistry Corp. or Uniregistry Ltd. (CA). Uniregistrar reserves the
right to restrict your access to the Whois database in its sole
discretion to ensure operational stability and police abuse.
whois lookup at whois.crsnic.net...
Domain Name: THEJEWELRYREVIEW.NET
Registry Domain ID: 1549461355_DOMAIN_NET-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.uniregistrar.com
Registrar URL: http://www.uniregistrar.com
Updated Date: 2019-04-02T15:42:03Z
Creation Date: 2009-03-26T03:38:23Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2020-03-26T03:38:23Z
Registrar: Uniregistrar Corp
Registrar IANA ID: 1659
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: email
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +1.4426008800
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Name Server: NS1.ADD2.NET
Name Server: NS2.ADD2.NET
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form: https://www.icann.org/wicf/
>>> Last update of whois database: 2019-10-21T16:14:50Z <<<

For more information on Whois status codes, please visit https://icann.org/epp

NOTICE: The expiration date displayed in this record is the date the
registrar's sponsorship of the domain name registration in the registry is
currently set to expire. This date does not necessarily reflect the expiration
date of the domain name registrant's agreement with the sponsoring
registrar. Users may consult the sponsoring registrar's Whois database to
view the registrar's reported date of expiration for this registration.

TERMS OF USE: You are not authorized to access or query our Whois
database through the use of electronic processes that are high-volume and
automated except as reasonably necessary to register domain names or
modify existing registrations; the Data in VeriSign Global Registry
Services' ("VeriSign") Whois database is provided by VeriSign for
information purposes only, and to assist persons in obtaining information
about or related to a domain name registration record. VeriSign does not
guarantee its accuracy. By submitting a Whois query, you agree to abide
by the following terms of use: You agree that you may use this Data only
for lawful purposes and that under no cir***stances will you use this Data
to: (1) allow, enable, or otherwise support the transmission of mass
unsolicited, commercial advertising or solicitations via e-mail, telephone,
or facsimile; or (2) enable high volume, automated, electronic processes
that apply to VeriSign (or its computer systems). The compilation,
repackaging, dissemination or other use of this Data is expressly
prohibited without the prior written consent of VeriSign. You agree not to
use electronic processes that are automated and high-volume to access or
query the Whois database except as reasonably necessary to register
domain names or modify existing registrations. VeriSign reserves the right
to restrict your access to the Whois database in its sole discretion to ensure
operational stability. VeriSign may restrict or terminate your access to the
Whois database for failure to abide by these terms of use. VeriSign
reserves the right to modify these terms at any time.

The Registry database contains ONLY .COM, .NET, .EDU domains and
Registrars.
Last update was 22 days ago
loader
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

*HypeStat.com is not linking to, promoting or affiliated with thejewelryreview.net in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

Hide/Remove your site data

• Use Show/Hide ESTIMATED data form to hide (Website worth, Daily ads revenue, Daily Visits, Daily Pageviews)
• Use Show/Hide WHOIS data form to hide whois data
• Use Remove form to remove all data
• If you have any problem with REMOVE/HIDE your data just drop an email at support (at) hypestat.com and we will remove/hide your site data manualy.
Make custom Widget for your website
Get the code now!
thejewelryreview.net widget